anaheim-gazette 1910-04-28

HICHBORN'S CHARGES PETTY QUIBBLING SPEAKER STANTON'S RECORD RIGHT ON FEDERAL SHIPS BILL Stood for Amended Report of Joint Committee, Striking Out Reference to Bristow and His Unsupported "Allegations," and Inserting Clear-Cut and Positive Request for Federal Vessels on Pacific Coast — Hichborn Long on Strike-Outs, but Short on Substitutions—The Facts a Herron satrap, in plain hearing of two republicans of Orange county, in the assembly three years ago, the advantage of the Circle and the republican column. Mr. Hichborn declares Stanton voted against "reform" in this bill, and again erred. We approve his course. What say you, gentlemen of the state of California? We suspect Judge Beatty and Judge Morrow and the other jurists whom Mr. Hichborn so eloquently quotes in support of his contention in this matter, really approve a measure which would take the judiciary out of politics, by electing judges for life; and not the joke of a bill whose defeat Mr. Hichborn now so tearfully mourns. The amendment of Assemblyman favor of this bill? He did. The Sanford resolution passed the assembly March 16 (assembly journal p.1433), on motion of Drew, unanimously. The speaker supported the bill, and so did Assemblyman Melrose of this county. One loses patience with this quibbling scribbler of the reform push. In his letter to the editor Mr. Hichborn says, concerning the federal-ships bill: "The Sanford resolution (S. J. R. No. 3) passed the senate without a dissenting vote, on January 26th, 1909. As it passed the senate it read without its preamble as follows: (See page 272, senate journal of the legislative session of 1909.)" Resolved, By the senate of the State of California, and the assembly, jointly, that we request the interstate commerce commission to consider the protests made against the advance in freight rates at as early a date as possible and thus relieve the manufacturers, merchants and producers of our state from the increased burden placed upon them; and, be it further "RESOLVED, THAT WE REQUEST THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES TO SPEEDILY GIVE CONSIDERATION TO THE REPORT OF THE HONORABLE JOSEPH L. BRISTOW, SPECIAL PANAMA RAILROAD COMMISSIONER, AS SUBMITTED BY HIM TO PRESIDENT-ELECT TAFT, AND THAT WE RECOMMEND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE LINE AT AS EARLY A DATE AS POSSIBLE, IN ORDER THAT RELIEF MAY BE AFFORDED TO THE MANUFACTURER." above in caps by the following: "Resolved, That the speedy establishment proposed in said Senator Flint and Lachlan at as easy, in order that forced to the new chants and produce Mr. Hichborn strike-outs and slash He parades the secrets in the dutrous' pockets. Let the reader again the paragraphs stricken out. He will note that "busting" with federal line of coast. Let him reads to us more Bristow, and a oak and McLachlan, preamble about it. In the second part which were strucker note the work such report of Fancy a state ing" a steamship "alleged" in a which was before tions of which were stantiated. Let these two paragraphs turn to the passage for them, referring Lachlan's bills at $10,000,000 of this line of the ships, and We suspect Judge Beatty and Judge Morrow and the other jurists whom Mr. Hichborn so eloquently quotes in support of his contention in this matter, really approve a measure which would take the judiciary out of politics, by electing judges for life; and not the joke of a bill whose defeat Mr. Hichborn now so tearfully mourns. The amendment of Assemblyman Leeds to the direct-primary law, which Stanton approved, we approve. It provides for an advisory vote by assembly districts upon a choice for United States senator. This is a cardinal sin on the part of the speaker, according to Mr. Hichborn. Yet under the original draft of the bill, for a state-wide vote upon United States senator, it would have been possible, for instance, for San Francisco to give Pat McCarthy such overwhelming majority as would have made it impossible for the smaller communities to overcome it. Thus this labor agitator of the north, this advocate of the wide-open Paris of America, would probably have no difficulty in securing the nomination. What would be the result? Republican candidates for the senate and assembly throughout California would be compelled to declare that, he being the party candidate, they would have to vote for him in the following session of the legislature. Thousands of republicans would be estranged from support of their party candidates, democratic legislators would be elected, and a democratic United States senator chosen. The Leeds amendment prevents this contingency. Speaker Stanton supported the amendment. Mr. Hichborn declares he voted against "reform" in so doing, and erred. We approve his course. Mr. Hichborn has made these accusations against Speaker Stanton in a book purporting to be a history of the last legislature. His references to the speaker are being industriously circulated by the Lincoln-Roosevelt papers throughout the state. These charges—involving the Party Circle bill, the Non-Partisan judiciary and the amendment of Assemblyman Leeds to the Direct Primary law—have been stigmatized as cardinal political sins. The speaker has been branded by this man as being "against reform" on all of