anaheim-gazette 1959-02-12

IN THE DAYS OF LONG AGO From the Files of The Anaheim Gazette By MRS. HENRY KUCHEL 88 Years Ago ... February 11, 1871 In the vicinity of Anaheim the people are prospering without the shadow of a doubt. Water has been extended to Fairview, and through the Coyote valley. At Santa Ana every farmer is cheerful and contented. A few days since while at that place, we took occasion to inquire of the assemblage of 15 farmers (who had gathered at the store of Mr. Spurgeon) if they were satisfied or discouraged and they unanimously declared their satisfaction with their prospects, and the prospects of their vicinity for the coming year. Now, it is quite certain that, if nine-tenths of our people are satisfied, the other tenth must be the uneasy, shiftless class which falls to our lot as well as to the lot of all other communities, to have subsist among and upon us. While buildings continue to be erected, fences continue to be put up, new lands continue to be plowed, and money is as plenty hereabouts, the man who complains is insulting dame fortune, and may some day expedition hard times some day experience hard times grumbling. Now that another line of communication is open, being the stage line from Anaheim to Wilmington, it is hoped that our citizens at least, will give it every encouragement and all possible patronage. In order to get the annual meeting of stockholders of the Anaheim Sugar company was held Saturday. The following resolution was introduced by Alexander Henry, Owing to the lateness of the hour it was laid over for adoption at a subsequent meeting: "Whereas, the Anaheim Cooperative Beet Sugar company has labored for more than four years in an effort to raise money for the purpose of building a sugar factory, and all such efforts have been thus far proven failures, and whereas by reason of dissentions in said corporation it finds itself without credit and unable to raise money even to pay the ordinary expenses of the corporation; and whereas there are now $4000 due for debts incurred and no money in the treasury with which to pay the same; and whereas there is no prospect that this corporation will ever be able to raise the amount of money necessary to build the factory or to carry out the objects for which the corporation was founded; therefore be it resolved that this corporation take immediate steps to pay up its indebtedness and to disincorporate at the earliest possible moment." One of the wags in Schillings' Minstrels perpetrated a horrible joke upon an efficient street car service when he said, after arriving in town he became dependent. LEGAL NOTICE (Pub. Anaheim Gazette Feb. 12 and 13) RESOLUTION NO. 1096 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A PETITION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, DESIGNATING THE TERRITORY AS THE BROOKHURST-KATELLA ANNEXATION; DISCUSING THE ROUND-AIR OF THE TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE DAY, HOUR AND PLACE WHERE AND WHEN ANY PERSON OWNING REAL PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY NO PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AND SHOW CAUSE WHICH TERRITORY SHOULD NOT BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim did on the 10th day of February, 1959, receive a written petition asking that certain new territory described in said petition be annexed to the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, before the filing of said petition, the proposal for the annexation of the territory hereafter described to the City of Anaheim was submitted to the Boundary Committee of the County of Orange, and reported upon by said Boundary Commission with respect to the definitiveness and certainty of the proposed boundaries; and WHEREAS, said territory proposed to be annexed to said City of Anaheim is situated in the County of Orange, State of California, and is contiguous to the City of Anaheim and is uninhabited territory, and said petition contained a description of said territory in words and figures as hereafter in this Resolution described; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds from evidence and reports received from said petition that at the time of the filing and presentation of said petition that said new territory proposed to be annexed to said City of Anaheim did not form a part of any municipal corporation and that said territory was uninhabited and is contiguous to the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds from said petition and evidence and reports received that the boundaries of the territory, so proposed to be annexed to the City of Anaheim are Now that another line of communication is open, being the stage line from Anaheim to Wilmington, it is hoped that our citizens at least will give it every encouragement and all possible patronage. In order to get the "cork out of the bottle" wherein Anaheim lies at present and to bring us better communications, let those we do obtain meet with permanent encouragement. The Gazette acknowledges receipt of one hundred pounds of apples from the lumber yard of Dicken, Huntington & Co. Mr. Huntington has our thanks and when we require a few dozen lumber of a ton of redwood posts, we will give him a call. An extensive dairy is being established about two miles below Santa Ana by Mr. Jerome Porter, formerly of Los Angeles. He now has on hand one hundred cows, and is purchasing continually, intending