anaheim-gazette 1910-03-31

SPEAKER STANTON AS A REFORMER HIS RECORD STANDS CLEAR IN THE LIGHT OF DAY Splenetic Attacks of Franklin Hichborn, Reproduced by Lincoln-Roosevelt Newspapers, Show on Examination Utter Falsity of Their Position—Stanton Voted for Federal Line of Steamers—Was Right on Party Circle Bill, Non-Judiciary bill and Amendment to Primary Law wantonly assailing the character of a man who has been in public life in California for ten years, and never yet turned his back upon the people—not one single time. If the implied charge against Stanton, that he voted against the establishment of a federal line of ships, is true, he deserves defeat. If it is not true, the Register has wantonly published a falsehood concerning him. Let us look into these charges, as they appeared in the Register: "Stanton voted five times for reform and five times against reform, being absent during the vote on the Stanford University saloon bill. He began his record 'against reform' by supporting the notorious gag rules proposed for adoption. He voted to eliminate from the Sanford resolution the paragraph asking for the establishment by congress of a federal line of steamers; he voted for the Leeds committee on Free Conference was received and read: "Assembly Chamber, Sacramento, March 11, 1909. Mr. Speaker: Your committee on Free Conference, concerning Senate Joint Resolution No. 3, relative to transportation rates, and urging our representatives in congress to support measure granting increased powers to the Interstate Commerce Commission, report that we have met a like committee of the senate, consisting of Senators Sanford, Cutten and Black, and we report that the free conference committee agreed upon and recommended the adoption of the annexed amendments to said resolution. "Johnson of Sacramento, "Transue, "Drew, "Committee on Free Conference. "Amendment No. 1 "Strike out lines 20 and 21 on page 1, and lines 22 up to and including 30, on page 2, and insert in lieu thereof the following: "Whereas, It is important to the people of this state that a line of steamers be established between the ports of the Pacific coast and the Isthmus of Panama; and "Whereas, Senator Flint and Representative McLachlan have recently introduced in congress a bill calling for an appropriation of ten million dollars to establish a federal line of steamers on the Pacific coast; therefore, be it "Amendment No. 2 "Strike out lines 37 to 49 inclusive on page 2, and insert the following: Resolved That we recommend publicans as absolutely to all other sections of the state amendment provided for an district vote, which means smaller communities in the have an equal chance with larger cities in the choice of States senator. We approve amendment. So does the press of the state, as well rank and file of the party county could not endorse for senator, and should he candidate for United States the party's candidate who him would in all probability feated by the democratic The Speaker supported the ment, which was carried. It is merely to defend the right smaller communities in the Mr. Stanton's record upon bills was that of a true referee in taking the judge of politics, and making just points for life, as doeral government. His record and will stand the test. But cannot be successfully Mr. Hichborn and she the so-called reform push. Mr. Hichborn has not say about Mr. Stanton's position on the anti-alien bills, legislation attempt if passed would have been history of the vested rights tors in Orange county and tions of the state; nothing cutting down of the mileage trips; nothing of the $800 per day in the house of attaches, nothing of the artesian wells, nothing o Let us look into these charges, as they appeared in the Register: "Stanton voted five times for reform and five times against reform, being absent during the vote on the Stanford University saloon bill. He began his record 'against reform' by supporting the notorious gag rules proposed for adoption. He voted to eliminate from the Sanford resolution the paragraph asking for the establishment by congress of a federal line of steamers; he voted for the Leeds amendment to the direct primary bill, which he (Stanton) had introduced into the lower house; he voted to deny second reading to the Party Circle bill; and he voted against the Non-Partisan Judiciary bill." These two latter charges show Mr. Hichborn's cloven foot so conspicuously that they are treated of in another article upon this page. Mr. Stanton was the author of the Party Circle bill, which was enacted into