anaheim-gazette 1910-02-24

REINSPECTION FOR GUARD COMPANY E TO HAVE ANOTHER VISIT FROM COLS. WILHELM AND SMITH Men In Line Whose Term of Enlistment Expired, Company Falls Below Required Percentage--Uniforms Condemned Last Year Still Doing Service—New Men Rally to Call Whether or not Company E shall be mustered out of service will depend upon a second inspection which has been ordered by Adjutant-General Lauck to be held about March 31. Capt. Schindler this week received orders from the adjutant-general’s office at Sacramento notifying him that his company will be reinspected, along with other companies of the seventh, and to parade his company with that purpose in view. Orders for reinspection and muster are expected momentarily, when it will be known which other companies of the south will be up for another official examination. It is known that the San Bernardino company will be included in the number, as it was ordered out of the drill hall for inefficiency in the manual of arms during inspection and muster last month. Reasons for reinspection of Company E are mainly because, with eight men in line at the annual muster in January whose terms of enlistment had expired and who therefor may demand discharge if they desire, the company fell below the 75 per cent required of all companies in order to retain a place in the national guard. The company’s percentage, with those men answering to roll call, was 79. The company paraded 56 men, includ- going to the Philippines. The First took that honor. But the Seventh proved itself to be composed of soldiers just the same. Three former members of the regiment are now lieutenants in the regular army. One is Lieut. Helpin, formerly captain of Company E, another is Lieut. Matthews of Santa Ana, and the third is Lieut. Overton of Orange, who was promoted to a lieutenancy for bravery under fire while carrying a message to Gen. MacArthur during the Filipino war. Twice since the Spanish war has Company E gone to San Francisco in response to a call for troops; once immediately following the fire, and a second time during the carmens’ strike. A number of former members of Company E will this evening join the colors, and an earnest effort made to recruit the company up to its maximum strength. The boys say the company shall not be mustered out. The citizens of Anaheim should lend them a helping hand. APPEAL FOR MORE MEN Corporal Nowotny Writes Concerning Status of Company Since we have received notice that Company E will have to be re-inspected to determine whether it shall be retained or whether it shall be reported for muster out of service, we look to the people of Anaheim and its community to come to our rescue and try their best to keep and maintain this company for the city of Anaheim. It is our sincere desire to keep and maintain this company, as we have been working hard to make it one of the best in the regiment, a position Company E formerly held, MR. SMITH DEFENDER TRANSFER OF WAR SITES FROM FEATURE AUTION Eastern Writer Criticism Is Encountering Virtue In Western Society Congressman Upholstered In a recent article in Evening Post, Stewart the well-known author principles involved in Smith’s bill providing of rights of way for power sites on the north from federal to state did not refer specifically but clearly had it in writing the article. He led the suggestion of Smith on reading the following letter to Mr. fense of his measure. Mr. Stewart Edward Barbara, California. I have read with unquestionable contribution to Evening Post, under servation vs. Conversely my interest in your article by my understanding the honor of claiming stituent at this time. I note your rather the position I have tendered power question we aim “more sure” “transfer the power from the secretary of state legislatures,” he defends against the acted “surreptitiously duced my bill last was no chance for it Reasons for reinspection of Company E are mainly because, with eight men in line at the annual muster in January whose terms of enlistment had expired and who therefor may demand discharge if they desire, the company fell below the 75 per cent required of all companies in order to retain a place in the national guard. The company's percentage, with those men answering to roll call, was 79. The company paraded 56 men, including three officers, while the maximum complement required by the service rules is 61. With the eight men continuing in the service the company is in position to pass inspection and muster, but according to the requirements prevailing these men must be regarded as non-members until reinlistment, which indeed a number of them contemplate. Another charge against the company is that the uniforms are worn and in some instances moth-eaten, but Capt. Schindler showed in the records, to the satisfaction of Cols. Wilhelm and Smith, that the company's uniforms were condemned by the former at the inspection last year. An order for new uniforms was at that time sent in. After waiting eight months the company received new trousers for each man, but the rest of the uniform has not yet appeared. That these old uniforms are a reproach to the national guard is admitted by members of the company, but the fault lies not at their doors, but with the state whose parsimony when it comes to dealing with the national guard is perfectly well known to all. In execution of the tactics and manual of arms the company received favorable commendation, and the state's property, outside the moth-eaten uniforms, and including rifles, cartridge belts and ammunition was found to be in excellent condition. Whatever the fault might have been with the uniforms, the boys of Company