these measures. Yet is there a republican in the state of California, who, knowing these matters as we here point them out, does not approve the course of the speaker? Resolved, That we urge our representatives in congress to use every effort for the furthering of the measures granting increased powers to the interstate commerce commission, and particularly those measures relating to giving it the power to pass upon the reasonableness of rates prior to the taking effect of any proposed advance." In the assembly Grove L. Johnson moved to amend by cutting out certain lines. The amendments were adopted. Mr. Stanton—and Mr. Melrose, by the way—voted for the Johnson amendments. As amended, the resolution, without the preamble, read: (See page 772, assembly journal of the legislative session of 1909) Resolved, By the senate of the State of California, and the assembly, jointly, That we request the interstate commerce commission to consider the protests made against the advance in freight rates at as early a date as possible and thus relieve the manufacturers, merchants, and producers of our state from the increased burden placed upon them; and be it further Resolved, That we urge our representatives in congress to use every effort for the furthering of the measures granting increased powers to the interstate commerce commission, and particularly those measures relating to giving it power to pass Fancy a state statement "alleged" in a which was before actions of which we stantiated. Let these two paragraphs turn to the point for them, referring Lachlan's bills at $10,000,000 of this line of ships, and better. Mr. Hichborn former. We thundered there was not produced as to port contained, the denunciation company was made by a majority that it was unnecessary with endation in regulation which they had. The Sanford passing passed them in the assembly and referred to This conference as to the verb bill was then made reference, which normal bill could very paragraphence so desiree had the power reject the two and report to legislature. The agreed, and then stricken out and the substitution to a free conference reported sebly, and on motion of Drew 1433), the assasiously to adopt reads as follow: Resolution made by Amended in January 1909.—Senate introduced by January 8, 1909. on Federal Relief "Senate Joining charges—involving the Party Circle bill, the Non-Partisan judiciary and the amendment of Assemblyman Leeds to the Direct Primary law—have been stigmatized as cardinal political sins. The speaker has been branded by this man as being "against reform" on all of these measures. Yet is there a republican in the state of California, who, knowing these matters as we here point them out, does not approve the course of the speaker? Nay, more, is there a political fool in the state so bereft of all semblance to reason as to for a moment believe these wanton, splenetic and outrageous charges against a man who, striving to do his duty by the people, is made the object of covert attack by this quibbling scribbler of the reform press. Of the five charges here referred to, but one remains—that of the federal ships. We have said, and say again, that if Mr. Stanton voted against this bill, it stamps him as being squarely in the railroad camp, and unfits him for the governorship. This is the one issue in the campaign which, in the present anti-railroad temper of the people of California, transcends all others. The Lincoln-Roosevelters are making their campaign on an anti-railroad platform. If Stanton voted against the ships, he is in the railroad corral and is unfitted to fill the high office of his seeking. If he voted for the ships, what becomes of Mr. Hichborn's charge against him, of his book judging the members of the last legislature, of the Lincoln-Roosevelt campaign against him. Let us look squarely into the record and see what we find. Mr. Hichborn, in summing up his case against Stanton on the federal ships bill, observes: "You will thus see that, in spite of Mr. Stanton, the legislature went on record as favoring the establishment of a government line of steamships on the Pacific." The legislature, indeed. Was not Speaker Stanton a member of the legislature? And did he not vote in the advance in freight rates at as early a date as possible and thus relieve the manufacturers, merchants, and producers of our state from the increased burden placed upon them; and be it further "'Resolved, That we urge our representatives in congress to use every effort for the furthering of the measures granting increased powers to the interstate commerce commission, and particularly those measures relating to giving it power to pass upon the reasonableness of rates prior to the taking effect of any proposed advance." "You will note that in the assembly the sections which I have written in caps in the resolution as it passed the senate are stricken out. You will see that Mr. Stanton—and Mr. Melrose as well—did vote to eliminate from the Sanford resolution a paragraph asking for the establishment of a line of federal steamers on the Pacific." Let us see what a few words will put this man down. Mr. Hichborn dwells at length upon those portions of the Sanford resolution which were stricken out, but he says not a word about the lines substituted for them. Here they are. In lieu of the lines stricken out in the first paragraph, as narrated by Mr. Hichborn in caps above, insert the following: "Whereas, It is important to the people of this state that a line of steamers be established between the ports of the Pacific coast and the Isthmus of Panama; and Whereas, Senator Flint and Representative McLachlan have recently introduced in congress a bill calling for an appropriation of ten million dollars to establish a federal line of steamers on the Pacific coast; therefore, be it, (Here follows the original resolution.) In lieu of the words stricken out in the second paragraph, as set forth "Resolution made by the Amended in 1909.