anaheim-gazette 1915-10-07

OLD S.P. MACHINE MAY CONTROL POLITICS NON-PARTISAN BILL GIVES CORPORATIONS OPPORTUNITY OF DEFEATING WILL OF THE PEOPLE STRONG ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF PRESENT METHOD OF ELECTING STATE OFFICERS, BY FORMER GOV. PARDEE The Oakland Enquirer, a staunch progressive newspaper and supporter of Gov. Johnson, is leading the fight in the north against the proposed non-partisan bill to be voted upon at the special election Oct. 26. The Wayfarer, writing in the Enquirer, gives strong reasons why the proposed bill should be defeated. The author is acknowledged to be former governor, George C. Pardee, a strong progressive and former member of the Lincoln-Roosevelt League. Pardee has fought the old S. P. machine more vigorously, probably, than any man in the state. As mayor of Oakland, he many years ago opposed the methods of the railroad machine, and more than any one man in the nor compelled the railroad to give Oakland a square deal. The railroad attempted to bottle up certain streets in Oakland, erecting high board fences across the thoroughfares, and thus seeking to prevent the people of that city from ingress and egress to and from the bay. As mayor of Oakland, he tore down these fences and compelled the railroad monopoly to observe the law. On his record as the direct primary, we also got a satisfactory legislature. In 1914, still under the direct primary, the progressive party gave us Governor Johnson; the progressive and republican parties between them, gave us Lieutenant Governor Eshleman; the progressive and republican and democratic parties between them gave us State Controller Chambers, State Treasurer Richardson and Attorney General Webb; and the progressive and republican and democratic and socialist and prohibition parties, between them, gave us a legislature that seems to have suited the people pretty well. Results are what the people of California want. Is anybody, except our standpat friends and brothers, dissatisfied with the direct primary progressive-republic-democratic-socialist-prohibition results of the last five years? Why change, then? Rainbow chasing, in politics, as in everything else, does not pay. There are two kinds of nonpartisanism. One is the voluntary kind—the kind we now have and have had in California for the last five years—the kind that has given us Governor Johnson twice, and Lieutenant Governors Wallace and Eshleman, and the last three legislatures, which have been the only legislatures that have really represented the people of California since the railroads went into politics nearly fifty years ago. This kind of nonpartisanism permits, by law, the people to register as members of any political party in whose state or national principles and policies they believe. It also permits the registered members of these parties to choose, at direct primaries, the nominees of these parties. So far, this nonpartisanism is partisan of the voluntary kind—it permits anybody to be any kind of a partisan he wants to be. But, if he doesn't want to be a partisan, the voter may be entirely nonpartisan—he may register with the county clerk as a strictly nonpartisan member of no party at all. But, out of the more than a million registered voters of California, it is entirely safe to say that there are not a thousand—one-tenth of one percent—of those voters so registered—everybody wants to be a partisan and not a nonpartisan. Well, after the nominees of the parties have been chosen at the direct primaries, our present voluntary nonpartisanism loaned, to whom they what the conditions be, the amount and titles to be deposited ed public money, etc., conditions because of constitution, can not accept by popular vote constitution—can not other words, without sent of the people. However, to take away this direct power of people's money, and enter to the legislature any and every legal change the terms, co-guards in such ways proper. True, if the tempts to do things funds which the people the people will be paid the private expense getting up referendum by vote, knocking on decree. But public ought to be, too important left to the whims of inexperienced and hardened legislators. If a methods and conditioned the public funds is not legislature propose that people in the form o to the constitution, to reject by the people should not be competed on guard, to have, to referendum, their own to the safeguarding funds. Let the labor matter rather be in the legislature than in the people. Let the legacy very important matter act only through that than to decree that it be ever ready to keep within due bounds by referendum. But it is charged that amendment No. 38, if it is said, and so far knows, not denied, amendment was originated two corporation attorn but little changed by from the form in w tortories drew it. It is fact, moreover, that tax-shirking corporate horse press are fighting amendment. A lot of friends and brethren... ago opposed the methods of the railroad machine, and more than any one man in the nor compelled the railroad to give Oakland a square deal. The railroad attempted to bottle up certain streets in