law, seven years ago. It was a party measure. Quite naturally he refused to abolish it. If Mr. Hichborn desires to put this bill in the category of "reform measures" he is at liberty so to do, but to charge by inuendo, as he does in his book, that men voting against his ideas of reform are "owned by the railroad," is dastardly false and mendaceous. Let us take up these matters in their order: (1.) The "gag" rule. The temporary rules of the assembly were reported to the house immediately upon its convening, and Mr. Stanton, as a member of that committee, voted for them. There was nothing in issue concerning them, and at least fifteen members of the house, who were his warm personal and political friends, voted against their adoption. Had Stanton desired to enact these rules he could easily have done so. But they were defeated, and referred back to the committee on rules. Here Stanton himself personally amended them and when they were again referred to the house they were unanimously approved—with the single exception of Grove L. Johnson, father of Hiram. Mr. Johnson, it seems, was for "gag" first, last and all the time. Mr. Stanton, as a member of the committee, voted with his committee in support of the hastily prepared rules, which were only the temporary rules of the house, and had little or no time, in the multiplicity of duties confronting him, to give them that consideration which he later gave them in committee. Had steamers be established ports of the Pacific coast and the Isthmus of Panama; and "Whereas, Senator Flint and Representative McLachlan have recently introduced in congress a bill calling for an appropriation of ten million dollars to establish a federal line of steamers on the Pacific coast; therefore, be it "Amendment No. 2 "Strike out lines 37 to 49 inclusive on page 2, and insert the following: Resolved, That we recommend the speedy establishment of the line proposed in said bills introduced by Senator Flint and Representative McLachlan at as early a date as possible, in order that relief may be afforded to the manufacturers, merchants, and prouducers of this state. "Mr. Drew moved the adoption of the report and amendments. "Motion carried." The motion was carried by unanimous vote, the Speaker voting aye. The portions of the preamble stricken out are as follows: Paragraph 7. Lines stricken out: "Whereas, In a report to President elect Taft issued by their Special Panama Railroad Commissioner Joseph L. Bristow, it was recommended that the United States government establish a line of steamers on the Pacific ocean, to connect with the railroad across the Isthmus of Panama, owned by the United States government, and the line of steamers on the Atlantic ocean, owned by the United States government, and "Whereas, In the said report the Hon. Joseph L. Bristow especially charges that the Pacific Mail steamship company is dominated and controlled by the transcontinental lines, and therefore does not solicit through business via the Panama line," In paragraph 10, lines struck out: "Resolved, That we request the congress of the United States to speedily give consideration to the report of the Hon. Joseph L. Bristow, special Panama railroad commissioner, as submitted by him to President-elect Taft, and that we recommend the speedy establishment of the line at as early a date as possible, in order that relief may be afforded to manufacturers, merchants and producers of this state, and "Resolved, That we denounce the arrangement made by the Pacific Mail steamship company with the transcontinental lines whereby they have never solicited any of this through business, and urge our representatives in congress and in the United States steamers be established ports of the Pacific coast and the Isthmus of Panama; and "Whereas, Senator Flint and Representative McLachlan have recently introduced in congress a bill calling for an appropriation of ten million dollars to establish a federal line of steamers on the Pacific coast; therefore, be it "Ammendment No. 2 "Strike out lines 37 to 49 inclusive on page 2, and insert the following: Resolved, That we recommend the speedy establishment of the line proposed in said bills introduced by Senator Flint and Representative McLachlan at as early a date as possible, in order that relief may be afforded to the manufacturers, merchants, and prouducers of this state. "Mr. Drew moved the adoption of the report and amendments. "Motion carried." The motion was carried by unanimous vote, the Speaker voting aye. The portions of the preamble stricken out are