anaheim-gazette 1902-12-25

The Weekly Gazette. ISSUED EVERY THURSDAY. HENRY KUCHEL. Editor and Proprietor THURSDAY... DECEMBER 25, 1902 Colonel Tuffree rushes into print with a lot of idiotic balderdash about the water company. He views with alarm the "Melrose influence," which he seems to fear is throttling the company to death. The colonel strikes a heroic attitude and warbles to the following effect: What is the cause of the complaint the Anaheim Union has been groaning beneath for years? The burden of litigation, the dread monster of civilization; the thing whose tentacles, clothed as attorneys, suck the life blood from the people to fatten themselves. This is indeed a gloomy aspect of affairs to take about this merry Yuletide. And again the colonel: I say that if they will investigate they will find more rottenness to the square inch in the dictation of the gang that has clutched the throat of the company since the days of Melrose as clerk, than, square inches in comparison, ever existed in Tammy in Croker's ripest days. The colonel has got 'em bad this trip. But let him give himself pause, let him calm his heated brow and compose himself while we inform him quietly that the only "burden of litigation" the company is now engaged in on its own account is an action in the superior court seeking to condemn the Tuffree reservoir; perhaps that has had something to do with starting this doleful train of thought on the part of the redoubtable colonel. True, the company has been engaged, in conjunction with the Santa Ana Valley Irrigation company, in defending its rights to the waters in the river, against such gentlemen as Mr. Newberry and Mr. Fuller, in both of which cases, the colonel may be able to recall, the water companies have achieved signally brilliant Durkee ranch, with all its inestimably valuable water rights? A perusal of Judge Bledsoe's decision in the Fuller case will emphasize the view which is pretty generally held by our people, that, conceived as it was in the minds of the brightest men in both companies, it has proven a blessing indeed to our irrigators. Let Tuffree read that decision, if he has not already done so (it was published in our columns last week), and let him see how largely it enters into sustaining our right to the 1000 inches of water which Fuller sought to take from us. To charge that its purchase was infamous is to argue either one's wilful ignorance of the whole matter or that one purposely mistates the facts. Col. Tuffree seeks to cast asperSION upon this journal because, as he says in his insane maunderings, it has been used to the end that all these "infamies" be fastened upon the people. Tuffree never uttered a more deliberate untruth in his life. Good or bad, none of these proceedings can be credited to or charged up against us. No one not altogether insane would make a statement so transparently ridiculaus and absurd. Moreover, no one is responsible for what appears herein except the proprietor of this journal, whose name appears, conspicuously printed, at the top of these columns, next to reading matter. We lay claim to no great shakes of credit for what we do, but when censure is being meted out, it is well to have this understood. Tuffree, in seeking to cast reproach upon the local attorney of the water company for fastening these "burdens" upon the people, and linking this journal with the "infamy," strikes feebly at a man who has no more to do with the preparation of this paper than Tuffree has himself. Our esteemed contemporary, the Orange Post, is wroth over some of the things connected with the McDowell-West contested election case. Now, if Krick is justified in saying the assessment "was dated to clair at 5 o'clock" we plead guilty; but he is not justified in making it, move his election as a member of the Ananias club. An up-county superior judge handed down a decision in the "nomination" imbroglio that seems us to possess elements of common sense, even if be not good law. While it appears to be at variance with the ruling of the supreme court in the Patterson-Hanley case yet we believe that in its vital point it must be upheld by the higher tribunal. He holds that while a single ballot stamped in the no-nomination column may be presumed to illegal, on account of the "disguising-mark" disqualification score or a hundred ballots so stated cannot rightfully come under scope of this decision. Suppose asks, every ballot in a precinct should be thus stamped, could they be said bear distinguishing marks? In such a case, where say every voter exonerate one in a precinct stamped his ballot in the no-nomination column, the one stamped his ticket property could mis ballot be said to be distinguishing feature? If not, others could most certainly not so classified. We have not the off of the decision of the Pattern Hanley case at hand, but we deceive if that august tribunal would continue the rejection of 86 other properly stamped ballots in precinct because of this constitution of the upper court's decision: the stamping of the no-nominal column. Yet this is what was seen in the trial of a contested elec- case the other day in this county Undoubtedly the trial judge soon conforms to the ruling of higher court in his decision in case, yet we doubt if he would upheld by the tribunal in the law of whose decision his