anaheim-gazette 1929-08-01

THE TOWN DOCTOR (The Doctor of Towns) SAYS "Thank You" are a Means to Much Business. here is a cigar store I know where you will give you back the amount of or purchase if the clerk falls to say, thank you." there was a string of drug stores in cage that appeared to make it it of not saying, "Thank you"—were forced to sell out at a loss. here is nothing that grates on my eyes quite as much as to pay a check a bill, or present legal tender in ment of purchase, and have the plent of my money fall to express appreciation for the patronage exiled. And there are millions ofers just like me. one of the most successful mercantile business concerns in the country built its business on the motto, "It only natural to trade where you are best." Some cash register company might do good if they put a bank you" on their register, like koos on clocks. y shouldn't the customer be thank-If one man gave another a dollar the receiver didn't even grunt to w appreciation, you'd call him an grateful cuss and a poor specimen humanity; yet, many a sale at a profit equivalent to much more, is accepted with the the air of "Well, it's coming to me." That is mighty poor business, or else inexcusable ignorance. The cheery "Thank you," "Call again," or some other such card on the inside of the door, or over the cash register, shows the right spirit and helps, but isn't enough. The American public are fickle buyers, and for that reason "business goes where it is invited, and stays and comes back to the place where it is well treated and served best." There is many a business house, many a community, failing to make an expression of appreciation for patronage extended, that is thereby driving customers to its competition, for it isn't always what is done, but what is left undone that counts. "Thank You" never drove business from any store or community, but lack of them has cost many thousands upon thousands of dollars. Copyright, 1929, A. D. Stone. Reproduction prohibited in whole or in part. This Town Doctor article is published by The Gazette in co-operation with the Anaheim Lions Club. board Replies To Col. Finley (Continued from Page One) H. C. HEAD, R. Y. WILLIAMS, N. T. EDWARDS, W. B. WILLIAMS, H. H. HALE, A. N. SAXTON, J. A. KNAPP. Statement by Attorney Head enlarge the underground basin, especially after a heavy capping of silt is deposited over it by repeated floods. An enlargement of that basin would add to the supply for Norco, Norconian Lake, and other upper users, and would doubtless supply water in the Chino basin for the development of thousands of acres of dry land which has been prevented from taking Santa Ana river water only by a court judgment obtained by the water companies. I am not convinced that placing of openings through a dam connected with bedrock would permit the free percolation of that underground water, not obstructed and so vital to Orange county. Mr. Browning's suggestion of a dam provement of Newport harbor with the half million dollars of money already invested in this provement. There is much harping on the "The People Have Spoken." True what have they said? Some said because they were convinced the site was chosen; some because will oppose any bonds unless No harbor is taken care of; some because their locality is not as to water or floods by the proposed plan (a mistake to include La Habra district); some because they can want their land in Santa Ana o taken by the district, and fact greater number because they pre risk flood damage and water sh rather than increase their taxes. have the people spoken, and m those who voted "No" would vote same way-on bonds for a dam at Comes now Editor Burke of the Ana Register and in a long article plaining his "Now Colonel" letter hold he makes me the goat of the proceeding! According to Mr. I am the fellow who would not Bailey locate the "dam at Prad made him select the lower site; did it because that was to the in of those bad water companies. He accuses me of serving two men Those are harsh words, brother utterly false. There were no two ters—there was no conflict of interest between the water companies and district as a whole; in fact, as shown, the interest of the water panies is the same as that of users of water from the Santa river basin. Neither the director of stockholders of the Anaheim Water company, for which I amney ever took any stand officials otherwise as between the two sites, and there was some d among them on that matter. N connected with either company discussed with me my position the proper site, and I took no p on that matter prior to the eng report. Had the engineers been to give assurance that there wo no shutting off of water by a d upper site, I am sure everyone nected with the two companies have preferred that site. To Col. Finley (Continued from Page One) H. C. HEAD, R. Y. WILLIAMS, N. T. EDWARDS, W. B. WILLIAMS, H. H. HALE, A. N. SAXTON, J. A. KNAPP. Statement by Attorney Head Attorney H. C. Head of Santa Ana, legal advisor of the Anaheim Union Water Co., writes the following very interesting communication: Stuart H. Lucas is president of the K-styled Water Users' Association. He uses of