Oakland, erecting high board fences across the thoroughfares, and thus seeking to prevent the people of that city from ingress and egress to and from the bay. As mayor of Oakland, he tore down these fences and compelled the railroad monopoly to observe the law. On his record as an anti-railroad man he was elected governor of California, and his administration was free from railroad control from first to last. He now sees in Gov. Johnson’s proposed non-partisan measure a chance for the railroad machine to again obtain control of state politics. We reproduce the following extracts from the Enquirer of Oct. 2, and we commend it to the careful persual of all our readers, republican, progressive, democratic, socialist, prohibitionist and all others: Governor Johnson made, as he always does, a good speech last Friday night here in Oakland. His address was a lengthy one—as every address must be that attempts to prove that partyless nonpartisanism can produce better political results in this state than the direct primary partisan system, under which we are now working, has produced. Our present system has deposed the Southern Pacific’s political bureau, scrap-heaped its bosses, given us Johnson twice for governor, Wallace and Eshleman for lieutenant governor, and three legislatures, one after the other, that have represented the people and not the corporations. In fact, the score for the present system has been perfect. No other system could have produced better results. No argument can disprove that. In fact, neither Governor Johnson nor any other arguer for nonpartisanism attempts to show, or can show, that the system we are now using has given us anything but good results. What the governor and all who stand with him do is this: Ignoring entirely the system under which we are now successfully working and have successfully worked for the past five years, they define “partisanism” as the old system of controlled nominating conventions, which, of course, put the bosses in control of the politics of this state, and advocate nonpartisanism in place of it. But the governor and all who stand with him do not tell their audiences nor inform their readers that, under and because of the present direct primary system of partisanism the bosses were deposed in 1910 and have been kept deposed ever since. Referring always to the old convention system and ignoring the last five years of direct primary partisanism, the Governor and his followers say that partisanism gave us machine politics and machine be any kind of a partisan he wants to be. But, if he doesn’t want to be a partisan, the voter may be entirely nonpartisan—he may register with the county clerk as a strictly nonpartisan member of no party at all. But, out of the more than a million registered voters of California, it is entirely safe to say that there are not a thousand—one-tenth of one percent—of those voters so registered—everybody wants to be a partisan and not a nonpartisan. Well, after the nominees of the parties have been chosen at the direct primaries, our present voluntary nonpartisanism permits, by law, the voters to look over the list of the nominees of the parties and size them up. If the voter is not satisfied with the nominees of his own party, if he thinks any of the nominees of any other party are better qualified for public office than the nominees of his own party, our present voluntary nonpartisanism permits him to vote for those other and better nominees. If the voter is satisfied with none of the party nominees, our present voluntary nonpartisanism permits him to vote for anybody he may see fit—he is not compelled to vote for any party nominee. What more than anybody ask for in the way of nonpartisanism? It was this kind of nonpartisanism that permitted voters registered as republicans, democrats, socialists and prohibitionists, at the last state election, to size up the nominees of their own parties and decide that Johnson was better fitted for governor than Fredericks, the republican nominee, or Curtin, the democrat, or the socialists, or the prohibition nominee. Evidently many thousand republicans, democrats, socialists and prohibitionists did so decide and vote. For, if Johnson had gotten only the votes of those who registered as Progressives, he would have been beaten out of sight, because the progressive registration was many thousand fewer than the democratic, which was many thousand fewer than the republican. With this kind of voluntary nonpartisanism Governor Johnson and certain others of our progressive friends and brothers are dissatisfied and advise us to supplant it with the involuntary kind of nonpartisanism, although the voluntary kind has rescued the people of California from the political clutches of the Southern Pacific and has given us every time we have tried it, public officials that have suited the people. The other kind of nonpartisanism—the kind that Governor Johnson strenuously advises us to adopt in place of our present successful and voluntary kind—is involuntary forced nonpartisanism. This kind of nonpartisanism will not permit the voter to register as a member of any political party for