anaheim-gazette 1940-01-25

ANAHEIM GAZETTE Established 1870 ORANGE COUNTY'S OLDEST NEWSPAPER HENRY KUCHEL, Editor and Publisher 1887-1935 The Anaheim Gazette has been owned and edited but the same family since 1875. Published every Thursday at 259 East Center Street, Anaheim, Calif. Subscription Per Year ... $2.00 Six Months ... $1.00 MRS. HENRY KUCHEL THEODORE B. KUCHEL Editors and Publishers Entered as second-class matter at the Post Office at Anaheim, California, under the Act of March 8, 1879. TWO DEANS: BORAH AND JORDAN The late William Edgar Borah, senior United States Senator from Idaho, takes his place among the great Americans and great statesmen in our country’s history. His memory will live on by dint of the impress he made upon this country, and, indeed, upon the world. An outstanding lawyer and student of government, Borah brought to the senate an ability for legislative work, a great facility of expression, and an indomitable courage. Sometimes, he was content to go his own way in matters of state, and his reputation for independence placed him high on the roster of members of the congress. Dean of the Senate in point of years of service, Borah was often mentioned as candidate for president, even as late as four years ago; and, as death took him last week, he was preparing to aid in the shaping of his party's platform for this year's presidential election. Last fall, demonstrating once again his independence, he chose to oppose the Roosevelt program of lifting the arms embargo. Then, shortly before he died, he told some of his intimates in Washington that his paramount desire was to see the 1940 Republican party platform unswervingly oppose any foreign relationship which might tend to bring us into war. Borah was a great force for good—a great force for Americanism. And with those who shared his political beliefs, he was of infinite value. Truly, a great loss has been sustained by all. Frank C. Jordan's passing calls particular attention to the worth of honorable public service, because, for an almost lifetime, his name has stood for the highest standard of labor in the field of government. The dean of all state secretaries of state, Jordan was the supreme example of a civic official. in Washington that his paramount desire was to see the Republican party platform unswervingly oppose any foreign relationship which might tend to bring us into war. Borah was a great force for good—a great force for Americanism. And with those who shared his political beliefs, he was of infinite value. Truly, a great loss has been sustained by all. Frank C. Jordan’s passing calls particular attention to the worth of honorable public service, because, for an almost lifetime, his name has stood for the highest standard of labor in the field of government. The dean of all state secretaries of state, Jordan was the supreme example of a civic official. Under his guidance, the office of Secretary of State in California, was always, invariably, correct in its many duties. Every city and county official knew that if Frank Jordan said it was so, there was no question about it. And it was characteristic that, as Governor Olson lately related, when Woodrow Wilson anxiously wired to Gavin McNab during the 1916 election, and this state’s vote was in doubt: “What manner of man is your Secretary of State”; only one reply could be, and was forthcoming: “Frank Jordan is a Republican, but if you win by one vote, you will get your certificate.” Frank Jordan will be missed. May the high standards by which he conducted his office be continued. OUR FARMERS SPEAK OUT The California Farm Bureau Federation has spoken out in no uncertain terms on the state relief problem. Its specific recommendations follow: 1. Relief grants should be such as to provide equal living standards for all relief recipients in all sections of the country. 2. Relief rolls should be made available to the general public through monthly posting at the court house steps. 3. Relief grants should not be made to those who refuse private employment at a compensation equal to or greater than monthly relief grants. 4. Local administration of all relief with a minimum amount of state or federal supervision. 5. County, state and federal relief agencies must not be controlled by pressure groups of any kind, but should carry out the laws and policies as approved by the legislative bodies. 6. Integration of the various phases of relief activities in the interest of economy and efficiency. 7. Reduction in the percentage of the government relief funds provided by the counties and an increase in the percentages provided by the state and federal governments. 8. That care for the transient indigent is neither a responsibility of local government or within its power to finance, and that adequate funds must be provided by federal government for this purpose; but, its administration must be tied in with other forms of relief under local control. 