water is confined to that which he draws from a faucet of his home in Newport Beach, where the illspared elogan is: Swat all bonds less harbor bonds are included. Mr. Lucas has written a piece for two papers in which he accuses the county supervisors of being crooks, because he says they employed an engineer to report a plan for flood control and then "directed" the nature of that report. His statements decidedly reflect the integrity and ability of Mr. Lucy. Mr. Lucas then says that the supervisors appointed representatives of the water companies on its advisory board and employed as its attorney the attorney for the water companies, and was made the whole program "a program of the water companies rather than of the people," and (as the Santa Ana Register points out) raises a question "concerning the motives and sinity of the legal advice" of that attorney. I am the attorney whom Mr. Lucas acts in his class of crooks; and, while there are many water companies in Orange county, evidently when he speaks of "the water companies" he refers to the Santa Ana Valley Irrigation company and the Anaheim Union Water company. For many years I have been attorney for the Anaheim Union Water company, but have never been attorney for the S. A. V. I. Co. Furthermore, Judge R. Y. Williams and I acted together as advisors of the supervisors in legal matters connected with flood control, and Judge Williams was not attorney for either of the two water companies. We were not asked and offered no advice concerning the location of the proposed dam. What are these wicked water companies that Mr. Lucas and some others because of being opposed to the best interests of Orange county? They are mutual, non-profit corporations whose stockholders are the thousands of or-WATER BOND—GAL TLWO hardlists and farmers using water for irrigation in the vicilities of Tustin, Santa Ana, Orange, Olive, part of Villa Park, Placentia, Fullerton, Orange-Vorpe and Anaheim. Abuse of the water companies is abuse of the inhabitants of all that vast, highly improved and wonderfully productive rezoning. During the summer months those depended over it by repeated use of an enlargement of that basin would add to the supply for Norco, Norconian Lake, and other upper users, and would doubtless supply water in the Chino basin for the development of thousands of acres of dry land which has been prevented from taking Santa Ana river water only by a court judgment obtained by the water companies. I am not convinced that placing of openings through a dam connected with bedrock would permit the free percolation of that underground water, not obstructed and so vital to Orange county. Mr. Browning's suggestion of a dam at Prado not connected with bedrock appeals to me more, provided it would be safe. In that connection it must be remembered that we are dealing with a stream which at rare intervals becomes a raging torrent, not merely for a few days, but for weeks and even months. A failure of the dam at such a time of heaviest stress must result in awful calamity and destruction. And with such a dam, there still remains the question of what effect the resulting capping of silt would have. There is rising water and surface flow at the vicinity of Prado only because the soil to bedrock is so saturated with percolating water that some of the water mut rise and flow to the surface. Fine, closely packed slit of sufficient thickness is almost impervious. We cannot use the early flow of storm water on the spreading basins for conservation of water because it carries so much silt that it would soon render the spreading grounds impervious to water. A thick coat of silt over the basin above a surface dam at Prado would surely offer real obstruction to the rising of water to the surface; it could not percolate faster underground, and therefore must back up and enlarge the underground basin, with the result of loss of water to Orange county as before stated. Mr. Browning's statements about loss by evaporation are true, though I think our water measurements indicate it is not nearly so great as he believes. He also makes the mistake of taking a elap at those wicked water companies. The standing stagnant water he sees near Prado is not on land owned by the companies, and they have been trying to find a remedy for that condition, but are unable to do so without buying the land at exorbitant prices. The directors have been considering for years the tilting of the Prado lands to prevent loss by evaporation, but the cost of that has been considered beyond the means of the companies. The foregoing, Mr. Lucas indicates some of the problems considered in connection with locating a dam at Prado. There were many others also affecting the whole district and not particularly the water companies; such as the right of the district by condemnation proceedings to take and relocate and rebuild many miles of highway and many bridges in other counties, and the resulting cost; the delay and the cost in acquiring eight to nine thousand acres of land in other counties, largely by condemnation; the probability of that land being subjected to a heavy tax burden, either under present