as follows: Paragraph 7. Lines stricken out: "Whereas, In a report to President elect Taft issued by their Special Panama Railroad Commissioner Joseph L. Bristow, it was recommended that the United States government establish a line of steamers on the Pacific ocean, to connect with the railroad across the Isthmus of Panama, owned by the United States government, and the line of steamers on the Atlantic ocean, owned by the United States government, and "Whereas, In the said report the Hon. Joseph L. Bristow especially charges that the Pacific Mail steamship company is dominated and controlled by the transcontinental lines, and therefore does not solicit through business via the Panama line," In paragraph 10, lines struck out: "Resolved, That we request the congress of the United States to speedily give consideration to the report of the Hon. Joseph L. Bristow, special Panama railroad commissioner, as submitted by him to President-elect Taft, and that we recommend the speedy establishment of the line at as early a date as possible, in order that relief may be afforded to manufacturers, merchants and producers of this state, and "Resolved, That we denounce the arrangement made by the Pacific Mail steamship company with the transcontinental lines whereby they have never solicited any of this through business, and urge our representatives in congress and in the United States steamers be established ports of the Pacific coast and the Isthmus of Panama; and "Whereas, Senator Flint and Representative McLachlan have recently introduced in congress a bill calling for an appropriation of ten million dollars to establish a federal line of steamers on the Pacific coast; therefore, be it "Ammendment No. 2 "Strike out lines 37 to 49 inclusive on page 2, and insert the following: Resolved, That we recommend the speedy establishment of the line proposed in said bills introduced by Senator Flint and Representative McLachlan at as early a date as possible, in order that relief may be afforded to the manufacturers, merchants, and prouducers of this state. "Mr. Hichborn has not say about Mr. Stanton's position on anti-alien bills,the legislation attempt if passed would have been tory of the vested rights tors in Orange county and tions of the state; nothing cutting down ofthe mileage trips; nothing ofthe $800 per day inthe houseof attaches,nothing ofthe artesian wells,nothing oong againstthe gun clubs'prab Newport harbor,nomany other statesmanlikeSpeaker. Let this valiant defense people's rights go higher sufferedthe wanton assaighy hypercritical andthe verythe peopleofthestatehim governorin spiteof TWO CRITICISMS THAT TEMPTIBLE Two ofthe criticisms Franklin Hichborn againstofthe last legislature,Lincoln-Roosevelt leaguedustmously circulatingtheState,andbased uponthenthePartyCirclebaththeNon-PartisanJudicianbillswere republicanmewere approvedbyeverylicanmemberexceptingformerswhonowseekitaloutofthepositiestepaperheartilyapproxofrepublicansupontheusseewhattheyare: The Party Circle billan attemptofdemocracytoabolishtheparticleheadofpartisan candidacialballots.Inastaticallyrepublican.itisdemocratstoseektoothemselvespoliticallythattocraticnomineeshavetheriurparticolumn,socialists,probhibitionist thoseofthe republicansasfairforoneasthecosedinthefirstinstantorNewportandcarriedicananddemocraticvepoliticalmeasure,andwThe minority party mantoabolishit.asa stepgettinga crackat"Thethe republicans sayno.ofthe recentMr.Seppymemory,"Itisaproposition." were unanimously approved—with the single exception of Grove L. Johnson, father of Hiram. Mr. Johnson, it seems, was for "gag" first, last and all the time. Mr. Stanton, as a member of the committee, voted with his committee in support of the hastily prepared rules, which were only the temporary rules of the house, and had little or no time, in the multiplicity of duties confronting him, to give them that consideration which he later gave them in committee. Had he desired to enact them he could have done so. He amended them; Mr. Johnson stood for the "gag," if indeed there existed any gag except in the mind of this bughouse hypochondriac now being quoted by Boss Lissner and his push. (2.) We quote Mr. Hichborn: "He (Stanton) voted to eliminate from the Sanford resolution the paragraph asking for the establishment by congress of a federal line of steamers." This statement is false, as we here prove by the record. If this statement were true, it would be the first time in his public life that this Man of the Hour turned his back upon the people and knuckled down to the railroad. If