9. That farmers should be encouraged and assisted in providing adequate housing facilities for their help. Thus, California’s farmers present food for thought to the state government. It is to be hoped that Governor Olson, under his constitutional discretion, will give the special session of the legislature the right to debate and legislate on all phases of this great and grave problem. Many commentators and analysts may feel that this prophesy is far too optimistic. Admittedly, it is premature, for most of the changes either are just starting or are still to get under way. But among the people of California—and America—the sentiment for a return to normalcy already has crystallized. And the people of this nation, when they really want something, can usually achieve it. In that respect, it differs from almost every other nation on the face of the globe—and thoughtful citizens are still grateful for it. Doubtless there is still rampant radicalism in many sections of the United States, particularly in many labor unions dominated by communist leaders. But the recent report of the Dies committee while it condemned radicalism and exposed many of its ramifications estimated that not more than 1. 9. That farmers should be encouraged and assisted in providing adequate housing facilities for their help. Thus, California's farmers present food for thought to the state government. It is to be hoped that Governor Olson, under his constitutional discretion, will give the special session of the legislature the right to debate and legislate on all phases of this great and grave problem. The Farmers Corner by RALPH H. TAYLOR Executive Secretary Agricultural Council of California When the pendulum swings, it always swings back. The watchmaker and the historian teach us that. "Everything which goes up must come down." Rudimentary science teaches us that. After the rain, there is sun. Nature teaches us that. In other words, it is a fundamental law of life that extremes are always equalized! During tempestuous days, when old standards seem to have fallen; when new ideologies seem to have supplanted basic truths; when radicalism seems to be in the ascendancy and temperate ways of life seem out-moded and old-fashioned; when diligence and frugality seem to have become vices, and prodigality a virtue—the everyday garden-variety American, who still believes in homespun truths, may wonder a bit whether all natural laws have been overthrown and discarded. But eventually, the pendulum swings back. It is swinging back today in the United States of America. Theaters, between their current glamour films, run a picture of Betsy Ross, with a homemade flag—and blase theater crowds stamp their feet and clap their hands as the screen reads: "I pledge allegiance . . . ." Ultra-liberals and even so-called radicals in the legislature—the Sam Yortys and the Jack Tenneys—step out boldly to join with republicans and conservative democrats in demanding that relief be purged of communism and political manipulation. Harry Bridges, recently escaped from the threat of deportation, announces he will seek final citizenship papers—protection of the government he has condemned and ridiculed. An erstwhile relief recipient—suddenly inheriting money—draws his first check to the order of Ucle Sam, repaying the bounty that had been given him. And President Roosevelt, wha started out to something, can usually achieve it. In that respect, it differs from almost every other nation on the face of the globe—and thoughtful citizens are still grateful for it. Doubtless there is still rampant radicalism in many sections of the United States, particularly in many labor unions dominated by communist leaders. But the recent report of the Dies committee while it condemned radicalism and exposed many of its ramifications estimated that not more than 1,000,000 of the 130,000,000 citizens of the United States have been seriously affected by subversive activities. "And the time may come," said the committee, "when they (the communists) will cease to be seriously regarded by anyone in the United States." The Dies committee, too, notes reasons for the shift. The soviet nazi pact, it reports, has helped protect constitutional democracy by "making more clear the nature of all dictatorships." And while a quarter of the leadership of the CIO is still communistic the committee finds that the overwhelming majority of the rank and file membership is shying away from radicalism. There can be no doubt of this. The average American, disgusted with "isms", government experimentalism and free-handed spending of his tax-given dollars, anxious to get back to solid ground and old-fashioned stands. All that remains is for American leaders to take the public pulse—and having taken it, to come down to earth and start representing the people who elected them. The pendulum is swinging back. NOT A NEW BELT BUT A