anaheim-gazette 1911-05-04

A PUZZLING QUESTION Ownership of Lands Along Colorado River Who owns the fabulously rich reclaimed lands immediately bordering each bank of the Colorado River where it forms the boundary between California and Arizona? Where and by what rules should the dividing line be drawn? Should the judgment of the unstable-minded river be taken as final, at all times and under all conditions, or only under certain conditions? If the stream adds a mile or more of land to your holdings which were purchased from the government on the California side, is the new land yours by the river's gift, or is it the government's? Do you pay taxes on it in Arizona or California? These questions the United States Government considers of sufficient importance to have sent one of its most trusted special agents to study carefully, and to collect evidence upon, so that the government can have facts on which to base a correct judgment as to proper solution of the problems. William O. Owen, United States examiner of surveys, has returned from a three months' investigation in the vicinity of Yuma, under orders from the Department of the Interior. Mr. Owen gathered much interesting information, which he is now embodying in a report to be submitted to the department. The Colorado River is great enough to be permitted to be eccentric, and it takes full advantage of its privileges. Never was a stream more restless, more cursed with the wan- points mentioned, but "meandered" the stream to show where the boundary lines of the forty-acre tracts into which the government has divided the land for sale, intersect the bank of the river. Previous surveys had shown where the section lines cut the river bank. THE MADERO FAMILY Leaders of Mexican Rebellion Are Wealthy The Madero family occupies a peculiar position in regard to the Mexican revolution. Francisco I., leader of the insurrectos, has brothers, sisters, uncles, cousins and nondescript name relatives sufficient to wipe out the government army of 25,000, could he unite them for his cause. There is no limit to the devotion of Francisco's brother, Gustavo A. But in Mexico the rebel general has a father, Francisco, Sr.; a grandfather, Evaristo, and other relatives, near and far, who do not particularly relish his attempts to gain for them and the un-Maderist half of the population a government purporting to represent all instead of one man. Three of his eight brothers are with him to the bitter or pleasant end. Raoul is in the field with him, and Alfonso is in San Antonio looking out for the in-3 terests of the revolutionists on the border. The Madero family is prominent because of its high standing and its wealth, owning enormous tracts of land. Evaristo, the grandfather, has a large family, and all his sons received a college education in the United States and Europe, just as have those of Francisco, Sr. BACK TO AFRICA Oklahoma Darkies That Gratinate To gather a thousand 10,000 colored visitors to Africa Congress, move among the directly out of the Ethiopian Franchise Provision which was organized "grandfather clause." The congress is set in Muskogee on August the plans formulated and specific in every laid down in the case issued to the race. The object of the down in the following: "It will be the degree to select a diplomat five to go to England gium and France, veto secure possession rica, under the protego governments, and threatles. The treaties among other things congress or its diplomat select the locations onies, to build rail highways and to provide reserves, to develop agricultural resource develop the waterway to maintain an armion of the colonies." "The form of gov ed for will have ther each of the powers Australia and New mother country." "The government furnish the neces States examiner of surveys has returned from a three months' investigation in the vicinity of Yuma, under orders from the Department of the Interior. Mr. Owen gathered much interesting information, which he is now embodying in a report to be submitted to the department. The Colorado River is great enough to be permitted to be eccentric, and it takes full advantage of its privileges. Never was a stream more restless, more cursed with the wandering foot. Mr. Owen has been mapping its wanderings, and attempting to explain their why and how, especially their how. A comparison of surveys of the river made at various previous times showed that the stream had in places moved two miles from its original bed. How has this movement taken place—the government wishes to know—by a slow process of tearing down and building up, or by sudden and violent leaps from accustomed bounds