anaheim-gazette 1932-06-30

Cuttle Declares Orange County Took Lead in Water Conservation Work, and Claims That Elliott’s Report Not Based on Facts President of Water Conservation Assn. Attacks Unfavorable Findings of San Francisco Engineer Who Advised Supervisors Not to Promote Upper Basin Conservation Until Agreement After reading a summary of Engineer G. A. Elliott’s report to the Orange county board of supervisors, in which he warns this county not to assist in spreading water in the upper Santa Ana river until an equitable arrangement has been worked out with Riverside and San Bernardino counties, President Francis Cuttle of the Water Conservation association took exception to a number of findings. Mr. Cuttle immediately wrote the Gazette his objections to Mr. Elliott’s findings. His letter follows: Anaheim Gazette, Anaheim, California. "I have before me copy of the issue of your paper containing a statement with reference to the report of G. A. Elliott, San Francisco engineer, to the board of supervisors of Orange county, and note among other things Mr. Elliott is reported to have advised that Orange county should not participate in the proposed plan of spreading in the upper basin, but should prevent, if possible, any further conservation above the lower canyon until an equitable arrangement has been agreed upon by all parties interested that will insure to the various parts of the entire area a fair proportion of the naturally available water. Possibly Mr. Elliott does not know that there is already an agreement signed and on record between the boards of supervisors of San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange counties and the Water Conservation association to the effect that no water shall be spread in the upper basin until and unless there is water flowing in the Santa Ana river at the Chapman bridge in Orange county, also that the Water Conservation association filed on two amounts of 15,000 miners inches each in October, 1911. (before the organization of the present division of water rights), and also holds a permit from the division of water rights than 2 miles a year, is assumed, the increasing flow of Santa Ana river during the last sixteen years may be due in part to the slow escape to the River of the waters that accumulated in the alluvium near the mountains during the decade of wet years preceding the present dry epoch, since these waters would have to pass through from 10 to 20 miles of gravels between the canyon mouths and the part of the Santa Ana in question. No criteria are known by which we can distinguish between these two possibilities at present. If the Santa Ana shrinks again later during a period when the minimum rainfall of the present decade is due to reach it, we can conclude that its fluctuations are to be attributed to this slow passage of the waters of wet and dry periods through the underground pores. If, on the other hand, its increased flow is maintained or continues to increase, this will prove that it is due to returning irrigation waters." Orange Took Initiative "That is exactly what occurred as indicated by the record of flow of water in the Santa Ana river at the Pedley bridge as hereinbefore referred to. "The initiative for securing financial assistance from the state for flood control on the Santa Ana river and water conservation was taken in Orange county at meetings of the Association of California, on A. D. 1932, and for the enforcement quiring sale of property of mortgage said Superior Court June, A. D. 1932, action, in favor Plaintiff and against et al., Defendants decree of foreclosure under the seal of Court on the 28th 1932, and to me day, together with nexed thereto, who manded to sell a cash in gold coin after the following and scribed real estate Situated in the State of California larly described as Lot "C" in Track on a Map record Page 51 of MI records of Oranfornia; ALSO half interest in feet wide and 88 described as beginning west corner of (33) of "Cypress" on a map record Page 35 of MI records of Oranfornia; running along the wester Thirty-three (32) 84.5 feet; right angles 10 feet early at right and tersection of the Lot Thirty-three Westerly 10 feet beginning; a point shown as Lot Tract No. 94, re-Page 51 of MI records of Oranfornia. And all reversers, together with rights, pipes and wise appertaining Together with all tenements, hereditances thereunto wise appertaining. Public notice is agreement signed and on record between the boards of supervisors of San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange counties and the Water Conservation association to the effect that no water shall be spread in the upper basin until and unless there is water flowing in the Santa Ana river at the Chapman bridge in Orange county, also that the Water Conservation association filed on two amounts of 15,000 miners inches each in October, 