DIET ORANGE COUNTY WEEKLY WATCHTOWER A Compilation of Observation and Comment by and for the Weekly Newspapers of the County: Huntington Beach News Newport Beach News Garden Grove News South Coast News Westminster Gazette Yorba Linda Star Costa Mesa Globe Buena Park News Coastline Dispatch La Habra Star Anabalm Gazette Brea Progress Placentia Courier Tustin News Seal Beach Post U. S. GEOLOGISTS TO STUDY SALT WATER BARRIER In all of the many discussions of the Orange county water problem for years past there has been mentioned the fact of an underground dike or barrier extending along the coast which prevents intrusion of salt water from the ocean. Conflicting statements about this barrier have sometimes been made. The facts about it should become available for the first time when a study which is soon to commence has been completed. Various engineers and committees have made reports on some phases of the salt waters intrusion question from time to time, but no comprehensive study ever has been made. Now however, an arrangement has been made with the government by which a complete U. S. Geological survey will be made. The deal is between the government department and the two counties of Orange and Los Angeles. The government will pay half the cost, the counties the remainder. Orange county's share will be divided between the county as a whole and the Orange County Water district, which is composed of the agricultural lands lying in the lower Santa Ana basin. No information has been given as to how long this survey will take, or when the facts learned will be made available to the interested parties. CAN HAVE JR, COLLEGE AS PART OF HIGH SCHOOL WASHINGTON SNAPSHOTS new budget, represented to a short time ago, is the straight edition of the government's version of with the Wind." In the same gloomy story predecessors of millions tons of dollars blowing down the gale. And it has old villians; a skyrocket-in debt, a huge deficit, prospect of heavier taxes be an anchor around the Mr. Average Citizen. Annual budget is a big book, a dull book, but it's all written about your money. On that account, it's worthwhile spending some time digging around among millions and billions and squillions to get at least some idea of what all the shooting's about. In the first place, this is as good a time as any to clear up a misconception that's sometimes held by the average citizen. The misconception takes the following form: J. Oswald Blimp picks up his newspaper reads a headline that less openly. Whispers frequently are heard about games in other spots. The difference seems to be one of location. Gambling games are any sort in incorporated town come under the eye of local authorities. The sheriff is responsible for such matters in unincorporated territory. Sheriff Elliott announced a policy a year ago under which he said he would aid in stopping gambling inside the towns and cities only when asked by local authorities to comply in and help. For a year now Los Angels gambling promoters, big and little have tried to edge into Orange county. At first they figured it would be easy. They have found it in fact very difficult. Op-gambling will not flourish strongly except as it is allowed to do so by city officials. NOTES In a report filed last spring a committee headed by Di Gardner a recommendation was offered that Orange county shop not turn ownership and control Prado basin lands over to the federal government. This has been done, nevertheless, though the committee did its work at the best of the supervisors and the report was made to them, M Gardiner says he things the linquishment of Prado to the government is a mistake and that two million dollars saved w prove a poor investment in the end. The county stands to lose fro America-rich, announces to that every department of sent, except national dead been cut and that spending must stop. In the first place, this is as good a time as any to clear up a misconception that's sometimes held by the average citizen. The misconception takes the following form: J. Oswald Blimp picks up his newspaper, reads a headline that says "DEFICIT IN BUDGET THIS YEAR CUT SHARPLY BY PRESIDENT," and remarks comfortably to his wife, "Well, it looks as though this reckless spending is beginning to stop. Debt isn't going to be as big as it was last year." Then he nibbles his buttered toast with real enjoyment for the first time in a long, long spell. But the poor deluded man is confusing two widely different items—the yearly deficit and the national debt. The deficit is the amount the government spends each year over and above what it is able to take in. The debt, on the other hand, is simply the accumulation of these deficits, which are added to the debt each year. This will be the eleventh year in a row that there's been a deficit. And, as an inevitable consequence, it's the eleventh year in a row that the breath-taking curve of the national