E evidently believe in having their rifles in order and their powder dry. In guard circles the impression prevails that Col. Smith, who is the ranking officer of the Fifth regiment, was harshly critical of the companies of the Seventh, whose record as a military organization outrivals that of the northerners all along the line. It is held by some that the north desires a number of new companies, and that places for them may be made by mustering out companies in the south. Company E boys say they will not It is our sincere desire to keep and maintain this company, as we have been working hard to make it one of the best in the regiment, a position Company E formerly held, and in order to do this we must first have the required membership, which is sixty-one men, including the three officers. One of the causes for the re-inspection is, that we did not have the number of members which a company is required to have in order to pass an inspection; and another cause is, that we carried a number of men whose terms had expired and had not re-enlisted. It is our belief that we were unable to get a just percentage on that account. These members will have to be discharged and replaced by new material. This will have to be done by March 31st, at which time the next inspection will take place. Therefore we kindly ask all the members and citizens to make a special effort to help secure this new material, which we are bound to have, and must have, in order to be ready for the coming inspection, which will be more severe than the inspections heretofore held, as we are now required to show the War Department that we most sincerely desire to keep and maintain this company. When a young man joins the company he does so at his own free will, and is not compelled to become a soldier as is the case in the foreign countries, where he is compelled to serve a number of years, so that in case his services are needed in time of war he will be acquainted with military tactics. I should think that our young men would be proud to join this company at their own free will and show their true honor to the Stars and Stripes. On Sunday, Feb. 13, it was clearly shown, when Company E participated in the exercises with the Knights of Pythias, how well a drilled soldier appears when familiar with military tactics. It should be everyone's wish, not only the citizens of Anaheim, but also of Fullerton and surroundings, to show his desire to keep and maintain Company E in our midst and also show the northern part of the state that we of the glorious south are, have been and always will be expected to determine whether it shall be retained or whether it shall be reported for muster out of service, we look to the people of Anaheim and its community to come to our rescue and try their best to keep and maintain this company for the city of Anaheim. It is our sincere desire to keep and maintain this company, as we have been working hard to make it one of the best in the regiment, a position Company E formerly held, and in order to do this we must first have the required membership, which is sixty-one men, including the three officers. One of the causes for the re-inspection is, that we did not have the number of members which a company is required to have in order to pass an inspection; and another cause is, that we carried a number of men whose terms had expired and had not re-enlisted. It is our belief that we were unable to get a just percentage on that account. These members will have to be discharged and replaced by new material. This will have to be done by March 31st, at which time the next inspection will take place. Therefore we kindly ask all the members and citizens to make a special effort to help secure this new material, which we are bound to have, and must have, in order to be ready for the coming inspection,which will be more severe than the inspections heretofore held, as we are now required to show the War Department that we most sincerely desire to keep and maintain this company. When a young man joins the company he does so at his own free will, and is not compelled to become a soldier as is the case in the foreign countries, where he is compelled to serve a number of years, so that in case his services are needed in time of war he will be acquainted with military tactics. I should think that our young men would be proud to join this company at their own free will and show their true honor to the Stars and Stripes. On Sunday, Feb. 13, it was clearly shown, when Company E participated in the exercises with the Knights of Pythias, how well a drilled soldier appears when familiar with military tactics. It should be everyone's wish, not only the citizens of Anaheim, but also of Fullerton and surroundings, to show his desire to keep and maintain Company E in our midst and also show the northern part of state that we of the glorious south are, have been and always will be expected to determine whether it shall be retained or whether it shall be reported for muster out of service, we look to the people of Anaheim and its community to come to our rescue and try their best to keep and maintain this company for the city of Anaheim. It is our sincere desire to keep and maintain this company, as we have been working hard to make it one of the best in the regiment, a position Company E formerly held, and in order to do this we must first have the required membership, which is sixty-one men, including the three officers. One of the causes for the re-inspection is, that we did not have the number of members which a company is required to have in order to pass an inspection; and another cause is, that we carried a number