1911, (before the organization of the present division of water rights), and also holds a permit from the division of water rights for 48,000 acre feet as of May, 1926, and another permit for 250,000 acre feet as of the date October 25, 1930. The Water Conservation association has been proceeding with due diligence to utilize the water allotted to it under these permits and the directors of the association have their permits and the directors of the association have no intention of letting these permits lapse for lack of diligence. At Loss "Another interesting statement attributed to Mr. Elliott is to the effect that the water supply of Orange county has been decreased by reason of the conservation of water in the upper basin. Not having had the privilege of examining Mr. Elliott's report I am at a loss to know where he gets that information. "Referring to the report of the division of water rights known as Bulletin 19, pages 354 and 355, we find that there is an incomplete record beginning with the year 1888. From that time down until 1931 there is a record of 29 years, 14 years having been omitted (probably for lack of funds). This record shows in 1888-89 an average of 517 inches of water flowing in the Santa Ana river at the Narrows or Pedley bridge, while the average for the 29 years for which there is a record is 1,764 inches. Certainly that does not show a decreased flow of water into Orange county. It is true that there has been a slight decrease in the flow from the years 1925 to 1931, but these, with the exception of 1927, have been years of less than normal rain fall. As to the effect upon Orange county of spreading water in the upper Santa Ana basin this fact should be kept in mind that the Riverside companies have water rights aggregating 57,000 acre feet annually, so long as they can get this water from the artesian basin and vicinity they do not draw upon the supply in the Riverside or Jurupa basin, but when they are unable to get the water to which they are entitled from the San Bernardino area they resort to pumping in the Jurupa basin which has a direct effect upon the supply going into Orange county. The purpose of spreading water on the debris cone above the Artesion basin is to maintain the supply of wafer at the Artesion basin. By doing that and using that water at the other hand, its increased flow is maintained or continues to increase, this will prove that it is due to returning irrigation waters." Orange Took Initiative "That is exactly what occurred as indicated by the record of flow of water in the Santa Ana river at the Pedley bridge as hereinbefore referred to. "The initiative for securing financial assistance from the state for flood control on the Santa Ana river and water conservation was taken in Orange county at meetings of the Associated chambers of commerce, the last one held at Anaheim. The Governor (then elect) Rolph and Lieutenant Governor (then elect) Merriam were honored guests and the writer was requested to present the matter. After doing so Governor Rolph and Lieutenant Governor Merriam pledged themselves to 100 percent cooperation by the state and they have kept their pledges. When the Bill No. 51, Statute 640 of the Civil Code 1931, was before the legislature making an appropriation for this purpose representatives of Orange county asked that the bill be changed so that the supervisors of Orange county would have an opportunity to be heard on any proposed work east of Tipppecanoe avenue in San Bernardino county. It was stated by a representative committee from Orange county that if this were done Orange county would continue its financial assistance. After the bill passed the legislature making $400,000 available for this work the question of matching the state fund was taken up with the boards of supervisors of the three counties.. The writer urged on behalf of Orange county its proportion be cut to 20 percent instead of one third an dthe boards of supervisors of the upper counties agreed to this. Remember no one in Orange county asked for this reduction. It was a voluntary act on the part of the supervisors of the two upper counties, so that at the present time with the state matching local funds Orange county would be putting up about 10 percent instead of 33 1-3 percent of the cost. Contrary Evidence "I can find no record which substantiates the statement attributed to Mr Elliott to the effect that the conservation of water in the upper basin reduces the flow into Orange county but I can find plenty of evidence to the contrary. It certainly is a late date now for Orange county to talk of preventing the spreading of water on the debris cone on the upper basin as Orange county has contributed to the construction of the weir for conservation of this water, has signed an agreement with reference to the spreading of the same and has taken the initiative in securing state aid for