it were true, it would unfit him for the governorship. There is great work for a man of Stanton's calibre to do at Sacramento in the next four years. The Panama canal will be completed in a few years. The Pacific coast, so long in the grip of the Southern Pacific and Pacific Mail, will strike the shackles of her thralldom with the advent of the isthmian waterway. There is need for a strong man at Sacramento. The people have need for such an one. If Mr. Hichborn's charge against Stanton is true, he is unfited to occupy the high office he seeks. What are the facts of history? "From the Assembly Journal, Mar. 11, 1909, page 1433, Report of Committee on Free Conference: "The following report of the Com- Taft, and that we recommend the speedy establishment of the line at as early a date as possible, in order that relief may be afforded to manufacturers, merchants and producers of this state, and "Resolved, That we denounce the arrangement made by the Pacific Mail steamship company with the transcontinental lines whereby they have never solicited any of this through business, and urge our representatives in congress and in the United States senate to give this matter their immediate time and attention." The objection to the resolution originally introduced by Senator Sanford (democrat) was that it, first, assumed that the Hon. Bristow had made the charges and recommendations stated in the resolution; and second, that, if such report was made, that the charges against the Pacific Mail Steamship company were true. In the debate on the resolution, there was not a scintilla of evidence produced as to what the alleged report contained, or on what evidence the denunciation of the steamship company was made, and it was held by a majority of the assembly that it was unnecessary to load the resolution with endorsements or vituperation in regard to matters about which they had no information. The resolution as finally adopted is certainly in better taste and carries out fully the purposes and intent of the original resolution. The resolution itself was not changed. (3.) The Leeds amendment to the direct primary bill. This amendment provided for a vote of assembly districts upon the choice for United States senator. Under the provisions of the bill as introduced, San Francisco, for instance, could have voted in favor of P. H. McCarthy, for example, by such overwhelming majority of union labor votes registered as re- The minority party may abolish it, as a step getting a crack at "the republicans say no." Of the recent Mr. Seppepy memory, "It is a proposition." The Non-Political Judges provided that candidates fices be placed in a con-selves, and not under designation. In other formers who supported have had the Orange canns to place the name West in the political giving such nominees like and Miguel Estudiado of the party circle. The absurd, does it not? ing a judge, endorsing out the campaign and power to elect him, w a party seek to advance placing his name, whi under the circle of tha made him a candidate to such a pure-minded West, and grant it to lists as Walker and Estudiado give rise to a smile est-haired reformer that is, if he have any. Mr. Hichborn is a s alieve. He was for ye-turned to socialism, whooping it up for the velters. Others of Mr. Hichbornisms are quite as unhe here noted. To attenu a legislator's character with being "owned but because he opposed is beneath the content-ican citizen. Americans as absolutely to override other sections of the state. The amendment provided for an assembly district vote, which means that the smaller communities in the state will have an equal chance with the larger cities in the choice of United States senator. We approve the amendment. So does the republican boss of the state, as well as the bank and file of the party. Orange county could not endorse McCarthy as senator, and should he become a candidate for United States senator, the party's candidate who endorsed him would in all probability be denied by the democratic candidate. The Speaker supported this amendment, which was carried. Its purpose merely to defend the rights of the smaller communities in the state. Mr. Stanton's record upon all these issues was that of a true reformer. He believes in taking the judiciary out of politics, and making judicial appointments for life, as does the federal government. His record is clear and will stand the test. His character cannot be successfully assailed by Mr. Hichborn and the shouters of the so-called reform push. Mr. Hichborn has not a word to