to increase the number to two hundred and fifty. Supplies will be furnished regularly from the dairy after the 20th inst. The village of Santa Ana now contains about 150 souls. It is owned principally by W. H. Spurgeon, A. L. Bush and D. H. Samis. It contains one general merchandise store, a post office (with daily mail), a fine school house, blacksmith shop, saloon and a number of hastily constructed residences. Immediately outside the town is a large two story brick house which cost about $10,000. It is the property of Mr. T. Casad. A hotel is about to be built and as the telegraph line passes through the town a telegraph office will soon be built. Our patrons at Santa Ana will please notice that W. H. Spurgeon, Esq., of that place is an authorized agent for the Gazette, to receive both money and subscriptions. One of the wags in Schillings' Minstrels perpetrated a horrible joke upon an efficient street car service when he said, after arriving in town, he became despondent and threatened suicide. He forthwith hired himself to the western limits of town and laid upon the track and waited patiently for six hours for the car to come along that would send him to destruction. He waited in vain, he said, and changing his mind, arrose and took his departure for his hotel where he became reconciled and abandoned self-destruction. John Everhardy who has lately opened up the Golden Eagle market in Los Angeles, was in town Sunday. He informs us he has met with very flattering success in his new venture. While in Santa Ana one day last week we took occasion to go out to Willie's stables and see Silkwood. The famous horse is kept in a rude box stall, which we should judge not good enough for an ordinary roadster. The place is unfit for a horse that has developed such wonderful speed and has become the pride of Orange county. At the last meeting of the city trustees the immediate necessity of increasing the electric light plant came up for discussion. More bonds will have to be voted by the people as something must be done to put in a larger plant. O. W. Bill of Garden Grove has sold his five acres to Mrs. Huntoon of Nevada. The consideration being $1500. There are several cases of measles in town, Mr. Dougherty's young son and Alex Wright's child being afflicted with the complaint. In conservative families in Korea, a woman is seldom referred to by name. She is addressed as wife or mother on some factory or to carry out the objects for which the corporation was founded; therefore be it resolved that this corporation take immediate steps to pay up its indebtedness and to disincorporate at the earliest possible moment." WHEREAS, the City Council finds from evidence and reports received and verified last month that at the time of filing and presentation of said petition that said new territory proposed to be annexed to said City of Anaheim did not form a part of any municipal corporation and that said territory was uninhabited and is contiguous to the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds from said petition and evidence and reports received that the boundaries proposed to be annexed to said City of Anaheim were omitted to the City of Anaheim are as follows: to wit: BROOKHURST-KATELLA ANNEXATION A Parcel of land being a portion of the southeast quarter of Section 19, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian located in the County of Orange State of California, described as follows: 1. Westerly along the south line of the N% of the SE% of the SE% of said Section 19 to the east line of Tract No. 2111, as shown on a map filed for record in Book 61, Target 474 of Miscellaneous Maps Records of Orange County, California; thence; 2. Northerly along the east line of Tract No. 2111 to the northeast corner of the said Tract 2111, said point also being in the southern line of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way as shown on the map of said Tract 2111 shown on Book 61, Target 474 of Miscellaneous Maps Records of Orange County, California; thence; 3. Easterly along the southerly line of said Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way to its point of intersection with the existing City limit line of the City of Anaheim as established by said Midwood Manor Anxiontion; thence; 4. Northerly along the said existing City of Anaheim City limit line to the point of beginning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that such propose an annexation be designated "BROOKHURST-KATELLA ANNEXATION" and that notice of such proposed annexation may hereby give and provide BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a public hearing shall be had upon the date set, not less than forty (40 nor more than sixty (60) days after the passage of this Resolution, unless the owner or owners of all or the territory to be annexed have petitioned for annexation or filed their consent to such annuation, in writing, with the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 17th day of March, 1959, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock P.M., at City Council Chamber in the City Hall of the City of Anaheim be, and FOR A GAZETTE WANT AD CALL RE 5-2206 Anaheim Gazette Theodore B. Ruchal, Publisher Frank Hall, Managing Editor G. E. "Andy" Mellen, Adv. Manager TELEPHONE KEITONE 5-2206 Entered as second class mail matter under the Act of March 3, 1879. All rights herein are reserved. LEGAL