footsteps court seeking to condemn the Tuffree reservoir; perhaps that has had something to do with starting this doleful train of thought on the part of the redoubtable colonel. True, the company has been engaged, in conjunction with the Santa Ana Valley Irrigation company, in defending its rights to the waters in the river, against such gentlemen as Mr. Newberry and Mr. Fuller, in both of which cases, the colonel may be able to recall, the water companies have achieved signally brilliant victories. In the Fuller case witnesses testified that land belonging to that gentleman was worth, per acre, without water, $10, while with water its value rose to $250 per acre. Fuller sought to thus increase the value of one thousand acres of his land; but the water companies have an idea there are several thousand acres of land in this valley where a similar ratio of values may prevail. Certainly the colonel does not discountenance the acts of the water board in taking on this "burden of litigation"? A portion of this land, so largely raised in value by the magic touch of water, may be situate on the rancho Buena Vista, which the colonel has recently brought out of litigation extending over a period of twenty years. Tuffree knows well the burdens of litigation. No man in the county has had more at stake at the hands of "this dread monster of civilization." As to that, indeed, he knows perfectly well whereof he speaks. The Newberry case is perhaps familiar to all, but we might say in passing that had this gentleman triumphed in his assault against the rights of the valley irrigators, it is doubtful if Tuffree had been able to dispose of a foot of land of his ranch at any price. Newberry sought to appropriate all the water in the river which Fuller left, if we mistake not; but the water companies so effectually beat him at his own game that he has since been practically a suppliant for their favor. The suit to condemn the Tuffree reservoir was forced upon the company by Tuffree himself, whose interminable wrangling and threats to bring suits to dispossesse the company from the premises in face of its perpetual contract to enjoy their peaceable occupation, no less than his repeated threats to blow up the dam with dynamite, made existence intolerable to the board. Mr. Crowther, who has long been a member of the board, has for years insisted that condemnation proceedings offered the only effectual solution to the Our esteemed contemporary, the Orange Post, is wroth over some of the things connected with the McDowell-West contested election case, as witness the following: Another peculiarity of the proceedings was the apparent partiality toward witnesses. Some of them were paid in advance, and others were evidently allowed to remain at home. This is dreadful! But witnesses in civil suits, we stop the press to say, for the information of our contemporary, "have a right" to demand their fees from the menial of the law summoning them. That is the way to get them "in advance." Once a secure holt is had upon the collateral, the same should be permitted to gracefully glide down, at an angle of 45 degrees, into the right-hand pant's pocket. Should the witness fail thus to demand his fees, the foxy constable will probably say nothing about them, and the meek and lowly editor drops his work and hies himself to court to testify about something he knows nothing whatever about, and he and his fees have parted company forevermore. That's the difference of getting fees "in advance" and not getting them at all. But as to those who were permitted to remain away, they ought to have been haled into court by the sheriff, heavily ironed (the editor, not the sheriff) and then thrown ignominiously into the body of the jail. Sure pop! Mr. Krick strives very hard to make it appear that he is blameless in the matter of the delinquent notice already referred to, and does not scruple at stretching the truth in his hair-raising attempt to bear him out in his contention. He says "the assessment was dated to close on Dec. 3d, at 5 p.m." while we solicited the advertisement at noon of that day. Therefore, he says, we were attempting to make him do what was wrong in order to get a big list of names at 50 cents each. If Mr. Krick can point out where he gets the authority to say the assessment notice "was dated to close at 5 o'clock p.m." on the day in question, we'll plead guilty to his accusation and stand for all the blame which we here said rightfully he to have this understood. Tuffree, in seeking to cast reproach upon the local attorney of the water company for fastening these "burdens" upon the people, and linking this journal with the "infamy," strikes feebly at a man who has no more to do with the preparation of this paper than Tuffree has himself. Our esteemed contemporary, the Orange Post, is wroth over some of the things connected with the McDowell-West contested election case, as witness the following: Another peculiarity of the proceedings was the apparent partiality toward witnesses. Some of them were paid in advance, and others were evidently allowed to remain at home. This is dreadful! But witnesses in civil suits, we stop the press to say, for the information of our contemporary, "have a right" to demand their fees from the menial of the law summoning them. That is the way to get them "in