—Senate introduced by January 8, 1909. on Federal Recommendations by our representatives in congress to use every effort for the furthering of the measures granting increased powers to the interstate commerce commission, and particularly those measures relating to giving it power to pass upon the reasonableness of rates prior to the taking effect of any proposed advance." "Whereas, The senate has put in freight rates points and thieves and Whereas, The burden uponrants and products proximizing uve year, and Whereas, The senate made railroads showings and Whereas, been filed with ental lines, pffect of the rates, and Whereas, The society and the matter merce commissio ableness of tue and Whereas, The congress of this measure looks at the powermerce commitio in a position advances in same go into" Whereas, people of this steamers be ANAHEIM GAZETTE above in caps by Mr. Hichborn, insert the following: "Resolved, That we recommend the speedy establishment of the line proposed in said bills introduced by Senator Flint and Representative McLachlan at as early a date as possible, in order that relief may be afforded to the manufacturers, merchants and producers of this state." Mr. Hichborn seems to be long on strike-outs and short on substitutions. He parades the former, the latter he secrets in the dark recesses of his trousers' pockets. Let the reader carefully go over again the paragraphs in capital letters stricken out, as above presented. He will note there is nothing so "busting" with enthusiasm about a federal line of ships on the Pacific coast. Let him note it carefully. It reads to us more like a eulogy of Mr. Bristow, and a covert thrust at Flint and McLachlan, than any bona-fide preamble about a line of federal ships in the second paragraph, portions of which were stricken out, let the reader note the words, "as alleged in such report of Joseph L. Bristow." Fancy a state legislature "denouncing" a steamship company on things "alleged" in a report, no copy of which was before it, and the allegations of which were altogether unsubstantiated. Let the reader peruse these two paragraphs again, and then turn to the paragraphs substituted for them, referring to Flint and McLachlan's bills in congress appropriating $10,000,000 for the establishment of this line of ships, and endorsing the ships, and tell us which is the ports of the Pacific coast and the Isthmus of Panama; and "Whereas, Senator Flint and Representative McLachlan have recently introduced in congress a bill calling for an appropriation of ten million dollars to establish a federal line of steamers on the Pacific coast; therefore, be it "Resolved, By the senate of the State of California, and the assembly, jointly, that we request the interstate commerce commission to consider the protests made against the advances in freight rates at as early a date as possible and thus relieve the manufacturers, merchants and producers of our state from the increased burden placed upon them,, and, be it further "Resolved, That we recommend the speedy establishment of the line proposed in said bills introduced by Senator Flint and Representative McLachlan at as early a date as possible in order that relief may be afforded to the manufacturers, merchants and producers of this state. "Resolved, That we urge our representatives in congress to use every effort for the furthering of the measures granting increased powers to the interstate commerce commission, and particularly those measures relating to giving it the power to pass upon the reasonableness of rates prior to the taking effect of any proposed advance." Speaker Stanton and Assemblyman Melrose voted for this bill. The reader will note that Mr. Hichborn observes, in closing his argument against the speaker: "You will thus sage through the house March 16, 1909 (assembly journal p. 1432.) The bill passed unanimously, and Mr. Hichborn is too astute an observer to say that the speaker did anything but vote for a bill which he favored from the start. He observes, at conclusion of his argument on the federal ships in the preceding article: "You will thus see that in spite of Mr. Stanton, the legislature went on record as favoring the establishment of a government line of steamers on the Pacific." Nothing here as to whether Mr. Stanton voted for the ships or not, but it would seem that in the criticisms made by Mr. Hichborn against the speaker, he would lose no such opportunity as is here afforded on the final passage of the bill, if the speaker was really opposed to the federal vessels. Neither does he say the speaker voted in favor of the bill, merely that the