NOTICE (Pub. Anaheim Gazette Feb. 12, 1958.) NOTICE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That Ronald M. Runyon, Vendor, whose address is 1060 W. Katella Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, Intends to sell to Ronald L. Kay, Vendee, whose address is 1060 W. Katella Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, the following described personal property, all stock and goods will of a certain Retail Gasoline Service Station business, known as Runyon's Flying "A" Service and located at 1060 W. Katella Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, and that a sale, transfer and assignment of the same will be made, and the consideration therefor will be paid at 10:00 o'clock AS on the 3rd day of May, 1959, at the area office of the Tidewater Oil Company at 2555 West Central, in the City of La Habra, County of Orange, State of California. C. E. Bishop, Vendee, Agent Tidewater Oil Co. Dated: February 11, 1958. In conservative families in Korea, a woman is seldom referred to by name. She is addressed usually, as wife, mother, or some other feminine relation to the male head of the family. LEGAL NOTICE (Pub. Anaheim Gazette Feb. 12, 1958.) CREDIT FOR BUSINESS FICTIOUS FIRM NAME THE UNDERSIGNED do hereby certify that they are conducting a mall order business at 7221 Thornton Avenue, Anaheim, California, under the fictitious firm name of Nan-Li Products and that said firm is composed of the following persons, whose names and addresses are as follows, to-will: William A. Cassell, 7221 Thornton Avenue, Anaheim, California, Lileth L. Cassell, 7221 Thornton Avenue, Anaheim, California, Cyrill H. Palmer, 1144 North Aetna Street, Anaheim, California, Nancy M. Palmer, 1144 North Aetna, Anaheim, California. WITNESS our hands this 11th day of February, 1958. COUNTY OF ORANGE On February 11, 1958, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared William A. Cassell and Lileth L. Cassell and Cyrill H. Palmer and Nancy M. Palmer, known to me to be the person whose names are solicited for within lawsuits and acknowledged that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal O. B. Woods (Seal): Notary Public in and for said County and State. My commission expires May 5, 1961. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 17th day of March, 1959, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Council Chamber in the City Hall of the City of Anaheim be, and she may hereby fix the hour and place when where the City Council will hear protests made by any owner or owners of real property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objections, any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s), any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s), any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s), any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s), any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s), any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s), any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s), any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s), any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s), any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s), any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s),any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s),any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s),any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s),any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s),any owner of property within the territory proposed to be annexed; and that at any time before the hour set for hearing objection(s),any owner of property within GAL NOTICE HEIM Gazette Feb. 12 and SOLUTION NO. 1035 SOLUTION OF THE CITY OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, DESIGNING THE BROOKATELLA ANNEXATION THE BOUNDARY TERRITORY PROPOSED ANNEXED AND GIVING THE DAY, HOUR AND THERE AND WHEN ANY OWNING REAL TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED BEFORE THE CITY AND SHOW CAUSE WHY TERRITORY SHOULD NOT TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. AS, the City Council of the City did on the 10th day, 1955, receive a written kind that certain new terriory to be in the City of Anaheim; and AS, before the filing of said proposal for the annexetion hereinafter defined by the Boundary Commission of County of Orange State, and reported upon by Bury Commission with redefinence and certainproposed boundaries; and AS, said petition proposed needed to said City of Anaheim in the County of State of California, and is to the City of Anaheim inhabited territory, and said contained a description of territory in words and figures in this Resolution dended. The City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last preceded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last preceded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last preceded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last preceded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last preceded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last preceded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last preceded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last preceded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last preceded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last