debt has continued to mount, mount, mount. In other words, we've depended for eleven years now on something called "future prosperity" to make up for the fact that our government is spending far more than it has been able to collect. The significant point, though, is that the "future" is already catching up with us. The figure in the budget which tells how rapidly this process is going on is the amount set aside for interest payments on the debt. If you as an individual borrow money for a number of years and finally reach the stage where you are paying most of the money you take in right back to your creditors in the form of interest, then you know that you've reached a danger point. The same situation holds true in the case of the federal government. The government this coming year, according to the budget, will have to pay out a new high total of $1,100,000,000 for this interest item. On the basis of estimated tax collections, this is going to mean that about one dollar in spending some time digging around omong millions and billions and squillions to get at least some idea of what all the shooting's about. In the first place, this is as good a time as any to clear up a misconception that's sometimes held by the average citizen. The misconception takes the following form: J. Oswald Blimp picks up his newspaper, reads a headline that says "DEFICIT IN BUDGET THIS YEAR CUT SHARPLY BY PRESIDENT," and remarks comfortably to his wife, "Well, it looks as though this reckless spending is beginning to stop. Debt isn't going to be as big as it was last year." Then he nibbles his buttered toast with real enjoyment for the first time in a long, long spell. But the poor deluded man is confusing two widely different items—the yearly deficit and the national debt. The deficit is the amount the government spends each year over and above what it is able to take in. The debt, on the other hand, is simply the accumulation of these deficits, which are added to the debt each year. This will be the eleventh year in a row that there's been a deficit. And, as an inevitable consequence, it's the eleventh year in a row that the breath-taking curve of the national debt has continued to mount, mount, mount. In other words, we've depended for eleven years now on something called "future prosperity" to make up for the fact that our government is spending far more than it has been able to collect. The significant point, though, is that the "future" is already catching up with us. The figure in the budget which tells how rapidly this process is going on is the amount set aside for interest payments on the debt. If you as an individual borrow money for a number of years and finally reach the stage where you are paying most of the money you take in right back to your creditors in the form of interest, then you know that you've reached a danger point. The same situation holds true in the case of the federal government. The government this coming year, according to the budget, will have to pay out a new high total of $1,100,000,000 for this interest item. On the basis of estimated tax collections, this is going to mean that about one dollar in spending some time digging around omong millions and billions and squillions to get at least some idea of what all the shooting's about. In the first place, this is as good a time as any to clear up a misconception that's sometimes held by the average citizen. The misconception takes the following form: J. Oswald Blimp picks up his newspaper, reads a headline that says "DEFICIT IN BUDGET THIS YEAR CUT SHARPLY BY PRESIDENT," and remarks comfortably to his wife, "Well, it looks as though this reckless spending is beginning to stop. Debt isn't going to be as big as it was last year." Then he nibbles his buttered toast with real enjoyment for the first time in a long, long spell. But the poor deluded man is confusing two widely different items—the yearly deficit and the national debt. The deficit is the amount the government spends each year over and above what it is able to take in. The debt, on the other hand, is simply the accumulation of these deficits, which are added to the debt each year. This will be the eleventh year in a row that there's been a deficit. And, as an inevitable consequence, it's the eleventh year in a row that the breath-taking curve of the national debt has continued to mount, mount, mount. In other words, we've depended for eleven years now on something called "future prosperity" to make up for the fact that our government is spending far more than it has been able to collect. The significant point, though, is that the "future" is already catching up with us. The figure in the budget which tells how rapidly this process is going on is the amount set aside for interest payments on the debt. If you as an individual borrow money for a number of years and finally reach the stage where you are paying most of the money you take