law. Mr. Browning's suggestion of a dam at Prado not connected with bedrock appeals to me more, provided it would be safe. In that connection it must be remembered that we are dealing with a stream which at rare intervals becomes a raging torrent, not merely for a few days, but for weeks and even months. A failure of the dam at such a time of heaviest stress must result in awful calamity and destruction. And with such a dam, there still remains the question of what effect the resulting capping of silt would have. There is rising water and surface flow at the vicinity of Prado only because the soil to bedrock is so saturated with percolating water that some of the water mut rise and flow to the surface. Fine, closely packed slit of sufficient thickness is almost impervious. We cannot use the early flow of storm water on the spreading basins for conservation of water because it carries so much silt that it would soon render the spreading grounds impervious to water. A thick coat of silt over the basin above a surface dam at Prado would surely offer real obstruction to the rising of water to the surface; it could not percolate faster underground, and therefore must back up and enlarge the underground basin, with the result of loss of water to Orange county as before stated. Mr. Browning's statements about loss by evaporation are true, though I think our water measurements indicate it is not nearly so great as he believes. He also makes the mistake of taking a elap at those wicked water companies. The standing stagnant water he sees near Prado is not on land owned by the companies, and they have been trying to find a remedy for that condition, but are unable to do so without buying the land at exorbitant prices. The directors have been considering for years the tilting of the Prado lands to prevent loss by evaporation, but the cost of that has been considered beyond the means of the companies. The foregoing, Mr. Lucas indicates some of the problems considered in connection with locating a dam at Prado. There were many others also affecting the whole district and not particularly the water companies; such as the right of the district by condemnation proceedings to take and relocate and rebuild many miles of highway and many bridges in other counties, and the resulting cost; the delay and the cost in acquiring eight to nine thousand acres of land in other counties, largely by condemnation; the probability of that land being subjected to a heavy tax burden, either under present law. Mr. Browning's suggestions about an enlargement of that basin would add to the supply for Norco, Norconian Lake, and other upper users, and would doubtless supply water in the Chino basin for the development of thousands of acres of dry land which has been prevented from taking Santa Ana river water only by a court judgment obtained by the water companies. I am not convinced that placing of openings through a dam connected with bedrock would permit the free percolation of that underground water, not obstructed and so vital to Orange county. Mr. Browning's suggestion of a dam at Prado not connected with bedrock appeals to me more, provided it would be safe. In that connection it must be remembered that we are dealing with a stream which at rare intervals becomes a raging torrent, not merely for a few days, but for weeks and even months. A failure of the dam at such a time of heaviest stress must result in awful calamity and destruction. And with such a dam, there still remains the question of what effect the resulting capping of silt would have. There is rising water and surface flow at the vicinity of Prado only because the soil to bedrock is so saturated with percolating water that some of the water mut rise and flow to the surface. Fine, closely packed slit of sufficient thickness is almost impervious. We cannot use the early flow of storm water on the spreading basins for conservation of water because it carries so much silt that it would soon render the spreading grounds impervious to water. A thick coat of silt over the basin above a surface dam at Prado would surely offer real obstruction to the rising of water to the surface; it could not percolate faster underground, and therefore must back up and enlarge the underground basin, with the result of loss of water to Orange county as before stated. Mr. Browning's suggestions about an enlargement of that basin would add to the supply for Norco, Norconian Lake, and other upper users, and would doubtless supply water in the Chino basin for the development of thousands of acres of dry land which has been prevented from taking Santa Ana river water only by a court judgment obtained by the water companies. But owners of property anywhere can whether it be at Garden Grove or Buena Park. But why do you always been considered one more Judge Williams, Mr. Burke best lawyers, and was never accepted being anybody's a "yes man." In fact, Editor Burke's effort some deep political plot in contrast with this flood control matter is Our supervisors are honest men; from different sections ofthe cityand each seoulous forthe bestofthe whole county.I think rnof them resides in territory