to new ones? By "accretion" or "avulsion"? Upon this apparently trivial and purely technical question hinges the whole wide-reaching, intensely practical problem. The United States Supreme Court, in a decision handed down in a controversy between Iowa and Nebraska, expressed its judgment as follows: "When grants of land border on running water, and the banks are changed by the gradual process known as 'accretion,' the riparian owners' boundary line still remains the stream; but when the boundary stream suddenly abandons its old bed, and seeks a new course by the process known as 'avulsion,' the boundary remains as it was, in the center of the old channel. And this rule applies to a State when a river forms one of its boundary lines." The Colorado River for a short distance forms the boundary line between the United States and Mexico. The nature of the river is the same here as elsewhere—it has the "wanderlust." This fact was evidently overlooked by the makers of the Gadsden purchase treaty, and the stream considered as a fixed line, for they established the boundary between the two countries "up the middle of Said Colorado River." That the question of the proper method of fixing the division line in cases of a movement of the channel will ultimately arise between the United States and Mexico, there can hardly be a doubt. When it does come up, the decision made by the United States examiner of surveys, has returned from a three months' investigation in the vicinity of Yuma, under orders from the Department of the Interior. Mr. Owen gathered much interesting information, which he is now embodying in a report to be submitted to the department. The Colorado River is great enough to be permitted to be eccentric, and it takes full advantage of its privileges. Never was a stream more restless, more cursed with the wandering foot. Mr. Owen has been mapping its wanderings, and attempting to explain their why and how, especially their how. A comparison of surveys of the river made at various previous times showed that the stream had in places moved two miles from its original bed. How has this movement taken place—the government wishes to know—by a slow process of tearing down and building up, or by sudden and violent leaps from accustomed bounds to new ones? By "accretion" or "avulsion"? Upon this apparently trivial and purely technical question hinges the whole wide-reaching, intensely practical problem. The United States Supreme Court, in a decision handed down in a controversy between Iowa and Nebraska, expressed its judgment as follows: "When grants of land border on running water, and the banks are changed by the gradual process known as 'accretion,' the riparian owners' boundary line still remains the stream; but when the boundary stream suddenly abandons its old bed, and seeks a new course by the process known as 'avulsion,' the boundary remains as it was, in the center of the old channel. And this rule applies to a State when a river forms one of its boundary lines." The Colorado River for a short distance forms the boundary line between the United States and Mexico. The nature of the river is the same here as elsewhere—it has the "wanderlust." This fact was evidently overlooked by the makers of the Gadsden purchase treaty, and the stream considered as a fixed line, for they established the boundary between the two countries "up the middle of Said Colorado River." That the question of the proper method of fixing the division line in cases of a movement of the channel will ultimately arise between the United States and Mexico, there can hardly be a doubt. When it does come up, the decision made by the United States examiner of surveys, has returned from a three months' investigation in the vicinity of Yuma, under orders from the Department of the Interior. Mr. Owen gathered much interesting information, which he is now embodying in a report to be submitted to the department. The Colorado River is great enough to be permitted to be eccentric, and it takes full advantage of its privileges. Never was a stream more restless, more cursed with the wandering foot. Mr. Owen has been mapping its wanderings, and attempting to explain their why and how, especially their how. A comparison of surveys of the river made at various previous times showed that the stream had in places moved two miles from its original bed. How has this movement taken place—the government wishes to know—by a slow process of tearing down and building up, or by sudden and violent leaps from accustomed bounds to new ones? By "accretion" or "avulsion"? Upon this apparently trivial and purely technical question hinges the whole