legislature "went on record in spite of Mr. Stanton." What is it that troubles Mr. Hichborn? Turn to page 772 of the assembly journal, and you will see. Here is where the record shows, as he avers, that Stanton and Melrose voted against the ships, because, as he observes, the paragraphs referring to Bristow and his "allegations" against Pacific Mail were stricken out, while the substitutions do not appear. Mr. Hichborn is really very amusing. Under parliamentary procedure, where a bill is referred to a free conference, which has power to remodel it in every paragraph the whole matter—original bill, strike- THE DEPENDENT MAIL WITH THE ISSUE (AS SET OF STOW) NEVER THIS URGE IN CONFINITED THIS TIME BE IT We our to use of the powers commissures to pass rates any pro-Johnson about certs were Mr. Melie Johnled, thereamble, only jourol of 1909) of the assembe the inssion to against us at as thus reurchants, from the them; our repouse evi of the powers commissures to pass rates any pro-Johnson about certs were Mr. Melie Johnled, thereamble, only jourol of 1909) of the assembe the inssion to against us at as thus reurchants, from the them; Fancy a state legislature "denouncing" a steamship company on things "alleged" in a report, no copy of which was before it, and the allegations of which were altogether unsubstantiated. Let the reader peruse these two paragraphs again, and then turn to the paragraphs substituted for them, referring to Flint and McLachlan's bills in congress appropriating $10,000,000 for the establishment of this line of ships, and endorsing the ships, and tell us which is the better. Mr. Hichborn prefers the former. We the latter. The objection to the resolution originally introduced by Senator Sanford, who is a democrat, was that it, first, assumed that the Hon. Joseph L. Bristow had made the charges and recommendations stated in the resolution; and second, that, if such report was made, that the charges against the Pacific Mail Steamship company were true. In the debate on the resolution, there was not a scintilla of evidence produced as to what the alleged report contained, or on what evidence the denunciation of the steamship company was made, and it was held by a majority of the assembly that it was unnecessary to load the resolution with endorsements or vituperation in regard to matters about which they had no information. The Sanford resolution, after having passed the senate, was amended in the assembly as already set forth, and referred to a joint conference. This conference met and disagreed as to the verbiage of the bill. The bill was then referred to a free conference, which means that the original bill could be amended in its every paragraph did the free conference so desire. The joint conference had the power only to stand by or reject the two paragraphs affected, and report to the two houses of the legislature. The joint conference disagreed, and the bill, with the lines stricken out in the two preambles, and the substitutions, were referred to a free conference. This conference reported to the senate and assembly, and on March 16, 1909, on motion of Drew (assembly journal p. 1433), the assembly voted unanimously to adopt the resolution, which reads as follows: "Resolution as passed, with amendments by the assembly: Amended in assembly, February 18, 1909.—Senate joint resolution, No. 3, introduced by Senator Sanford, January 8, 1909. Referred to Committee on Federal Relations. "Senate Joint Resolution No. 3, relating for the furthering of the measures granting increased powers to the interstate commerce commission, and particularly those measures relating to giving it the power to pass upon the reasonableness of rates prior to the taking effect of any proposed advance." Speaker Stanton and Assemblyman Melrose voted for this bill. The reader will note that Mr. Hichborn observes, in closing his argument against the speaker: "You will thus see that in spite of Mr. Stanton the legislature went on record as favoring the establishment of a government line of steamships on the Pacific." Mr Hichborn is too worldly wise not to know that he is deceiving his readers in this matter.. Be it remembered that at this time, February 18 (assembly journal 772), when the assembly was considering the matter, Mr. Drew, who was fathering the Bristow endorsement in the lower house, and who had been requested to prepare such substitutions to the bill as would meet the approval of a majority of the assembly, failed to present such substitutions, preferring to let the matter go over to the free conference, where he might have an opportunity of including Bristow's eulogium in the resolution. For that reason, and for no other reason, did those substitutions fail to appear. Had the amendments which were finally adopted to the resolution, upon the recommendation of the free conference committee been submitted on February 18 by the proponents of the resolutions, they would have been adopted unanimously at that time. In other terms, the charges "as alleged by Mr. Bristow," in a report not in evidence, were stricken out, and a ringing, clear-cut and decisive stand taken in favor of a government line of vessels plying between Panama and the ports of the Pacific coast. Mr. Hichborn charges Stanton and Melrose with voting to strike