of men whose terms had expired and had not re-enlisted. It is our belief that we were unable to get a just percentage on that account. These members will have to be discharged and replaced by new material. This will have to be done by March 31st, at which time the next inspection will take place. Therefore we kindly ask all the members and citizens to make a special effort to help secure this new material, which we are bound to have, and must have, in order to be ready for the coming inspection,which will be more severe than the inspections heretofore held, as we are now required to show the War Department that we most sincerely desire to keep and maintain this company. To my way of thinking of chiefest importance is that of having total agency stand by users of power from of the power公司ing of the small user who pumps waterthe manufacturer who run by this subtle if our states and countries be trusted too simple duty, then I less, perchance,the are no more worth mist I have not introduced secretly. Hon. S. C. Smith Sir: Thank you for February 7th. Trouble by discussion.up seriatim on po You misunderstood word "surreptitious"that your own or introduced secretly. In guard circles the impression prevails that Col. Smith, who is the ranking officer of the Fifth regiment, was harshly critical of the companies of the Seventh, whose record as a military organization outrivals that of the northerners all along the line. It is held by some that the north desires a number of new companies and that places for them may be made by mustering out companies in the south. Company E boys say they will not be mustered out without the strongest effort on their part to retain their place in the guard. The company has been more than twenty years in continuous service in the guard, barring a muster-out by Gov. Bard some fifteen years ago to make room for a company in one of the upper tiers of the cow counties. When the call for troops came in the Spanish war the members, some of them attached to other companies and some out of service, sprang to their colors to fight for their country. Col. Finley, then captain of the Santa Ana company, telegraphed Sergeant Abbey: "Bring over the rifles." Men and guns were soon on their way to the county seat, and the following day the regiment went north. That was probably the day of most intense excitement in the recent history of Southern California. The regiment marched upon the Presidio an hour after the First. The dandy Seventh had traveled 500 miles—some of the companies had traveled more than 600 miles—in freight cars to get a chance to avenge the Maine. The First, with headquarters not five miles from the Presidio, beat the boys to it by an hour. Then the Seventh was debarred the privilege of ly shown, when Company E participated in the exercises with the Knights of Pythias, how well a drilled soldier appears when familiar with military tactics. It should be everyone's wish, not only the citizens of Anaheim, but also of Fullerton and surroundings, to show his desire to keep and maintain Company E in our midst and also show the northern part of the state that we of the glorious south are, have been and always will be their superiors. Hoping that the public in general will join us in our effort to place Company E in its former high position, I am, very respectfully yours, A. Nowotny. CHARGES FRAUD Charging fraud Henrietta and Rudolph Kruger have begun suit in the superior court against Henry J. Martens and Martha and J. C. Fast. The complaint states that last September the Krugers agreed to buy from Martens Kern county land at a valuation of $6000. The first payment of $5200 was a deed to twenty-five acres near Anaheim to Martens. The complaint declares that with intent to defraud, Martens for no consideration deeded the land to Martha R. Fast, expecting to establish that she was an innocent purchaser. Further the complaint declares that Martens cannot deliver the Kern county land. The court is asked to rescind the September contract, to rescind the Kruger deed to Martens and the Martens deed to Fast. Two fine lots for sale, cheap. On Adele and Emily streets. Inquire at 212 South Lemon street. 2-17-tf MR. SMITH DEFENDS HIS BILL TRANSFER OF WATER POWER SITES FROM FEDERAL TO STATE AUTHORITY Eastern Writer Criticizes Bill, Which Is Encountering Vigorous Opposition in Western States—California Congressman Upholds His Measure In a recent article in the Saturday Evening Post, Stewart Edward White, the well-known author, discussed the principles involved in Congressman Smith's bill providing for a transfer of rights of way for power lines and power sites on the public domain from federal to state jurisdiction. He did not refer specifically to this bill, but clearly had it in mind when he wrote the article. He strongly opposed the suggestion of transfer. Mr. Smith on reading the article sent the following letter to Mr. White in defense of his measure: Mr. Stewart Edward White, Santa Barbara, California. Dear Mr. White: I have read with unusual interest your contribution to the Saturday Evening Post, under the caption, "Conservation vs. Conversation." Perhaps my interest in your article is increased by my understanding that I have the honor of claiming you as a constituent at this time. I note your rather fiery charge on the position I have taken in the water power question when you say that we aim "more surreptitiously" to "transfer the power over said grants from the secretary of the interior to state legislatures," but I think I can defend against the charge of having acted "surreptitiously," for I introduced my bill last July when there was no chance for its immediate