wide-reaching, intensely practical problem. The United States Supreme Court, in a decision handed down in a controversy between Iowa and Nebraska, expressed its judgment as follows: "When grants of land border on running water, and the banks are changed by the gradual process known as 'accretion,' the riparian owners' boundary line still remains the stream; but when the boundary stream suddenly abandons its old bed, and seeks a new course by the process known as 'avulsion,' the boundary remains as it was, in the center of the old channel. And this rule applies to a State when a river forms one of its boundary lines." The Colorado River for a short distance forms the boundary line between the United States and Mexico. The nature of the river is the same here as elsewhere—it has the "wanderlust." This fact was evidently overlooked by the makers of the Gadsden purchase treaty, and the stream considered as a fixed line, for they established the boundary between the two countries "up the middle of Said Colorado River." That the question of the proper method of fixing the division line in cases of a movement of the channel will ultimately arise between the United States and Mexico, there can hardly be a doubt. When it does come up, the decision made by the United States examiner of surveys, has returned from a three months' investigation in the vicinity of Yuma, under orders from the Department of the Interior. Mr. Owen gathered much interesting information, which he is now embodying in a report to be submitted to the department. The Colorado River is great enough to be permitted to be eccentric, and it takes full advantage of its privileges. Never was a stream more restless, more cursed with the wandering foot. Mr. Owen has been mapping its wanderings, and attempting to explain their why and how, especially their how. A comparison of surveys of the river made at various previous times showed that the stream had in places moved two miles from its original bed. How has this movement taken place—the government wishes to know—by a slow process of tearing down and building up, or by sudden and violent leaps from accustomed bounds to new ones? By "accretion" or "avulsion?" Upon this apparently trivial and purely technical question hinges the whole wide-reaching, intensely practical problem. The United States Supreme Court, in a decision handed down in a controversy between Iowa and Nebraska, expressed its judgment as follows: "When grants of land border on running water, and the banks are changed by the gradual process known as 'accretion,' the riparian owners' boundary line still remains the stream; but when the boundary stream suddenly abandons its old bed, and seeks a new course by the process known as 'avulsion,' the boundary remains as it was, in the center of the old channel. And this rule applies to a State when a river forms one of its boundary lines." The Colorado River for a short distance forms the boundary line between the United States and Mexico. The nature of the river is the same here as elsewhere—it has the "wanderlust." This fact was evidently overlooked by the makers of the Gadsden purchase treaty, and the stream considered as a fixed line, for they established the boundary between the two countries "up the middle of Said Colorado River." That the question of the proper method of fixing the division line in cases of a movement ofthe channel will ultimately arise betweenthe United States and Mexico,the can hardly be a doubt. When it does come up,the decision made bythe United States examinerofsurveyshasreturnedfromathreemonths'investigationinthericinesspracticalproblem.TheUnitedStatesSupremeCourt.in.a decisionhandleddownin.acontroversybetweenIowaandNebraska.expresseditsjudgmentasfollows:"Whengrants.oflandborder.onrunningwater,and.thebanksarechangedbythegradualprocessknownas'accretion,"theriparianowners'boundarylinestillremainsthestream;butwhentheboundarystream Suddenlyabandonsitsoldbed,andseeksanewcoursebytheprocessknownas'avulsion,"theboundaryremainsasitwas,inthecenteroftheoldchannel.AndthisruleappliestoaStatewhenatriverformsoneofitsboundarylines." The Colorado River for a short distance forms the boundary line betweentheUnitedStatesandMexico.Thenatureoftheriveristhesamehereaselsewhere-ithasthe"wanderlust."ThisfactwasevidentlyoverlookedbythemakersoftheGadsdenpurchasetreaty,andthestreamconsideredasafixedline,forsheystablishedtheboundarybetweenthetwocountries"upthemiddleofSaidColoradoRiver."ThatthequestionofthepropermethodoffixingthedivisionlineincasesofamovementofthechannelwillultimatelyarisebetweentheUnitedStatesandMexico,thecanhardlybeadoubt.Whenitdoescomeup,thedecisionmadebytheUnitedStates