out all reference to federal vessels. We answer that he has not proven his case. The facts stand out against him, and right well does he know it. What must be said, then, of the morality of his position, of his book which originated this series of accusations, of the Lincoln-Roosevelt league newspapers which have been chattering for months about this charge, of the campaign against an honorable man in his aspirations to be the chief executive of the state? Concerning Mr. Hichborn's book. We never saw a copy of it. If we avers, that Stanton and Melrose voted against the ships, because, as he observes, the paragraphs referring to Bristow and his "allegations" against Pacific Mail were stricken out, while the substitutions do not appear. Mr. Hichborn is really very amusing. Under parliamentary procedure, where a bill is referred to a free conference, which has power to remodel it in every paragraph the whole matter—original bill, strike-out, and substitutions — are referred to the free conference. So far as the reference to the bill in the assembly journal (p. 772) is concerned, the bill was incomplete, Mr. Drew not having brought in the amendments desired by the majority of the house. Consequently the substitutions for the Bristow strike-out, did not appear. Because the bill does not appear in its entirety on page 772 furnishes no ground for Mr. Hichborn to charge that the speaker was opposed to a line of federal vessels. The bill again appeared in the house March 16 (assembly journal p. 1433), with the Bristow strike-out omitted, and with the substitutions made in the report of the joint committee included. The bill was unanimously passed. Why does not Mr. Hichborn be fair for once in his life and say so? He would have his readers infer that the senate refused to concur in the report of the joint committee because of the striking-out of the reference to Bristow, but this strike-out remained striken out in the report of the free conference. The substitutions made by the joint committee were retained in the bill as finally passed, and there matter ended. Because the bill does not appear in extenso on page 772 of the assembly journal Mr. Hichborn has attacked the speaker in his book and in his writings, and built up a superstructure of specious arguments, based upon this flimsy foundation, which falls to earththe momentthe lightof truth is turned thereupon. This isthe onechargemadebyHichbornagainstthespeakerwhichiftrueamountstoahillofbeansHisotherfour"charges"aremerely"hotair."Wehavehereshownthathis"charge"thatStantonopposedthefederalvesselsisfalse. VITALITY OF EGGS German Bird Fancier Makes Some Interesting Tests ence reported to the senate and assembly, and on March 16, 1909, on motion of Drew (assembly journal p. 1433), the assembly voted unanimously to adopt the resolution, which reads as follows: "Resolution as passed, with amendments by the assembly: Amended in assembly, February 18, 1909.—Senate joint resolution, No. 3, introduced by Senator Sanford, January 8, 1909. Referred to Committee on Federal Relations. "Senate Joint Resolution No. 3, relative to transportation rates and urging our representatives in congress to support measures granting increased powers to the interstate commerce commission. "Whereas, The transcontinental lines have put into effect advances in freight rates between California points and the east and vice versa, and "Whereas, These advances will place a burden upon manufacturers, merchants and producers to an extent approximating upwards of $10,000,000 a year, and "Whereas, In view of the statements made by the transcontinental railroads showing increased net earnings, and "Whereas, Various protests have been filed with the said transcontinental lines, prior to the going into effect of the said advances in freight rates, and "Whereas, The California Traffic association and others are presenting the matter to the interstate commerce commission as to the reasonableness of the rates now in effect, and "Whereas, There are now before the congress of the United States several measures looking to the enlargement of the powers of the interstate commerce commission so that it will be in a position to review any proposed advances in freight rates before the same go into effect, and "Whereas, It is important to the people of this state that a line of steamers be established between the" Concerning Mr. Hichborn's book. We never saw a copy of it. If we ever wrote a line in criticism of it; we do not know it. What we did say was that in the extracts therefrom furnished the Lincoln-Roosevelt papers by Boss Lissner and his overworked corps of typewriters, nothing is said about Mr. Stanton's vote in the assembly upon bills of particular significance to citizens of Orange county. This Lissner literature has been sent broadcast over this county, as well as over the entire state. Lissner doubtless considers it as having great weight with Orange county voters, but says nothing of the Johnson and Black irrigation measures, which if enacted into law would have turned over the co-operative water companies of this county and state to private monopolistic interests. Mr. Stanton saw that both were killed immediately they made their appearance in the assembly. The typewriters say nothing of his vote upon the attempt to grab