anaheim-gazette 1925-12-17

Engineer Opposes The Boulder Dam Government Officials Declare the Plan Impractical E. C. LaRue, hydraulic engineer of the U.S. geological survey, recommended to the senate irrigation committee that the project to build a dam at Boulder Canyon, on the Colorado river, be abandoned and that instead congress authorize building a dam at Mojave or Glen Canyon. Declaring that construction of a high dam at Boulder Canyon will result in an unnecessary waste of water to the detriment of irrigation, LaRue proposed that congress appropriate $500,000 for surveys of different sites at Glen Canyon, Mojave Bridge Canyon and other points along the river. He suggested that a dam at either Glen Canyon or Mojave be for flood control, under the general supervision of the federal power commission. LaRue also recommended that the United States negotiate a treaty with Mexico definitely fixing the amount of water from the Colorado river Mexico may use. He discouraged building of a power plant which would give Los Angeles its water by the pump system and favored the gravity system. Within 20 years, he said, one million acres will be without irrigation water if the Boulder Canyon dam is built. A high dam at Boulder Canyon cannot be made to form a unit of a comprehensive plan for the maximum development of the river, he said. Senators Hiram Johnson, California, and Key Pittman, Nevada, immediately attacked LaRue's recommendations. LaRue replied that Johnson was misinformed of the facts. Johnson said Los Angeles stands ready now to build Boulder dam by itself if congress grants the authority. "I would suggest that, when Los Angeles gets ready to build a dam by itself," LaRue said, "it first go to the federal government to get permission to the workmen of any other nation—therefore his production is greater and his wages the highest. We have an unprecedented number of newspapers and publications which keep us fully informed on local and world news. Perfection may not exist in this world, but so far as government can give liberty and protection to a people, in conjunction with freedom of thought and action, the United States has gone further than any other country. True Americans should be thankful every day for a government which makes it possible for us as a people to develop and enjoy the spiritual and material advantages which are ours. While we should be tolerant of the ideas and opinions of others we should not be led astray by doctrines preached by persons who, lacking information and understanding of the principles which have made this nation great, would substitute schemes and theories which could only detract from rather than add to the advantages and liberties which we now enjoy. Prosperity and happiness have come to this nation as the result of a minimum of government coupled with a maximum of individual opportunity. This is distinct contrast to the hardships suffering and lack of advantages which exist in countries having a maximum of government that stifles individual opportunity. Let us keep Our Country free from any experiment which would tend to radically change our time tested system of government with its unequaled record of blessings and advantages for the people. FIRE! FIRE! FIRE! How many thrilling scenes in plays fiction and real life have revolved around the terrifying cry of "fire!" When a fire starts it is like war—one never knows when it will be stopped nor what the toll will be in life and property. The National Board of Fire Underwriters in order to show the public the basic importance of fire insurance, that trade would stagnate without its safeguards and its vital place in our industrial and social scheme, is offering a prize of $1,500 for the best synopsis for Santa Fe Park Gives In his bulletin he dent W. B. Storey road gives some p comparative freight clothing and others and every day uses. This study of air on representative centers to Santa California shows t The freight on cargo to Topeka, Houston, Texas, 109 freight on a pair of ranges from 4.1 cents to Albuquerque cents to Phoenix, A The freight on an adelphia