state elections. It will not permit rank and file republicans, or progressives, or democrats or socialists, or prohibitionists to select, at primaries or in any effective other way, the nominees of their parties for state offices, because the governor and his followers sat that, if they have their But it is charged that amendment No. 38, if it is said and, so far knows, not denied, that amendment was originated two corporation attacks but little changed by from the form in wortneys drew it. It is fact, moreover, that tax-shirking corporation horse press are fighting amendment. A lot of friends and brothers ment convincing to anything they advocate certain corporations out of our progressive frighters also throw verbals regard with suspicion greaves们 who opposed nonpartisanism; for they claim these same oppose. Sauce for goose ought to be also progressive gander. I sives are at least foot nonpartisanism because certain corporations what shall we think about our progressive friend who crawl into bed with corporations who favor amendment No. 38? No. 38 provides that shall be vested “in time and not in “in the legal state”—which latter people, with the referent initiative. Now, if “alone shall have the population laws,” where will off if the legislature laws that suit the tax portations and do not burdened people? That But how can anything ed which the constitution adopted such the referendum amendments shall be the prerogativeislature”? “The initial appears that only “will have the power,” ment No. 38, be adopted action laws, and the peo initiate them. APPORTIONMENT OF STATE SECTION Orange County Gets $500 million and $12,228 for education money to the common state; Orange county gives high schools of this county $228.45. The common school district is made upon a basis of teachers on attendance allowed for each other. put the bosses in control of the politics of this state, and advocate non-partisanism in place of it. But the governor and all who stand with him do not tell their audiences nor inform their readers that, under and because of the present direct primary system of partisanism the boses were deposed in 1910 and have been kept deposed ever since. Referring always to the old convention system and ignoring the last five years of direct primary partisanism, the Governor and his followers say that partisanism gave us machine politics and machine rule. Therefore, let's have non-partisanism, they argue. The Wayfarer, answering says this: "Partisanism, with nominating conventions, gave us machine politics and machine rule, it is true. But partisanism, minus the nominating conventions and plus the direct primary, has put the machine entirely out of business, and given us every time we have tried it, governors, legislatures and other state officials that satisfy the people. Why change, then, from partisanism, minus the conventions, and plus the direct primary to nonpartisanism?" Having licked his enemy in every battle for five years, having gotten that enemy down and being seated on him, a general would be foolish who would change his successful plan of campaign for any kind of a new one. The partisan direct primary has enabled the people of California to lick their political enemies in every battle for the past five years. It has enabled those people to get those enemies down and sit on them. Why, then, should the people change their plan of campaign from partisanism to partyless nonpartisanism? "Let well enough alone," especially when that "well enough" is producing results that suit us, ought to be a good rule to follow. "What have national political policies and national politics and national political parties got to do with state politics, state policies and state political parties," Governor Johnson, in effect, asks. "Not a thing," the Wayfarer replies. But the republican party of California, under the direct primary, gave us Governor Johnson, Lieutenant Governor Wallace and a satisfactory legislature in 1910. In 1912, under the party system and At the coming October special election there will be up to the people several propositions. One of them is a constitutional amendment which proposes to take out of the constitution most of the safeguards of the public funds which are to be and now are loaned out to the banks-and to leave the safeguarding of these funds to the tender mercies of every legislative session. As things now are, the people themselves have decided in their constitution how these funds shall be The other kind of nonpartisanism—the kind that Governor Johnson strenuously advises us to adopt in place of our present successful and voluntary kind—is involuntary forced nonpartisanism. This kind of nonpartisanism will not permit the voter to register as a member of any political party for state elections. It will not permit rank and file republicans, or progressives, or democrats or socialists, or prohibitionists to select, at primaries or in any effective other way, the nominees of their parties for state offices, because the governor and his followers sat that, if they have their way, there will be no party nominees on the ballot. All that the voters will be