sithwater throughthetwowaterspanies.orisastockholderinIfThere were any "politics"ofany heardofit,andiftherehadanconnectionwiththematter.IthinkIwouldhavelearnedofit. In answer to one of Mr.Istatements,let me say that I did that I received no pay for me as one ofthe attorneysfortheControlDistrict OnthepublicstatedthatJudgeWilliamsIwerepaidfourourservices;thatisparingtheresolutioncallingthenoticeofelectionandtheballot.I further stated thatIwouldpayforanyworkIdidduringelectioncampaign,thatIhaveacceptedpayforanypartItthepublicquestions,andthatnooneorcandictateinfleisurepositioninsuchmatters. I wish to compliment Mr.Burke not hesitating to indulge in peacetime.Iwouldm ratherreclaippinginthefacethanastablebackandhave.nouseforcowainsuctions. It is conceded that only preventing flood damage by any servingthestormwatersoftheAnahiverinOrangecounty.isconstructionofa giganticdamlowerSanta Ana canyon,andaretwoavailablesitesfortheoneatPradoandoneatthelowestwaterburden,eitherunderpresentlawdeepenedoveritbyrepeatnecessaryproblemswithsupplyingthestormwatersoftheAnahiemetalcompany.forwhichIamnevertookanyofficialotherthanweevertookanyofficialotherthanweevertookanyofficialotherthanweevertookanyofficialotherthanweevertookanyofficialotherthanweevertookanyofficialotherthanweevertookanyofficialotherthanweevertookanyofficialotherthanweevertookanyofficialotherthanweevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficialotherthanwevertookanyofficial其他方面没有问题。 What are these wicked water companies that Mr. Lucas and some others cause of being opposed to the best interests of Orange county? They are mutual, non-profit corporations whose stockholders are the thousands of or-WATER BOND—GAL TLWO hardists and farmers using water for irrigation in the vicinities of Tustin, Santa Ana, Orange, Olive, part of Villa Park, Placentia, Fullerton, Orange Grope and Anaheim. Abuse of the water companies is abuse of the inhabitants of all that vast, highly improved and wonderfully productive region. During the summer months those companies pump more water than they derive from surface flow of the river; the interests of their stockholders in food control and water conservation matters are identical with those of other inhabitants of the county. In fact for many years and at burdensome expense to their stockholders, these two water companies have fought for the preservation of the water rights of nearly all of Orange county by extensive litigation to prevent unlawful appropriation of water above us, and by purchasing and holding under bursome some taxation several thousand acres of water bearing land near Prado in Riverside and San Bernardino counties. It would be a great relief to the water companies if the flood control district could take over that Prado land and relieve them of an investment of many thousands of dollars and a heavy annual tax burden; and it would be a very fair thing to do, for nearly all of the water supply of the greater part of Orange county comes through and from that land. It would be very much on the advantage of the water companies if the proposed dam be located at Prado, provided the dam would not cut off part of our water supply. That is the main question involved in that location, and it affects not merely the two water companies, but most of the county. The fairest and most sensible communication on the subject since the bond election was that of Mr. Brownling, in which he fairly stated at least part of his objections to the lower site and outlined his plan for a dam at Prado which would not retard the underground flew. Any structure which would retard that flow would surely The foregoing, Mr. Lucas indicates some of the problems considered in connection with locating a dam at Prado. There were many others also affecting the whole district and not particularly the water companies; such as the right of the district by condemnation proceedings to take and relocate and rebuild many miles of highway and many bridges in other counties, and the resulting cost; the delay and the cost in acquiring eight to nine thousand acres of land in other counties, largely by condemnation; the probability that land being subjected to a heavy tax burden, either under present law or an amendment to the law. These and many other problems were freely and openly discussed in many meetings of the supervisors and the advisory committee (only two of whom were directors of the water companies), and by the engineers, including the Orange County Engineers' Association, as well as the three outfitting expert engineers. They were all very properly considered in determining the dam location. Col. S. H. Finley was present at many of those meetings, and I never heard of his saying anything at those meetings to indicate his belief that the Prado site should be selected. In his report Mr. Bailey was submitting a plan for flood control and not writing a belief as between two dam sites. That report is the honest report of a capable engineer, approved by other capable and disinterested engineers. There was no fraud or undue influence connected with it. "To be is human," Mr. Lucas, and it is really unkind of you and Col. Finley to charge