in right back to your creditors in the form of interest, then you know that you've reached a danger point. The same situation holds true in the case of the federal government. The government this coming year, according to the budget, will have to pay out a new high total of $1,100,000,000 for this interest item. On the basis of estimated tax collections, this is going to mean that about one dollar in spending some time digging around omong millions and billions and squillings to get at least some idea of what all the shooting's about. In the first place, this is as good a time as any to clear up a misconception that's sometimes held by the average citizen. The misconception takes the following form: J. Oswald Blimp picks up his newspaper, reads a headline that says "DEFICIT IN BUDGET THIS YEAR CUT SHARPLY BY PRESIDENT," and remarks comfortably to his wife, "Well, it looks as though this reckless spending is beginning to stop. Debt isn't going to be as big as it was last year." Then he nibbles his buttered toast with real enjoyment for the first time in a long, long spell. But the poor deluded man is confusing two widely different items—the yearly deficit and the national debt. The deficit is the amount the government spends each year over and above what it is able to take in. The debt, on the other hand, is simply the accumulation of these deficits, which are added to the debt each year. This will be the eleventh year in a row that there's been a deficit. And as an inevitable consequence, it's the eleventh year in a row that the breath-taking curve of the national debt has continued to mount, mount, mount. In other words, we've depended for eleven years now on something called "future prosperity" to make up for the fact that our government is spending far more than it has been able to collect. The significant point, though, is that the "future" is already catching up with us. The figure in the budget which tells how rapidly this process is going on is the amount set aside for interest payments on the debt. If you as an individual borrow money for a number of years and finally reach the stage where you are paying most of the money you take in right back to your creditors in the form of interest, then you know that you've reached a danger point. The same situation holds true in the case of the federal government. The government this coming year, according to the budget, will have to pay out a new high total of $1,100,000,000 for this interest item. On the basis of estimated tax collections, this is going to mean that about one dollar in spending some time digging around omong millions and billions and squillings to get at least some idea of what all the shooting's about. In the first place, this is as good a time as any to clear up a misconception that's sometimes held by the average citizen. The misconception takes the following form: J. Oswald Blimp picks up his newspaper, reads a headline that says "DEFICIT IN BUDGET THIS YEAR CUT SHARPLY BY PRESIDENT," and remarks comfortably to his wife, "Well, it looks as though this reckless spending is beginning to stop. Debt isn't going to be as big as it was last year." Then he nibbles his buttered toast with real enjoyment for the first time in a long, long spell. But the poor deluded man is confusing two widely different items—the yearly deficit and the national debt. The deficit is the amount the government spends each year over and above what it is able to take in. The debt, on the other hand, is simply the accumulation of these deficits, which are added to the debt each year. This will be the eleventh year in a row that there's been a deficit. And as an inevitable consequence, it's the eleventh year in a row that the breath-taking curve of the national debt has continued to mount, mount, mount. In other words, we've depended for eleven years now on something called "future prosperity" to make up for the fact that our government is spending far more than it has been able to collect. The significant point, though, is that the "future" is already catching up with us. The figure in the budget which tells how rapidly this process is going on is the amount set aside for interest payments on the debt. If you as an individual borrow money for a number of years and finally reach the stage where you are paying most ofthe money you take in right back to your creditors in the form of interest, then you know that you've reached a danger point. The same situation holds true in the case ofthe federal government. The government this coming year, according to the budget, will have to pay out a new high total of $1,100,000,000 for this interest item. On the basis of estimated tax collections, this is going to mean that about one dollar in spending some time digging around omong millions and billions and squillings to get at least some idea of what allthe shooting's about. In the first place, this is as good a time