permitted to do, under this involuntary and forced nonpartisanism, will be to vote, at the primaries, for those self-selected aspirants who appear to them to be best fitted for the several offices. And, of all these aspirants, the two who receive the highest votes for each office will be declared the nominees for that office; and from these two nominees, the voters will choose the one who best suits them for each office. The people will be split, at the primaries, into numerous factions, each supporting a "favorite son"—the Southern Pacific and other special-interests will see to it that the crop of "favorite sons" is large. But the Southern Pacific and its allied villainies will not split up. For governor, for instance, they will support Brown from the south, and Smith, from the north. And under the Governor's enforced, involuntary, partless nonpartisanism, it will be a whole lot easier for the Southern Pacific to capture again the government of this state—which, ever since we have had our present voluntary nonpartisanism with the direct primary, it has been impossible for it to grab. At the coming October special election there will be up to the people several propositions. One of them is a constitutional amendment which proposes to take out of the constitution most of the safeguards of the public funds which are to be and now are loaned out to the banks—and to leave the safeguarding of these funds to the tender mercies of every legislative session. As things now are, the people themselves have decided in their constitution how these funds shall be ANAHEIM GAZETTE Thursday, Oct. 7 loaned, to whom they shall be loaned, what the conditions of loaning shall be, the amount and kind of the securities to be deposited for the borrowed public money, etc. And all these conditions, because they are in the constitution, can not be changed except by popular vote amending the constitution—can not be changed, in other words, without the direct consent of the people. It is proposed, however, to take away from the people this direct power of safeguarding the people's money, and to give that power to the legislature, which may, at any and every legislative session, change the terms, conditions and safeguards in such ways as to it may seem proper. True, if the legislature attempts to do things with the public funds which the people do not approve, the people will be permitted to go to the private expense and trouble of getting up referendum petitions and, by vote, knocking out the legislative decree. But public funds are, or ought to be, too important things to be left to the whims of even honest, but inexperienced and harassed and hurried legislators. If any change in the methods and conditions of lending out the public funds is necessary, let the legislature propose that change to the people in the form of an amendment to the constitution, to be approved or rejected by the people. The latter should not be compelled to be always on guard, to have, by means of the referendum, their own way in regard to the safeguarding of the public funds. Let the laboring car in this matter rather be in the hands of the legislature than in the hands of the people. Let the legislature, in this very important matter, be permitted to act only through the people, rather than to decree that the people must be ever ready to keep the legislature within due bounds by means of the referendum. But it is charged that this taxation amendment, No. 38, is "loaded." For it is said, and, so far as the Wayfarer knows, not denied, that this tax amendment was originally drawn by two corporation attorneys, and was but little changed by the legislature from the form in which these attorneys drew it. It appears to be a fact, moreover, that none of the big tax-shrinking corporations or the led-horse press are fighting this proposed amendment. A lot of our progressive friends and brothers use this information. ANAHEIM WINS WITH POINTS TO SPARE LONG BEACH BASEBALL TEAM PROVES AN EASY MARK FOR LOCALS ELEVEN TO TWO WAS THE SCORE AND IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN MUCH WORSE La Franco's curves, twists and spit balls proved too much for the aggregation of alleged ball players who broke away from their reservation at Long Beach Sunday and wandered into the interior under the impression that they could play ball. These boys may be able to make a good record when playing with teams along the coast within sight of the bounding billows, but they are woefully outclassed when they strike the inland provinces where real ball players grow. A week ago Sunday they tackled Fullerton, a town which supports only a mediocre ball team, and were defeated by a score of 7 to 0. Not content with this they even arranged a game with Anaheim and, of course, the result was worse. Eleven to two was the score. It might be mentioned that those two runs were handed them for the purpose of reviving their lagging spirits and prevent their collapse in the middle of the game. The slaughter began at the beginning. The beachites went out in one-two-three order in their half of the first. Then the locals began swatting the ball into the three