to Los Angeles costs 7.9 mills to a from Seattle to L points east of the Santa Fe, 8 mills The freight on an ncia to Santa Fe t two-thirds of a centering the especial corporation service needs citrus shipments. T and other dried fruit to points east of the mately 1 1-4 cents The freight on an iron, Ohio to Phoenix The cost of shipping weighing an average Molline, Ill., to Denver 1041 miles, is $6.19 The president corrects erroneous belief on the price he pays l the amount of freight The freight on head great bulk and more take on greater co The official quote Labor Review, puls States Department the average wholesale ducts for the eight August, 1925 was 5 for the year 1913; A high dam at Boulder Canyon cannot be made to form a unit of a comprehensive plan for the maximum development of the river, he said. Senators Hiram Johnson, California, and Key Pittman, Nevada, immediately attacked LaRue's recommendations. LaRue replied that Johnson was misinformed of the facts. Johnson said Los Angeles stands ready now to build Boulder dam by itself if congress grants the authority. "I would suggest that, when Los Angeles gets ready to build a dam by itself," LaRue said, "it first go to the federal government to get permission to build a dam that will not be out of harmony with the comprehensive plan for the development of the entire river." LaRue was smarting under the attacks made on him when he was in Los Angeles recently for advocating abandonment of the Boulder dam project and for preferring a gravity to a pump system to provide Los Angeles with water. "Of course, I could not miss the attacks," he said. "They were in big black letters on the first page there." Pittman asked him if he could conceive why Los Angeles is willing to go to Boulder Canyon for its water and power at a greater cost than at some of the other dam sites recommended by LaRue. "There are just a few engineers," LaRue said, "who want to spend $150,000,000 of the taxpayers' money. I don't think the people of Los Angeles want to do it." UNIFORM TRAFFIC LAWS Sentiment for a uniform traffic ordinance is sweeping the cities and towns of the Southland like wildfire. It seems probable that this section will be the first in the United States to have city laws governing motor vehicles conform approximately to a single standard. To introduce the proposed plan throughout Southern California, the legal department of the auto club recently sent to the attorneys for more than 200 towns and cities copies of an ordinance prepared with a view of general adoption. These attorneys were asked to consider the proposed law thoroughly and to give any assistance they could in bringing it to perfection for presentation to the law-making bodies of the various communities. Replies received so far from the attorneys to whom the law was submitted are highly favorable and many contain pertinent suggestions indicating keen interest on the part of communities and a desire to make their local laws conform with those of other communities in regulating motor vehicles. The proposed ordinance is the result of joint labors on the part of the public safety and legal departments of the Automobile Club of Southern California, aided by Dr. Miller McClintock, director of the bureau of traffic research of the University of California, Southern Branch. It is believed that a uniform law is more important in this section than any other of the country in view of the enormous number of motor vehicles owned here and the large number of touring motorists from all sections of the country. FIRE! FIRE! FIRE! How many thrilling scenes in plays fiction and real life have revolved around the terrifying cry of "fire!" When a fire starts it is like war—one never knows when it will be stopped nor what the toll will be in life and property. The National Board of Fire Underwriters in order to show the public the basic importance of fire insurance, that trade would stagnate without its safeguards and its vital place in our industrial and social scheme, is offering a prize of $1,500 for the best synopsis for a two-reel motion picture bringing out