anaheim-gazette 1899-09-21

This Paper not to be taken from the Library. Anaheim VOLUME XXIX. Dr. A. W. Bickford OFFICE OPPOSITE POSTOFFICE. Telephone Central. Residence near Christian Church. Telephone 671. ANAHEIM, CAL. G. S. EDDY, M. D. PHYSICIAN AND SURGEON. OFFICE—First door East of Boston Bakery. Residence—The Witte residence on Center St., opposite Catholic Church. CALLS ANSWERED AT ALL HOURS. ANAHEIM CAL. HERBERT JOHNSTON, M. D. PHYSICIAN AND SURGEON. Office and Residence: Los Angeles St., 8 doors south of Boyd's store. Telephone 205-330-4900. Office Hours: 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. 3:30 p.m. to 5 p.m. 7 p.m. to 8 p.m., evenings. I. L. Menges, DENTIST. Metz Building, Anaheim. feb24 DR. F. H. HOUCK DENTIST. OFFICE NEXT DOOR to P. O. (Federman Block, up stairs.) HOURS 9 to 5 ANAHEIM CAL. S. G. WILSON, M. D. Free Exhibition and Entertainment OF THE... "Angelus Orchestral" (Or self-playing Piano) Every day between 3 and 4 o'clock p.m.; Saturdays between 8 and 9 p.m. This is a recent invention and is the musical wonder of the age. Plays any piece of music, making "runs" and "trills," and playing a great number of keys that would be impossible for the human hands to execute. It is also a self-playing organ, having the volume of a pipe organ. It can play either the piano or organ alone, or both together at the same time. There are but few of these instruments in the State, the PYNE MUSIC CO. owning one of them. Every one cordially invited to see and hear this wonderful instrument at our store room, Cor. 5th and Main St., SANTA ANA. PYNE MUSIC CO. ANAHEIM BREWERY Pure Lager Beer DENTIST. Metz Building, Anaheim. feb24 DR. F. H. HOUCK DENTIST. OFFICE NEXT DOOR to P. O. (Federman Block, up stairs.) HOURS 9 to 5 ANAHEIM CAL. S. G. WILSON, M. D. Office and Residence: Over H. A. Dickel's Store. CENTER ST., ANAHEIM. Paul A. Derge. Graduate in Pharmacy. DRUGS, MEDICINES, Perfumes and Toilet Articles. BEST 5-CENT CIGAR IN TOWN MEDICAL HALL, KOLL BLOCK. PUBLIC TELEPHONE OFFICE. RICHARD MELROSE ATTORNEY-AT-LAW And Notary Public. Special attention given to Probate Matters. Center Street, Anaheim. Z. B. WEST. E. T. LANGLEY. West & Langley. Attorneys at Law. No. 113 West Fourth street, Santa Ana. Rooms 1, 2 and 3. Will practice in all States and Federal courts. CHARLES BAUER Blacksmithing and Wagon-Making Center St., Anaheim. Having purchased the shop formerly conducted by Hank Stough, I take this means of soliciting a share of the public patronage, guaranteeing all work performed by me. HORSESHOEING a SPECIALTY L. GUNTHER. PIONEER BOOT AND SHOE MAKER. Corner Adele and Los Angeles Sts. L. NEMETZ, Carriage Painting & Trimming New Buggies for Sale. Shop on Center St., near Opera-house, Anaheim. LITTLE GEM BARBER SHOP PYNE MUSIC CO. ANAHEIM BREWERY Pure Lager Beer Made from Pure Malt, For Sale by the Bottle or by the Keg. PURE CRYSTAL ICE DELIVERED TO ANY PART OF THE CITY AT ONE CENT PER POUND. The Patronage of the Public is Solicited. F. CONRAD, - Proprietor GRAY BROTHERS & WARD Cement Contractors Shillinger Patent. Contracts for RESERVOIRS, IRRIGATION DITCHES, Cellar and Stable Floors, Sidewalks Etc. OFFICES—No. 125 N. Broadway, Los Angeles St. Telephone—236. No. 816 Montgomery St., San Francisco, Cal. ONLY FIRST-CLASS RESTAURANT! -IN TOWNIn Connection with Boston Bakery. S. KISTLER, PROPRIETOR. A. FREISE, ...KEEPS THE FINEST OF... Wines, Liquors And Cigars. LOS ANGELES BEER ON DRAUGHT. Koll Block, Los Angeles Street. The Weekly Gazette. Established 1870. SUBSCRIPTION, - $1 50 Per Year. Six months....$1 00 Three months....75 Payable invariably in advance: Transient advertising rates,$1 per inch per month. The GAZETTE is issued every Thursday morning. Entered at the Anaheim Postoffice as second-class matter. Items of news and correspondence on all live subjects are solicited by the editor. RAILWAY TIME TABLE. Time of Arrival and Departure of Trains. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD. Trains on the Southern Pacific pass Anaheim as follows: To Los Angeles. Daily.....7:52 am Daily.....9:49 am Daily.....4:23 pm Daily.....6:03 pm Pass Anaheim Junction: To Los Angeles. Daily.....7:56 am Daily.....9:45 am Daily.....4:27 pm Daily.....5:50 pm Los ALAMITOS TRAINS: Leave for— 9:48 a.m. Sugar Factory Arrive from 6:02 p.m. In effect Nov. 1st, 1898 Street cars connect with all trains. Alamitos trains do not run on Sundays. NEWPORT BEACH RAILWAY. Daily Schedule. Leave Anaheim. Arrive Anaheim. 7:54 a.m. 8:01 p.m. L. NEMETZ, Carriage Painting & Trimming New Buggies for Sale. Shop on Center St., near Opera-house, Anaheim. LITTLE GEM BARBER SHOP Frank Dyer, Prop. First-Class Tonsorial Artists. Shop 1 door east of McCollum's cyclery. We keep constantly on hand the best of hair Restorer, Dandruff Cures, and other articles found in a well-appointed barber shops. A share of the public patronage solicited GO TO THE Oak Barber Shop FOR A FIRST-CLASS SHAVE OR HAIR CUT. TWO DOORS *7EST OF BANK. HUSMANN BROS. JOSEPH BACKS, Undertaker and Embalmer DEALER IN Furniture and Bedding Repairing Done. jel5 FRED PRESSEL Blacksmithing and Wagon-Making HORSE-SHOEING A SPECIALTY. Shop on Center street, opposite Metropolitan Block. jel5 City Stables, L. F. Lewis, Proprietor. Center St, opp. Kroeger Block Single and double teams S. KISTLER, PROPRIETOR. A. FREISE, Wines, Liquors And Cigars. LOS ANGELES BEER ON DRAUGHT. Koll Block, Los Angeles Street. J.M.Griffith Company A CORPORATION LUMBER DEALERS Neer Railroad Depot, Anaheim, keep constantly on hand Doors, Blinds, Windows, Mouldings, Posts, Shakes, Shingles, Lath, Hair Plaster of Paris. Anaheim Grist Mills operating on Wednesdays and Saturdays of each week. Grain, feed, meal, etc., of all varieties. Cornshelled and shipped. W. T. BROWN, Agent. N. HART'S PLACE. SCHLITZ MILWAUKEE BEER ON DRAUGHT. ...DEALER IN... FINE LIQUORS! AND... Choice Wines FOR MEDICINAL PURPOSES, Fine Domestic and Imported Cigars. Headquarters for the famo's Schlitz, Milwaukee, beer. F. BACKS, UNDERTAKER And Dealer in FURNITURE. Wall Paper, Cornices, Window Shades, Picture Frames, Upholstery Goods, Paints, Oils and Glass Sewing Machine Supplies, Etc. Cor. Los Angeles & Chartres Sts. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD. Trains on the Southern Pacific pass Anaheim as follows: To Los Angeles. Daily.....7:52 am Daily.....9:49 am Daily.....4:23 pm Daily.....6:03 pm Pass Anaheim Junction: To Los Angeles. Daily.....7:56 am Daily.....9:45 am Daily.....4:27 pm Daily.....5:50 pm LOS ALAMITOS TRAINS. Leave for— 9:48 a.m. {Sugar Factory} 7:52 a.m. 6:02 p.m. {4:25 p.m. In effect Nov. 1st, 1898. Street cars connect with all trains. Alamitos trains do not run on Sundays. NEWPORT BEACH RAILWAY. Daily Schedule. Leave Anaheim. 9:45 a.m. 7:54 a.m. 6:01 p.m. 4:25 p.m. All trains connect at Santa Ana with Newport trains. Sundays only. Leave Anaheim. 