gardens, with the utmost impunity. After four positions and separated from it by a fog-like belt. In its most perfect development the mirage shows the upper and topsy-turvy portion of the view quite as distinctly as the lower and true portion. These appearances are due to refraction and reflection from layers of air of different density, such as are often formed above a wide expanse of level country in warm weather. LONG BEACH WINS IN BOWLING GAME Team From Beach City Defeats Anaheim by 36 Pins The Long Beach bowling team came up Friday night and defeated the crack locals by the narrow margin of 26 pins. While Breckney, of the visitors, made the high score—202, Fisher's average of 180 was the highest. Cowan, of the locals was second with an average of 178. Mondell appeared to be under the influence of a jinx. It was an off day for him. His average was only 140. The locals will go down to Long Beach in a day or two and play a return game. Following is the score: LONG BEACH— Aver. Clay ...166 187 160 179 165 171 Breckney ...202 147 144 170 165 165 Evans ...168 163 176 171 167 167 Totals ...526 497 480 520 497 2520 Team average, 168. ANAHEIM— Aver. Fisher ...195 197 181 181 147 180 Mondell ...146 130 146 148 133 140 Cowan ...166 199 168 191 166 178 Totals ...507 526 495 520 446 2494 Team average, 166. REFORESTATION COMMITTEE HOLDS A MEETING Members From Three Counties Gather But it is charged that this taxation amendment, No. 38, is "loaded." For it is said, and so far as the Wayfarer knows, not denied, that this tax amendment was originally drawn by two corporation attorneys, and was but little changed by the legislature from the form in which these attorneys drew it. It appears to be a fact, moreover, that none of the big tax-shirking corporations or the led-horse press are fighting this proposed amendment. A lot of our progressive friends and brothers use, as an argument, convincing to them, in favor of anything they advocate, the fact that certain corporations oppose it. Some of our progressive friends and brothers also throw verbal rocks at and regard with suspicion all other progressives who oppose any proposal—nonpartisanism, for instance—which they claim, these same corporations oppose. Sauce for the progressive goose ought to be also sauce for the progressive gander. If those progressives are, at least, foolish who oppose nonpartisanism, because, it is claimed, certain corporations also oppose it, what shall we think and say of those of our progressive friends and brothers who crawl into bed with these same corporations who favor this taxation amendment, No. 38? Besides all this, No. 38 provides that the power to tax shall be vested "in the legislature," and not in "in the legislative power of the state"—which latter includes the people, with the referendum and the initiative. Now, if "the legislature" alone shall have the power to pass taxation laws, where will the people get off if the legislature passes taxation laws that suit the tax-shirking corporations and do not suit the tax-burdened people? The referendum? But how can anything be referendumed, which the constitution, in an amendment adopted subsequently to the referendum amendment, provides shall be the prerogative of "the legislature"? "The initiative"? But it appears that only "the legislature" will have the power, if this amendment, No. 38, be adopted, to make taxation laws, and the people can not initiate them. APPORTIONMENT OF STATE SCHOOL FUND Orange County Gets $53,900 for Common and $12,228 for High Schools In an apportionment of state school money to the common schools of the state, Orange county gets $53,900. In the high school apportionment the high schools of this county get $12,228.45. The common school apportionment is made upon a basis of the number of teachers on attendance, $250 being allowed for each teacher. In a beachites went out in one-two-three order in their half of the first. Then the locals began swatting the ball into the three gardens with the utmost impunity. After four clean hits had been made and two men had crossed the plate they eased up, seeing that Hanselman's supporters in the field were becoming exhausted. The locals are tender hearted. This chapter was repeated in the second, and the third and fourth were like unto it. After seven men had trotted unrestrained around the diamond the boys became listless and concluded it was unnecessary to exert themselves. It was in the fifth that they handed the visitors their first run. Even Laporte, who is always safe and reliable, contributed to this by making an error, and he was glad of it. In the next inning they succeeded in getting another man around by the same process. Evans, who never was known to do it before, dropped an easy fly out in the left garden, and everybody cheered when the beachite crossed the plate. This cheered the visitors considerably and kept them hoping until the end of the game, but never again did they see the home plate. But the locals kept up the interest by adding a few more runs and ceased only when the score board showed eleven. This would have been added to if they had taken advantage of their last