the business romance interwoven with the history and fundamentals of fire underwriting. The board does not want a script designed to sell insurance policies, but one that will interpret the business in terms of human interest understandable to everybody. The plot might involve incendiaries, insurance taxation which cripples a company, rating difficulties or other problems of business which appeal to contestant. The board retains the privilege of purchasing for $500 one other of the scenarios submitted. Scripts should be sent to National Board of Fire Underwriters, 76 William street, New York, N.Y., on or before March 1, 1926. Nearly one-fifth of the total receipts from the sale of resources of the 158 national forests in the United States for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1925 came from the 12 national forests of California, it was revealed in a bulletin received by the Automobile Club of Southern California. Of the $5,000,137 received for the sale of mature timber, grazing privileges, summer home permits and other special uses including water power in the country's national reserves, $1,271,276 will be returned to states as road and school funds for counties in which national forests are located. An additional sum of $497,182 derived from the receipts will also be spent by the forest service in building roads and trails within government forests, it is stated. The California district furnished $986,646 of the total forest service receipts, and will receive $346,133 back from the government, which is more than $100,000 above the share of any other state in the Union. Motorists planning trips to Arizona need not be lacking in detailed information regarding road conditions there since two representatives of the touring bureau of the Automobile Club of Southern California just completed charting all—the main roads in that state. In checking all the main highways of the state for changes in condition and for general touring information, George Woodward and Hugh Shy, the touring bureau men, covered 4500 miles in the charting trip of six weeks. Drafting of a new map of the state is now under way. Roads were found to be generally good in the youngest state in the Union. The most heavily traveled routes were those bringing transcontinental tourists to Southern California, the Old Spanish The proposed ordinance is the result of joint labors on the part of the public safety and legal departments of the Automobile Club of Southern California, aided by Dr. Miller McClintock, director of the bureau of traffic research of the University of California, Southern Branch. It is believed that a uniform law is more important in this section than any other of the country in view of the enormous number of motor vehicles owned here and the large number of touring motorists from all sections of the country. It has long been held a bad situation to have the laws governing motor vehicles changed with the passing of the limits of different communities as this contributes to unintentional lawbreaking and the incidental conflict with the authorities. Should the proposed uniform traffic law be generally adopted, as now seems probable, the motorist will have only one set of traffic rules to memorize and visiting tourists may travel free throughout Southern California in the knowledge that they will be governed by the same law in one town as in another. BE THANKFUL EVERY DAY Our country has enjoyed a Thanksgiving Day for which we should be truly grateful. Over the nation as a whole there is practically no unemployment. Soil products have been bountiful and farmers have generally had good prices. Our factories, mines, sawmills, transportation, insurance and utility companies have all been doing a good business and rendering a greater service to the public than at any time in the nation's history. Electric light and power, the telephone and gas service are so common to the average American family, that they are considered necessities, rather than sovelties or luxuries, as is the case in most other countries of the world. Improved and paved highways have ended