Newport harbor by a private corporation, nor of his stand in requiring the gun clubs properly to cap their artesian wells, and prevent the wanton waste of irrigating water. These bills were measures of paramount importance to our citizens, but Lissner ignores them. It's a game of thimbleig the typewriters are attempting to play upon us, and the game has been accepted at its true value—which is nil. It will be noted that Mr. Hichborn does not make the statement that Speaker Stanton voted against the Sanford resolution on its final pass against him, and right well does he know it. What must be said, then, of the morality of his position, of his book which originated this series of accusations, of the Lincoln-Roosevelt league newspapers which have been chattering for months about this charge, of the campaign against an honorable man in his aspirations to be the chief executive of the state? This is the one charge made by Hichborn against the speaker which if true, amounts to a hill of beans. His other four "charges" are merely "hot air." We have here shown that his "charge" that Stanton opposed the federal vessels is false. VITALITY OF EGGS German Bird Fancier Makes Some Interesting Tests A German bird fancier has made a series of experiments for the purpose of determining the vitality of eggs in different stages of incubation. On the fifth day of incubation five canary birds' eggs were taken from the nest marked with numbers and replaced in the nest, one by one, at half-hour intervals. This experiment was repeated ten times, with as many clutches of eggs. As a rule, says the Scientific American, the first three eggs replaced hatched normally, and the two others failed to hatch. Hence it may be inferred that the average longevity of a canary bird's eggs, taken from the nest on the fifth day of incubation, is one and a half hours. In the same way the longevity was found to increase to two and a half hours on the seventh day, and three and a half hours to four hours on the ninth day of incubation. It was discovered by accident that eggs in a very advanced stage of incubation can endure very much longer periods of removal from the nest. Two eggs, purchased as plover's eggs, in the course of an excursion, were stowed in a basket brought home and forgotten. On the evening of the following day a fair "peep" recalled the existence of these eggs, and it was found that a young snipe had issued from one of them. The second snipe soon made its appearance, but lived only an hour. Hence it appears that the vitality of partly hatched eggs depends on the size of the bird as well as on the stage of incubation. THursday, April 28 THE First National Bank Capital Stock, $50,000.00 BOARD OF DIRECTORS JOHN HARTUNG, President. FRANK SHANLEY, A. S. BRADFORD, 1st VICE PRES'T 2nd VICE PRES'T EDGAR J. HARTUNG, Cashier. O. STORM and O. BEËBE, Ass't Cashiers. INTEREST PAID on TIME DEPOSITS Peter Stoffel HEADQUARTERS FOR FRESH VEGETABLES Kansas Hard-wheat Flour Consignments of Staple and Fancy Groceries Received Daily. Phones Pacific 237 Home 1103 PETER STOFFEL, Prop. Peter Stoffel HEADQUARTERS FOR FRESH VEGETABLES Kansas Hard-wheat Flour Consignments of Staple and Fancy Groceries Received Daily. Phones Pacific 237 Home 1103 PETER STOFFEL, Prop. Electric Power Is The Cheap Power Because: Cost of installation is less; labor for operating is saved; less floor space is required; friction and wear and tear are reduced to a minimum; repair bills are obviated; injury to building by vibration is eliminated; there is no loss in the shafting and pulleys; no energy lost in getting started; always ready; always reliable; service is always perfect. Southern California Edison Co. Palace Market Schumacher & Schneider Proprietors DEALEPS IN Choice Fresh and Salted Meats Exclusive Agents for Clover Glen Creamery Butter Telephone Main 51 Meats Delivered to all parts of city H. H. Gardner Co. HEADQUARTERS FOR Ice, Hay, Grain, Coal, Wood, Oil and Gasoline, Poultry Supplies, Stock Foods & Tonics, Yorkshire Hero Peas, Onion Sets and Cabbage Seed. A TRIAL ORDER WILL CONVINCE YOU. C. B. HALLEY, - MANAGER, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. PHONES, HOME 1542, MAIN 91. shire Hero Peas, Onion Sets and Cabbage Seed. A TRIAL ORDER WILL CONVINCE YOU. C. B. HALLEY, - MANAGER, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA. PHONES. HOME 1542. MAIN 91. California Wine Co. F. Conrad & Son, Props. Center Street Anaheim Wholesale Wine and Liquor Merchants Best Brands of Bottled Beer. Delivery Made Everywhere HENSHAW, BULKLEY & CO. 262-64 So. Los Angeles St. Los Angeles IRRIGATION PLANTS INSTALLLED COMPLETE MACHINERY of all kinds, including road making machinery, levelers, scrapers, hardpan ploughs, etc. Full stock always on hand. GASOLINE ENGINES CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS LUMBER, CEMENT, BRICK ARDEN PLASTER MILL WORK Beveled Well Curbing C.GANAHL LUMBER COMPANY CHAS F. GRIM. Manager JOSEPH BACKS, Undertaker and Embalmer Furniture and Bedding. Repairing Done Phones—Pacific M.98 Home 1062 O. LAGMAN, BUILDER. Graduated as Architect in 1885 Will Furnish Plans, Specifications and Estimates Free of Cost Will Build Mod. 5-R'm House, $1,000 7-R'm 1,400 If you have a lot I will Build a House On Monthly Payments Pacific 1111 406 E. Center St