chance. It was in the eighth that Hanselman threw up his hands and quit cold. The locals were batting freely, easily and at will, and after two easy flies into right field had dropped so close to Perry that he had move to avoid being hit, Hanselman quit. He walked out of the box, put on his sweater and sat down on the bench. His heart was broken and he refused to be comforted. Borco went in and finished the inning. La Franco was in splendid form, retiring 9 men. Hanselman struck out two. Captain Jake Vetter was back in the game, but made no attempt at heavy slugging on account of his recent injury, contenting himself with bunts. Herman Stock and Harry Inskew were the umpires and Billy Knott scorer. REFORESTATION COMMITTEE HOLDS A MEETING Members From Three Counties Gather At Orange County Park The Tri-Counties Reforestation committee met last Thursday at Orange county park. The members from Riverside and San Bernardino counties were met at Orange and a picnic lunch was taken with the party to Orange county park. George Maxwell of the government reclamation service made a fine speech on the Newland-Broussard water conservation bill, which will come up before congress at the next session. The Orange county forestry board brought up three oak trees and the members of the committee from each of the three counties planted a tree in the park. Those present from this end of the county were J. J. Dwyer of this city, A. S. Bradford and A. Pierotti of Placentia and George Sherwood of Fullerton. ANNOUNCEMENT Orange county fourth district of California, Congress of Mothers, will hold an all day meeting in the new grammar school house, Tustin, Saturday, October 9th. The meeting will be called to order at 10 o'clock a.m. Local presidents will be asked to speak about "their brightest hopes for the coming year." There will be a roll call of the chairmen of departments at which time the president will be glad to hear their plans. A basket luncheon will be served at noon, the hostess association providing hot tea and coffee. The speaker, Mrs. Hamilton, of Los Angeles, requests that all manner of questions on ways and means for local association work be brought in to be used in the Round Table talk. Yourself and all members of your association are cordially invited to be present. Any parent is welcome. WAR PROVES VALUE OF PRINTER'S INK In an apportionment of state school money to the common schools of the state, Orange county gets $53,900. In the high school apportionment the high schools of this county get $12-228.45. The common school apportionment is made upon a basis of the number of teachers on attendance, $250 being allowed for each teacher. This county has a total of 215.60 teachers in the common schools. The high school apportionment is based upon average daily attendance. Anaheim Union high school with an average daily attendance of 247 gets $2068.65; Fullerton Union, 250 attendance, $2087.50; Huntington Beach, 131 attendance, $1379.45; Orange, 245 attendance, $2057.75; Santa Ana, 678 attendance, $4634.10. The total daily average attendance for the county last year was 1551. The next apportionment for the common schools by the state should be made about the last of February. It is possible that a small apportionment will be made about the last of June or the first of July. The next apportionment of the high schools will come from the county and district taxes and should be available immediately after the first Monday in December. The state will give the next high school apportionment about the last of February or the first of March. This apportionment will be less than the present. The state gives $15 per pupil in average daily attendance. The remaining money to be appropriated will be in the neighborhood of $324,242.85. This will give a rate of $407 per school and $4.05 per pupil in attendance. Who's Hazel? Your Druggist? The mirage, typical of plains country or the ocean, may be seen in the Red River Valley of Minnesota almost any sunshine day in spring, summer or autumn. This queer phenomenon makes the high land at the sides of the valley and the tops of the distant trees and houses appear to be raised a little above the horizon, with a narrow strip to sky between. The more complex and astonishing effect of mirage may be seen from the highland on either side of the lake bed floor. There, in looking across the valley from one and one-half to two hours after sunrise on a hot morning following a cool night, the groves and villages, houses and grain elevators loom up two or three times their true height and places ordinarily hidden by the curvature of the earth are brought into view. Often times, too, these objects are seen double, being repeated in an inverted image close above their real noon, the hostess association providing hot tea and coffee. The speaker, Mrs. Hamilton, of Los Angeles, requests that all manner of questions on ways and means for local association work be brought in to be used in the Round Table talk. Yourself and all members of your association are cordially invited to be present. Any parent is welcome. WAR PROVES VALUE OF PRINTER'S INK The war has proved the value