to crookiness and dishonesty the opinions of those who have faith in the Bailey plan even though you think they are mistaken. There is constant mention of that Lippincott report on which the supervisors was $3,600.00 of county money. It is merely a compilation of statistics and facts, almost of which were well known it was made. It does not submit any flood control plan which could be the basis of a bond election under the flood control district act. Mr. Lippincott merely pointed out the availability of the Prado site for a dam as others had done before. The report was of no practical value to Orange county, and the money paid for it would have been better invested in the im- I wish to compliment Mr. Buck not hesitating to indulge in petites. I would much rather reckon in the face than a stab back and have no use for cowardies. It is conceded that the only preventing flood damage by any serving the storm waters of the Ana river in Orange county, is construction of a gigantic dam lower Santa Ana canyon, and there are two available sites for this one at Prado and one at the low I predict that there will be nothing wrong about the matter uber confronted with calamity or water shortage; then, in a par will vote bonds for a dam some When that is done, if the bonds sold, it will be at least ten years any dam can be completed. The test of the act and of the bonds tested by court action. Then must be thousands of acres of land acquired, most of it by condemnation and highways and railways taken by suit. All this will receive five years and must precede construction work, which it require five years. Even if cost of the dam is followed by we will require a number of years operation to appreciably replenish basin, for it is large and surheavy draft, Meantime, Rivera San Bernardino counties are made form a district of their own and to catch the storm water far ahead to which we cannot object so we are not prepared to hard share. What will happen to county requires no prophet to come. I hope I am a false prophet make that prophecy because I have learned of water condition of human nature, and in spite fact that my good friend, Jim Janssen uses that notwithstanding official records of fast lowering levels through wet years and regardless of what we have experienced in flood damage, nevertheless not be alarmed for there will water shortage or flood damage he proposes to take time and do some investigating by some holes in the bedrock with inch augur. True, we have ANAHEIM GAZETTE ment of Newport harbor along the half million dollars of county property already invested in that im-ment. There is much harping on the theme "People Have Spoken." True, and have they said? Some said "No," because they were convinced the wrong was chosen; some because they suppose any bonds unless Newport is taken care of; some because locality is not as to water supply goods by the proposed plan (it was mistake to include La Habra in the district); some because they do not their land in Santa Ana canyon by the district, and far the number because they prefer to flood damage and water shortage than increase their taxes. Thus the people spoken, and most of who voted "No" would vote the way-on bonds for a dam at Prado. Now Editor Burke of the Santa Register and in a long article ex-ing his "Now Colonel" letter, be-come makes me the goat of the whole flooding! According to Mr. Burke, the fellow who would not let Mr. locate the dam at Prado and him select the lower site; and I believe that was to the interest these bad water companies. He even mess me of serving two masters! We are harsh words, brother, but my false. There were no two mas- there was no conflict of interest when the water companies and the fact as a whole; in fact, as before, the interest of the water com- is is the same as that of other of water from the Santa Ana basin. Neither the directors nor stockholders of the Anaheim Union company, for which I am attor- ever took any stand officially or otherwise as between the two dam and there was some division among them on that matter. No one acted with either company ever passed with me my position as to proper site, and I took no position at matter prior to the engineer's visit. Had the engineers been able to assure that there would be cutting off of water by a dam at proper site, I am sure everyone con- died with the two companies would preferred that site. HOPE HOSE gations, the payment of note dated November 15th, unable to INTERSTATE COMPANY, or order, for sum of $1700.00, with in- vember 15th, 1928, at the per cent per annum, partly; and WHEREAS, default has that the interest due on February 15th, 1929, has and WHEREAS, Interstate pany, owner and holder heretofore demanded ther sell said property and 1929, duly recorded in the County Recorder of sive Book 266, page 276 of thereof, a notice of sale of its election to cause to be sold and more than have now elapsed since of said notice. The s principal, and interest November 15th, 1928, ing and unpaid on said is also secured by said the Trustee' feet and e amounting to $173.00. NOW, THEREFORE HEREBY GIVEN that the County Title Company, authority vested in it as said