isolation for the farm. Labor saving appliances are as common to the American housewife as the latest labor-saving machinery is in our factories. The American workman has more power machinery at his fingertips than ANAHEIM GAZETTE Santa Fe President Gives Freight Cost In his bulletin for December, President W. B. Storey of the Santa Fe railroad gives some practical data on the comparative freight rates on men's clothing and other articles of general and everyday use. This study of actual freight charges on representative items from producing centers to Santa Fe points, including California, shows the following: The freight on a man's suit from Chicago to Topeka, Kana, is 6.1 cents; Houston, Texas, 10.2 cents; Denver, 10.9 cents and Los Angeles, 16 cents. The freight on a pair of shoes from St. Louis ranges from 4.1 cents to Kansas; 9.1 cents to Albuquerque, N. M. and 13.2 cents to Phoenix, Ariz. The freight on a man's hat from Philadelphia to Los Angeles is 1.8 cents. It costs 7.9 mills to ship a can of salmon from Seattle to Los Angeles and all points east of the Rocky mountains on the Santa Fe, 8 mills. The freight on oranges from California to Santa Fe territory east of the Rockies is about 8 cents per dozen, or two-thirds of a cent each, notwithstanding the especial equipment and refrigeration service necessary to handle the citrus shipments. The freight on raisins and other dried fruits from California to points east of the Rockies is approximately 1 1/4 cents per pound. The freight on an auto tire from Akron, Ohio to Phoenix is only 60½ cents. The cost of shipping a sulky plow, weighing an average of 550 pounds from Moline, Ill., to Denver, a distance of 1041 miles, is $6.19. The president calls attention to the erroneous belief of the consumer that the price he pays is largely enhanced by the amount of freight paid by the merchant on heavy articles or those of great bulk and moving a long distance, take on greater cost for transportation. The official quotes from the Monthly Labor Review, published by the United States Department of Labor to show the average wholesale price of farm products for the eight months, ending with August, 1925 was 58.9 cents higher than for the year 1913; foods, 56.8 per cent In Vineyard Lot C-3, Helmann & George Tract, Southerly 104 feet of Lot 113, Block H, with improvements and personal property Coalson, V. A. In Vineyard Lot H-5, California Square, Lot 12, Block C Cole, JackIn Anaheim Extension, Parsons Subdivision, Lot 10, with improvements and personal property Covert, H. E. In Hotel del Campo Tract, Lot 31, Block F Covert, H. E. In Hotel del Campo Tract, Lot 32, Block F Craddock, RobertDavis Brothers' Addition, Southerly 40.3 feet of Westerly 24.87 feet of Lot 8, Block B; Southerly 40.3 feet of Lot 11, Block B; Northerly 2½ feet of Lot 12, Block B, with improvements Chambers, C. W., et al. In Tract No. 221, J. Lloyd Moore Subdivision, Lot 4, Block 2 Chambers, C. W., et al. In Tract No. 224, J. Lloyd Moore Subdivision, Lot 3, Block 5 Chambers, C. W., et al. In Tract No. 221, J. Lloyd Moore Subdivision, Lot 4, Block 5 Dean, Calvin L., EstateIn Anaheim Extension Lot 48, Lot 120 x 600 feet, with improvements Donovan, C. L. In Tract No. 230, Jewett Subdivision, Lot 25 Donovan, C. L. In Tract No. 230, Jewett Subdivision, Lot Johnston, A. J. In Vineyard Lot A-2, Monte Vista Tract, Lot 29, Block A Johnston, JohnIn Anaheim Extension, Anaheim Investment Company Subdivision, Lot 55.92 x 120 feet of Lot 2, with improvements and personal property Johnston, JohnIn Anaheim Extension, Anaheim Investment Company Subdivision, Westerly 90 feet of Lot 2 Jones, Oliver A. In Vineyard Lot B-5, Park View Tract, Lot 6, Block D Kemper, John F. In Vineyard Lot A-3, Elk Park Tract, Lot 11, Block C with improvements and personal property Kenney, J. J. Davis Brothers' Addition, Westerly 25 feet of Lot 9, Block B; Southerly 10 feet of Lot 12, Block B; Northerly 30 feet of Lot 14, Block B with improvements Kidd, JuliettaIn Tract No. 221, J. Lloyd Moore Subdivision, Lot 4, Block 6 with improvements and personal property Kimmel, CathrynIn