as any to clear up a misconception that's sometimes held bythe average citizen. The misconception takes the following form: J. Oswald Blimp picks up his newspaper, reads a headline that says "DEFICIT IN BUDGET THIS YEAR CUT SHARPLY BY PRESIDENT," and remarks comfortably to his wife, "Well, it looks as though this reckless spending is beginning to stop. Debt isn't going to be as big as it was last year." Then he nibbles his buttered toast with real enjoyment forthe first time in a long, long spell. But the poor deluded man is confusing two widely different items—the yearly deficit andthe national debt. The deficit isthe amountthe government spends eachyear overandabovewhatitisabletotakein.victoryofnegotiatorsandspeciallawyerswillbe lost.Bethecountywillreduceitsbondindebtednessandthetaxloadfloodcontrolbondswillbeeasy. One result accreditedto ther Grand juryisthatonecountofficehasbeeninhisofficecounselorismoreofthetimeduringtheperiodofgrandjuryactivities Hold thought steadfastlytoenduring,thegood,andthetrulyandyouwill bringtheseintoyourexperienceproportionablytotheoccupancyofyourthoughtsMaryBakerEddy. Wonderful USED can usually achieve it. Respect, it differs from ally other nation on the globe—and thoughtful are still grateful for it. Less there is still rampant in many sections of the States, particularly in labor unions dominated by most leaders. But the recent of the Dies committee, condemned radicalism and many of its ramifications, that not more than 1-1/2 of the 130,000,000 citizens of United States have been affected by subversive "And the time may aid the committee," when the communists) will cease violously regarded by anyone United States." 委员会 too, notes for the shift. The soviet-tit, it reports, has helped constitutional democracy taking more clear the real of all dictatorships." And quarter of the leadership CIO is still communistic, committee finds that the over-majority of the rank and membership is shying away radicalism. Can be no doubt of this.rage American, disgusted amms", government experiment and free-handed spend his tax-given dollars, is to get back to solid and old-fashioned stand-All that remains is for men leaders to take the pube—and having taken it, to down to earth and start telling the people who elect-The pendulum is swinging. WASHINGTON SIDELIGHTS: Dr. Leiserson, the latest addition to the National Labor Relations board who was added because proponents of the act figured that his appointment would forestall criticism of board bias, has dissented from his colleagues in a number of important cases. His memorandums to the other board members, produced as evidence by the house committee investigating the Wagner board, have also showed that he often differed with them. Of this situation, a former trial examiner for the board made the following analysis in a recent public address. "Dr. Leiserson is either inviting the courts to reverse his associates on the board, or inviting congress to clarify its intent with respect to certain ambiguities of the act by amendments. His dissenting opinions are tacit admissions that the act is defective and that his associates on the board cannot be trusted to administer fairly and impartially its provisions." By WARREN BAYLEY PINE RIDGE, ARKANSAS—The door opened with a swish and an impressively dressed gentleman entered the store. "Have you got any cheese?" he asked. Upon receiving an affirmative reply, he said "Give me two pounds—Have you any horehound candy?" When the answer was again yes, he said, "Let me have a quarter's worth—now show me the cracker barrel and let me sit in the big chair-by the stove. I want to be able to tell my friends back home that I ate cheese and horehound candy, and snitched crackers out of the barrel, just like Lum and Abner tell about on the radio." The place was Pine Ridge. The store was Dick Huddleston's. The visitor, a Cleveland banker, one of the many thousands who visit Pine Ridge each year to see the little community made famous by the home-spun philosophy of the popular radio team. If you're contemplating a trip down Arkansas way don't fail to drop in on this thriving metropolis situated in the center of the Ocachita National Forest in the western part of the state. You won't need a road map to find it. Pine Ridge markers on the sign posts receive top billing along with Hot Springs and Little Rock. The town looks exactly as portrayed on the air. Fifty people, two stores, a blacksmith shop and the saw mill. Your only trouble will be in slowing up quick enough to be able to stop in town at all. So when you think you are getting close, start looking for signs. When you see this one April 26, 1937, the change was officially made. A nation wide broadcast, attended by over 20,000 people, was made from the state capitol steps in Little Rock, to celebrate the change. Another nice tribute which was paid to the two small town boys who made good, was the naming of the Mena-Pine Ridge road. "The Lum and Abner highway." Its made of gravel and pretty rough in spots, which is as it should be. Maybe, in the future, one of the schemes the "old fellows" are continually hatching out to make Pine Ridge a big city, will prove successful. Then they'll have a concrete road and stop lights on every corner. Maybe even an elevator in the "Jot'em Down Store." What Other They Say . . . "Free men cannot risk being controlled by professional politicians. Free men must themselves control the mechanism of free institutions. Free men must be ever vigilant that no group, no individual, no single power shall control the political and economic processes of our country." — R. W. Moore, Pres. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. "Our constant goal of a higher standard of living requires the wise use and conservation of our public funds. Waste and extravagance should find no place in government expenditures. Economy in government is the path to lower taxes." H. Smith Richard own ownership and control of basin lands over to the government. This has been nevertheless, though the tree did its work at the beef of the supervisors and the was made to them, Mr. Ever says he things the rehment of Prado to the gov't is a mistake and that the million dollars saved will a poor investment in the county stands to lose from million to three-quarters of million in the Prado deal. How much nobody knows of the appraisal work, the of negotiators and of lawyers will be lost. But county will reduce its bondedness and the tax load for control bonds will be eased. Result accredited to the jury is that one county has been in his office conolly more of the time during period of grand jury activity. I thought steadfastly to the king, the good, and the true, you will bring these into yourance proportionably to their necessity of your thoughts.—Baker Eddy. Western part of the state. You won't need a road map to find it. Pine Ridge markers on the sign posts receive top billing along with Hot Springs and Little Rock. The town looks exactly as portrayed on the air. Fifty people, two stores, a blacksmith shop and the saw mill. Your only trouble will be in slowing up quick enough to be able to stop in town at all. So when you think you are getting close, start looking for signs. When you see this one "Drive Keerful—Don't hit our young'uns—You all hurry back" start putting on the brakes. In the center of town is Huddleston's general store. From 10 to 30 automobiles from as many different states will probably be parked around its entrance. On the inside, Mr. Huddleston (Dick to everybody) will graciously be playing host to everyone. Don't fail to meet him—he's chuck full of amusing stories and a headline in his own right. Last year he played 53 fairs with his hill-billy band. Back in its beginning the town's name was Waters. It was Dick's idea to change the name to Pine Ridge. Application was made to the postoffice department and on "Our constant goal of a higher standard of living requires the wise use and conservation of our public funds. Waste and extravagance should find no place in government expenditures. Economy in government is the path to lower taxes."—H. Smith Richardson, Chairman, Vick Chemical Co. The control of government expenditures is vital and imperative, as it is the only way to decrease discouraging, unfair, destructive taxes, which, continued indefinitely destroy the vital, impelling force of industry, venture and progress under our free enterprise system.—A. W. Hawkes, Pres. Congoleum-Nairn, Inc. Tax collections mean just that much less that the average individual has today to spend for the goods he wants and needs—goods which mean jobs and payrolls in their production.—Walter D. Fuller, Pres. Curtis Publishing Co. NEW CHEVROLET SALES SOARING WONDERFUL USED CAR VALUES Now in stock! 5 REASONS WHY YOU SHOULD BUY USED CAR VALUES Now in stock! The Biggest Used Car Bargains in Town We are immediately reducing our fine stock of used cars to make room for more and more trade-ins on the popular new Chevrolet. Every used car and truck in our stock has been priced to SELL NOW. BUY NOW AND SAVE! 6,647,437 people bought used cars and trucks from Chevrolet dealers during the last four years. SEE THE CLASSIFIED SECTION OF THIS PAPER FOR LISTINGS OF YOUR CHEVROLET DEALER'S BARGAINS! 5 REASONS WHY YOU SHOULD BUY YOUR USED CAR FROM YOUR CHEVROLET DEALER NOW! 1 Buy a reconditioned used car now, and save costly repairs on your old car. 2 Save further depreciation on your old car. Trade up to a late model used car now. 3 Buy now—before prices rise—and save the difference. 4 Save winter conditioning expense on your old car. 5 All used cars are priced to sell fast to make room for more trade-ins. Buy now and save. Chevrolet Dealers are Headquarters for USED TRUCK Values! ALL POPULAR MAKES AND MODELS Cone Bros. Phone 2515 N. Loo Angeles St. Anaheim