examinerofsurveyshasreturnedfromathreemonths'investigationinthericinesspracticalproblem.TheUnitedStatesSupremeCourt.in.a decisionhandleddownin.acontroversybetweenIowaandNebraska.expresseditsjudgmentasfollows:"Whengrants.oflandborder.onrunningwater,and.thebanksarechangedbythegradualprocessknownas'accretion,"theriparianowners'boundarylinestillremainsthestream;butwhentheboundarystream Suddenlyabandondsitsoldbed,andseeksanewcoursebytheprocessknownas'avlision,"theboundaryremainsasitwas,inthecenteroftheoldchannel.AndthisruleappliestoaStatewhenatriverformsoneofitsboundarylines." The Colorado River for a short distance formsthe boundarylinebetweentheUnitedStatesandMexico.Thenatureoftheriveristhesamehereaselsewhere-ithasthe"wanderlust."ThisfactwasevidentlyoverlookedbythemakersoftheGadsdenpurchasetreaty,andthestreamconsideredasafixedline,forsheystablishedtheboundarybetweenthetwocountries"upthemiddleofSaidColoradoRiver."ThatthequestionofthepropermethodoffixingthedivisionlineincasesofamovementofthechannelwillultimatelyarisebetweentheUnitedStatesandMexico,thecanhardlybeadoubt.Whenitdoescomeup,thedecisionmadebytheUnitedStates examinerofsurveyshasreturnedfromathreemonths'investigationinthericinesspracticalproblem.TheUnitedStatesSupremeCourt.in.a decisionhandleddownin.acontroversybetweenIowa和Nebraska.expresseditsjudgmentasfollows:"Whengrants.oflandborder.onrunningwater,and.thebanksarechangedbythegradualprocessknownas'accretion,"theriparianowners'boundarylinestillremainsthestream;butwhentheboundarystream Suddenlyabandondsitsoldbed,andseeksanewcoursebytheprocessknownas'avlision,"theboundaryremainsasitwas,inthecenteroftheoldchannel.AndthisruleappliestoaStatewhenatriverformsoneofitsboundarylines." The Colorado River for a short distance formsthe boundarylinebetweentheUnitedStatesandMexico.Thenatureoftheriveristhesamehereaselsewhere-ithasthe"wanderlust."ThisfactwasevidentlyoverlookedbythemakersoftheGadsdenpurchasetreaty,andthestreamconsideredasafixedline,forsheystablishedtheboundarybetweenthetwocountries"upthemiddleofSaidColoradoRiver."ThatthequestionofthepropermethodoffixingthedivisionlineincasesofamovementofthechannelwillultimatelyarisebetweentheUnitedStatesandMexico,thecanhardlybeadoubt.Whenitdoescomeup,thedecisionmadebytheUnitedStates examinerofsurveyshasreturnedfromathreemonths'investigationinthericinesspracticalproblem.TheUnitedStatesSupremeCourt.in.a decisionhandleddownin.acontroversybetweenIowa和Nebraska.expresseditsjudgmentasfollows:"Whengrants.oflandborder.onrunningwater,and.thebanksarechangedbythegradualprocessknownas'accretion,"theriparianowners'boundarylinestillremainsthestream;butwhentheboundarystream Suddenlyabandondsitsoldbed,andseeksanewcoursebytheprocessknownas'avlision,"theboundaryremainsasitwas,inthecenteroftheoldchannel.AndthisruleappliestoaStatewhenatriverformsoneofitsboundarylines." The Colorado River for a short distance formsthe boundarylinebetweentheUnitedStatesandMexico.Thenatureoftheriveristhesamehereaselsewhere-ithasthe"wanderlust."ThisfactwasevidentlyoverlookedbythemakersoftheGadsdenpurchasetreaty,andthestreamconsideredasafixedline,forsheystablishedtheboundarybetweenthetwocountries"up-themiddle-of-Said-Colorado-River."ThatthequestionofthepropermethodoffixingthedivisionlineincasesofamovementofthechannelwillultimatelyarisebetweentheUnitedStatesandMexico,thecanhardlybeadoubt.Whenitdoescomeup,thedecisionmadebytheUnitedStates examinerofsurveyshasreturnedfromathreemonths'investigationinthericinesspracticalproblem.TheUnitedStatesSupremeCourt.in.a decisionhandleddownin.acontroversybetweenIowa和Nebraska.expresseditsjudgmentasfollows:"Whengrants.oflandborder.onrunningwater,and.thebanksarechangedbythegradualprocessknownas'accretion,"theriparianowners'boundarylinestillremains_thestream;butwhen_theboundarystream Suddenlyabandondsitsoldbed,andseeksanewcourseby_theprocessknownas'avlision,"Thephysicalproblem.TheGovernmentfurnishsherexcessivesfromAmericatoeachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country. "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericatoeachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericatoeachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericatoeachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericatoeachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericatoeachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericatoeachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericatoeachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericatoeachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericatoeachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessivesfromAmericato eachof-thepowersAustraliaandNewmoney