9:45 a.m. 7:54 a.m. 6:01 p.m. 4:25 p.m. 7:35 p.m. 7:30 p.m. The last train is a through train to and from Newport. SANTA FE ROUTE. Local time table. In effect Sunday, June 4. Trains on the Santa Fe route leave Anaheim as follows for points named: Los Angeles--7:55 am; 10:15 am; 5:05 pm. Pasadena, Azusa, Redondo. San Bernardino--7:55 am; 10:15 am; 5:05 pm. To Pasadena Sunday only. San Bernardino and Riverside (via Orange)--9:55 am; 5:54 pm. San Diego--9:55 am; *2:50 pm. Santa Ana--9:55 am; 2:50 pm; 5:54 pm. Redlands--9:55 am. San Jacinto, Elsinore, Perris, Temecula--*9:55 am. Escondido*2:50 pm. Fallbrook*9:55 am. Chicago, Denver, St. Louis, Kansas City and all points East--7:55 am; 9:55 am. Trains marked with a * are daily except Sunday. All others daily. OUT OF SORTS? TAKE Cascade Bitters TONIC, STOMACHIC, LAXATIVE CURES POSITIVELY CONSTIPATION, PILES, MALARIA Billiousness and all Stomach and Bowel Troubles As a Liver Remedy and Blood Purifier it has no equal THE ONLY TONIC LAXATIVE in the WORD SOLD BY P. A. DERGE. ERWIN BARR INSANE? Offer in Court to Prove Him of Unsound Mind. Puts in His Time Importuning People to Take the Plain Dealer, Which He Says "He Chipped in a Few Bits With the Rest of the Boys to Start"—His Case Against N. Hart Fizzles Out—Reputable Witnesses Swear That Barr's Reputation for Truth, Honesty and Integrity is Bad—Case Taken Under Advisement. The case of Erwin Barr versus N. Hart, in which plaintiff sought to have defendant placed under bonds to restrain him from "killing and murdering" him, resulted in a fiddle in justice Shanley's court on Thursday last. The defense was represented by J. Marion Brooks of Los Angeles and H. W. Chynoweth, while District Attorney Williams showed his usual weakness in prosecuting. That the District Attorney should ever have issued papers in the case, will attach as a reproach to his office. The case was called at 9:45, when the plaintiff, laboring under considerable mental stress, was sworn. Attorney Brooks here arose and objected to the witness giving testimony, on the ground that he was of unsound mind. He characterized Barr as being insane, and therefore disqualified under the laws of the State to give testimony. He quoted from Section 1880 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in reference to people who are debarred the privilege of testifying in the courts of this State, in which it is set forth that people of unsound mind are not permitted to testify. Brooks repeated his objection, after and tell the truth, and I will have to refuse the objection. Mr. Brooks—To which the defendant exceeds, and now offers to establish by medical testimony and by testimony of the witnesses who have observed Barr's conduct in the town of Anaheim for the last five years, to establish before this court, all facts that are set forth in the complaint as the result of hallucination and brought about by a disordered mind. Q-What is your name? A.-Erwin Barr. Q-Where do you reside, Mr. Barr? And where did you reside on the 21st day of August, of this year? A.-On Sycamore street, just north of the cemetery, on land that I have owned for a good many years. Q-In what city? A.-Near Anaheim, in the Anaheim extension. Q-What county? A.-Orange county. Q-What is your age? A-I was born on the 5th of February, 1838. I will soon be 62 years of age. Q-Do you know Napoleon Hart? A.-I have known him ever since he has been in Anaheim. Q-How long has he been here? A.-I do not remember the time he has been here. It is 22 years this fall since I came here; located here. Q-How you see him on the 21st day of August of this year? A-I did. Q-And where? A.-At Miller & Nagel's store, and afterwards on the side walk in front of the store. Q-Where is Miller & Nagel's? A-It is the hardware store, the second door east of the Postoffice. Q-And you were in their place? A.-In their place. Q-What city? A.-Anaheim. Q-What county and State, if you will please state? A.-Orange county, California. Q-Under what circumstances did you see him at that time and place; tell it briefly, as it took place? A.-As usual, I spend the forenoon at home and in the afternoon I come to town. As my custom was, I came into town and went to the Postoffice. Mr. Brooks—We move to strike out where he spends his forenons and afternoons. Mr. Williams—What took place? HAS LITTLE SPELLS OF SICKNESS. A-I went into the Postoffice and received a letter, and as I came out I started to Miller & Nagel's store, and I knew there are times when I have little spills of sickness, by being overheated, and I stepped in there to sit down. I am troubled with dizziness in the head; but it soon passes off after sitting down. Mr. Brooks—We object to that. Q-What did you do in Miller & Nagel's store? A-My mind was on the letter I had received. I went in there and looked around for a camp chair. There is generally one or two there, inside or outside of the door. There was one just inside of the door, and I sat down and had the letter up before my face, reading it, and the first thing I knew there was a fist stuck within five inches of my face. Mr. Brooks—We object to that fist. Witness—Well that is just what it was. Doubly told the truth, and I will have to refuse the objection. Mr. Brooks—To which the defendant exceeds, and now offers to establish by medical testimony and by testimony of the witnesses who have observed Barr's conduct in the town of Anaheim for the last five years, to establish before this court, all facts that are set forth in the complaint as the result of hallucination and brought about by a disordered mind. Q-What is your name? A.-Erwin Barr. Q-Where do you reside on the 21st day of August, of this year? A.-On Sycamore street, just north of the cemetery, on land that I have owned for a good many years. Q-In what city? A-Near Anaheim, in the Anaheim extension. Q-What county? A.-Orange county. Q-What is your age? A-I was born on the 5th of February, 1838. I will soon be 62 years of age. Q-Do you know Napoleon Hart? A-Ainahim. Q-How long has he been here? A-I do not remember the time he has been here. It is 22 years this fall since I came here; located here. Q-How you see him on the 21st day of August of this year? A-I did. Q-And where? A.-At Miller & Nagel's store, and afterwards on the side walk in front of the store. Q-Where is Miller & Nagel's? A-It is the hardware store, the second door east of the Postoffice. Q-And you were in their place? A-In their place. Q-What city? A-Anaheim. Q-What county and State, if you will please state? A-Orange county, California. Q-Under what circumstances did you see him at that time and place; tell it briefly, as it took place? A-As usual, I spend the forenoon at home and in the afternoon I come to town. As my custom was, I came into town and went to the Postoffice. Mr. Brooks—We move to strike out where he spends his forenons and afternoons. Mr. Williams—What took place? IS NOT A MIND READER. A-I am not a mind reader; I could not tell what he was thinking of. Q-Could he have carried out his threats there at that time. You saw the condition of affairs there. Could he have carried out his threats against you at that time? A-He could. Q-and he did not do it? A-No he did not do it. Q-You wasn't very afraid he would do it there? A-You couldn't tell anything about it. Q-He did not do it, did he? A-No he did not do it. Q-and he had an opportunity to do it didn't need her. Mr. Williams—I objec t to the examination of the witness in that way. It is calling for the conclusion of the witness. Objection sustained. Defendant excepts. Q-How long did he remain there talking to you? A-Very short time. Q-About how long? A-I do not know, would not say. Q-Whereabouts were you in this Miller & Nagel's store? A-In the front part. Q-Here is a kind of a diagram of that store. Just inside of the door on the left hand side as you go in. Q-Let hand side as you go in. What implements of warfare, things good to fight with, were there in the immediate vicinity. What could you have used to fight a fellow with? A-Nothing as I know of. Q-Anxies or simply hardware, any hardware over right in front. A-I could not tell you that I did not look to see. Q-You were acquainted with the contents of that store, Mr. Barr? A-I have been in that store. Q-it is a large hardware store isn't it? A-Yo sir, reasonably large for a town of this size. Q-A great many pieces of hardware there for a fellow to get up a pretty good collection things to fight with? A-I suppose if he hath time to make a selection, he could. Q-How long did Hart remain in that store? A-I could not give you the time, I could give you the conversation that passed. Q-Would he have had time to have got a axe or an ax handle if he so desired? A-I did not threaten to use the axe on me there. Ju says, if my name ever appears in the Plain Deal again I will take an axe and kill you. I to him that I did not run the Plain Deal. Q-Have you any interest in the Plain Deal Attorney Brooks here apose and objected to the witness giving testimony on the ground that he was of unsound mind. He characterized Barr as being insane, and therefore disqualified under the laws of the State to give testimony. He quoted from Section 1880 