Deed of Trust, will auction, to the highest lawful money of the U.S. the 24th day of August hour of eleven o'clock day, at the South door County Court House Santa Ana, California, interest conveyed to it by Trust in and to all the described property situated city of Orange, State of scribed as follows, to-w That portion of B eight (28) of Buena P on a Map recorded on page 50 of Miscellan- of Los Angeles Coun- described as follows: Parcel 1. Beginning which is 30 feet North East and 104.69 feet 30". West from the N ner of Lot Seventeenen "C" of "Tract No. 77 on a Map recorded in Stockholders of the Anaheim Union company, for which I am attornever took any stand officially or otherwise as between the two dam and there was some division among them on that matter. No one acted with either company ever passed with me my position as to proper site, and I took no position at matter prior to the engineer's. Had the engineers been able to assure that there would be nutting off of water by a dam at proper site, I am sure everyone condied with the two companies would preferred that site. There was never any talk or threat allegation with the water companies dam were located at Prado. The best approach to that was when we knew were asked if the district be held liable for damage if it had a dam at Prado and it cause a flood at crops. Our answer was it could if those facts were proved, question and answer applied not to the water companies, but to the laws of property anywhere in the area affected by that condition, then it be at Garden Grove, Orange Juvenile Park. But why do you ignish been considered one of our Judge William, Mr. Burke? He lawyers, and was never accused of anybody's a "yes man." Fact, Editor Burke's effort to find deep political plot in connection this flood control matter is absurd supervisors are honest men, coming different sections of the county, each seoulous for the best interest whole county. I think not one them resides in territory supplied water through the two water commons, or is a stockholder in either. There were any secret meetings or were any "politics" of any kind of it, and if there had been connection with the matter, I never would have learned of it. Answer to one of Mr Burke's comments, let me say that I never that I received no pay for my work one of the attorneys for the Flood Control District On the contrary, I clearly stated that Judge Williams and are paid for our services; that those ended when we finished pregning the resolution calling the election of election and form of it. I further stated that I was not for any work I did during bond campaign, that I have never posted pay for any part. I take on questions, and that no one, client either, can dictate or influence my opinion in such matters. Wish to compliment Mr. Burke on hesitating to indulge in personalition. I would much rather receive a in the face than a stab in the hand have no use for cowardly intentions. KATHLEEN COOK, of Fullerton, calls attention to the forthcoming convention of the California State Firemen's Association at Fullerton, August 7, 8 and 9, by displaying a fire helmet and belt more than 100 years old. They are the property of the Balboa fire department and once graced the manly figure of a Bordentown, Pa., fireman. bored lots of holes and know that the bedrock is safe and solid at both sites; but there is one peculiar virtue in that three-inch augur, so he must use it. Be careful, Jim, you might bore too far through the hotel. H.-C. HEAD. Josephus Daniels says that within ten years Uncle Sam will be in the League of Nations, or something just like it, which indicates that Josephus is about as good a prophet as Boston is a baseball team. NOTICE OF SALE OF REAL PROPERTY BY TRUSTEE UNDER DEED OF TRUST. WHEREAS, CHARLES D. SANDERSON and EVA L. SANDERSON, husband and wife, by Deed of Trust dated November 15th, 1929, in Book 248, page 247 of Official Records, of Orange County, California, did grant and convey the property therein and hereinafter described, to Orange County Title Company, as Trustee, to secure, among other oblifity. Parcel 1. Beginning which is 30 feet North East and 104.68 feet 30" West from the Nearer of Lot Seventeen "C" of "Tract No. 77" on a Map recorded in 6 of Miscellaneous Maps of Orange County. Point being in the Western Avenue, as map of Buena Park (on said center line and 30" West as shown on Tract No. 770); run North 57° 01' West; the true point of begin-land herein described; said true point of be-32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East 161.36'South 73° 48'45'"Ethence South 32° 59'East PRINTING Whatever your Job printing needs may be, we can take care of both large and small jobs at very low prices. We turned out promptly—no waiting. Come in and consult us on your printing problems. Estimates cheerfully furnished. Anaheim Gazette gations, the payment of one promissory note dated November 15th, 1928, payable to INTERSTATE FINANCE COMPANY, or order, for the principal sum of $1700.00, with interest from November 15th, 1928, at the rate of eight per cent per annum, payable quarterly; and WHEREAS, default has occurred in that the interest