say about Mr. Stanton's position upfront; the anti-alien bills, the bad irrigation legislation attempted, which passed would have been confiscatory of the vested rights of irrigators in Orange county and other sections of the state; nothing of the setting down of the mileage of junket trips; nothing of the saving of 100 per day in the house in the pay of attaches, nothing of the capping of telegian wells, nothing of his stand against Boss Lissner's dope into the waste basket? Here in Orange county only one newspaper is printing his pathetic appeal for office, while probably a half dozen have pitched his opinion on enforcing the can-do laws. Mr. Hichborn has not a word to say about Mr. Stanton's position upon the anti-alien bills, the bad irrigation legislation attempted, which he passed would have been confiscatory of the vested rights of irrigators in Orange county and other sections of the state; nothing of the getting down of the mileage of junket trips; nothing of the saving of 100 per day in the house in the pay of attaches, nothing of the capping oftesian wells, nothing of his stand against the gun clubs' purpose to grab Newport harbor, nor of the many other statesmanlike acts of the speaker. Let this valiant defender of the people's rights go higher. He has suffered the wanton assaults of the hypercritical and the venomous, but the people of the state will elect him governor in spite of them all. Two CRITICISMS THAT ARE CONTEMPTIBLE Two of the criticisms leveled by Franklin Hichborn against members of the last legislature, which the Lincoln-Roosevelt league is now industriously circulating throughout the State, are based upon their votes (1) upon the Party Circle bill and (2.) the Non-Partisan Judiciary bill. These bills were republican measures, and were approved by every true republican member excepting a few reformers who now seek to make capital out of their position. This newspaper heartily approves the stand of republicans upon these bills. Let us see what they are: The Party Circle bill came up in an attempt of democratic members to abolish the party circle at the head of partisan candidates upon official ballots. In a state overwhelmingly republican, it is natural for democrats to seek to abolish this circle, for they seek to advantage themselves politically thereby. Democratic nominees have this circle over their party column, so have the socialists, prohibitionists, as well as those of the republican party. It is as fair for one as the other. It was proposed in the first instance by Mr. Stanton, and was carried by republican and democratic votes. It is a political measure, and we approve it. The minority party may now desire to abolish it, as a stepping stone to getting a crack at "them offices;" the republicans say no. In the words of the recent Mr. Sepulveda of happy memory, "It is a plain business proposition." THE IRRIGATION BILLS When the bill introduced by Johnson of San Diego affecting the rights of irrigators, and which if passed would have been confiscatory of those rights, a delegation of irrigators from Imperial county went to Sacramento and called upon Speaker Stanton, protesting against its enactment. They also protested against the passage of the Black irrigation bill, which was similar in import to the Johnson bill. Both were vicious attempts at unwise legislation. The delegation told the Speaker that they were farmers and had work to do at home, and that they could not afford to remain long in Sacramento. They declared, however, that the bills were so adverse to their interests that they preferred to sacrifice their interests at home and remain at the state capital if it were necessary to defeat the bills. Mr. Stanton said he would be pleased to have them remain at Sacramento as long as they desired, and added: "But, gentlemen, so far as these two bills are concerned, you may take the first train home, and rest assured they will not pass. Go home, if you have work calling you home. These bills will not pass." And they did not. They were killed. Evidently Mr. Hichborn does not consider this act of the Speaker a "reform measure." JIM FEELEY IN TOWN Deacon Alameda Assemblyman Gives campaign literature. That no Stanton literature has yet appeared does not argue that there are no papers supporting him. That a number of papers are printing Boss Lissner's stuff does not prove that they are for the Rooster-Boosters. Again, how many papers have thrown Boss Lissner's dope into the waste basket? Here in Orange county only one newspaper is printing his pathetic appeal