country." "The政府 furnish sherexcessives从America到国家保护的措施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实施" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》的实现" "《美国对各州的保护措施》" "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population density is increasing due to overpopulation among urban areas." "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected population密度是增加的。" "Affected人口数量是增加的。" "Affected人口数量是增加的。" "Affected人口数量是增加的。" "Affected人口数量是增加的。" "Affected人口数量是增加的。" "Affected人口数量是增加的。" "Affected人口数量是增加的。" "Affected人口数量是增加的。" "Affected人口数量是增加的。" "Affected人口数量是增加的。" "AffectED人口数量是增加的。" "AffectED人口数量是增加的。" "AffectED人口数量是增加的。" "AffectED人口数量是增加的。" "AffectED人口数量是增加的。" "A affectED人口数量是增加的。" "A affectED人口数量是增加的。" "A affectED人口数量是增加的。" "A affectED人口数量是增加的。" "A affectED人口数量是增加的。" "A affectED overlooked by the makers of the Gadsden purchase treaty, and the stream considered as a fixed line, for they established the boundary between the two countries "up the middle of Said Colorado River." That the question of the proper method of fixing the division line in cases of a movement of the channel will ultimately arise between the United States and Mexico, there can hardly be a doubt. When it does come up, the decision made by the United States Government regarding the boundary between California and Arizona will probably have an influence upon Mexico's ultimatum concerning the boundary between the two neighboring countries on each side of the river. Mr. Owen says that a little more than fifteen miles below Yuma, on the American side, are some settlers who have been in possession of their lands a good many years. Since they bought them, the Colorado has receded more than a mile toward Mexico, generously presenting the settlers with a wide strip of some of the richest land on the globe—which twenty-five years ago lay within the borders of the neighboring republic. Mr. Owen, in order to help the department in its decision as to the manner of change of the course of the Colorado, will adduce in his report the following points: The topography of the country; the character of the soil; the formation of the bank in different places, whether sloping or steep; and the nature of the vegetation—whether the latter appears at particular localities to be of recent or long-continued growth. His personal opinion as to changes in the river's course, Mr. Owen, as a government official, is not at present at liberty to make public. He not only made observations on the modern affair, where prints are being made on a large scale, as well as the raaw cotton being prepared, spun and woven. The power for these three manufacturing establishments was obtained by drilling a number of tunnels under the mountains near Parras. This water power system is a costly work, showing great engineering skill. Far from being the traditional revolutionists the Madero family is thus seen to be large and wealthy. For all that, they have no voice in the government of Mexico, they say. CALIFORNIA'S FISH PRODUCTS In the value of products from fisheries as shown by the recent census returns, California ranked second among the Pacific coast states, both at the canvass of 1904 and of 1908, as will be shown in the forthcoming special census report on the fisheries industry of the United States for the year 1908, to be issued by Director E. Dana Durand of the bureau of the census. The report was prepared under the supervision of William M. Steuart, chief statistician for manufactures. The value o the products in 1908 was $1,970,000, as compared with $2,523,000 in 1904, while the value of the equipment in 1908 was $1,568,000, which was less than in 1899 though more than the $1,489,000 reported in 1904. The value of vessels and of boats, including outfit, was $1,066,000 in 1908, as compared with $1,128,000 in 1904, and $1,325,000 in 1899. The value of the apparatus of capture, which was $250,000 in 1899, increased to $360,000 in 1904, and to $502,000 in 1908. Watch, clock and jewelry repairing. First class work guaranteed. Theo Roberts. BACK TO AFRICA SLOGAN Oklahoma Darkies Talking of Emigrating To gather a thousand delegates and 10,000 colored visitors to form an "On to Africa Congress," is the latest move among the negroes arising directly out of the Ethiopian Afro-American Franchise Protective League, which was organized to fight the "grandfather clause" in Oklahoma. The congress is scheduled to meet in Muskogee on August 4, 1912, and the plans formulated are exhaustive and specific in every detail, being laid down in the call, which is to be issued to the race. The object of the congress is laid down in the following