due on said note on February 15th, 1929, has not been paid; and WHEREAS, Interstate Finance Company, owner and holder of said note, heretofore demanded that said Trustee sell said property and on April 26th, 1929, duly recorded in the office of the County Recorder of said County, in Book 266, page 276 of Official Records thereof, a notice of said default and of its election to cause said property to be sold and more than three months have now elapsed since the recordation of said notice. The sum of $1700.00 principal, and interest thereon from November 15th, 1928, is now due, owing and unpaid on said note, and there is also secured by said Deed of Trust the Trustee' feet and expenses of sale, amounting to $173.00. NOW, THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said Orange County Title Company, by virtue of the authority vested in it as Trustee under said Deed of Trust, will sell at public auction, to the highest bidder for cash, lawful money of the United States, on the 24th day of August, 1929, at the hour of eleven o'clock A.M., of said day, at the South door of the Orange County Court House in the City of Santa Ana, California, all of the interest conveyed to it by said Deed of Trust in and to all the following described property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: That portion of Block Twenty-eight (28) of Buena Park, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 18, page 50 of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, California, described as follows: Parcel 1. Beginning at a point which is 30 feet North 89° 33' 30" East and 104.69 feet North 0° 26' 30" West from the Northeast corner of Lot Seventeen (17) in Block "C" of "Tract No. 770," as shown on a Map recorded in Book 24, page on a Map recorded in Book 24, page 6 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California, said line being in the center of Western Avenue, as shown on said Map of Buena Park (bearings based on said center line as North 0° 26' 30" West as shown on said map of Tract No. 770); running thence North 57° 01' West 357.98 feet to the true point of beginning of the land herein described; thence from said true point of beginning North 32° 59' East 188.39 feet; thence South 73° 43' 45" East 46.98 feet; thence South 32° 59' West 201.90 feet; thence North 57° 01' West 45 feet to the true point of beginning. Parcel 4. Beginning at a point which is 30 feet North 89° 33' 30" East and 104.69 feet North 0° 26' 30" West from the Northeast corner of Lot Seventeen (17) in Block "C" of "Tract No. 770," as shown on a Map recorded in Book 24, page on a Map recorded in Book 24, page 6 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California, said line being in the center of Western Avenue, as shown on said Map of Buena Park (bearings based on said center line as North 0° 26' 30" West as shown on said map of Tract No. 770); running thence North 57° 01' West 312.98 feet to the true point of beginning. That portion of Block Twenty-eight (28) of Buena Park, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 18, page 50 of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, California, described as follows: Parcel 1. Beginning at a point which is 30 feet North 89° 33' 30" East and 104.69 feet North 0° 26' 30" West from the Northeast corner of Lot Seventeen (17) in Block "C" of "Tract No. 770," as shown on a Map recorded in Book 24, page 6 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, California, said point being in the center line of Western Avenue, as shown on said map of Buena Park (bearings based on said center line as North 0° 26' 30" West as shown on said map of Tract No. 770); running thence North 57° 01' West 447.98 feet to the true point of beginning of the land herein described; thence from said true point of beginning North 32° 59' East 161.36 feet; thence South 73° 48' 45" East 46.98 feet; thence South 32° 59' West 174.88 feet; thence North 57° 01' West 45 feet to the true point of beginning. Parcel 2. Beginning at a point which is 30 feet North 89° 33' 30" East and 104.69 feet North 0° 26' 30" West from the Northeast corner of Lot Seventeen (17) in Block "C" of "Tract No. 770," as shown which is 30 feet North 89° 33' 30" East and 104.69 feet North 0° 26' 30" West from the Northeast corner of Lot Seventeen (17) in Block "C" of "Tract No. 770," as shown on a Map recorded in Book 18, page 50 of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, California, described as follows: Parcel 1. Beginning at a point which is 30 feet North 89° 33' 30" East and 104.69 feet North 0° 26' 30" West from the Northeast corner of Lot Seventeen (17) in Block "C" of "Tract No. 770," as shown on a Map recorded in Book 18, page 50 of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, California, described as follows: Parcel 1. Beginning at a point which is 30 feet North 89° 33' 30" East and needs may be, we can take care of that will be a delight to the eye. The printing cannot be overestimated. due of your advertising matter take care of both big and very low prices, Work promptly—no waiting. and consult us on your problems. Estimates wrfully furnished. Gazette