advance." Once a secure holt is had upon the collateral, the same should be permitted to gracefully glide down, at an angle of 45 degrees, into the right-hand pant's pocket. Should the witness fail thus to demand his fees, the foxy constable will probably say nothing about them, and the meek and lowly editor drops his work and hies himself to court to testify about something he knows nothing whatever about, and he and his fees have parted company forevermore. That's the difference of getting fees "in advance" and not getting them at all. But as to those who were permitted to remain away, they ought to have been halled into court by the sheriff, heavily ironed (the editor, not the sheriff) and then thrown ignominiously into the body of the jail. Sure pop! Mr. Krick strives very hard to make it appear that he is blameless in the matter of the delinquent notice already referred to, and does not scruple at stretching the truth in his hair-raising attempt to bear him out in his contention. He says "the assessment was dated to close on Dec. 3d, at 5 p.m." while we solicited the advertisement at noon of that day. Therefore, he says, we were attempting to make him do what was wrong in order to get a big list of names at 50 cents each. If Mr. Krick can point out where he gets the authority to say the assessment notice "was dated to close at 5 o'clock p.m." on the day in question, we'll plead guilty to his accusation and stand for all the blame which we here said rightfully he to have this understood. Tuffree, in seeking to cast reproach upon the local attorney of the water company for fastening these "burdens" upon the people, and linking this journal with the "infamy," strikes feebly at a man who has no more to do with the preparation of this paper than Tuffree has himself. Our esteemed contemporary, the Orange Post, is wroth over some of the things connected with the McDowell-West contested election case, as witness the following: Another peculiarity of the proceedings was the apparent partiality toward witnesses. Some of them were paid in advance, and others were evidently allowed to remain at home. This is dreadful! But witnesses in civil suits, we stop the press to say, for the information of our contemporary, "have a right" to demand their fees from the menial of the law summoning them. That is the way to get them "in advance." Once a secure holt is had upon the collateral, the same should be permitted to gracefully glide down, at an angle of 45 degrees, into the right-hand pant's pocket. Should the witness fail thus to demand his fees, the foxy constable will probably say nothing about them, and the meek and lowly editor drops his work and hies himself to court to testify about something he knows nothing whatever about, and he and his fees have parted company forevermore. That's the difference of getting fees "in advance" and not getting them at all. But as to those who were permitted to remain away, they ought to have been halled into court by the sheriff, heavily ironed (the editor, not the sheriff) and then thrown ignominiously into the body of the jail. Sure pop! Mr. Krick strives very hard to make it appear that he is blameless in the matter of the delinquent notice already referred to, and does not scruple at stretching the truth in his hair-raising attempt to bear him out in his contention. He says "the assessment was dated to close on Dec. 3d, at 5 p.m." while we solicited the advertisement at noon of that day. Therefore, he says, we were attempting to make him do what was wrong in order to get a big list of names at 50 cents each. If Mr. Krick can point out where he gets the authority to say the assessment notice "was dated to close at 5 o'clock p.m." on the day in question, we'll plead guilty to his accusation and stand for all the blame which we here said rightfully he to have this understood. Tuffree, in seeking to cast reproach upon the local attorney of the water company for fastening these "burdens" upon the people, and linking this journal with the "infamy," strikes feebly at a man who has no more to do with the preparation of this paper than Tuffree has himself. Our esteemed contemporary, the Orange Post, is wroth over some of the things connected with the McDowell-West contested election case, as witness the following: Another peculiarity of the proceedings was the apparent partiality toward witnesses. Some of them were paid in advance, and others were evidently allowed to remain at home. This is dreadful! But witnesses in civil suits, we stop the press to say forthe information of our contemporary, "have a right" to demand their fees fromthe menial ofthe law summoning them.That isthewaytogetthematethereupon,astatenofplaintiffsattorneysthatcouldnotsegregatetheamountpendedbyWestpriortohisseedingthenominationandsubsequentthereto,summarilythrownoutcourt.Wewerecommandtedtopearin Court,bringingourbookreceiptbooks，stubsandvouchersandshowhowmuchofthecirculingmediumWesthadshoweredourlapduringthecampaign.willherestate,forgreatbreathlessworld,matthewiswas$3.