Vineyard Lot G-3, Mother Colony Square, Lot 29 with improvements and personal property Kirk, E. M. In Vineyard Lot G-5,Hess Subdivision,Lot 20,Block D with improvements and personal property Kirk, E. M. In Vineyard Lot H-5, California Square,Lot 14; Block D Kitchens, George E. Lorel Tract,Lot 5, Smith visi pro pro pro Saus,Ale In A.M.P.A. In S.M.P.A. Schmeke,Lorel In S.M.P.A. Seale,M.P.A. In T.M.P.A. Sears.W.V.I. In W.V.I. Spiller,H.V.I. In W.V.I. Sprouse,H.V.I. Stern,H.V.I. In W.V.I. SLIM'S CAFE On C. D. Campbell Ranch, one mile west of Cypress. Our Specialty is Corned Beef and Cabbage We serve Hot Lunch, Cold Drinks and carry Cigars and Tobacco. Hungry parties homeward bound from the beach at night can get an excellent lunch here. Open until midnight. F. FREEMAN, Prop'r DELINQUENT TAX LIST In Aud Fer The CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE Fiscal Year, 1925-1926. Amount of Tax and Costs Owner Tract Lot Blk., Due Beatty, J. W.— In Vineyard Lot G-3, Mother Colony Square, Lot 21 $ 8.31 Bills, F. J.— In Vineyard H-5, Palomar Tract, Lot 4 with improvements and Personal Property $ 40.15 Bonnat, Victor— In Vineyard Lot C-7., Fern Tract, Lot 6 $ 15.79 Burke, Francis D.— Chambers, C. W., et al— In Tract No 221, J. Lloyd Moore Subdivision, Lot 4, Block 5 $ 9.63 Dean, Calvin L., Estate— In Anaheim Extension Lot 48, Lot 120 x 600 feet, with improvements $ 34.00 Donovan, C. L.— In Tract No. 230, Jewett Subdivision, Lot 25 $ 5.12 Donovan, C. L.— In Tract No. 230, Jewett Subdivision, Lot 26 $ 8.17 Drews, A. L.— In Vineyard Lot F-7, Lohman Tract, Lot 14, Block B, with improvements $ 20.14 Drisner, A. M.— In Vineyard Lot H-5, California Square, Lot 6, Block B, with improvements $ 13.92 Drumm, Wm. M.— In Vineyard Lot G-7, Beverly Tract, Southerly 20 feet of Lot 21, Block A; Northerly 20 feet of Lot 22, Block A, with improvements $ 33.90 Dyckman, Fred A.— In Vineyard Lot D-5, Lot 2, Block E, with improvements $ 34.00 Dyckman, Fred A.— In Vineyard Lot G-3, Beverly Tract, Southerly 40 feet of Lot 19, Block A, with improvements $ 31.15 Folkers, B. H.— In Vineyard Lot E-6, Lot 55 x 130 feet, with improvements and personal property $ 49.01 Ford, W. B.— In Vineyard Lot A-4, Zeyn Tract Annex, Lot 19, Block E, with improvements and personal property $ 38.23 Franz, R. W.—Santa Fe Tract, Lot 21, Block 6 $ 4.35 Franz, R. W.—Santa Fe Tract, Lot 22, Block 6, with improvements and personal property $ 20.52 Fuller, Chas, W.—In Vineyard Lot B-5, Park View Tract, Lot 4, Block B, with improvements and personal property $ 62.10 Gist, F. B.—In Vineyard Lot A-2, Monte Vista Tract, Lot 8, Block D, with improvements $ 7.81 Gleason, N. H.—In Vineyard Lot C-3, Helmann & George Tract, Northernly 64.65 feet of Easterly 40 feet of Lot Lot 29, with improvements and personal property $ 18.60 Kirk, E. M.—In Vineyard Lot G-5, Hess Subdivision, Lot 20, Block D, with improvements and personal property $ 39.39 Kirk, E. M.—In Vineyard Lot H-5, California Square, Lot 14; Block D $ 9.20 Kitchens, George E.—Lorelei Tract, Lot 5, Block C with improvements and personal property $ 45.93 Kitchens, George E., Jr.—In Vineyard lot H-3 Berger Tract, Lot 6, Block D with personal property $ 11.94 Klassen, A. E.—In Original City Lot No. 55, Easterly 32.12 feet of Westerly 70.12 feet with improvements $ 42.08 Landreth, C.H.- In Vineyard Lot A-2, Monte Vista Tract, Lot 6, Block C $ 5.50 Lawrence May- In Vineyard lot G-4, Lot 116 x 298 feet with improvements $ 67.49 Liebing David- In Vineyard lot A-2, Monte Vista Tract, Lot 28, Block B $ 5.89 Long, O.V.- In Vineyard lot G-3,Mother Colony Square,Lot 27 $ 9.63 MacDonald E.- In Vineyard lot A-2,Monte Vista Tract,Lot 20,Block A with improvements and personal property $ 49.01 Maddock,A.J.- In Vineyard lot A-2,Monte Vista Tract,Lot 21,Block B $ 8.09 Massey,H.M.- In Spoerl Tract,Summerfield & Oppenheimer Subdivision.Easterly % of Lot 15,Block 1; All of Lot 16,Block 1 with improvements and personal property $ 29.22 Mattoon,Frank- In Vineyard lot H-5,Palomar Tract,Lot 13with improvements and personal property $ 39.77 Miller,R.K.