conformance. whole matter is one that belongs in the domain of state's rights; but without entering into the merits of the case, such a discussion is academic. As a matter of cold fact, the states have done practically nothing, and the federal government has; and the people who do a thing should be paid for doing it. I see no reason why a reasonable annual horsepower tax should not go to the people who to a large extent take care of the continuance of that horsepower. Furthermore, the state gets its return from the water front within its limits through the regular channels of taxation. On a 50,000 horsepower plant properly assessed the revenue to the state should be somewhere about $20,000 per annum in taxes. This revenue would lack were it not for the water power. The county taxes should in all fairness be added to this, as indicating the addition to the public wealth from this source. The figures are rough, and might vary in individual cases, but their mere existence indicates my point. As a federal control vs. state control, outside the monetary considerations discussed above, it hardly seems merely a question as to whether "the folks at home" can be trusted or not. Leaving aside all sentiment and noble ideals, the average state legislature has rarely showed itself either competent or fitted to deal with such matters to the best interests of the public at large. They are not as fully under the public eye as the congress at Washington; they are more apt to be swayed by considerations of immediate expediency at the expense of ultimate welfare; and they offer a continual temptation if not an open opportunity to interests that otherwise might let such matters alone. Furthermore I believe that the question of control and sale of water power in one state is no more TO ELIMINATE SPARROWS Neets Should Be Destroyed During Breeding Season (By Ned Dearborn of the Agricultural Department at Washington.) In its economic relations the English sparrow among birds is comparable to the rat among mammals. It is cunning, destructive and filthy. This sparrow was introduced into America about sixty years ago, and is now distributed generally over the eastern half of the United States and southern Canada and locally westward to the Pacific coast. This rapid dissemination is a result of the bird's hardiness, extraordinary fecundity, diversity of food, aggressive disposition, and almost complete immunity from natural enemies through its sagacity and its preference for thickly settled communities. Its natural diet consists of seeds, but it eats a great variety of other foods. While much of its annual fare consists of waste material from the streets, in autumn and winter it consumes quantities of weed seed, and in summer numerous insects. The destruction of weed seed is undeniably in the sparrow's favor. Its record as to insects is not so clear. There is substantial evidence that it eats certain harmful insects quite freely when these are abundant, but that it habitually seeks insects, or that it prefers them to seeds or other vegetable-food is not borne out by the evidence. Out of 522 English sparrow stomachs examined by the Biological Survey, 47 contained noxious insects, 50 contained beneficial insects, and 31 contained insects of little or no economic importance. This report shows conclusively that, aside from the destruction of weed seed, there is very little to be said in the sparrow's fa- the honor of claiming you as a constituent at this time. I note your rather fiery charge on the position I have taken in the water power question when you say that we aim "more surreptitiously" to "transfer the power over said grants from the secretary of the interior to state legislatures," but I think I can defend against the charge of having acted "surreptitiously," for I introduced my bill last July when there was no chance for its immediate consideration and at once brought it to the attention of the press throughout the west and invited the fullest discussion of the plan proposed. I am inclined to think that the parting of the ways is found in your expression that any of the bills before congress would turn over "without return" the "water wealth of the country" for exploitation, for I assume that you mean without return to the federal government. Frankly, I do not think that that government is entitled to any return whatever from our western water powers. I am willing that they shall be called "natural" resources and be jealously protected from waste and misuse; and taxed for state and local purposes; but they are no more "national" in character and subject to a federal tax than is a delightful climate such as I am happy to know you are enjoying at beautiful Santa Barbara. To my way of thinking, the point of chiefest importance in this problem is that of having some governor tal agency stand by to protect the users of power from the aggressions of the power companies. I am thinking of the small user now—the farmer who pumps water for irrigation, or the manufacturer whose machinery is run by this subtle agent. Of course if our states and counties can no longer be trusted to do a plain and simple duty, then I have no case—unless, perchance, the federal authorities are no more worthy. Being an optimist, I have not lost faith in the folks at home. Mr. White replies with the following in which he states his objections to the Smith bill more in detail than he did in the article in the Saturday Evening Post: Hon. S. C. Smith, Washington.Dear Sir: Thank you for your letter of February 7th. These things never lose by discussion. I will try to take up seriatim the points in your letter. You misunderstood the use of