this work. "I trust that you will print this in full or reject it entirely." QUOTES U. S. EXPERT As authority that this statement is correct, I quote from the United States Geological Survey Paper 142 by W. C. Mendenhall, U. S. G. S., who made a thorough study of this question and was the author of Water Supply Paper 142 published in 1902. "Speaking of the increase in flow into Orange county, Mendenhall says, on page 28, the following: "This rather remarkable increase is usually attributed to return waters from irrigation in the vicinity of Riverside, Pomona and Ontario and it is probable that the greater part of it is correctly assigned to this cause, but there is another possibility which deserves to be considered. The decade of excessive rainfall ending in the early nineties thoroughly saturated the gravels near the mountains in this part of the etate. Subsurface percolation varies widely in rate, this being dependent upon the coarseness of the material through which the water passes. Rates between zero and 96 feet per day have been measured by Homer Hamlin in the narrows of Los Angeles river and rates with lower maxima are reported by Professor Slichter from Mohave River below Victorville and from the Paso de Barolo. If a rate of 23 feet a day, or less reduces the flow into Orange county but I can find plenty of evidence to the contrary. It certainly is a late date now for Orange county to talk of preventing the spreading of water on the debris cone on the upper basin as Orange county has contributed to the construction of the weir for conservation of this water, has signed an agreement with reference to the spreading of the same and has taken the initiative in securing state aid for this work. "I trust that you will print this in full or reject it entirely. "Thanking you in advance for giving this article the same prominence that you gave to the Elliott report, I am "Yours very truly, FRANCIS CUTTLE, President WATER CONSERVATION ASSN." ALUMNI MARKER The north entrance to the campus of the University of Southern California is now marked by a pylon 58 feet high, erected by the Alumni association and dedicated on commencement day. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT In and For the County of Orange, State of California SALE UNDER FORCLOSURE OF MORTGAGE MARY H. MILLER, Plaintiff, VS. KAY W. HUNT and BEATRICE B. HUNT; SAMUEL L. GARDNER, FARMERS AND MERCHANTS TRUST COMPANY OF LONG BEACH, a corporation, Trustee: KENT REALTY CO., Inc., a California corporation; BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, a National Banking Association, Defendants. Under and by virtue of a decree of foreclosure and order of sale duly made and entered in the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, on the 24th day of June, A. D. 1932, and a Writ of Execution for the enforcement of judgment requiring sale of property under foreclosure of mortgage issued out of the said Superior Court on the 28th day of June, A. D. 1932, in the above entitled action, in favor of Mary H. Miller, Plaintiff and against Kay W. Hunt, et al., Defendants a copy of which said decree of foreclosure duly attested under the seal of the said Superior Court on the 28th day of June, A. D. 1932, and to me delivered on the same day, together with the said writ annexed thereto, whereby I am commanded to sell at public auction for cash in gold coin of the United States, the following and in said decree, described real estate: Situated in the County of Orange State of California, and more particularly described as follows, to-wit: Lot "C" in Tract No. 94, as-shown on a Map recorded in Book 10, Page 51 of Miscellaneous Maps records of Orange County, California. ALSO an undivided one-half interest in a strip of land 10 feet wide and 84.5 feet long described as beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot Thirty-three (33) of "Cypress Park," as shown on a map recorded in Book 7, Page 35 of Miscellaneous Maps records of Orange County, California; running thence southerly along the westerly line of Lots Thirty-three (33) and Thirty-two (32), 84.5 feet; thence Easterly at right angles 10 feet; thence North-ery at right angles 84.5 feet to intersection of the Northerly line of Lot Thirty-three (33); thence Westerly 10 feet to the point of beginning; a portion thereof being shown as Lot "G" on a Map of Tract No. 94, recorded in Book 10, Page 51 of Miscellaneous Maps records of Orange County, California. And all reversions and remainders, together with all water, water rights, pipes and flumes in any wise appertaining to said land. Together with all and singular tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in any wise appertaining. Public notice is hereby given that on ORDINANCE NO. 583 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTIONS 24, 30, 31, 32 AND 33 OF ORDINANCE NO. 54, ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING A SYSTEM FOR THE ASSESSMENT. LEVY AND COLLECTION OF CITY TAXES FOR THE CITY OF ANAHEIM." THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Sections 24, 30, 31, 32 and 33 of Ordinance No. 54, entitled "An Ordinance Providing a System for the Assessment, Levy and Collection of City Taxes for the City of Anaheim," be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 24. Within ten days after the receipt of the assessment book, the Chief of Police must publish a notice specifying: 1. That the taxes on all personal property secured by real property, and one-half of the taxes on all real property will be due on the 1st day of November, and will be delinquent on the 5th day of December, next thereafter, at five o'clock P.M., and that unless paid prior thereto ten per cent will be added to the amount thereof, and that if said one-half be not paid before the twentieth day in April next, at five o'clock P.M., an additional five per cent will be added thereto. That the remaining one-half of the taxes on all real property will be payable on and after the twentieth day of January next, and will be delinquent on the twentieth day in April next thereafter, at five o'clock P.M., and that unless paid prior thereto five per cent will be added to the amount thereof. 2. That all taxes may be paid at the time the first installment, as herein provided, is due and payable. 3. The times and places at which payment of taxes may be made. The Tax Collector may fix a date in advance of the due date when payments may be made. Section 30. On the fifth day introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 14 day of June, 1932, and that the same was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said city Council held on the 28 day of June, 1932 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Koesel, Mann Martenet Jr. NOES: Councilmen none. ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: Councilmen Sheridan and Cook. And I further certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed and approved said ordinance on the 28 day of June, 1932. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 28 day of June, 1932. (J. W. PRICE, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim.) NOTICE OF SALE BY TRUSTEE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on the 25th day of July, 1932, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock A.M. of said day, at the South entrance to the Orange County Court House, in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, the BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, (the successor to all the rights, powers and duties of Bank of Italy National Trust and Savings Association, organized and existing at the time of the execution of the deed of trust hereinafter referred to) as Trustee under a certain deed of trust executed by E. A. SPILLER, also known as Ernest A. Spiller, and GERTRUDE A. SPILLER, husband and wife, and recorded on June 5, 1930, in Book 392, page 74, Official Records of Orange County, California, which was given to secure a promissory note for the sum of $400.00 with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum, principal and interest payable in monthly installments of $4.60 each, on the first day of each and every month, beginning July 1, 1930, in accordance with the terms of said deed of trust and in compliance with a notice of default and demand for sale of the property in the said deed of trust and hereinafter described, recorded on March 21, 1932, in Book 547, page 116 of Official Records of Orange County, California, executed by the owner and holder thereof. beginning; a portion thereof being shown as Lot "G" on a Map of Tract No. 94, recorded in Book 10. Page 51 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California. And all reversions and remainders, together with all water, water rights, pipes and flumes in any wise appertaining to said land. Together with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in any wise appertaining. Public notice is hereby given that on Friday, the 22nd day of July, A.D. 1932, at ten o'clock A.M. of said day, I will proceed to sell at the south door of the court house, in the City of Santa Ana, at public auction, to the highest bidder for cash, in gold coin of the United States, all the above described real estate, or so much thereof as will be sufficient to satisfy said decree for principal, interest and all costs. Given under my hand this 28th day of July, A.D. 1932. LOGAN JACKSON. Sheriff. ROSCOE S. WILKEY, Attorney for Plaintiff. 