terms: "It will be the duty of the congress to select a diplomatic agency of five to go to England, Germany, Belgium and France, with a proposition to secure possessions of lands in Africa, under the protectorate of those governments, and to make plans and treaties. The treaties will contain, among other things, the right of the congress or its diplomatic corps, to select the locations for proposed colonies, to build railroads and public highways and to protect the mineral reserves, to develop and protect the agricultural resources, to protect and develop the waterways and the right to maintain an army for the protection of the colonies. "The form of government to be asked for will have the same relation to each of the powers as that of Canada, Australia and New Zealand to the mother country." "The governments will be asked to furnish the necessary transportation..." The form of government to be asked for will have the same relation to each of the powers as that of Canada, Australia and New Zealand to the mother country. "The governments will be asked to furnish the necessary transportation from America to Africa, and loans are also to be asked for with from twenty to sixty years limit on them." In the preamble to the call the following language is used: "Dear Sisters and Brothers of King Menelek—It is the will of God that we return to the land of our forefathers. We have a parallel case to that of the white men who were slaves to the Pharaohs of Egypt and sold at the block." It then goes on to recall the history of the African race, of its rise and fall, and dwells on the strides it has made in America since emancipation. The call claims that the negro has already demonstrated that he can take care of himself and that the race is able to work out its own salvation. The plans for calling state conventions from which delegates to the congress in Muskogee are elected are set forth. It ends with an appeal to the race to take widespread interest in the movement. Isaac B. Atkinson, who signs the call as chairman, has been interviewed on the subject. Atkinson is 62 years of age and somewhat crippled up with rheumatism, but he is an enthusiast. "It takes an old head to work out these things," said he, "but the younger generation will have to carry it out." "How about Bishop Turner's attempt to colonize the negroes in Africa?" was asked him. "The bishop quit. It can not be done in a day any more than Rome was built in that time. I believe the movement will be taken hold of in other states like it has in Oklahoma. Africa is the place for us. We are built to govern ourselves and become a nation of ourselves, a credit to the people of the earth." Asked how the movement would be developed, Atkinson said that he would himself travel in some of the southern states and visit noted men of his race and interest them and al- Action brought in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, and the Complaint filed in the office of the Clerk of said County of Orange. Tipton & Callor, Attorneys for Plaintiff. The People of the State of California send Greeting to Emil A. Sanger and A. H. Ricketts Trustees, and Casper M. Sanger, Defendants. You are Hereby Directed to Appear, and answer the Complaint in an action entitled as above, brought against you in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, within ten days after the service on you of this summons—if served within this County; or within thirty days if served elsewhere. And you are hereby notified that unless you appear and answer as above required the said plaintiff will take judgment for any money or damages demanded in the complaint as arising upon contract, or he will apply to the Court for any other relief demanded in the complaint. Given under my hand and the seal of the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, this 12th day of April, A.D. 1911. W. B. WILLIAMS, Clerk. By J. C. Burke, Deputy Clerk. (Seal) Ap20-9t Notice to Creditors. Estate of Alice E. Susmil, deceased. Notice is hereby given by the undersigned administrator of the estate of Alice E. Susmil, deceased, to the creditors of, and all persons having claims against the said deceased, to exhibit the same with the necessary vouchers, within four months after the first publication of this notice (which publication was first made on the 13th day of April, 1911), to the said administrator at the office of Tipton & Callor, 118 West Center street, Anaheim, California, the place of business of said estate in the County of Orange. Dated this 4th day of April, A.D., 1911. FLETCHER J. SUSMIL. Administrator of the Estate of Alice E. Susmil, Deceased. Tipton & Callor, Attorneys for the Administrator. apr13-5t IN THE SUPERIOR COURT Of the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles In the Matter of the estate of Leopold Wigand, deceased. NOTICE INVITING BIDS AT PRIVATE SALE. Under the authority of an order granted by the above entitled Court, dated February 16th, 1910, I will sell at private sale, the following described property, to-wit: 1st. Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot Six (6) of Anaheim Extension, as shown on a map of survey by Wm. Hamel, signed and acknowledged by Alfred Robinson, Trustee, on Dec. 11, 1868, on file in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, California, and running thence North 75 1-4 degrees East four (4) chains; thence North 14 3-4 degrees West to the center line of the main ditch of the Anaheim Water Company; thence Westerly along said center line to its intersection with the Westerly line of said Lot Six (6), and thence South 14 3-4 degrees East to the point of beginning. 2nd. Beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot Five (5) of said Anaheim Extension, on the Northerly line of Center Street, and running thence Westerly along the Northerly line of said street to its intersection with done in a day any more than Rome was built in that time. I believe the movement will be taken hold of in other states like it has in Oklahoma. Africa is the place for us. We are built to govern ourselves and become a nation of ourselves, a credit to the people of the earth." Asked how the movement would be developed, Atkinson said that he would himself travel in some of the southern states and visit noted men of his race and interest them and also the masses of the people. "It's sure to come," he said, "for it is the only real salvation of the negro race." "How will it be done?" he was asked. "By the will of God and the energies of the negroes," he said. Isaac B. Atkinson was promoter of the fight against the grandfather amendment to disfranchise voters in Oklahoma, and was born in Dallas county, Ark., January 1, 1849. He owned a farm of 160 acres near the city of Fordyce, Ark., and sold it for $1000 in 1876 to get money to go to school on. He taught public school for several years in and around Little Rock, and in 1888 was elected to the Arkansas legislature from Pulaski county, beating his opponent, a white man, 447 votes for the position. Estate Is Appraised According to reports of appraisers the estate of Pierre Nicolas, a Fullerton pioneer, is valued at about $130,000. The Los Angeles property is valued at $100,700. Gustav Stern, William Fleishman and Joseph Dubble have appraised the Orange county property at $29,491.08. School children's eyes should be taken care of. Have them tested free at Hartfield's. JOSEPH BACKS, Undertaker and Embalmer Furniture, Bedding. Repairing done Phones Pacific M93, Home 1062. THURSDAY, MAY 4 NORTH EVERYWHERE THEY USE IN THE NINE WEST LEVI STRAUSS & CO. COPPER RIVETED OVERALLS SOUTH AT PLAY AT THE CANAL New Telephone Directory FOR ORANGE COUNTY New Telephone Directory FOR ORANGE COUNTY WILL Close May 15th Any changes or additiohs to listing or advertising matter for this issue must be arranged for on or before this date. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company ANNOUNCEMENT Due to the eight-hour law we are compelled, along with all other laundries in the State, to largely increase our payroll in order to get out the work. An advance in prices for laundry is consequently necessary. All laundries in the State are now re-arranging their price lists to meet the emergency, and we are obliged to follow the same course in self-defense. Anaheim Steam Laundry Reduced Fares Anaheim Steam Laundry Reduced Fares East Special occasion Round Trip Tickets will be sold on the following dates during 1911: May 16-17-18-19-22-23-24-25-27-28-29-31. June 5-6-7-8-9-10-14-15-16-28-29-30. July 1-2-3-4-5-6-19-20-26-27-28. August 3-4-5-14-15-16-17-21-22-23-28-29-30. Sept. 1-2-3-4-6-7. Going Limit 15 Days, Return Limit Oct. 31, 1911. Here are some Rates: Going and returning direct routes: Colorado Springs, Denver, Pueblo $55.00 Omaha, Kansas City, Dallas, Houston 60.00 St. Louis, Memphis, New Orleans 70.00 Chicago 72.50 St. Paul and Minneapolis 73.50 Baltimore, Washington, D.C. 107.50 New York, Philadelphia, Montreal 108.50 Boston 110.50 Tickets reading one way via Portland $24.50 higher from Los Angeles. For full particulars see agents. SOUTHERN PACIFIC Los Angeles Offices: 600 South Spring St. J. M. Pickering, Agent, Anaheim. Phones—Pacific 1231; Home 1724. L. B. Valla, Commercial Agent, Santa Ana. Both Phones 19. Proper Printing that Please our Patrons