- In Vineyard lot A-2,Monte Vista Tract,Lot 19,Block B $ 5.89 Musser,Harry A.-Lorelei Tract,Lot 23,Block A with improvements and personal property $ 17.83 Mollin Ill., to Denver,a distance of 1041 miles,$6.19. The president calls attention to the erroneous belief of the consumer that the price he pays is largely enhanced by the amount of freight paid by the merchant on heavy articles or those of great bulk and moving a long distance,take on greater cost for transportation. The official quotes from the Monthly Labor Review,published by the United States Department of Labor to show the average wholesale price of farm products for the eight months ending with August，1925 was 58.9 cents,higher than for the year 1913;foods，56.8 per cent higher;cloths and clothing89.7 per cent higher;fuel and lighting，71.5 per cent higher;metals and metal products，30.2 per cent higher;building materials，75-.4 per cent higher;chemicals and drugs，33.9 per cent higher;house furnishings，70.6 per cent higher;miscellaneous commodities，32 per cent higher;and for all commodities，58.8 per cent higher. The Santa Fe in 1913 received an average of one cent for hauling a ton of freight one mile,and for the eight months of this year it was l% cents,the increase of 25 per cent. Arizona conformaies there touring Club of completed in that ways of union and George touring in the setting of new under generally the Union were tourists Spanish Amount of Tax and Costs Owner Tract Lot Blk Due Beatty, J. W.— In Vineyard Lot G-3, Mother Colony Square, Lot 21 $ 8.31 Bills, F. J.— In Vineyard H-5, Palomar Tract, Lot 4 with improvements and Personal Property 40.15 Bonnat, Victor— In Vineyard Lot C-7., Fern Tract, Lot 6 15.79 Burke, Francis D.— In Vineyard Lot B-4, Zeyn Tract Annex, Lot 7, Block C, with improvements 48.24 Belden, Earl and Beaugh, Long— In Vineyard B-1, Tract No. 549, Lot 2, Block B 4.73 Belden, Earl and Beaugh, Long— In Vineyard Lot B-1, Tract No. 549, Lot 3, Block B, with improvements 16.29 Bouas, A.— In Vineyard Lot A-2, Monte Vista Tract, Lot 26, Block C, with improvements 9.74 Buck, H. G.— Lorelei Tract, Westerly ½ of Lot 7, Block C, with improvements 20.91 Buck, H. G.— Lorelei Tract, Westerly ½ of Lot 8, Block C, with improvements 29.38 Buck, H. G.— Lorelei Tract, Lot 10, Block C 4.35 Buck, H. G.— In Vineyard Lot E-5, Chestnut Street Tract, Lot 6, with improvements 35.53 Bungay, F. M.— In Hotel del Campo Tract, Lot 30, Block B 6.27 Bungay, F. M.— In Hotel del Campo Tract, Lot 31, Block B, with improvements and personal property 23.98 Christianson, J.— In Vineyard Lot A-3, Elk Park Tract, Lot 14, Block C, with improvements 32.07 Clasen, Florence— In Vineyard Lot B-5, Park View Tract, Lot 4, Block B, with improvements and personal property 62.10 Gist, F. B.— In Vineyard Lot A-2, Monte Vista Tract, Lot 8, Block D, with improvements 7.81 Gleason, N. H.— In Vineyard Lot C-3, Helmann & George Tract, Northerly 64.65 feet of Easterly 40 feet of Lot 87, Block G; Northerly 64.65 feet of Easterly 40 feet of Lot 88, Block G; Northerly 64.65 feet of Easterly 40 feet of Lot 89, Block G, with improvements 43.62 Grant, Ray D.— In Vineyard Lot B-5, Park View Tract, Lot 12, Block B, with improvements 33.61 Granger, George— In Vineyard Lot H-4, Stueckle Subdivision, Lot 18, with improvements 13.59 Hansow, W. J.— In Vineyard Lot G-6, Nut Grove Tract, Lot 8, Block B 5.99 Hayden, Henry Wm.—Santa Fe Tract, Lot 7, Block B 3.58 Hayden, Henry Wm.—Santa Fe Tract, Lot 8, Block B 6 with improvements 15.13 Hilles, Gertrude S.—In Original City Lot No. 16,Northerly 45.37 of Southerly 136.12 feet with improvements 31.68 Hittt, Thomas O.-Davis Brothers' Addition,Lot 40 x 100 feet of Lot 13,Block B; Lot 25 x 40 feet of Lot 9,Block B with improvements 15.13 Hulburt,L.-In Vineyard Lot H-5,California Square,Lot 14,Block B 8.59 Mattoon,Frank— In Vineyard Lot H-5,Palomar Tract,Lot 13with improvements and personal property 39.77 Miller,R.K.- In Vineyard Lot A-2,Monte Vista Tract,Lot 19,Block B 5.89 Musser,Harry A.-Lorelei Tract,Lot 23,Block Awith improvements and personal property 17.83 Myers.E.H.