for office, while probably a half dozen have pitched his stuff in the waste basket. If this ratio holds good throughout the state, and 23 papers have printed his lamentations, Boss Lissner must be a greatly overworked man. More than this, we hear Miguel Estudillo is operating a type-writer in Boss Lissner's seraglio and is industriously sending out stuff against Stanton. Politics makes strange bedfellows. But these two worthies are pretty well known, and their type-writers are quite harmless. THE IRRIGATION BILLS When the bill introduced by Johnson of San Diego affecting the rights of irrigators, and which if passed would have been confiscatory of those rights, a delegation of irrigators from Imperial county went to Sacramento and called upon Speaker Stanton, protesting against its enactment. They also protested against the passage of the Black irrigation bill, which was similar in import to the Johnson bill. Both were vicious attempts at unwise legislation. The delegation told the Speaker that they were farmers and had work to do at home, and that they could not afford to remain long in Sacramento. They declared, however, that the bills were so adverse to their interests that they preferred to sacrifice their interests at home and remain at the state capital if it were necessary to defeat the bills. Mr. Stanton said he would be pleased to have them remain at Sacramento as long as they desired, and added: "But, gentlemen, so far as these two bills are concerned, you may take the first train home, and rest assured they will not pass. Go home, if you have work calling you home. These bills will not pass." And they did not. They were killed. Evidently Mr. Hichborn does not consider this act of the Speaker a "reform measure." CLARKE AND ESTUDILLO Bawled Him Out, Yet Supported Him After Nomination Deacon Clarke of the Riverside Press has a deal to say nowadays of the Orange county anti-machine republicans, and on Monday evening rose to remark: "They (the anti-machinists) had a very effective organization two years ago" etc. Deacon Clarke refers, of course, to the swatting of Estudillo, and what a swatting it was, to be sure. And where was Deacon Clarke during all this political battle? Starting the ball against Estudillo before the illegitimate nomination of that individual, what did Deacon Clarke have to offer later in the campaign? When the anti-machinists of Orange county, in the rough-and-tumble fight of that campaign, having Estudillo down, would thrust the dagger deep into the depths of his political heart, where was Deacon Clarke? Lustily called this man for help. A governor, a United States senator, the money of the machine were brought here. Here was the greatest fight ever enacted those of the republican party. It is as fair for one as the other. It was proposed in the first instance by Mr. Stanton, and was carried by republican and democratic votes. It is a political measure, and we approve it. The minority party may now desire to abolish it, as a stepping stone to getting a crack at "them offices;" the republicans say no. In the words of the recent Mr. Sepulveda of happy memory, "It is a plain business proposition." The Non-Political Judiciary bill provided that candidates for judicial offices be placed in a column by themselves, and not under their political designation. In other words, the reformers who supported this bill would have had the Orange county republicans to place the name of Judge West in the political discard, while giving such nominees as S. O. Walker and Miguel Estudillo the benefit of the party circle. This seems a bit absurd, does it not? After nominating a judge, endorsing him throughout the campaign and doing all in its power to elect him, why should not a party seek to advantage him by placing his name, where it belongs, under the circle of the party which made him a candidate. To deny this to such a pure-minded jurist as Judge West, and grant it to such machine-lists as Walker and Estudillo, ought to give rise to a smile with the longest-haired reformer in the state—that is, if he have any political sense. Mr. Hichborn is a socialist, we believe. He was for years a democrat, turned to socialism, and is now whooping it up for the Lincoln-Roosevelters. Others of Mr. Hichborn's criticisms are quite as untenable as these here noted. To attempt to besmirch a legislator's character, charging him with being "owned by the railroad" because he opposed these two bills, is beneath the contempt of an American citizen. But, gentlemen, so far two bills are concerned, you