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in reference to people who are debarred the privilege of testifying in the courts of this State, in which it is set forth that people of unsound mind are not permitted to testify. Brooks repeated his objection, after reading the section of the code referred to, to Barr's giving testimony, designating him as a man of evident unsound mind, bordering upon insanity. He was ready to submit proof to the court that Barr was out of his head. District Attorney Williams—Do you want a Commission in Lunacy to be appointed? That would be the best way to settle this matter of insanity. Brooks—We'll see. It may result in before we get through with it. I am prepared to show by the evidence of at least one physician of this city, as well as by other witnesses, that Barr is not in such a condition of mind as would fit him to give testimony here. His actions, as will be testified to here by his neighbors, will prove that conclusively. He is a somnambulist; walks in his sleep; takes off his coat, throws it upon the ground violently, and curses imaginary foes; he talks so loudly in his house adjoining the graveyard that the neighbors are frequently attracted thereto to see what the matter is. The only way for this to be brought out in court is by taking testimony. I am satisfied beyond a doubt that I can establish the fact that this man is of unsound mind. Williams, in his usual tiresome drawl, said he did not think it was fair to give Barr's enemies a chance to come into court and give testimony against him. He was fearful that the whole thing would end up in one side swearing the other was crazy, and vice versa. He had no objection to the court asking Barr such questions as he saw fit, to develop for himself whether or not he was insane. The Judge said he had known Barr four years, and considered him perfectly sane. He denied the application of the defense to introduce testimony relative to Barr's insanity. Defense noted an exception. It was its purpose to carry the case up in review before the Superior Court on a writ of habeas corpus. Defense noted probably a dozen exceptions to the ruling of the court during the progress of the case. Henry Smith, John Smith and John Kuebler, neighbors of Barr, swore that his reputation in the community for truth, honesty and integrity was bad. The defense also subpoenaed other witnesses, among them J. K. Eastman and Frank Eastman, former neighbors of Barr, who however were not called. Williams leaned over and whispered to Brooks there was in his opinion nothing in the case. "Are you going to introduce any further evidence?" he asked, previous to the calling of the three character witnesses. Brooks replied that he had a number of other witnesses, but would only call three, to impeach Barr—to prove that his reputation for truth, honesty and integrity was bad. No testimony was offered in rebuttal, to sustain Barr against the adverse testimony of his neighbors, and he stood before the plaintiff, laboring under considerable mental stress, was sworn. Attorney Brooks here apose and objected to the witness giving testimony on the ground that he was of unsound mind. He characterized Barr as being insane, and therefore disqualified under the laws of the State to give testimony. He quoted from Section 1880 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in reference to people who are debarred the privilege of testifying in the courts of this State, in which it is set forth that people of unsound mind are not permitted to testify. Brooks repeated his objection, after reading the section of the code referred to, to Barr's giving testimony, designating him as a man of evident unsound mind, bordering upon insanity. He was ready to submit proof to the court that Barr was out of his head. District Attorney Williams—Do you want a Commission in Lunacy to be appointed? That would be the best way to settle this matter of insanity. Brooks—We'll see. It may result in before we get through with it. I am prepared to show by the evidence of at least one physician of this city, as well as by other witnesses, that Barr is not in such a condition of mind as would fit him to give testimony here. His actions, as will be testified to here by his neighbors, will prove that conclusively. He is a somnambulist; walks in his sleep; takes off his coat, throws it upon the ground violently, and curses imaginary foes; he talks so loudly in his house adjoining the graveyard that the neighbors are frequently attracted thereto to see what the matter is. The only way for this to be brought out in court is by taking testimony. I am satisfied beyond a doubt that I can establish the fact that this man is of unsound mind. Williams, in his usual tiresome drawl, said he did not think it was fair to give Barr's enemies a chance to come into court and give testimony against him. He was fearful that the whole thing would end up in one side swearing the other was crazy, and vice versa. He had no objection to the court asking Barr such questions as he saw fit, to develop for himself whether or not he was insane. The Judge said he had known Barr four years, and considered him perfectly sane. He denied the application of the defense to introduce testimony relative to Barr's insanity. Defense noted an exception. It was its purpose to carry the case up in review before the Superior Court on a writ of habeas corpus. Defense noted probably a dozen exceptions to the ruling of the court during the progress of the case. Henry Smith, John Smith and John Kuebler, neighbors of Barr, swore that his reputation in the community for truth, honesty and integrity was bad. The defense also subpoenaed other witnesses, among them J. K. Eastman and Frank Eastman, former neighbors of Barr, who however were not called. Williams leaned over and whispered to Brooks there was in his opinion nothing in the case. "Are you going to introduce any further evidence?" he asked, previous to the calling of the three character witnesses. Brooks replied that he had a number of other witnesses, but would only call three, to impeach Barr—to prove that his reputation for truth, honesty and integrity was bad. No testimony was offered in rebuttal, to sustain Barr against the adverse testimony of his neighbors, and he stood before the plaintiff, laboring under considerable mental stress, was sworn. Attorney Brooks here apose and objected to the witness giving testimony on the ground that he was of unsound mind. He characterized Barr as being insane, and therefore disqualified under the laws of the State to give testimony. He quoted from Section 1880 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in reference to people who are debarred the privilege of testifying in the courts of this State, in which it is set forth that people of unsound mind are not permitted to testify. Brooks repeated his objection, after reading the section of the code referred to, to Barr's giving testimony, designating him as a man of evident unsound mind, bordering upon insanity. He was ready to submit proof to the court that Barr was out of his head. District Attorney Williams—Do you want a Commission in Lunacy to be appointed? That would be the best way to settle this matter of insanity. Brooks—We'll see. It may result in before we get through with it. I am prepared to show by the evidence of at least one physician of this city, as well as by other witnesses, that Barr is not in such a condition of mind as would fit him to give testimony here. His actions, as will be testified to here by his neighbors, will prove that conclusively. He is a somnambulist; walks in his sleep; takes off his coat, throws it upon the ground violently, and curses imaginary foes; he talks so loudly in his house adjoining the graveyard that the neighbors are frequently attracted thereto to see what the matter is. The only way for this to be brought out in court is by taking testimony. I am satisfied beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish the fact that this man is of unsound mind. Williams, in