of printer's ink in a new way and one of the out growths has been the development of the British government as the greatest advertisers on earth. It is impossible to estimate the amount of money John Bull has spent in direct advertising for recruits, for war loans, and for loyalty of workingmen and women in the mines and factories upon which success depended. Discussing the subject, The Fourth Estate says: FORD Owners CHAMPION Spark Plugs For Ford Automobiles 45c Everything for the Ford Automobile LIVESEY'S 214-216 East Fourth St. Santa Ana, Calif. Citrus Growers and Others—Attention! $2.70 PER TON F.O.B. Corona (sacked) A MINERAL FERTILIZER Containing the largest percentage of iron sulphides, free from arsenic, carrying 108 pounds of commercial sulphuric acid to 100 pounds of iron sulphides; a large percentage of gypsum, scientifically mixed by nature. Why add a few pounds of available plant food per acre, at from $30 to $60 a ton, when you have from forty to sixty thousand pounds per square foot per acre of unavailable plant food in your soil? And nothing will make it available and attack the undecomposed material but Acid. We are now shipping daily to some of the largest growers in Southern California, who, upon investigation, find that we have the largest percentage of sulphuric per ton to be found anywhere. It has no equal for gum disease or yellow mottle. A. FOLSOM, G. A. 170 S. Main St., Pomona, Cal. or G. H. Hadley, Corona Cal. BOSTON BAKERY 201 East Center St. Wholesale & Retail. EVERYTHING IN THE BAKERY LINE All flour used in this shop is thoroughly sifted by sanitary machines. All bread is mixed and moulded by the latest machinery. Everything sanitary. Our brands, "Quality" and "Crown" bread is handled by all grocers. BOSTON BAKERY 201 East Center St. Wholesale & Retail. EVERYTHING IN THE BAKERY LINE All flour used in this shop is thoroughly sifted by sanitary machines. All bread is mixed and moulded by the latest machinery. Everything sanitary. Our brands, "Quality" and "Crown" bread is handled by all grocers. GEO. BISHOP, PROP. Excursion Time is at Hand A NEW TRAIN to CHICAGO via DENVER BURLINGTON LIMITED carrying through standard and tourist sleepers Los Angeles to Chicago and dining cars and free chair cars to Salt Lake City, Denver and Chicago. Lv. Los Angeles ...9:00 a.m. daily Lv. Pomona ...9:53 a.m. daily Lv. Ontario ...10:06 a.m. daily Lv. Riverside ...10:45 a.m. daily Lv. San Bernardino 11:35 a.m. daily Ar. Salt Lake City 11:45 a.m. 1st day Ar. Denver...8:45 a.m. 2nd day Ar. Omaha ...1:10 a.m. 3rd day Ar. Chicago ...2:30 p.m. 3rd day SALT LAKE ROUTE-UNION PACIFIC-BURLINGTON ROUTE This service in addition to the popular LOS ANGELES LIMITED and PACIFIC LIMITED Daily through to Chicago in less than 3 days via Salt Lake Route and Union Pacific, via Omaha, gives a choice of three limited trains, for both first class and tourist car travel. SALT LAKE ROUTE Geo. H. PLATT, C. T. A., J. J. TAVIS, C. P. F. A. Phones 211. 201 W. 4th St., Santa Ana SANTA ANA OFFICE IS AT 201 W. FOURTH ST. Phone or write and we will call Kitchener's army has been raised chiefly by advertising. Full page, half-page and smaller advertisements, in the papers are almost daily occurrences. The recent big war loan, the largest in the history of governmental borrowings, was the occasion of another tremendous advertising campaign. Even the big advertisers who have HOTEL Steam Heat—Private Baths New and Modern. FREE GARAGE. One 75c,$1.00,$1.25. Two,$1.00,$1.25,$1.50. Fifth and Ash. SAN DIEGO. Miss Clio Davenport, who was killed Kitchener's army has been raised chiefly by advertising. Full page, half-page and smaller advertisements, in the papers are almost daily occurrences. The recent big war loan, the largest in the history of governmental borrowings, was the occasion of another tremendous advertising campaign. Even the big advertisers who have contracts for the outside pages of the dailies were pushed into the inside so that John Bull could ask Britons to pour their savings into the nation's till. If the public had not become accustomed to Great Britain as a big advertiser because of the proportions of the army recruiting crusade, the dimensions of this campaign of advertising for money would seem startling, for in itself it was altogether without precedent among nations before this war. Now there are signs of a third big advertising movement by Great Britain in its "thrift campaign." Already the posters are urging people to eat less meat, to eat more vegetables, to insist that each loaf of bread weighs a pound, to report any dealer trying to sell a smaller loaf, and giving similar advice as to economical housekeeping. The third campaign on the part of the empire, hitherto regarded as conservative and not given to modern or sensational methods, has not yet reached the proportions of the other two—the campaign for recruits and the campaign for money—but it is in embryo still. All the patent medicine and breakfast food advertisers in the United States must take a back seat compared with the British empire now, when the dimensions, cost or character of display advertising are in question.