702 Security Bldg.. Long Beach, Calif. June 30, July 7-14 NOTICE OF SALE BY TRUSTEE SECTION 1. That Section 22-A of Ordinance No. 476 entitled: "An Ordinance creating the Public Service Department of the City of Anaheim. Defining its Powers and Prescribing its Duties; Creating the Office of Controller of said Department, Defining his Powers, Prescribing his Duties and Fixing His Compensation; Establishing Rates and Charges for Electric and Water Service and Providing for the Collecting Thereof; Specifying the Manner of Making Applications and Deposits for Such Service and of Handling Delinquent Payments; Prescribing Certain Rules and Regulations Governing the Installation and Use of Electric and Water Services, and Fixing Penalties for Violations Thereof; and Abolishing the Office of Rate Collector of said City," be amended to read as follows: Section 22-A: SCHEDULE P-11 OPTIONAL AGRICULTURAL POWER SERVICE: Applicable to general agricultural power service. RATE: Energy charge in addition to the service charge. Rate per K.W. H. for Consumption per H.P. per year of Size Annual First Second All of Service 1000 1000 over Install-Charge KWH KWH 2000ation, per per KWH per H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. Section 32. After the settlement with the Chief of Police as prescribed in the preceding section, The Clerk must charge the Chief of Police with the amount of the taxes due on the delinquent list, with the penalties added thereto, and within three days thereafter. COLLECTING THEREOF; SPECIFYING THE MANNER OF MAKING APPLICATIONS AND DEPOSITS FOR SUCH SERVICE AND OF HANDLING DELINQUENT PAYMENTS; PRESCRIBING CERTAIN RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE INSTALLATION AND USE OF ELECTRIC AND WATER SERVICES, AND FIXING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND ABOLISHING THE OFFICE OF RATE COLLECTOR OF SAID CITY." THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Section 22-A of Ordinance No. 476 entitled: "An Ordinance creating the Public Service Department of the City of Anaheim. Defining its Powers and Prescribing its Duties; Creating the Office of Controller of said Department, Defining his Powers, Prescribing his Duties and Fixing His Compensation; Establishing Rates and Charges for Electric and Water Service and Providing for the Collecting Thereof; Specifying the Manner of Making Applications and Deposits for Such Service and of Handling Delinquent Payments; Prescribing Certain Rules and Regulations Governing the Installation and Use of Electric and Water Services, and Fixing Penalties for Violations Thereof; and Abolishing the Office of Rate Collector of said City," be amended to read as follows: Section 22-A: SCHEDULE P-11 OPTIONAL AGRICULTURAL POWER SERVICE: Applicable to general agricultural power service. RATE: Energy charge in addition to the service charge. Rate per K.W. H. for Consumption per H.P. per year of Size Annual First Second All of Service 1000 1000 over Install-Charge KWH KWH 2000ation, per per KWH per H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. Section 32. After the settlement with the Chief of Police as prescribed in the preceding section, The Clerk must charge the Chief of Police with the amount of the taxes due on the delinquent list, with the penalties added thereto, and within three days thereafter. COLLECTING THEREOF; SPECIFYING THE MANNER OF MAKING APPLICATIONS AND DEPOSITS FOR SUCH SERVICE AND OF HANDLING DELINQUENT PAYMENTS; PRESCRIBING CERTAIN RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE INSTALLATION AND USE OF ELECTRIC AND WATER SERVICES, AND FIXING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF; AND ABOLISHING THE OFFICE OF RATE COLLECTOR OF SAID CITY." be amended to read as follows: Section 22-A: SCHEDULE P-11 OPTIONAL AGRICULTURAL POWER SERVICE: Applicable to general agricultural power service. RATE: Energy charge in addition to the service charge. Rate per K.W. H. for Consumption per H.P. per year of Size Annual First Second All of Service 1000 1000 over Install-Charge KWH KWH 2000ation, per per KWH per H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.P. H.p was given to secure a promissory note for the sum of $400.00 with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum, principal and interest payable in monthly installments of $4.60 each, on the first day of each and every month, beginning July 1, 1930, in accordance with the terms of said deed of trust and in compliance with a notice of default and demand for sale of the property in the said deed of trust and hereinafter described, recorded on March 21, 1932, in Book 547, page 116 of Official Records of Orange County, California, executed by the owner and holder of said note on account of the default in the payment of principal and interest due on March 1, 1931, and all payments due subsequently thereto, there being a total sum of $418.37 due and unpaid on the 15th day of February, 1932, and all payments due subsequently thereto—will sell at public auction, for cash, lawful money of the United States, and to the highest bidder, subject to liens and encumbrances prior to said deed of trust, the following described property, situate in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California: Lots Twenty-Six (26) and Twenty-Seven (27) in Block "B" of "Tract No. 247, Monte Vista Tract," as shown on a Map recorded in Book 13, page 51 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, California. or so much thereof as shall be necessary to pay the principal, interest, advances, charges, costs and trustee's fees due and unpaid at the date of said sale. Dated June 27, 1932. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION. By Roy E. Vincent, Vice-President, And W. Dale Bell, Assistant Trust Officer. (Successor to Bank of Italy National Trust and Savings Association) June 30, July 7, 14, 21 Chief of Police who acted under it therewith, and make final settlement of all taxes charged against him on the assessment book, and must require from him the Treasurer's receipt of all amounts collected. Section 32. After the settlement with the Chief of Police as prescribed in the preceding section, The Clerk must charge the Chief of Police with the amount of the taxes due on the delinquent list, with the penalties added thereto, and within three days thereafter deliver the list duly certified to such Chief of Police. Section 33. On or before the eighth day of June of each year, the Chief of Police shall publish the delinquent list which must contain the name of the persons and description of the property delinquent and the amount of taxes, penalties and costs due opposite each name and description, with the taxes due on personal property added to the taxes on real estate where the real estate is liable therefor on the several taxes are due from the same person. SECTION 6. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once in the Anaheim Gazette, a weekly newspaper printed, published and circulated in said City of Anaheim, and thirty days thereafter it shall take effect and be in full force. The foregoing ordinance is signed, approved and attested by me this 28 day of June, 1932. (SEAL) FRED KOESEL, Mayor of the City of Anaheim. Attest: J. W. PRICE. City Clerk of the City of Anaheim. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF ORANGE. CITY OF ANAHEIM. I. J. W. PRICE, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was in- Inno case will the total annual service charge be less than $13.00 for single phase service, nor less than $19.50 for three phase service. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (a) This rate applies to service rendered at 220 or 440 volts at the option of the consumer. All necessary transformers to obtain such voltage to be installed, owned and maintained by the City. (b) The annual period upon which this rate is based shall begin with the first regular meter reading on and after May 1st, and end with the last regular meter reading taken prior to May 1st of the succeeding year. (c) The service charge is payable in six monthly installments during the months of May to October inclusive. The energy charge is payable monthly as energy is used. (d) Any consumer may obtain the rates for a larger installation by guaranteeing the rates and service charge of the larger installation. (e) Whenever upon test any motor is found to be delivering more than 125% of its capacity as indicated by its name plate rating, the City may disregard the name plate rating and base its charges upon the actual output as calculated from test. (f) Change in Connected Load: Consumers permanently increasing or decreasing connected load will have payments adjusted in accordance with the basis outlined under provision (g) following: (g) Service Commenced or Discontinued During the Agricultural Year: The following adjustments apply only in the case of service first begun or permanently discontinued and will not be made when installations shut down for a few months. For a fractional agricultural year the rate will be modified as follows: The service charge will apply to service taken between May 1 and October 31 at the rate of one-sixth of the annual charge per month. The size of the blocks of energy charge will be prorated upon an annual basis. SECTION 2. That this Section shall be in force, together with existing provisions of said Ordinance, and is hereby adopted as an alternative ser- A regular meeting of the City of Anaheim on June 24, 1932, and it was passed and adopted meeting of said city Council the 28 day of June, 1932, voting vote: Councilmen Koesel, Mann. Councilmen none. AND NOT VOTING: Councillor and Cook. Her certify that the Mayor of Anaheim signed and approved on the 28 day of July WHEREOF. I have my hand and affixed the City of Anaheim this 28 day of July. J. W. PRICE. City Clerk of the City of Anaheim. STATE AMENDING SECOND OF ORDINANCE NO. 561 SHEED: "AN ORDINANCE FOR THE PUBLIC SERVICE DEFINING ITS POWDER PRESCRIBING ITS CREATING THE OFFICE COLLER OF SAID DEFINING HIS PRESCRIBING HIS AND FIXING HIS COMMUNICATION ESTABLISHING AND CHARGES