his usual tiresome drawl, said he did not think it was fair to give Barr's enemies a chance to come into court and give testimony against him. He was fearful that the whole thing would end up in one side swearing the other was crazy, and vice versa. He had no objection to the court asking Barr such questions as he saw fit, to develop for himself whether or not he was insane. The Judge said he had known Barr four years, and considered him perfectly sane. He denied the application of the defense to introduce testimony relative to Barr's insanity. Defense noted an exception. It was its purpose to carry the case up in review before the Superior Court on a writ of habeas corpus. Defense noted probably a dozen exceptions to the ruling of the court during the progress of the case. Henry Smith, John Smith and John Kuebler, neighbors of Barr, swore that his reputation in the community for truth, honesty and integrity was bad. The defense also subpoenaed other witnesses, among them J. K. Eastman and Frank Eastman, former neighbors of Barr, who however were not called. Williams leaned over and whispered to Brooks there was in his opinion nothing in the case. "Are you going to introduce any further evidence?" he asked, previous to the calling of the three character witnesses. Brooks replied that he had a number of other witnesses, but would only call three, to impeach Barr—to prove that his reputation for truth, honesty and integrity was bad. No testimony was offered in rebuttal, to sustain Barr against the adverse testimony of his neighbors, and he stood before the plaintiff, laboring under considerable mental stress, was sworn. Attorney Brooks here apose and objected to the witness giving testimony on the ground that he was of unsound mind. He characterized Barr as being insane, and therefore disqualified under the laws of the State to give testimony. He quoted from Section 1880 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in reference to people who are debarred the privilege of testifying in the courts of this State, in which it is set forth that people of unsound mind are not permitted to testify. Brooks repeated his objection, after reading the section of the code referred to, to Barr's giving testimony, designating him as a man of evident unsound mind, bordering upon insanity. He was ready to submit proof to the court that Barr was out of his head. District Attorney Williams—Do you want a Commission in Lunacy to be appointed? That would be the best way to settle this matter of insanity. Brooks—We'll see. It may result in before we get through with it. I am prepared to show by the evidence of at least one physician of this city, as well as by other witnesses, that Barr is not in such a condition of mind as would fit him to give testimony here. His actions, as will be testified to here by his neighbors, will prove that conclusively. He is a somnambulist; walks in his sleep; takes off his coat, throws it upon the ground violently, and curses imaginary foes; he talks so loudly in his house adjoining the graveyard that the neighbors are frequently attracted thereto to see what the matter is. The only way for this to be brought out in court is by taking testimony. I am satisfied beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubt that I can establish beyond a doubthatI cannot establish without evidence Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatofhis into execution.Mr.Brookswill carrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brookswillcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brooks willcarrythisthreatofhisintoexecution.Mr.Brooks willcarrythisthreatofhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatofhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr. Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.BROOKS WILL CARRY THIS TIME OF YEAR Mr. Brooks—We object到that question Mr.Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carry this threatOfhis INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carry this threatOf他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carry this threatOf他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carry this threatOf他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carry this threatOf他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carry this threatOf他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carry this threatOf他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carry这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carry这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carry这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITATION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 INTOEXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart will carrying这威胁OF他的 TO EXITION,Mr.Hart Will Carrying This Threat Of Yourself As A Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Sir, Q.-Noise Siir, Q.-Noise Siir, Q.-Noise Siir, Q.-Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice Siir, Q- Noice SIIR, Q- Noice SIIR, Q- Noice SIIR, Q- Noice SIIR, Q- Noice SIIR, Q- Noice SIIR, Q- Noice SIIR, Q- Noice SIIR, Q- Noice SIIR, Q- Noice SIIR, Q- Noice SIIR, Q- NoICE SIIR, Q- NoICE SIIR, Q- NOICE SIIR, Q- NOICE SIIR, Q- NOICE SIIR, Q- NOICE SIIR, Q- NOICE SIIR, Q- NOICE SIIR, Q- NOICE SIIR, Q- NOICE SIIR, Q- NOICE SIIR， Q- NOICE SIIR， Q- NOICE SIIR， Q- NOICE SIIR， Q- NOICE SIIR， Q- NOICE SIIR， Q- NOICE SIIR， Q- NOICE SIIR， Q- NOICE SIIR， Q- NOICE SIIR， Q- NOICE SIIR， Q -NOICE SIIR， Q -NOICE SIIR， Q -NOICE SIIR， Q -NOICE SIIR， Q -NOICE SIIR， Q -NOICE SIIR， Q -NOICE SIIR， Q -NOICE SIIR， Q -NOICE SIIR， Q -NOICE SIIR， Q -NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR， q - NOICE SIIR The defense had also subpoenaed other witnesses, among them J. K. Eastman and Frank Eastman, former neighbors of Barr, who however were not called. Williams leaned over and whispered to Brooks there was in his opinion nothing in the case. "Are you going to introduce any further evidence?" he asked, previous to the calling of the three character witnesses. Brooks replied that he had a number of other witnesses, but would only call three, to impeach Barr—to prove that his reputation for truth, honesty and integrity was bad. No testimony was offered in rebuttal, to sustain Barr against the adverse testimony of his neighbors, and he stood before the court an impeached witness. Williams at this time said to Brooks there was nothing in the case, and advised that it was not necessary to offer any further testimony. Addressing the court Williams said that if, from the evidence offered, it appeared that Barr was not in any peril of being again assaulted by Hart, it was the duty of the court to discharge the accused. If the court believed that Barr was in danger of his life, it was his duty to hold him. He (the District Attorney) did not care to argue the case—he left that to the Court. Brooks said he did not care to argue the case—he would leave it for the Court to decide. He suggested that inasmuch as the Court could not render judgment until the short-hand notes of the trial had been written out, the case be taken under advisement. To this the Court and District Attorney agreed. "I suppose it would be better for the Court to adjourn to a certain day," said Williams, solemnly. And so the case went over to be taken under advisement, until the testimony can be written out and signed by the witnesses. The case proceeded as follows: BARR OBJECTED TO AS AN INCOMPETENT. Erwin Barr called as a witness for the people; sworn and examined, testified as follows: Examination by District Attorney Williams: Q.