$Thatiswhatourbe show.Flwestpaidnoonem thanhepaidusforservicesremained,hene needhaveno furtherfea t anothercontestalongthelines. The annual statement of Riverside Water company shows bonded indebtednesstobe$8120andtotalliabilitiesexceeding$35000.Yetthecompanypurposesubidemoneywhereonare situatedlandwhereonare situatedwellfromwhichallproposeforitswaterisderived.Theexpenditureismadenecessarythe recent decisionofthesupreme courttotheeffectthatwatercanbeflawfullyconductedawayforsuchwellstothedetrimentofwonadjoiningproperty.TheRiversidecompanywillpurchaseacresoftheselands,togetherwiththeirwaterrights.atanexpense$66000. The now celebrated supreme court decision inthecaseofKatzvs.VikinshawbidsfairtobeofinterestpropertyownersintheRinconlowerChinocountry.Theexpressionintodertertaincityownswholequarteranywaterrights.atanexpense$66000. by Tuffree himself, whose interminable wrangling and threats to bring suits to disposses the company from the premises in face of its perpetual contract to enjoy their peaceable occupation, no less than his repeated threats to blow up the dam with dynamite, made existence intolerable to the board. Mr. Crowther, who has long been a member of the board, has for years insisted that condemnation proceedings offered the only effectual solution to the question. Mr. Bradford has also on numerous occasions similarly expressed himself. Hale and Sheppard, during their membership on the board during the past year, have been insistent that condemnation proceedings against Tuffree be instituted as the only sensible solution of the vexed problem. The final order beginning the suit was voted upon affirmatively by the entire membership of the board, without a dissenting vote. So much for that part of "the burden of litigation" "sucking the life blood out of the people." If the "burden of litigation" in the Newberry and Fuller cases, and the "infamous Durkee deal," are to provoke censure on Tuffree's part, it would seem that he place that censure equally upon the shoulders of the Santa Ana water company, as well as upon their lawyers and engineers; inasmuch as both companies are equally interested in these "burdens" and "infamies." It is rather unfair to place all the blame upon one man who had no more to do with them than any one of upward of a score of men in fastening these grievous "burdens" upon the people. But if the Newberry and Fuller lawsuits, so far from imposing "burdens" upon the irrigators of this valley, are glorious pages in the history of both water companies, what must be said of the purchase of the "The assessment was dated to close on Dec. 3d, at 5 p.m." while we solicited the advertisement at noon of that day. Therefore, he says, we were attempting to make him do what was wrong in order to get a big list of names at 50 cents each. If Mr. Krick can point out where he gets the authority to say the assessment notice "was dated to close at 5 o'clock p.m." on the day in question, we'll plead guilty to his accusation and stand for all the blame which we have said rightfully belongs to him. Then, either we are guilty as charged, or, in his inability to point out where this particular "5 o'clock" comes in, he stands convicted of a deliberate misstatement, the more despicable because he attempts thereby to relieve himself of the charge of error and place it on the shoulders of another. Turning to the assessment notice, we see it provides that stock upon which the assessment has not been paid shall become delinquent "on December 3d,"—not at 5 p.m. or at 5 a.m., but simply on December 3d. When, therefore, we solicited the advertisement at noon of that day we were within our rights in the premises; and it is not true that in doing we were after a longer list than would otherwise exist, for we told Krick that, if given the advertisement at noon, we would, at 5 o'clock, withdraw every name upon which the assessment had in the meantime been paid. Mr. Krick seemed to be laboring under a mild attack of the rattles; he said he had so much to do he did not know if he could prepare the delinquent list before night or not, and perhaps not then. We withdrew from his office, and paid no further attention to it. At 5 o'clock, when our forms were on the press, Krick telephoned inquiring if we could wait for the advertisement until 6 o'clock. We in REAL ESTATE TRANSFERS For Week Ending December 22, 1902. Furnished by the Orange County Title Company, Santa Ana. Henry P Opp and Emma L Opp to A H Nickle—Lot 4 and n½ of lot 7, block B, Fruit addition to Santa Ana East: $1000. Anaheim Co-operative Beet Sugar Co to Robert Ochsenfahrt—W½ of w½ of net of sw½ of sec 28-4-10; $5. Carl Ochsenfahrt et al to C G Lott—W½ of net of sw½ of sec 28-4-10, 20 acres; $450. W W Hoyt to Annis A Hoyt, his wife—An interest in John T Carpenter Water Co and in the John T Carpenter water ditch; $1. Mailen A Yost to 1 G Clark—Lot 14, block C, Gardiner & Moye’s addition to Santa Ana; $10. Citizens Bank of Anaheim to Sarah Hussey—E½ of net of se¾ of sec 12-4-11, 20 acres; $725. F Stephens to A W Rhodes—5 acres 1 mile north of Orange; $40. D H Thomas and Jennie H Thomas to F E Monaghan—Lot A of the Stafford & Tustin tract, 19 23 acres; $10. F F Pyne to E W Pyne—Lots 8, 9 and 10, block B, Shelton & Deuel’s addition to Santa Ana; $10. E Walter Pyne to William H Davis—Lots 8, 9 and 10, block B, Shelton & Deuel’s addition to Santa Ana; $300. W B Hervey and J C Hervey to Edwin Cox—Lots 1, 2, 11 and 12, block A, Santa Ana Investment Co tract No 1, Humphrey’s addition to Santa Ana; $1200. Stearns Ranchos Co to Andreas Beker—N½ of net of sw½ of sec 12-4-12, 20 acres; $10. Andreas Beker and