FOR AND WATER SERVICES PROVIDING FOR THE THEREOF; SPECIE MANNER OF MAKINGS AND DEPARTMENTS OF ELECTRIC CENTER SERVICES, AND ENALTIES FOR VIOLATION; AND ABOLISHING OFFICE OF RATE COLLECTION SAID CITY." VICE TO Schedule P-11 in Section 22 of the above entitled Ordinance No. 476. SECTION 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances, to the extent the same conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, are to that extent hereby repealed. SECTION 4: The City Clerk of the City of Anaheim shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance, and cause the same to be published once in the Anaheim Gazette, a weekly newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in said City of Anaheim, and said Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after August 1, 1932. The foregoing Ordinance is signed, approved and attested by me this 28th day of June, 1932. (SEAL) FRED KOESEL. Mayor of the City of Anaheim. Attest: J. W. PRICE. City Clerk of the City of Anaheim. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF ORANGE. CITY OF ANAHEIM. I, J. W. PRICE, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 14th day of June, 1932, and that the same was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 28th day of June, 1932, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Koesel, Mann, and Martenet Jr. NOES: None. ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: Councilmen Cook and Sheridan. And I further certify that the Mayor, of the City of Anaheim signed and adopted said ordinance on the 28th day of June, 1932. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 28th day of June, 1932. (SEAL) J. W. PRICE. City Clerk of the City of Anaheim. Once in the Anaheim Gazette, a weekly newspaper printed, published and circulated in said City of Anaheim, and shall take effect immediately upon its passage; and the City Council does declare that the above ordinance was passed in an emergency measure upon the following grounds, which facts constitute the emergency: the City is confronted with demand from the public that the license fees be payable semi-annually instead of annually; that the City Council believes that it is for the best interests of the City of Anaheim that such license be so payable, and that the licenses are all, under the present ordinance, payable on the first day of July, and that it is impossible to amend the ordinance within thirty days to become effective on July 1st, and therefore the City Council declares that emergency exists as above stated. The foregoing ordinance is signed, approved and attested by me this 28th day of June, 1932. (SEAL) FRED KOESEL. Mayor of the City of Anaheim. Attest: J. W. PRICE. City Clerk of the City of Anaheim. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF ORANGE. CITY OF ANAHEIM. I. J. W. PRICE, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 14th day of June, 1932, and that the same was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 28th day of June, 1932, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Koesel, Mann, and Martenet Jr. NOES: Councilmen none. ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: Councilmen Sheridan and Cook. And I further certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed and approved said ordinance on the 28th day of June, 1932. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 28th day of June, 1932. ORDINANCE NO. 565 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION 5 and SUB-SECTION 74 OF SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE NO. 507 OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE LICENSING OF BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS, SHOWS, EXHIBITIONS AND GAMES CONDUCTED OR CARRIED ON IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, FIXING THE RATE OF LICENSE THEREFOR, PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION THEREOF, AND FIXING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF." THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Section 5 and Subsection 74 of Section 10 of Ordinance No. 507 of the City of Anaheim entitled "An Ordinance Providing For The Licensing of Business, Professions, Shows, Exhibitions and Games Conducted or Carried on in the City of Anaheim, Fixing the Rate of License Therefor, Providing for Collection Thereof, and Fixing Penalties for the Violation Thereof," be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 5. All licenses shall be paid in advance in the legal currency of the United States, at the office of the Chief of Police, provided however, that the licenses required to be paid by the provisions of this ordinance shall be due and payable from and after the first day of July of each year and a separate license must be obtained for each branch establishment or separate place of business in which the business, profession, show, exhibition or game is carried on, and each license shall authorize the party obtaining it, to carry on pursue or conduct only that business, profession, show, exhibition or game described in such license, and which is indicated thereby, and all of the provisions of this ordinance shall apply with equal force to branch establishments. The annual license as in this Council held on the 28th day of June, 1932, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Koesel, Mann, and Martenet Jr. NOES: Councilmen none. ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: Councilmen Sheridan and Cook. And I further certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed and approved said ordinance on the 28th day of June, 1932. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 28th day of June, 1932. J. W. PRICE. City Clerk of the City of Anaheim. ORDINANCE NO. 566 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PRESCRIBING THE MANNER IN WHICH CLAIMS AGAINST THE SAID CITY SHALL BE FILED AND ALLOWED, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 335 OF SAID CITY ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PRESCRIBING THE MANNER IN WHICH CLAIMS AGAINST SAID CITY SHALL BE FILED AND ALLOWED." THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Anaheim shall not hear or consider or allow any demand in favor of any person, firm or corporation, company or association, against said City, nor shall said City Council credit or allow any claim or bill against said City unless the same be itemized, giving the names, dates and particular service rendered and supplies or materials furnished and delivered. SECTION 2. Such demands presented to the City Council of said City shall conform to such forms as the City Council from time to time may by resolution, adopt. SECTION 3. The word "demand" used in this ordinance shall include any claims of any creditor, of said City, whether arising out of tort or contract or any breach of any contract, or whether the same be liquidated or unliquidated. SECTION 4. The demands provided for herein shall not apply to the regular employees of the City and the claims presented for the payroll may be made in one demand, which demand shall be itemized and rendered and approved by the City Clerk of the City of Anaheim. SECTION 5. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once in the Anaheim Gazette, a week- ANNUAL PERIOD UPON WHICH USED SHALL BEGIN WITH THE METER READING ON AND END WITH THE LAST READING TAKEN PRIOR TO SUCCEEDING YEAR. VICE CHARGE IS PAYABLE INSTALLMENTS DURING THE YEAR TO October, inclusive. Charge is payable monthly used. Consumer may obtain the larger installation by guaranties and service charge installation. After upon test, any mode delivering more than capacity as indicated by rating, the City may name plate rating and is upon the actual outed from test. In Connected Load: permanently increasing connected load will have rated in accordance with under provision (g). Commenced or Discontinued the Agricultural Year; adjustments apply to service first begun discontinued and will when installations shut months. Total agricultural year theified as follows: Charge will apply to service May 1 and October of one-sixth of the lower month. The blocks of energy correlated upon an annual That this Section shall together with existing Old Ordinance, and is as an alternative ser- SECTION 1. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 2. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published UNLIQUIDATED. SECTION 4. The demands provided for herein shall not apply to the regular employees of the City and the claims presented for the payroll may be made in one demand, which demand shall be itemized and rendered and approved by the City Clerk of the City of Anaheim. SECTION 5. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once in the Anaheim Gazette, a weekly newspaper printed, published and circulated in said City of Anaheim, and thirty days thereafter it shall take effect and be in full force. The foregoing ordinance is signed, approved and attested by me this 28th day of June, 1932. (SEAL) FRED KOESEL. Mayor of the City of Anaheim. Attest: J. W. PRICE. City Clerk of the City of Anaheim. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF ORANGE. CITY OF ANAHEIM. I. J. W. PRICE, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 14th day of June, 1932, and that the same was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 28th day of June, 1932, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen Koesel, Mann, and Martenet Jr. NOES: None. ABSENT AND NOT VOTING: Councilmen Sheridan and Cook. And I further certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed and approved said ordinance on the 28th day of June, 1932. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 28th day of June, 1932. (SEAL) J. W. PRICE. City Clerk of the City of Anaheim.