-What is your name? Mr. Brooks — We object to the testimony of this witness being given, upon the ground that he is not qualified under Section 1880 of the Code of Civil Procedure; we rely upon the first subdivision. We propose to show that the said Erwin Barr is of unsound mind, and was of unsound mind at the time of this examination, and we propose to show it by witnesses. Here of that fact, and will then ask the court to determine whether said witness can testify or not. The Court I have known Barr ever since I came here, and always considered that there was no question of his sanity; I think he is perfectly sane as to the majority of things, and I think he is competent to testify The defense had also subpoenaed other witnesses, among them J. K. Eastman and Frank Eastman, former neighbors of Barr, who however were not called. Williams leaned over and whispered to Brooks there was in his opinion nothing in the case. "Are you going to introduce any further evidence?" he asked, previous to the calling of the three character witnesses. Brooks replied that he had a number of other witnesses, but would only call three, to impeach Barr—to prove that his reputation for truth, honesty and integrity was bad. No testimony was offered in rebuttal, to sustain Barr against the adverse testimony of his neighbors, and he stood before the court an impeached witness. Williams at this time said to Brooks there was nothing in the case, and advised that it was not necessary to offer any further testimony. Addressing the court Williams said that if, from the evidence offered, it appeared that Barr was not in any peril of being again assaulted by Hart, it was the duty of the court to discharge the accused. If the court believed that Barr was in danger of his life, it was his duty to hold him. He (the District Attorney) did not care to argue the case—he left that to the Court. Brooks said he did not care to argue the case—he would leave it for the Court to decide. He suggested that inasmuch as the Court could not render judgment until the short-hand notes of the trial had been written out, the case be taken under advisement. To this the Court and District Attorney agreed. "I suppose it would be better for the Court to adjourn to a certain day," said Williams, solemnly. And so the case went over to be taken under advisement, until the testimony can be written out and signed by the witnesses. The case proceeded as follows: BARR OBJECTED TO AS AN INCOMPETENT. Erwin Barr called as a witness for the people; sworn and examined, testified as follows: Examination by District Attorney Williams: Q.-What is your name? Mr. Brooks — We object to the testimony of this witness being given, upon the ground that he is not qualified under Section 1880 of the Code of Civil Procedure; we rely upon the first subdivision. We propose to show that the said Erwin Barr is of unsound mind, and was of unsound mind at the time of this examination, and we propose to show it by witnesses. Here of that fact, and will then ask the court to determine whether said witness can testify or not. The Court I have known Barr ever since I came here, and always considered that there was no question of his sanity; I think he is perfectly sane as to the majority of things, and I think he is competent to testify The defense had also subpoenaed other witnesses, among them J. K. Eastman and Frank Eastman, former neighbors of Barr, who however were not called. Williams leaned over and whispered to Brooks there was in his opinion nothing in the case. "Are you going to introduce any further evidence?" he asked, previous to the calling of the three character witnesses. Brooks replied that he had a number of other witnesses, but would only call three, to impeach Barr—to prove that his reputation for truth, honesty and integrity was bad. No testimony was offered in rebuttal, to sustain Barr against the adverse testimony of his neighbors, and he stood before the court an impeached witness. Williams at this time said to Brooks there was nothing in the case, and advised that it was not necessary to offer any further testimony. Addressing the court Williams said that if, from the evidence offered, it appeared that Barr was not in any peril of being again assaulted by Hart, it was the duty of the court to discharge the accused. If the court believed that Barr was in danger of his life, it was his duty to hold him. He (the District Attorney) did not care to argue the case—he left that to the Court. Brooks said he did not care to argue the case—he would leave it for the Court to decide. He suggested that inasmuch as the Court could not render judgment until the short-hand notes of the trial had been written out, the case be taken under advisement. To this the Court and District Attorney agreed. "I suppose it would be better for the Court to adjourn to a certain day," said Williams, solemnly. And so the case went over to be taken under advisement, until the testimony can be written out and signed by the witnesses. The case proceeded as follows: BARR OBJECTED TO AS AN INCOMPETENT. Erwin Barr called as a witness for the people; sworn and examined, testified as follows: Examination by District Attorney Williams: Q.-What is your name? Mr. Brooks — We object to the testimony of this witness being given, upon the ground that he is not qualified under Section 1880 of the Code of Civil Procedure; we rely upon the first subdivision. We propose to show that the said Erwin Barr is of unsound mind, and was of unsound mind at the time of this examination, and we propose to show it by witnesses. Here of that fact, and will then ask the court to determine whether said witness can testify or not. The Court I have known Barr ever since I came here, and always considered that there was no question of his sanity; I think he is perfectly sane as to the majority of things, and I think he is competent to testify The defense had also subpoenaed other witnesses, among them J. K. Eastman and Frank Eastman, former neighbors of Barr, who however were not called. Williams leaned over and whispered to Brooks there was in his opinion nothing in the case. "Are you going to introduce any further evidence?" he asked, previous to the calling of the three character witnesses. Brooks replied that he had a number of other witnesses, but would only call three, to impeach Barr—to prove that his reputation for truth, honesty and integrity was bad. No testimony was offered in rebuttal, to sustain Barr against the adverse testimony of his neighbors, and he stood before the court an impeached witness. Williams at this time said to Brooks there was nothing in the case, and advised that it was not necessary to offer any further testimony. Addressing the court Williams said that if, from the evidence offered, it appeared that Barr was not in any peril of being again assaulted by Hart, it was the duty of the court to discharge the accused. If the court believed that Barr was in danger of his life, it was his duty to hold him. He (the District Attorney) did not care to argue the case—he left that to the Court. Brooks said he did not care to argue the case—he would leave it for the Court to decide. He suggested that inasmuch as the Court could not render judgment until the short-hand notes of the trial had been written out, the case be taken under advisement. To this the Court and District Attorney agreed. "I suppose it would be better for the Court to adjourn to a certain day," said Williams, solemnly. And so the case went over to be taken under advisement, until the testimony can be written out and signed by the witnesses. The case proceeded as follows: BARR OBJECTED TO AS AN INCOMPETENT. Erwin Barr called as a witness for the people; sworn and examined, testified as follows: Examination by District Attorney Williams: Q.