preceded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last preceded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filing and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filling and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filling and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filling and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filling and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filling and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filling and presentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filling andresentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filling andresentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded county assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filling andresentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded country assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filling andresentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded country assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filling andresentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded country assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at the filling andresentation of the territory proposed to be according to the last pre-ceeded country assessment AS, the City Council finds and reports received said petition that at The city council finds evidence and signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. A. J. SCHUTTE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. C. W. MILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOUBLE HOUND HAIRM AMAZEMENT TO BE A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, held on the 10th day of February, 1958, by following vote of members thereafter. AYES: COUNCIHLEN: Border Coons, Fry, Pearson and Schutte NOBS: COUNCIHLEN: None ABRENT: COUNCIHLEN: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that he Mayor of The city氨heim approved and signed Resolution on this 10th day of February, 1958. W. TNESS WHEREFOF have been audited by her husband affirmed by official seal of The city氨heim this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY_OF ANAHEIM ) D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK_OF THE CITY_OF ANAHEIM STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE ) SS.CITY_OF_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE ) SS.CITY_OF_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE ) SS.CITY_OF_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE ) SS.CITY_OF_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE ) SS.CITY_OF_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE ) SS.City_OF_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE ) SS.City_OF_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE ) SS.City_OF_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE ) SS.City_OF_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE ) SS.City_OF_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE )SS.City_OF_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE )SS.City_OF_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE )SS.City_of_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE )SS.City_of_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE )SS.City_of_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE )SS.City_of_ANAHEIM_STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA_COUNTY_OF_ORANGE ) AYES: COUNCIHLEN: Border Coons, Fry, Pearson and Schutte NOBS: COUNCIHLEN: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that he Mayor of The city氨heim approved and signed Resolution on this 10th day of February, 1958. W. TNESS WHEREFOF have been audited by her husband affirmed by official seal of The city氨heim this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D. NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D.NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D.NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D.NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February, 1958. D.NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February，1958. D.NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February，1958. D.NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February，1958. D.NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERK Of The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February，1958. D.NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERKOf The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February，1958. D.NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERKOf The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February，1958. D.NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERKOf The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February，1958. D.NENE M.WILLIAMS CITY CLERKOf The City Of Anaheim is signed by me this 10th day of February，1958. D.NENE M.WILLIAMS Clermont : Border Coons, Fry, Pearson and Schutte NOBS: COUNCIHLEN: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that he Mayor of The city氨heim approved and signed Resolution on this 10th day of February，1958. W.TNESS WHEREFOF have been audited by her husband affirmed by official seal of The city氨heim this 10th day of February，1958. D.NENE M.Williams