may take the first train home, and rest assured they will not pass. Go home, if you have work calling you home. These bills will not pass." And they did not. They were killed. Evidently Mr. Hichborn does not consider this act of the Speaker a "reform measure." JIM FEELEY IN TOWN Popular Alameda Assemblyman Gives Us a Look In Assemblyman James Feeley of Alameda county was a visitor in Anaheim on Friday, a guest of Richard Melrose. Mr. Feeley's batting average in the last legislature was good, and he proved to be one of the most successful legislators at the session. He is endowed with correct political principles, and was one of the powerful members of the lower house. He is mentioned as a candidate to oppose Senator Leavitt, the railroad push candidate, who led the forces of the railroad against the anti-racetrack gambling bill. The Emeryville racetrack is located in the district represented by Leavitt, and the programme men of the party think it is about time for him to join his former associate, Senator Lukens, who was lost in the shuffle two years ago. Mr. Feeley says Stanton has strong backing in Alameda and throughout the north, and adds the Speaker will have the united support of the anti-push republicans of that region. Several newspapers in Southern California are giving Charley Curry half-hearted support, as if ashamed of themselves; but their action is explained in the fact that Curry has the giving out of the general election proclamation, the printing of which will net these papers not less than $500. S. O. Llewellyn has received a dip net from Chicago for catching bait, and will shortly move upon the works of the mackerel tribe at Newport Beach. It has been difficult to catch bait off the pier, for when the big fish come in they make away with the little fellows. With Mr. Llewellyn's contrivance it is like finding bait, and all of the proper size, for bait of too large proportions will not do. He used to like to hunt ducks, but has given up hunting for his favorite pastime of fishing, and mackerel had better take a header, for Lew will catch them if they don't watch out. THURSDAY, MARCH 31 THE First National Bank Capital Stock, $50,000.00 BOARD OF DIRECTORS JOHN HARTUNG, President. FRANK SHANLEY, A. S. BRADFORD, 1st VICE PRES'T 2d VICE PRES'T EDGAR J. HARTUNG, Cashier. O. STORM and O. BEEBE, Ass't Cashiers. INTEREST PAID on TIME DEPOSITS Peter Stoffel HEADQUARTERS FOR FRESH VEGETABLES Kansas Hard-wheat Flour Consignments of Staple and Fancy Groceries Received Daily. Phones Pacific 237 Home 1103 PETER STOFFEL, Prop. HEADQUARTERS FOR FRESH VEGETABLES Kansas Hard-wheat Flour Consignments of Staple and Fancy Groceries Received Daily. Phones Pacific 237 Home 1103 PETER STOFFEL, Prop. POWER FOR ALL PURPOSES. PLENTY OF POWER. Southern California Electric Co. 411 N. Main st. SANTA ANA, CAL. Phones—46. Palace Market Schumacher & Schneider Proprietors DEALERS IN Choice Fresh and Salted Meats Exclusive Agents for Clover Glen Creamery Butter Telephone Main 51 Meats Delivered to all parts of city H. H. Gardner Co. HEADQUARTERS FOR Ice, Hay, Grain, Coal, Wood, Oil and Gasoline, Poultry Supplies, Stock Foods & Tonics, Yorkshire Hero Peas, Onion Sets and Cabbage Seed. A TRIAL ORDER WILL CONVINCE YOU. C. B. HALLEY, - MANAGER, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. PHONES. HOME 1542. MAIN 91. and Cabbage Seed. A TRIAL ORDER WILL CONVINCE YOU. C. B. HALLEY, - MANAGER, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. PHONES. HOME 1542. MAIN 91. California Wine Co. F. Conrad & Son, Props. Center Street Anaheim Wholesale Wine and Liquor Merchants Best Brands of Bottled Beer. Delivery Made Everywhere HENSHAW, BULKLEY & CO. 262-64 So. Los Angeles St. Los Angeles IRRIGATION PLANTS INSTALLED COMPLETE MACHINERY of all kinds, including road making machinery, levelers, scrapers, hardpan ploughs, etc. Full stock always on hand. GASOLINE ENGINES CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS The New Big 4 McCormick mower is furnished with either a 6 or 7 foot cutter bar. The frame on this machine is one piece and heavier and the wheels are further apart than those on other machines. Wm. F. Lutz Co., Santa Ana. 3-17tf For Sale: Good young work team, weight 2660 lbs, age 6; price $500. Wickersheim Implement Co., Fullerton. O. LAGMAN, BUILDER. Graduated as Architect in 1885 Will Furnish Plans, Specifications and Estimates Free of Cost Will Build Mod. 5-R'm House, $1,000 " " " 7-R'm " 1,400 If you have a lot I will Build a House On Monthly Payments Pacific 1111 406 E. Center St