-What is your name? Mr. Brooks — We object to the testimony of this witness being given, upon the ground that he is not qualified under Section 1880 of the Code of Civil Procedure; we rely upon the first subdivision. We propose to show that the said Erwin Barr is of unsound mind, and was of unsound mind at the time of this examination, and we propose to show it by witnesses. Here of that fact, and will then ask the court to determine whether said witness can testify or not. The Court I have known Barr ever since I came here, and always considered that there was no question of his sanity; I think he is perfectly sane as to the majority of things, and I think he is competent to testify The defense had also subpoenaed other witnesses, among them J. K. Eastman and Frank Eastman, former neighbors of Barr, who however were not called. Williams leaned over and whispered to Brooks there was in his opinion nothing in the case. "Are you going to introduce any further evidence?" he asked previous to the calling of the three character witnesses. Brooks replied that he had a number of other witnesses, but would only call three, to impeach Barr—to prove that his reputation for truth, honesty and integrity was bad. No testimony was offered in rebuttal, to sustain Barr against the adverse testimony of his neighbors, and he stood before the court an impeached witness. Williams at this time said to Brooks there was nothing in the case, and advised that it was not necessary to offer any further testimony. Addressing the court Williams said that if, from the evidence offered, it appeared that Barr was not in any peril of being again assaulted by Hart, it was the duty of the court to discharge the accused. If The court believed that Barr was in danger of his life, it was his duty to hold him. He (the District Attorney) did not care to argue the case—he left that to the Court. Brooks said he did not care to argue the case—he would leave it for the Court to decide. He suggested that inasmuch as the Court could not render judgment until the short-hand notes of this trial had been written out, then take under advisement. To this The Court and District Attorney agreed. "I suppose it would be better for the Court to adjourn to a certain day," said Williams, solemnly. And so the case went over to be taken under advisement, until this trial had been written out, then take under advisement. To this The Court and District Attorney agreed. "I suppose it would be better for the Court to adjourn to a certain day," said Williams, solemnly. And so the case went over to be taken under advisement, until this trial had been written out, The defense had also subpoenaed other witnesses among them J.K.Eastman and Frank Eastman former neighbors of Barr who have never been sued one while now? A-Yes sir. Q.-Been engaged in business here? A-Iran ranched as long as I was able to ranch. Q.-You have been engaged in business transactions here; have you? You have transacted business in Anahelia for a term years? A-It has about twenty-two years since I located here. Q.-As near as you can tell. Well since you have been here you have had more than difficulty; have you with people? About how many? Mr.Williams-I objected to what question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; irrelevant and immaterial. We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetent; We are not trying at all question as incompetente; We are not tryng at all questions as incompete we are not tryng at all questions as incompete we are not tryng at all questions as incompete we are not tryng at all questions as incompete we are not tryng at all questions as incompete we are not tryng at all questions as incompete we are not tryng at all questions as incompete we are not tryng at all questions as incorpete we are not tryng at all questions as incorpete we are not tryng at all questions as incorpete we are not tryng at all questions as incorpete we are not tryng at all questions as incorpete we are not tryng at all questions as incorpete we are not tryng at all questions as incorpete we are not tryng at al questions as incorpete we are not tryng at al questions as incorpete we are not tryng at al questions as incorpete we are not tryng at al questions as incorpete we are not tryng at al questions as incorpete we are not tryng at al questions as incorpete we are not tryng at al questions Witness: I never have been sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sued in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never sused in my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never susedin my life nor never suSEDIN MY LIFE OR MOTIONAL LAYOUT! SOLD BY P.A.DERGE. A SORT OF SORTS? TAKE THE FORTUNE! BASING AND ALL STOMACH AND Bowel Troubles Over Remedy And Blood Purification It has no equal THE CASE PROceeded As follows: BARR OBJECTED TO AS AN INCOMPETENT. Erwin Barr called as a witness for sworn examined testified as follows: Examination by District Attorney Williams: Q.-What is your name? Mr.Brook - We object to its testimony being given upon its chair so you could protect yourself? A-No sir, Q.-Weren't you talking? A-No sir! Q.-Perfectly cool? A-Yes sir, Q.-You knew that he had advantage over you? A-Yes sir, Q.-Did you wear anything protective over you? A-No sir, Q.-Was there any telling or protection yourself? A-No sir, Q.-Didn't you tell him what you made it point your life never到你死 with newspaper men和 women for they always had last word because you could NOT reply_to a newspaper? A-No sir, Q.-Didn't you give your arms in a position so that protect yourself? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squored yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squored yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squored yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squored yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squored yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squored yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squored yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squored yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squored yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squored yourself around too fight? A-No sir, Q.-Squored yourself around too fight? A-SORT OF SORTS? TABLE OF SORTS? MISSING AND ALL STOMACH AND Bowel Troubles Over Remedy And Blood Purification It has no equal THE CASE PROceeded As follows: BARR OBJECTED TO AS AN INCOMPETENT. Erwin Barr called as a witness for sworn examined testified as follows: Examination by District Attorney Williams: Q.-What is your name? Mr.Brook - We object to its testimony being given upon its chair so you could protect yourself? A-No Sir, Q.-Weren't you talking? A-Yes Sir, Q.-Perfectly cool? A-Yes Sir, Q.-Didn't you tell him what made it point your life never到你死 with newspaper men和 women for they always had last word because you could NOT reply_to a newspaper? A-No Sir, Q.-Didn't you give your arms in a position so that protect yourself? A-No Sir, Q.-Squared yourself around too fight? A-No Sir, Q.-Squared你自己around too fight? A-No Sir, Q.-Squared你自己around too fight? A-No Sir, Q.-Squared你自己around too fight? A-No Sir, Q.-Squared你自己around too fight? A-No Sir， Q.-Squared你自己around too fight？A-No Sir， Q.-Squared你自己around too fight？A-No Sir， Q.-Squared你自己around too fight？A-No Sir， Q.-Squared你自己around too fight？A-No Sir， Q.-Squared你自己around too fight？A-No Sir， Q.-Squared你自己around too fight？A-No Sir， Q.-Squared你自己around Too fight？ A-SORT OF SORTS? TABLE OF SORTS? MISSING AND ALL STOMACH AND Bowel Troubles Over Remedy And Blood Purification It has no equal THE CASE PROceeded As follows: BARR OBJECTED TO AS AN INCOMPETENT. Erwin Barr called as a witness for sworn examined testified as follows: Examination by District Attorney Williams: Q.-What is your name? Mr.Brook - We object to its testimony being given upon its chair so you could protect yourself? A-Nothing! Q:-Didn't you tell him what made it point your life never到你死 with newspaper men和 women for they always had last word because you could NOT reply_to a newspaper？A-Nothing！ Q:-Didn't you give your arms in a position so that protect yourself？A-Nothing！ Q:-Didn't you tell him what made it point your life never到你死 with newspaper men和 women for they always had last word because you could NOT reply_to a newspaper？ A-SORT OF SORTS? TABLE OF SORTS? MISSING AND ALL STOMACH AND Bowel Troubles Over Remedy And Blood Purification It has no equal THE CASE PROceeded As follows: BARR OBJECTED TO AS AN INCOMPETENT。 Erwin Barr called as a witness for sworn examined testified as follows: Examination by District Attorney Williams: Q:-What is your name? Mr.Brook - We object to its testimony being given upon its chair so you could protect yourself？