Julia Beker to Charles I Cartis et al—W½ of n½ of net of sw½ of sec 12-4-10, 10 acres; $10. Henry Suyder and Elizabeth L Snyder to David L Lee—E 12.42 acres of s¹ of lot A, Gray tract; $2000. Henry Gaylord Wilshire to Sarah A Schumacher—Lots 32, 33, 34, 35 and 36, block 23, Fullerton; $400. Samuel Bowers, trustee, to Esther Speer—Lot 26, block A, Boteler addition to Santa Ana; also part of lots 24 to 30, inclusive, block 68, Santa Ana East. Thomas J Chappell and Lida H Chappell to Charles F Ward—N½ of net of sw½ of sec 36-5-11, 20 acres; $10. Stearns Ranchos Co to S H Finley—5 acres adjoining Pacific City on the east; $10. Levi J Colby and Lucretia J Colby to Mary W Blodgett—Lot 19, block A, J W Gardner’s subdivision; $10. Stearns Ranchos Co to Jacob Walton et al—E½ of sec 36-3-11; $1. E C F Pacholke and A C Pacholke to H Machander—10 acres 2 miles ne of Santa Ana; $4500. H W Judson and Martha C Judson to E E Beazley—Lot 13, block 14, town of Fullerton; $10. THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ANAHUR OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS: W. F. BOTSFORD, PRESIDENT JOHN HARTUNG, VICE PRESIDENT C. E. HOLCOMB, CASHIER FRANK SHANLEY AND PETER WEISEL Drafts sold direct on all European Countries PASTURA City Stables E.A.M. Televi MAK Centr $60 KANSAS CITY AND BACK JANUARY 8 AND 9 STOPOVERS ON RETURN TRIPES TICKETS GOOD ON “OVERLAND” OR “CALIFORNIA LIMITED.” SEE ANY AGENT SANTA FE For Sale—Real Estate Choice bargains in city and country property at ANAHUR and other Southern California localities. A nice list of homes in Los Angeles city. See me for real estate. I also sell the best propositions in Fire, Life and Accident Insurance Address For Sale—Real Estate Choice bargains in city and country property at ANAHEIM and other Southern California localities. A nice list of homes in Los Angeles city. See me for real estate. I also sell the best propositions in Fire, Life and Accident Insurance. Wm. Schwenckert, 215 Henne Bldg No. 122 W 3d St LOS ANGELES, CAL. After January 3, 1903, address ANAHEIM, CAL. List your property with me if you want to sell or exchange. Christmas Presents AT HATZFELD'S Come in and see our line of fine Holiday Goods. Everything up-to-date. The French Stag is the latest and nobbiest novelty in the market. We have it in various styles of sets. Burnt Wood and Leather, Brush and Comb Sets, Shaving Sets, smoking sets, Mirrors, Perfumeries, Fine Stationery, Manicure Sets, Steins, etc. Also a fine line of Holiday cigars. J. P. Hatzfeld, Druggist Opposite Commercial Hotel, Center Street ANAHEIM S.S. "State of California" Has, on account of the holidays, been postponed one day on her next two trips. She will, therefore, leave for "San Diego" Saturday, Dec. 27th, and Saturday, January 3d; for "San Francisco" Monday, December 29th, and Monday, January 5th, instead of one day previous as advertised. ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS' MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE annual meeting of the stockholders of the Oak Grove Oil company will be held on the 5th day of January, 1903, at 2 o'clock p.m., at the office of the First National Bank of Anaheim, in the City of Anaheim, California, for the purpose of electing a board of directors and for the transaction of such business as may be lawfully brought before the meeting. Dated December 24th, 1902. M. NEBELUNG, Secretary d25-2t University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Dec. 20.-The ten-weeks' short course in agriculture and horticulture and in dairying have just come to a close. The students enrolled are enthusiastic over the practical value of the instruction they have received. They came diSome Celebrated Men Who Their Domestic Servants Many celebrated men have their domestic servants. Sir Parkes, premier of New South Wales is an example. One night when at a friend's house he was stitched the appearance of a servant waited upon the table and placed his host to allow her to enter ploy. This she did and for a sheriff held the position of cook in Sirhousehold. Then he made his Parkes. But more illustrious than the case of Peter the Great. One was dining at the house of Prince Shikoff. He noticed one of the maids particularly, and, though not handsome, she caughtcy. Her name, the prince told her was Martha. She had been at in the house of a Lutheran martenburg, and when that captured by the troops of Rud had been taken prisoner by Bauer, who had passed her own prince, whose servant she we count politely made a present to the czar, who eventually married William Cobbett, the great when he was only twenty-one age one morning chanced to see om servant girl busily english washing the family linen. Was pretty, so Cobbett spoke learned her name and the same called upon her parents he would like to marry their child. The parents of the girl inform young man that they had no objection to him as their son-in-law, but would have to wait until their ter was of a marriageable age years later Cobbett, true to love, married her. Southey on Wordsworth Of Wordsworth, Southey w1898 says Harold S. Scott in lantic: "He has written a poem called 'The White Doe of Hall' or The Norton poem is incomparably fine. I am anuse you to hear how he tallied own production. His entire selfishness exceeds anything you have conceived. I am more arid