the word "surreptitious." I did not imply that your own, or any other bill, was introduced secretly. I believe the competent of tried to deal with matters to the best interests of the public at large. They are not as fully under the public eye as the congress at Washington; they are more apt to be swayed by considerations of immediate expediency at the expense of ultimate welfare; and they offer a continual temptation if not an open opportunity to interests that otherwise might let such matters alone. Furthermore I believe that the question of control and sale of water power in one state is no more a local question in its final economic effects than is the question of the disposition of coal lands. It affects the welfare of the whole people. I might answer your optimism as to "not having lost faith in the folks at home"—which I am sure you will on re-reading, agree sounds a little too much like playing to the gallery—with that statement that neither have I. I am sure they have sense enough to realize the calibre of the make-up and the sources of many of our state commissions. I am not necessarily referring to California anywhere in these remarks. The Chinese wall type of local patriotism does not appeal to me. I fail to see the especial virtue of favoring an individual at the expense of a community, a community at the expense of a state, or a state at the expense of a nation. We are all Americans. I am decidedly with you, I fancy, in a desire to see the water power of the country developed as rapidly as possible by private enterprise. It is in my mind the only way to do it. And I want to see the water companies make money commensurate with their risk and enterprise. I do not, however, see why the temptation should be thrown in their way of a scattered power over water sites. WEDDED BLISS SOON ENDS Ontario Swain Finds Santa Ana Bride Loved Another After being married six weeks, Mr. and Mrs. Damerow of Ontario are separated. Damerow who is 22 years old wedded Mary Clara Moberly of Santa Ana, on Dec. 30, 1909. They lived together peaceably enough, but Damerow's father became suspicious of the young wife. He went to the county seat at San Bernardino and looked up the record. He asserts he discovered that she had been married before, but could find nowhere a record of a divorce, and the former husband is still living. Returning, he told his son this. Young Dame-happy insects quite treely when these are abundant, but that it habitually seeks insects, or that it prefers them to seeds or other vegetable food is not borne out by the evidence. Out of 522 English sparrow stomachs examined by the Biological Survey, 47 contained noxious insects, 50 contained beneficial insects, and 31 contained insects of little or no economic importance. This report shows conclusively that, aside from the destruction of weed seed, there is very little to be said in the sparrow's favor. On the other hand, much can be said against the bird. It destroys small fruits, as cherries, grapes, peaches and peaches. It also destroys buds and flowers of cultivated trees, vines and shrubs. In the garden it eats seeds as they ripen, and nips off the tender young vegetables as they appear above ground, peas and lettuce being especially subject to attack. It damages wheat and other grains when newly sowed, ripening and in shocks. It reduces the numbers of some of our most useful native species, such as bluebirds, house wrens, purple martins, tree swallows, cliff swallows,and barn swallows, by destroying the eggs and young and by usurping the nesting places. It attacks other familiar native birds, as the robin, wren, red-eyed vireo, catbird, and mocking bird, causing them to desert parks and shady streets of towns. Unlike our native birds whose places it usurps, it has no song, but is noisy and vituperative. It defiles buildings and ornamental trees, shrubs, and vines with its excrement and with its bulky nests. The evidence against the English sparrow is overwhelming, and the present unfriendly attitude of the public toward it is reflected in our state laws. Nowhere is it included among the birds that are protected. In response to frequent inquiries for means of abating the sparrow nuisance received by the Biological Survey, a few approved methods applicable to different conditions are here described. Sparrows frequently give annoyance by roosting in ornamental vines and in crevices about buildings. If driven out late at night, several nights in succession, they will usually desert the roost. A jet of water from a garden hose is a potent disturber, particularly on frosty nights. Where water is not available, small Roman candles may be employed. Though sparrows may be driven from a given neighborhood, the relief thus obtained is only temporary, and ing in which he states his objections to the Smith bill more in detail than he did in the article in the Saturday Evening Post: Hon. S. C. Smith, Washington.Dear Sir: Thank you for your letter of February 7th. These things never lose by discussion. I will try to take up seriatim the points in your letter. You misunderstood the use of the word "surreptitious." I did not imply that your own, or any other bill, was introduced secretly. I believe the ultimate effect of the bill, whether by intention or otherwise, is not that which appears on the surface. I disagree with your contention that the government is not entitled to any return from our western water power. Your implication is that the government would get all the public return from water power rights and projects and the state nothing. This is not the case. The government would get the exceedingly moderate conservation charge