A-Nothing！ Q:-Didn't you tell him what made it point your life never到你死 with newspaper men和 women for they always had last word because you could NOT reply_to a newspaper？ A-SORT OF SORTS? TABLE OF SORTS? NOBER 21. 1899 THE WATER QUESTION. Paper read by W. M. McFadden of Placonia at the Anaheim Farmers Institute Tuesday, Sept. 12, 1899. To irrigate you must have water, and water when needed, to obtain best results. To irrigate properly you must put the water on the land in a proper manner; and to have it do the most good the land must be cultivated at the right time and in a thorough manner. I will first speak of getting and saving water, and will confine my remarks on this subject to our own locality, as we are the only ones interested. The Santa Ana river furnishes us all the water we get. Its supply for the Santa Ana valley is received from springs around the Rincon, also the Chino creek. This is divided equally between the east and west sides of the Santa Ana river. The Cajon ditch in the summer time takes our half about five miles down the ditch, where it is divided, part running to Anaheim and part (about 200 inches) to Yorba. In the winter season, or when there is an abundance of water in the river, the ditch delivers plenty. When there is a scarcity, a cement ditch would very materially increase it, yet our summer supply for two or three months is always short. The question of how to increase it is one that has occupied the attention of our sages for a number of years, and is demanding a satisfactory solution immediately. The wisest and best thing to do to increase our volume of water is what I now propose to speak about: 1. I would trim the earth ditches to a line, to remove all the eddies along banks of ditch; grade the bottom to a uniform grade; cement all porous or sandy places so as to give a good current to the water in ditch and prevent seepage, then build a reservoir on site now owned by the company, known as the La Habra reservoir, which can be built 50 feet high for $42,000. A connection from present ditch to reservoir can be built for $5000. An outlet to connect with company's concrete ditch at Botsford's northeast corner, near... used to fight a fellow with? A.-Not nowtaxes, or simply hardware, any right or from? A.-I could not tell how much we looked, never took, we acquainted with the contents of Mr. Barr? A.-I have told did not look to see. we acquainted with the contents of Mr. Barr? A.-I have been in there, large hardware store isn't it? A.-Yes largely large for a toy this size of that many pieces of hardware there for get up a pretty good collection of light with? A.-I suppose if he had take a selection, he could. long did Hart remain in that store? A.-No give you the time, I could give conversation that passed. Did he have it when to have got an new paper? A.-He went to use the axe on me there, just name ever appears in the Plain Dealer will take an axe and kill you. I told did not run the Plain Dealer. Do you any interest in the Plain Dealnot as a newspaper I chipped in with and helped out in the plant in what you know he was going to put Mr. Barr in the paper? A.-How could I tell you tell Mr. Valjean that he hif his name appeared again in the terror, that he would take an axe to you? A.-Not remember whether I did or do you just think about it; didn't you Valjean that Mr. Hart said he must mention his name in that paper again; that a fact? A.-I could not say posither do it or cry it? A.-I could not deny he told him. It was no secret obbless you did tell him? A.-I may him. his name ever appear in the Plain once? A.-I should judge it had. AND BARR IS STILL ALIVE. If you are still alive? A.-Yes sir, I am he has not carried out his threats? Hart told you that his name should in the Plain Dealer, of which you some chips into, with the rest of the keep it running; hasn't his name apply that Plain Dealer, and very unfavorit it? Williams-We object to that question; this is the best evidence. non sustained. Books-Cannot you get a copy of the dealer, having any words against Mr. A.-I have not. Your possession? A.-No sir, all do you know, as a fact, whether any issues, after having any impact on Mr. Hart? Williams-We object to that on the that it is not the best evidence. non sustained. Books-Mr. Barr, that conversation all in the hardware store? A.-Yes sir, the threats have never been carried no Sir. williams-We object to that on the that it is not the best evidence. non sustained. Books-Mr. Barr, that conversation all in the hardware store? A.-Yes sir, the threats have never been carried no Sir. While I was at the encampLong Beach. Did you have been here attending to business ever since? A.-With that expentation remember being away from exceed being in Santa Ana one day. our conduct and actions in this city morning that Hart was going to murkill you, as you state here, has been same that you have always had, hasn’t conduct here has been just the same as being around them down as usual? A.-I Passed Hart, haven't you, and seen him... A.-I think I have never passed him, see I went into the butcher shop in his, and he was standing outside when I again. you have been in Mr. Hart's building time, and it was —? A.-He was deowned outside of the door. now Mr. Harr, you and Harr have also good friends up to this time you A.-We never had any trouble. not a word in your life? A.-No sir, you were astonished that he got mad at as particular time? A.-I was a little this was a surprise to you at the time in this manner, wasn't it? A.-I was surprised. you had never any trouble with him beyou state; mind, this was simply a little relation in the heat of passion, at that time? A.-I have no idea about the matter; he has mad, wasn't he? It was in the passion at the time? A.-He was cerand. are you certain about it? A.-Why, I not tell what his idea was. could not tell whether he was mad could you, Mr. Harr? Objection sustained. Defendant excepts. Q.-Mr. Barr, you are acquainted with the Judge of this Court, are you? A.-Yes sir, Q.-Did you tell him, the Judge of two weeks ago or three, in this city, that you would put under a lot of people in this town, through the Plain Dealer. If it took every dollar you had, or words to that effect? Mr. Williams-To which we object on the ground it is not proper cross-examination, and is irrelevant and immaterial. Objection sustained. Defendant excepts. Q.-Mr. Barr, you are acquainted with the Judge of this Court, are you? A.-Yes sir, Q.-Did you tell him, the Judge of two weeks ago or three, in this city, that you would put under a lot of people in this town, through the Plain Dealer. If it took every dollar you had, or words to that effect? Mr. Williams-To which we object on the ground it is not proper cross-examination, and is irrelevant and immaterial. Brooks-You have been soliciting for it; have taken subscribers for the paper since that time? A.-I have taken names of subscribers and put them in. Q.