-In Vineyard lot B-3 Elliott & Anderson Subdivision,Southerly 55 feet of Lot 6,Block 3with improvements and personal property 30.92 Ochoa.J.M.-Lorelei Tract,Lot 23,Block Ewith improvements and personal property 36.30 Pearson,Chesa-In Vineyard lot A-2,Monte Vista Tract,Lot 2,Block Bwith improvements 10.18 Phillips,j.T.-In Vineyard lot G-5,Hess Subdivision,Lot 15,Block Dwith improvements 37.85 Plain Dealer,the In Original City Lot No.27Easterly40feetwithimprovementsandpersonalproperty84.43 Pressel,Carl-In Vineyard lot F-7,Lohman Tract,Lot 15,Block A7.05 RoscoeJohnQ-ReiserTract,Lot12,BlockD3.58 RoscoeJohnQ-ReiserTract,Lot13,BlockD3.58 RushAnnaR-In Hotel del Campo Tract,Smith&DeanSubdivision,Lot316.66 RushAnnaR-In Hotel del Campo Trac Smith & Dean Subdivision, Lot 32, with improvements and personal property ... 20.13 Saus, Alexander A.— In Anaheim Extension, Parsons Subdivision, Lot 16, with improvements ... 48.63 Schmekel, Chas. A.— Lorelel Tract, Lot 29, Block B, with improvements ... 28.22 Schell, Mike— In Vineyard Lot G-5, Hess Subdivision, Lot 17, Block A, with improvements ... 30.15 Seale, M. L.— In Tract No. 221, J. Lloyd Moore Subdivision, Lot 1, Block 3, with improvements and personal property ... 25.53 Sears, W. H.— In Vineyard Lot D-5, Hess Subdivision, Lot 8, Block D ... 8.47 Schastian, J. P.— In Vineyard Lot B-5, Park View Tract, Lot 2, Block C; Southerly 4 feet of Lot 3, Block C, with improvements and personal property ... 40.15 Shores, Ralph— In Tract No. 221, J. Lloyd Moore Subdivision, Lot 8, Block 3, with improvements ... 40.54 Spiller, E. A.— In Vineyard Lot A-2, Monte Vista Tract, Lot 26, Block B ... 5.89 Spiller, E. A.— In Vineyard Lot A-2, Monte Vista Tract, Lot 27, Block B ... 5.89 Sprouse, J. J.— In Vineyard Lot H-5, Palomar Tract, Lot 20, with improvements and personal property ... 27.07 Stern, Herman— In Vineyard Lot A-3, Elk Park Tract, Lot 5. Fitz, R.— North and East Anaheim Addition, Tract No. 601, Lot 32 ... 4.25 Moore, Harry E.— North and East Anaheim Addition, Tract No. 601, Lot 37, with improvements and personal property ... 9.61 McHarg, Geo. A.— North and East Anaheim Addition, Mills Park Tract, Lot 14, Block 6 ... 4.01 Rice, Katherine— North and East Anaheim Addition, Worthmore Tract Annex, Lot 12, Block C ... 5.41 Schwager, L. E.— North and East Anaheim Addition, Scenic Tract, Lot 3, with improvements and personal property ... 24.02 Shrode & Bonnat— North and East Anaheim Addition, Clementine Street Tract, Lot 17 ... 6.00 Stinson, J. A.— North and East Anaheim Addition, Clementine Street Tract Annex, Lot 1 ... 2.50 Stinson, J. A.— North and East Anaheim Addition, Clementine Street Tract Annex, Lot 2 ... 3.00 Anaheim Chamber of Commerce— North and West Anaheim Addition, Koefler Tract, Lots 5, 6, 21, 22, Block 2; Northerly 37 feet of Lots 4 and 20; Block 2; Northerly 137 feet of Lots 8, 10, 12, 14, 16; Block 2 ... 14.14 Anaheim Chamber of Commerce— North and West Anaheim Addition, Koefler Tract, All of Block 3; Northerly 37 feet of Lots 4; Block 6; All of Lots 5 and 6; In Vineyard Lot A-2, Monte Vista Tract, Lot 26, Block B ... 5.89 Spiller, E. A.— In Vineyard Lot A-2, Monte Vista Tract, Lot 27, Block B ... 5.89 Sprouse, J. J.— In Vineyard Lot H-5, Palomar Tract, Lot 20, with improvements and personal property ... 27.07 Stern, Herman— In Vineyard Lot A-3, Elk Park Tract, Lot 5, Block A ... 12.33 Stewart, R. F.— Lorelei Tract, Lot 9, Block C, with improvements and personal property ... 39.38 Swelkhardt, Emma— In Vineyard Lot A-3, Elk Park Tract, Lot 20, Block A ... 6.66 Power, C. E.— In Vineyard Lot G-5, Hess Subdivision, Lot 15, Block C, with improvements ... 37.08 Townsend, O. F.— In Vineyard Lot G-6, Nut Grove Tract, Lot 21, Block A, with improvements and personal property ... 36.69 Utterback, Mrs. Frances— In Anaheim Extension Lot 48, Groos Subdivision Annex, Lot 14 ... 12.16 Vaz, J. C.— In Vineyard Lot A-2, Monte Vista Tract, Lot 6, Block D ... 4.73 Vivian, W. A.— In Tract No. 280, Jewett Subdivision, Lot 17, with improvements ... 34.77 Whitaker, J.— In Vineyard Lot B-1, Tract No. 549, Lot 11, Block C, with improvements and personal property ... 