cistry_CLERKOfTheCityOfAnanheimis_signedbymethis_10thdayofFebruary，1958.D.NENEM.Williamscistry_CLERKOfTheCityOfAnanheimis_signedbymethis_10thdayofFebruary，1958.D.NENEM.Williamscistry_CLERKOfTheCityOfAnanheimis_signedbymethis_10thdayofFebruary，1958.D.NENEM.Williamscistry_CLERKOfTheCityOfAnanheimis_signedbymethis_10thdayofFebruary，1958.D.NENEM.Williamscistry_CLERKOfTheCityOfAnanheimis_signedbymethis_ NOTICE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That WALTER MISTAL, Vendor, whose address is in the City of Anaheim, County of ORANGE, State of California, intends to sell to T. R. WARDEN T. M. WARDEN, a partnership, Vendor, whose address is in the City of PLACENIA, County of ORANGE, State of California, the following describe personal property to-wit: All stock in trade, fixtures, equiment and good will of a certain property to-wit: FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the City Counler. FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the city Council FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the city Council FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the city Council FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and writing, with the city Council FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1959, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be，and writing，with the city Council FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March，1959，at The Council Chamber In TheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInTheCityTheCityInThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecityThecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity Thecity The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 The城市 THE FURTHER RESOLVE THAT DAY OF MARCH，1959，AT THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE CITYIN THE FURTHER RESOLVE THAT DAY OF MARCH，1959，AT THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CITY IN THE CILITYIN THE CILITYIN THE CILITYIN THE CILITYIN THE CILITYIN THE CILITYIN THE CILITYIN THE CILITYIN THE CILITYINTHECILITYINTHECILITYinTHECILITYinTHECILITYinTHECILITYinTHECILITYinTHECILITYinTHECILITYinTHECILITYinTHECILITYinTHECILITYinTHECILITYinTHECILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHEC LIABILITYinTHENCLIENTION NOTICE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That WAULT MISTAL，Vendor， whose address is in the NANAHEIM COUNTY OF ORANGE，State OF California，intends to sell T. R. WARDEN T. M. WARDEN，a partnership，Vendor， whose address is in the NANAHEIM COUNTY OF ORANGE，State OF California，intends to sell T. R. WARDEN T. M. WARDEN，a partnership，Vendor， whose address is in the NANAHEIM COUNTY OF ORANGE，State OF California，intends to sell T. R. WARDEN T. M. WARDEN，a partnership，Vendor， whose address is in the NANAHEIM COUNTY OF ORANGE，State OF California，intends to sell T. R. WARDEN NOTICE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That WAULT MISTAL，Vendor， wh whose address is in the NANAHEIM COUNTY OF ORANGE，State OF California，intends to sell T. R. WARDEN T. M. WARDEN，a partnership，Vendor， wh whose address is in the NANAHEIM COUNTY OF ORANGE，State OF California，intends to sell T. R. WARDEN NOTICE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That WAULT MISTAL，Vendor， wh whose address is in therNAHEIM COUNTY OF ORANGE，State OF California，intends to sell T. R. WARDEN NOTICE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That WAULT MISTAL，Vendor， wh whose address is in therNAHEIM COUNTY OF ORANGE，State OF California，intends to sell T. R. WARDEN NOTICE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That WAULT MISTAL，Vendor， wh whose address is in therNAHEIM COUNTY OF ORANGE，State OF California，intends to sell T. R. WARDEN NOTICE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That WAULT MISTAL，Vendor， wh whose address is in therNAHEIM COUNTY OF ORANGE，State OF California，intends to sell T. R. WARDEN NOTICE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That WAULT MISTAL，Vendor， wh whose address is in therNAHEIM COUNTY OF ORANGE，State OF California，intends to sell T. R. WARDEN NOTICE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That WAULT MISTAL，Vendor， wh whose address is in therNAHEIM COUNTYOFORANGE ，StateOfCalifornia,intendsto sellT.R.WARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDDENTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWARDNTWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTWDWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTDTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWTO DTWO DTWTO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO DTWO NOTICE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That Larry L. Fields，Vendor， wh whose address is in NANAHEIM COUNTY OF ORANGE，State Of California，intends to sell firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at Suiney,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at SuINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at SuINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at SuINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at SuINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at SuINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at SuINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at SUINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at SUINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at SUINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livestock business at SUINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livstock business at SUINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livstock business at SUINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livstock business at SUINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livstock business at SUINEY,Cypress,California,and that fialture,firm for buying,selling,a dealing in livstock business ATSUINEY,CYPRESSCALIFORNIA, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexation to call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexation to call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexation to call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexation to call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexation to call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexation to call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexation to call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexation to call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexation to call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexation to call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexation to call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexation to call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexationto call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexationto call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexationto call their purpose to submit a proposal to new land purchase by said county authority, notice to all stock owners having perfornce to such proposed annexationto call their purposeto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a proposalto submit a notice TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTICETO NOTICE TO NOTICE TO NOTiceTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NoticeTo NOTICE To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice To not notice NOTICE TO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTICETO NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Note Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes notes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes otes Note Note Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes Notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes .notes Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note :Note : Notices : Notices : Notices : Notices : Notices : Notices : Notices : Notices : Notices : Notices : Notices : Notices : Notices : Notices : Notices : Not No other car like a wi like a wi Wheels are 5 inches farther ap Gives you a steadier BEE YOUR LOCAL AUTHORIZED CASEY-BECKHAM PONTIAC BEE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that day of March, 1659, at the 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the council Chamber in the City the City of Anaheim be, and is here fixed, and placed when and where the council will hear protests made owner or owners of real property in the territory proposed annexed; and that at any time one hour set for hearing obj any owner of property with territory may file with the clerk a written protest against exaction. Said protest shall begging and shall cause the name of the property affected description and area of the in general terms. FURTHER RESOLVED that Clerk be, and she is hereby, directed and directed to cause a week, in a newspaper circulation, published in the city: The Anaheim Gazette, Anaheim, Orange County, Calif., and that such publication is completed at least twenty prior to the date of hearin above specified. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City Clerk of the City be, and she is hereby, directed and directed to cause notice of such proposed annexation be situated such person whom land within the territory proposed to be annexed is said in the last equalized county rent roll available, on the dateceedings were initiated, at the shown on said assessment known to said City Clerk, any person who has filed his address and the designations in which he has any legal or equitable. Said Clerk, and is there within the territory proposed to be annexed to the City of it is owned by a County, the Clerk of the City of Anaheim also cause written notice of proposed annexation to be submitted to the Board of Supervisors County. The foregoing no address is 297 Spruce Drive, In City of Anaheim, County of Oran State of California, intends to to William H. Dunlap, Vendee, wh address is 1106 El Terraza Drive, City of Whittier, County of Angeles, State of California, following described personal property to-wit: All stood in trade, fixtures, equipment and good will of a certain OF SAID TERRITORY TO THE Anaheim must be in writing filed with the City Clerk of Anaheim at any time than the hour and date set forth for the hearing of objection to the resolution to be published once a week for two days to the date hereinabove the hearing of protests and to said election and the sale of said territory to the Anaheim, in the Anaheim G-news paper of general circulation in Anaheim, County of Orange of California. FOREGOING RESOLUTION and approved by me this February 1958. M. WILLIAMS CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM NINE M. WILLIAMS, City of Anaheim, held 6th day of February, 1959, by drawing vote of the members COUNCILMEN: Borden, Anson and Schutte COUNCILMEN: None I FURTHER CERTIFY that favor of the City of Anaheim and signed Resolution 6th day of February, 1959. TNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim on day of February, 1959. IS HEREBY GIVEN: ALTER MISTAL, Vendor, address is 617 GROVE AVE., City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, in the City of PLACENOUNDER OF ORANGE, State of California, the following described property, to-wit: In trade, fixtures, equipment and good will of a certain RE-GASOLINE SERVICE STA-Business, known as STATE AND COUNTRY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, in the City of Anaheim, State of Orange, County of Orange. STALL Gasoline Service Station business, known as Field's Shell Service, and located at 1200 E. Center St., in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, and that a sale, transfer and assignment of the same will be made, and the contract will be paid at 10:00 o'clock A.M., on the 4th day of March, 1959, at the escrow department of Westward Escrow Co., at 1715 Atlantic, in the City of Long Beach, County of Los Angeles, State of California. DATED February 5, 1959. Lile L. Fields, Vendor Westward Escrow Co. 1715 Atlantic Long Beach California Escrow No. 2619 (Pub. Anaheim Gazette Feb. 5, 12, 19 and 26, 1959.) NO. A-22586 ORDER TO CAUSE FOR CHANGE OF NAME IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE In the Matter of the Application of A. ROBERT DWORK and DOROTHY J.DWORK for Change of Names. WHEREAS, the application of A. Robert Dwork and Dorothy J.Dwork was filed with the Clerk of this Court, and it appearing from such application that said applicants desire to have their names changed to the proposed names of A. Robert Stevens and Dorothy J. Stevens, respectively. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered and directed that all persons interested in the said matter of change of names above entitled Court, in Department 3 thereof, on the 6th day of March, 1959, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock A.M., then and there to show cause, if any they have, why the application for change of names should not be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order be published once every week prior to the date above set for the hearing of said application in the Anaheim Gazette, a newspaper of general circulation; printed and published in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, Dated January 27, 1959. Raymond Thompson Presiding Judge of said Superior Court. (Pub. Anaheim Gazette Feb. 5, 12 and 19, 1959.) NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE T. O. No. 52-2236 On Tuesday March 3, 1959, at 11:00 A.M., TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, as duly appointed Trustee under and pursuant to Deed of Trust dated July 19, 1955, executed by FRANZ RAYMANN DEANEFF and DONNA HORNEF his wife, and recorded August 10, 1955 in book 2168 page 409 or implied, regarding title possession or encumbrances, to pay the remaining principal sum of the note secured by said Deed, to-wit: 112-619.50 with interest from May 1, 1958, as in said note provided advances if any, under the terms of said Deed of Trust, fees charges and expenses of the Trustee and of the Trustee by said Deed. The beneficiary under said Deed of Trust, by reason of a breach or fault in the obligations secured thereby, heretofore executed and delivered to the undersigned written Declaration of Default and Demand for Sale and written notice of breach and of election to cause the undermined to sell proper property solely applicable after October 21, 1958; thus underaged caused said notice of breach and of election to be recorded on book 4468 page 460, of said Official Records. Date: Feb. 2, 1958. TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY as said Trustee. By C. J. TIGHE. Assistant Secretary CR-1900 (NOTE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That Edward M. Myers, Vendor whose address is Chapman and Dale Street in the City of Garden Grove County of Orange, State of California,intends to sell to J.C. Long,Vende whose address is Chapman and Dale Street in the City of Garden Grove County of Orange State of California,the following described personal property.to-wit: All stock in trade,fixtures,equipment and good will.of a certain Service Station business,known as Ed's Flying "A" Service and located at Chapman and Dale Street in the City of Garden Grove County of Orange State of California,C.E.Bishop,Vende Agent Tidewater Oil Company Date:D February 6, 1959. (NOTE OF INTENDED SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: That F.C.NEETE,Vendorwhose address is 14622 Harper Streetin the City Midway City Countyof OrangeStateofCalifornia,intendsto selltoJOHN M.LIGER,Vendewhose address is 15141 Huntington Beach Blvd.,in the City MidwayCityCountyofCalifornia,thefollowingdescribedpersonalproperty.to-wit: HELP WANTED Volunteer Workers for Heart Fund Drive in Anaheim Volunteer needed for organizing door-to-door campaign in Anaheim, Sunday, February 22 If you are willing to help in this worthy cause, Telephone Mrs. Wesolek at PR 4-2222 OR return this blank to Mrs. Wm. Wesolek, 1514. E Center, Anaheim— Mrs. Wesolek: I will be glad to assist you: Name ___ Address ___ Phone ___ ner car clings to curves like a wide-track Pontiac! AMERICA'S NUMBER 1 ROAD CAR 5 inches farther apart. This widens the stance, not the car. Helps you a steadier, balanced, road-hugging ride. LOCAL AUTHORIZED PONTIAC DEALER FOR A ROAD TEST TODAY, NIAM PONTIAC 336 S. LOS ANGELES ST. — ANAHEIM PHONE KEYSTONE 3-3121