it than offended; not being sus attached to him to feel pain ing his faults, and yet respect far too much on the average qualities to be disgusted. It is unnixed a passion in him Jonson would have had him bad he been his contemporary." All on Account of the Deaf "There's another war on Closer and Pincer." "No? What's the matter this? Of course you know they other. Been rivals in business cleft for years. Long ago both to marry the same girl, and neither. Each blames the other Mention Closer to Pinchem wants to fight. Mention Pinchem closes and he'll swear in the vocabulary a profane man ever laided." OPERA-HOUSE ONE NIGHT ONLY Tuesday, Dec. 30th STETSON'S ORIGINAL BIG DOUBLE SPECTACULAR Uncle Tom's Cabin Co. THE BARNUM OF ALL More Grand Novelties than ever Prof. Derr's Military Band Creole Ladies' Brass Band Blood Hounds Beautiful Chariots and Tableaux Wagons Drawn by Handsome Shetland Ponies Genuine Cake Walkers Buck and Wing Dancers Male and Female Quartettes Jubilee Singers Eva and her Golden Chariot Watch for the Big Parade—It Beats a Circus Reserved Seats 75¢. On sale at McCollum's University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Dec. 20. The ten-weeks' short course in agriculture and horticulture and in dairying have just come to a close. The students enrolled are enthusiastic over the practical value of the instruction they have received. They came directly from the orchard, farm, or creamery, and they now return to their work to apply the suggestions which they have received from the University's agricultural experts. Professor Jacques Loeb arrived yesterday from the University of Chicago to begin his work as Professor of Physiology in the University of California. The Glee club has settled on the following itinerary for its concert tour during the Christmas holidays: Salinas, Dec. 22; Oxnard, Dec. 23; Santa Barbara, Dec. 24; Ventura, Dec. 25; Los Angeles, Dec. 27; Coronado, Dec. 28; Santa Ana, Dec. 29; Pasadena, Jan. 1, and also Riverside, Redlands, San Bernardino, Pomona, Bakersfield, Visalla, Hanford, Fresno, Merced and Stockton. The region of the great pyramids of Egypt has been divided by the Egyptian government between the Italian and German governments and the University of California. Separate expeditions representing the University and the two foreign governments will have the sole right to excavate for Egyptian antiquities in that extraordinarily rich and historically important field. Mrs. Hearst defrays all expenses of the University expedition, but the great collections gathered will be added to the University museum, and all the discoveries made will be published at Mrs. Hearst's expense, in the name of the University, thus adding to its scientific reputation throughout the world. E. Turk and family are here from China to spend the holidays. St. Michaels Ladies' Guild will meet with Mrs. Eva Boyd on Jan. 8th instead of Jan. 1st. At her residence opposite Del Campo hotel, Anaheim. All on Account of the Death "There's another war on Closer and Pinchem." No? What's the matter this other course you know they have other. Been rivals in business city for years. Long ago both to marry the same girl, and never. Each blames the other Mention Closer to Pinchem wants to fight. Mention Pinchem and he'll swear in the vocabulary a profane man ever lated. Deacon Worthy was the oak tree the most recent rupture. He was money for some good purpose after Closer, who headed the $800 under a positive agreement $200 of the amount was to beately handed back to him. Deacon went to Pinchem, then red splotches on the moon. He closed as a miser and a sham idea of his having subscribed to such a cause was disgraceful him put down $500 and generate the deacon to call on him if needed. When Closer saw the list he was tickled into a coughing fit word conveyed to Pinchem of being with the deacon. They for a time that they'd have to pem in a straitjacket. The named Closer would keep a stench busy for a week. They reached and now there is to be a slant Each has vowed to whip the sight, and it is better than any see how they dodge each other daily walks. The deacon only while he deplores the fact that feeling was created."—Detroit Press. Daft Tam, as he was called, ing through the village one day verely bitten by the village inn. Proceeding to the inn, he she mistress what her "dawg" had She was much alarmed and half crown into Tam's hand, said "Awa tae the doctor, nooo him wi' the hauf crown." Tam eyed the coin, saying: "I dinna think I'll bother doctor, but jist keep the siller." For my sake, gang tae him ye'll gang daft." Hoots, wumman, ye're b Daft folk canna gang daft tw Pearson's Weekly. BANK OF ANAHEIM PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT CASHIER AND Countries PASTURAGE E.A.ZEUS Telephone MAIN 83 Center St., VERS ON RETURN TRIP. IS GOOD ON "OVERLAND" CALIFORNIA LIMITED." BY AGENT PRANKS OF CUPID. HOME Celebrated Men Who Married Their Domestic Servants. Many celebrated men have married their domestic servants. Sir Henry Markes, premier of New South Wales, an example. One night when dining at a friend's house he was struck by the appearance of a servant girl who limited upon the table and persuaded his host to allow her to enter his empory. This she did and for a short time Delinquent Tax List IN AND FOR THE City of Anaheim, County of Orange, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, For the Fiscal Year 1902-1903. A Ahern, W J, in Santa Fe tract, lot 11, block 3, amount of tax and costs due, $1.09. Ahern, W J, in Santa Fe tract, lot 12, block 3, amount of tax and costs due, $1.09. Ahern, W J, in Santa Fe tract, lot 23, block 3, amount of tax and costs due, $1.09. Ahern, W J, in Santa Fe tract, lot 24, block 3, amount of tax and costs due, $1.09. B Bauer, J S, in Santa Fe tract, lot 17, block 4, amount of tax and costs due, 96 cents. Bauer, J S, in Santa Fe tract, lot 18, block 4, amount of tax and costs due, 96 cents. Boothe, A E, personal property improvements and west 100 feet of north 155 feet of original city lot No. 36, amount of tax and costs due, $94.97. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 1, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, 72 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 2, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, 72 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 3, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, 72 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 3, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, 72 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 4, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, 72 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 5, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, 72 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 6, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, 72 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 7, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, 72 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 8, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, 72 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 9, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, 72 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 10, block 4, amount of tax and costs due, 73 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 11, block 4, amount of tax and costs due, 73 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 12, block 4, amount of tax and costs due, 73 cents. Brunn, I R, in Spoerl tract, lot 13, block 4, amount of tax and costs due, 73 cents. Brunn，I R，in Spoerl tract，lot1，block6，amountof taxandcostsdue，$2.15. D Dockweiler，J B，in Vineyard C-8，lot27，blockC，amountof taxandcostsdue，$1.36. E U Unknown owner，在Vineyard F5，lot2，blockB，amountof taxandcostsdue，$1.21。 Unknown owner，在Vineyard F5，lot3，blockB，amountof taxandcostsdue，$1.21。 Unknown owner，在Vineyard F5，lot4，blockB，amountof taxandcostsdue，$1.21。 Unknown owner，在SantaFe tract，lot7，block2，amountof taxandcostsdue，85 cts. V Van Vorst，C，在Spoerl tract，lot1，block1，amountof taxandcostsdue，69 cents。 Van Vorst，C，在Spoerl tract，lot2，block1，amountof taxandcostsdue，69 cents。 Van Vorst，C，在Spoerl tract，lot3，block1，amountof taxandcostsdue，69 cents。 W Wesselman，Agnes，在Reiser tract，lot1，blockD，amountof taxandcostsdue，90 cts。 Wesselman，Agnes，在Reiser tract，lot2，blockD，amountof taxandcostsdue，89 cts。 Wesselman，Agnes，在Reiser tract，lot3，blockD，amountof taxandcostsdue，89 cts。 Wesselman，Agnes，在Reiser tract，lot4，blockD，amountof taxandcostsdue，89 cts。 Wesselman，Agnes，在Reiser tract，lot5，blockD，amountof taxandcostsdue，89 cts。 Wesselman，Agnes，在Reiser tract，lot6，blockD，amountof taxandcostsdue，89 cts。 Wesselman，Agnes，在Reiser tract，lot7，blockD，amountof taxandcostsdue，89 cts。 Wesselman，Agnes，在Reiser tract，lot8，blockD，amountof taxandcostsdue，89 cts。 Wesselman，Agnes，在Reiser tract，lot9，blockD， amountof taxandcostsdue，89 cts。 Wesselman，Agnes，在Reiser tract， lot10，block4， amountof taxandcostsdue， 73 cents。 Wesselman，Agnes，在Reiser tract， lot11，block4， amountof taxandcostsdue， 73 cents。 Wesselman，Agnes在Reiserract， lot12，block4， amountof taxandcostsdue， 73 cents。 Wustamenta,B.在Davis Bros addition and improvements,Lot5.blockB_amountof taxandcostsdue,$2.15。 CONDITIONS. The real property will be sold subject to redemption within twelve months from the day of sale; but if not redeemed,the conveyance absolute in form of the property sold will be executed to the purchasers thereof as provided by law. NO PROPERTY IS EXEMPT. PRANKS OF CUPID. Home Celebrated Men Who Married Their Domestic Servants. Many celebrated men have married their domestic servants. Sir Henry Markes, premier of New South Wales, an example. One night when dining at a friend's house he was struck by the appearance of a servant girl who waited upon the table and persuaded his host to allow her to enter his emergy. This she did and for a short time held the position of cook in Sir Henry's household. Then he made her Lady Markes. But more illustrious than this is the case of Peter the Great. One day he was dining at the house of Prince Menskoff. He noticed one of the servant girls particularly, and though she was not handsome, she caught his fancy. Her name, the prince told the czar, was Martha. She had been a servant in the house of a Lutheran minister of Carlinburg, and when that city was captured by the troops of Russia she had been taken prisoner by General Maurice, who had passed her over to the Prince, whose servant she was. The count politely made a present of her to the czar, who eventually married her. William Cobbett, the great writer, when he was only twenty-one years of age one