35.15 Wilkins, Myra— In Vineyard Lot G-3, Mother Colony Square, Lot 31, with improvements and personal property ... 19.36 Wilson, Frances— In Vineyard Lot H-3, Berger Tract, Lot 4, Block A ... 12.87 Windham, C. A.— In Anaheim Extension, Tract No. 11, Lot 8 ... 8.58 Yantz, H. W.— In Boege's Subdivision of Lot 34, Villa Place Addition, Westerly ½ of Lot 2, with improvements ... 17.83 Zeyn, Miss M. S. D.— In Vineyard Lot A-4, Zeyn Tract Annex, Lot 7, Block E ... 12.88 Zeyn, Miss M. S. D.— In Vineyard Lot A-4, Zeyn Tract Annex, Lot 8, Block E ... 12.88 Anaheim Chamber of Commerce— North and West Anaheim Addition, Koeffler Tract, Lots 5, 6, 21, 22, Block 2; Northerly 37 feet of Lots 4 and 20; Block 2; Northerly 137 feet of Lots 8, 10, 12, 14, 16; Block 2 ... 14.14 Anaheim Chamber of Commerce— North and West Anaheim Addition, Koeffler Tract, All of Block 3; Northerly 37 feet of Lots 4; Block 6; All of Lots 5 and 6; Block 6; Northerly 137 feet of Lots 8, 10, 12, 14, 16; Block 6; Northerly 37 feet of Lots 20; Block 6; All of Lots 21 and 22; Block 6; All of Block 7 ... 79.18 Ruiz, Francisco— North and West Anaheim Addition, Anaheim Home Tract; Lot 28; with improvements and personal property ... 2.73 Schmidt, E. R.— North and West Anaheim Addition; Home Builders Tract; Lot 3; Block B; with improvements ... 4.14 Todd, J. A.— North and West Anaheim Addition; Home Builders Tract; Lot 7; Block C ... 4.85 Cabral, Sabes— Industrial Site Addition; Grasswell Subdivision; Lot 18; with improvements ... 6.07 Carrillo, F.— Industrial Site Addition; Schaffer-Oswald Subdivision; Lot 25; with improvements and personal property ... 4.54 Moreno, Everista— Industrial Site Addition; Grasswell Subdivision; Lot 9; with improvements and personal property ... 7.22 Perris, G.- Industrial Site Addition; Schaffer-Oswald Subdivision; Lot 24; with improvements ... 3.24 NOTICE OF TAX SALE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ( ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ( ) SS CITY OF ANAHEIM ( ) Public notice is hereby given that default having been made in the payment of taxes due the City of Anaheim for the fiscal year 1925-1926 upon the property described. I. J. S. Martin as Tax Collector in and for said City of Anaheim by virtue of the power and authority in me vested by law unless the taxes delinquent, ... STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Public notice is hereby given that default having been made in the payment of taxes due the City of Anaheim for the fiscal year 1925-1926, upon the property described. I. J. S. Martin, as Tax Collector in and for said City of Anahelm, by virtue of the power and authority in me vested by law, unless the taxes delinquent, together with the cost and percentages due thereon are paid, will on THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1926. At the hour of 10 o'clock in the forenoon of that day, commence to sell the real estate upon which said taxes are a lien, at PUBLIC AUCTION, for and on account of such delinquent taxes thereon, in my office in the City Hall, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, and that I will continue such sale from day to day (Sunday and legal holidays excepted), according to the adjournments, and between the hours of 10 o'clock a.m. and 2 o'clock p.m. of each day of sale, and at the same place, until the whole property hereinbefore set forth, or so much thereof as may be necessary; shall be sold; together with the sum of fifty (50) cents, provided by law for the certificate of sale in duplicate in each and every case. NO PROPERTY IS EXEMPT No property is exempt from seizure and sale for personal property taxes; even the homestead and house utensils are subject thereto. The law is imperative. The collector has no discretion and delinquents must suffer if they fail to pay. All the property heretofore described is in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California. Signed and dated at the said City of Anaheim, California, this 17th day of December, 1925. J. S. MARTIN, Tax Collector of the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California.