-Have you solicited for the Plain Dealer and advertisements; en Our sages for a number of years, and is demanding a satisfactory solution immediately. The wisest and best thing to do increase our volume of water is what I now propose to speak about: 1. I would trim the earth ditches along a line, to remove all the eddies along banks of ditch; grade the bottom to a uniform grade; cement all porous or sandy places so as to give good current to the water in ditch and prevent seepage, then build a reservoir on site now owned by the company, known as the La Habra reservoir, which can be built 50 feet high for $42,000. A connection from present ditch to reservoir can be built for $5000. An outlet to connect with company's concrete ditch at Botosq's northwest corner, at an expense of $3000. Pipe the water across the sandwash from Selinger's to Anaheim's ditch near Leonard Parker's Anaheim can have day water as well as the north side. The reservoir is estimated to contain enough water to irrigate this whole district twice with what water comes in during summer, and two irrigations in summer from stored winter water will banish all fear from drought in summer, make water cheaper and guarantee all in reaping abundant harvests where they plant or sow. 2. To put water on land in a proper manner is something we can all learn about. Since the plow has been laid to one side, and the harrow, disc and cultivator substituted, we find at a depth in all our orchards of from four to six inches formed each time irrigation is done. The water is run over this crust often not wetting through it, but only dampening the crust through. The roots of the trees being below the crust and nearly always in dry soil, they draw toward the surface up under this crust and soon absorb all the moisture there and soon show signs of drought. Often the leaves are still wilted when the surface is too wet to cultivate. The question is how to get the water through so it will penetrate. The roots go deep into the soil. Draw the roots down instead of up; keep the trees in good growing healthy condition. I would recommend that every orchard be thoroughly plowed both ways during the winter months, and about April or May, when water is plentiful get a plow with a narrow share, something no wider than a cultivator tooth. On a strong plow put four or six horses and set it down about two feet in the middle of each row; then turn in a small stream and let it run for a week or so, when it will fill the ground full-of-water. The moisture coming up by capillary attraction will prevent this crust from forming. The trees will grow better, be better, and they will not have to live on the impoverished surface soil. I would recommend the furrow system of irrigation, as I believe you can get more water on the land than by any other system at less expense and labor, and it leaves the land in better condition to cultivate. A few words as to the cultivation. I notice quite a good many people especially on sandy land cultivating within a day or two after irrigation. In my opinion nothing can be more damaging to the soil. It kills all the fertility in it. The trees have a sickly or yellow appearance, the land soon needing irrigation again. The cultivator often says: "The land don't take any water," or "It doesn't seem to do any good to irrigate this year; the ground so soon dries out." My friends, take my advice for once. Don't be in a hurry to move on your land after irrigation, no matter what kind of land you have. If you have ridges, plow them out in about a week after irrigation, not before. Then harrow them down in a day or You have been in Mr. Hart's building at time and he was — A. He was on the outside of the door. Now, Mr. Barr, you and Hart have all grown good friends up to this time you A. — We never had any trouble. Not a word in your life! A. — No sir. You were astonished that he got mad at a particular time? A. — I was a little sad. This was a surprise to you at the time he to you this manner, wasn't it? A. — I was surprised. You had never any trouble with him because you state; mind, this was simply a little situation, in the heat of passion, at that time? A. — I could not solve the problem; I have my own idea about the matter; he was mad, wasn't he? It was in the passion at the time? A. — He was certain. Are you certain about it? A. — Why, I don't tell what his idea was. You could not tell whether he was mad could you, Mr. Barr? ED AN EXCUSE TO DO SOME-THING. I believe that he wanted to draw me out some excuse to do something. He had excuse enough, because you deceived the editor of the Plain Dealer? A. — Not early that; I said if he would go to see Jaan, he would explain it; he, alone, uniting the paper in this town, ure, and you were only one of a numberers around; that was the only interest? Ever solicited for that paper, Mr. Barr? Yes sir; aren't you local solicitor for the A. — No sir. Don't you take subscribers? A. — I do. Did you ever ask Mr. Hart to subscribe A. — I think once I asked him if he did not take it. I did not expect him to; I im more as a joke. Didn't you ask him just as you would ask people here; you meant what you said? Did, if you want it, I would hand in his but I did not really expect he would take you did not expect him to take it? A. — I know anything about it with him? No sir. How long before this difficulty with him you had asked him to take the Plain A. — I could not tell you. A week or two? A. — A couple of weeks nothing like that. Are you an excitable man? A. — I never killed so. Aren't you a very excitable man? A. — I not. Don't you often get excited? A. — I think about as cool as they make them. That is what I thought; you are cool and hate, in whatever you do, aren't you have had quite an experience in my life. I understand it, but this is a little the you have ever bad, isn't it; this with You have had quite an experience in my life. I understand it, but this is a little the you have ever bad, isn't it; this with You have had quite an experience in my life. Williams—We object to these questions. He doesn't define the term "game." Brooks—Without fear. The Homeliest Man in Anaheim, As well as the handsomest, and others, are invited to call on any druggist and get free a trial bottle of Kemp's Balsam for the Throat and Lungs, a remedy that is guaranteed to cure and relieve all Chronic and Acute Coughs, Asthma, Bronchitis and Consumption. Price 25c. and 50c. Jan26-1p A few words as to the cultivation. I notice quite a good many people especially on sandy land cultivating within a day or two after irrigation. In my opinion nothing can be more damaging to the soil. It kills all the fertility in it. The trees have a sickly or yellow appearance, the land soon needing irrigation again. The cultivator often says, "The land don't take any water," or, "It don't seem to do any good to irrigate this year; the ground so dries out." My friends, take my advice for once. Don’t be in a hurry to get on your land after irrigation, no matter what kind of land you have. If you have ridges, plow them out in about a week after irrigation, not before. Then harrow them down in a day or two later. Harrow the land thoroughly: get on the harrow and ride; keep your harrow teeth sharp. Within ten days or two weeks get on the land with a cultivator; set it down deep and cultivate both ways, or cross-cultivate unless you plow. If you plow, which I would recommend more than is done, I would harrow close up after the plow, not leaving it goover half a day. After cultivation I would again harrow when your ground will retain all the fertility it gets from the water and the moisture a long time; and being then well watered and well cultivated nothing can prevent the trees from making a healthy growth and yielding an abundant crop of good fruit. If the water is secured in abundance, applied in an intelligent manner according to the most approved plans, as demonstrated by experience, and the land cultivated in a systematic, thorough manner at the proper time after irrigation, there is nothing to prevent the section embraced within the confines of the Anaheim Union Water company from being the most productive as well as the most wealthy section of California. When You Ride Your Wheel Always shake into your shoes Allen's Foot Ease, a powder for the feet. It keeps your feet cool, prevents sweating feet, and makes your endurance ten-fold greater. Over one million wheel people are using Allen's Foot Ease. They all praise it. It gives rest and comfort to smarting, hot, swollen, aching feet and is a certain cure for ingrowing nails. At all druggists and shoe stores. 25c. Sample free by mail. Address, Allen S. Olmsted, Le Roy, N.Y. Plumbing and Tinnning. Bicycles and Bicycle supplies, plumbing and knitting, pump repairing. All kinds of light machine work. Agent for Eclipse and Fairbanks wind wills, and Towers', the best wind mill made. Also agent for the Santa Ana Steam Laundry. I run a wagon that will call for and deliver your laundry twice a week.[j26tf] E.W.M'COLLUM.