based on horsepower, to be sure, and it should do so. The water depends to a large extent on the conservation of forest cover, and the forest cover is depending more and more on the administration of our national forests. I speak conservatively and in accordance with the best modern thought when I say that in the long run the very existence of water power in present quantity will depend on the federal initiative and administration of forest reserves. The people at large pay for this administration. There exists no reason why either a corporation or a state should be subsidized by free service paid for by the whole people. The conservation charge is not a claim on the entire public revenue from water power, but a reasonable charge for service rendered. It may be argued that the separated. Damerow who is 22 years old wedded Mary Clara Moberly of Santa Ana, on Dec. 30, 1909. They lived together peaceably enough, but Damerow's father became suspicious of the young wife. He went to the county seat at San Bernardino and looked up the record. He asserts he discovered that she had been married before, but could find nowhere a record of a divorce, and the former husband is still living. Returning, he told his son this. Young Damerow went home and ordered his wife from his house, later sending her to her folks at Santa Ana. From there she telephoned to Damerow several times, begging him to go to her and let her explain. He would not hear of it. Damerow then left town; he boarded an east-bound Southern Pacific train, destination unknown. URGES SHORTER EXAMS State School Supt. Says Breezy Oral Quizzes Better Than Long Written Grind State Superintendent of Public Instruction Hyatt is opposed to a long period of examinations at the close of the school year, according to an opinion forwarded to school teachers throughout the state. In place of this hard mental grind, he recommends a breezy oral test, lasting for a few hours, in which each child can be tested sufficiently to judge whether or not he or she is up to the requirements for promotion. Long written tests not only grind upon the pupils but teachers as well. It fairly takes the life out of children. Hyatt's plan is to give the students a good quizzing on one of the closing days of the term and next day take them all out for a picnic. Sparrows frequently give annoyance by roosting in ornamental vines and in crevices about buildings. If driven out late at night, several nights in succession, they will usually desert the roost. A jet of water from a garden hose is a potent disturber, particularly on frosty nights. Where water is not available, small Roman candles may be employed. Though sparrows may be driven from a given neighborhood, the relief thus obtained is only temporary, and has the further objection that the nuisance is simply transferred elsewhere. More drastic action is therefore preferable. Prevention of Increase The most effective method of preventing the increase of sparrows in a locality is to destroy their nests at intervals of ten or twelve days throughout the breeding season. Occasionally they build large covered nests in trees, but as a rule they build open nests in bird houses, electric light hoods, cornices, water-spouts, and similar places. While it is often difficult to reach nests with the hand, they can usually be torn down by means of a long pole having an iron hook at the tip. By a concerted and continued movement to destroy every nest after the eggs are laid, English sparrows in any locality may be gradually reduced without resorting to shot or poison. Mission Stables Cor. Lemon and Oak Sta W. B. FINCH, - PROPRIETOR Fashionable Rigs Furnished at Reasonable Rates Contracts Taken for Team Work on Short Notice. SPARROWS Destroyed During Season Given Away In addition to the now cut-in-two prices you may have your choice of a 50c to 75c TIE FREE from a nobby line with every $5.00 purchase of Men's Furnishing Goods Time is precious, lease is nearly up, only a few days more; no shelf-worn goods, stock is oniy 3 months old. Big Bargains F.A.YUNGBLUTH THE TOGGERY STORE, 111 W. CENTER ST. ANAHEIM, CAL. AUTOMOBILES BUICK, STUDEBAKER FORD, MAXWELL REPAIRS AND SUPPLIES Pumping Plants and Windmills Installed. All Work Guaranteed. Let us Give You BUICK, STUDEBAKER FORD, MAXWELL REPAIRS AND SUPPLIES Pumping Plants and Windmills Installed. All Work Guaranteed. Let us Give You an Estimate. Beebe-Weisel Co. INCORPORATED Sacrifice Vehicle Sale To Reduce Overstock To continue for three weeks only, until February 15th. About 60 up-to-date styles, including all of our Davis Buggies, equipped with air-tempered Moyer-Banner or Happy-Thought Gears, bought direct by the carload from the George W. Davis Carriage Co. These Davis vehicles are of the highest quality, strictly A grade, the best we can buy and the latest styles. Stylish, Hercules Runabout, Just Think, Only $40.00 Runabout and Concords, $40.00 to $125.00 Surreys and Buckboards, $60.00 to $190.00 Top Buggies, - $70 to $140 Bike Buggies, $75 to $150 Come early and take your choice of over 60 styles. Wickersheim Implement Co, FULLERTON, CAL. 25 Overcoats 25 25 Overcoats 25 AT 1-2 Price This is all the Overcoats we have left and wish to close them out Louie Z. Kroeger 126½ W. Center St.—UP Stairs O. LAGMAN, BUILDER. Graduated as Architect in 1885 Will Furnish Plans, Specifications and Estimates Free of Cost Will Build Mod. 5-R'm House, $1,000 " " " 7-R'm " 1,400 If you have a lot I will Build a House On Monthly Payments Sunset 1111 406 E. Center Street Anaheim Bakery Peter Syre, Prop. Fresh Bread Cakes and Pies Confectionery, Etc. Wedding Cakes a Specialty Los Angeles and Cypress Sts.