morning chanced to see a buxom servant girl busily engaged in washing the family linen. The girl was pretty, so Cobbett spoke to her, warned her name and the same even called upon her parents and said he would like to marry their daughter. The parents of the girl informed the young man that they had no objections him as their son-in-law, but that he would have to wait until their daughter was of a marriageable age. Five years later Cobbett, true to his early life, married her. Southey on Wordsworth. Of Wordsworth, Southey writes in 1805, says Harold S. Scott in The Attic: "He has written a masterly poem called 'The White Dote of Rilston Hall' or, The Fate of the Nortous.' The poem is incomparably fine. It would mouse you to hear how he talks of his own production. His entire and intense brillishness exceeds anything you could have conceived. I am more amused at than offended; not being sufficiently attached to him to feel pain at perceiving his faults, and yet respecting him for too much on the average of his abilities to be disgusted. It is so pure and unmixed a passion in him that Benenson would have had him in a play and he been his contemporary." All on Account of the Deacon. "There's another war on between closer and Pinchem." "No? What's the matter this time?" "Of course you know they hate each other. Been rivals in business and society for years. Long ago both wanted to marry the same girl, and neither got it. Each blames the other for that.ention Closer to Pinchem and he wants to fight. Mention Pinchem to closer and he'll swear in the richest vocabulary a profane man ever accumulated." Deacon Worthy was the occasion of most recent routine. He was raising "There's another war on between Closer and Pinchem." "No? What's the matter this time?" "Of course you know they hate each other. Been rivals in business and society for years. Long ago both wanted to marry the same girl, and neither got married. Each blames the other for that. Mention Closer to Pinchem and he wants to fight. Mention Pinchem to Closer and he'll swear in the richest vocabulary a profane man ever accumulated." "Deacon Worthy was the occasion of the most recent rupture. He was raising money for some good purpose and went to Closer, who headed the list with 800 under a positive agreement that amounted to $200 of the amount was to be immediately handed back to him. When the deacon went to Pinchem, there were plotches on the moon. He denounced Closer as a miser and a shark. The idea of his having subscribed but $800 such a cause was disgraceful. Pinchem put down $500 and generously told the deacon to call on him if more were needed." "When Closer saw the list again, he was tickled into a coughing fit and had cord conveyed to Pinchem of his agreement with the deacon. They thought for a time that they'd have to put Pinchem in a straitjacket. The names he called Closer would keep a stenographer busy for a week. They reached Closer, and now there is to be a slander suit. Each has vowed to whip the other on sight, and it is better than a cirous to see how they dodge each other in their daily walks. The deacon only smiles while he deplores the fact that any bad feeling was created."—Detroit Free Press. Daft Tam, as he was called, wandered through the village one day, got severely bitten by the village inn dog. Proceeding to the inn, he showed the distress what her "dawg" had done. She was much alarmed and, putting a half crown into Tam's hand, said: "Awa tae the doctor, noo, an pay tamwi' the hauf crown." Tam eyed the coin, saying: "I dinna think I'll bother wi' the doctor, but jist keep the siller." "For my sake, gang tae him, or else I'll gang daft." "Hoots, wumman, ye're bletherin. Aft folk canna gang daft twice."—Pearson's Weekly. Pavcich, J. L., in Santa Fe tract, lot 10, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, 83 cts. Pavcich, J. L., in Santa Fe tract, lot 3, block 4, amount of tax and costs due, 83 cts. Pavcich, J. L., in Santa Fe tract, lot 4, block 4, amount of tax and costs due, $1.61. Pratt, Ernest W., in Center tract, personal property and improvements, lot 31, block C, amount of tax and costs due, $10.48. Pratt, Ernest W., in Center tract, lot 35, block C, amount of tax and costs due, $1.61. Pullman Palace Car Co., 151-100 miles right of way on Southern California railroad, report of Orange county Board of Supervisors, amount of tax and costs due, $8.60. Pullman Palace Car Co., 8-100 miles of right of way on Southern California railroad, report of Orange county Surveyor in addition to Supervisors' report, amount of tax and costs due, 68 cents. R Riball, J. in Santa Fe tract, lot 18, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, $1.02. Riball, J. in Santa Fe tract, lot 19, block 2, amount of tax and costs due, $1.43. Rich, B. B., in Vineyard C-3, lot 104, block 14, amount of tax and costs due, $1.49. Rich, B. B., in Vineyard C-3, lot 105, block 14, amount of tax and costs due, $1.61. Richter, Mrs A., in Center tract, lot 28, block B, amount of tax and costs due, $1.61. S Scheuter, F., in Spoerl tract, lot 28, block 2 amount of tax and costs due, 76 cents. Scheuter, F., in Spoerl tract, lot 24, block 2 amount of tax and costs due, 76 cents. Scheuter, F., in Spoerl tract, lot 31, block 3 amount of tax and costs due, 83 cents. Scheuter, F., in Spoerl tract, lot 32, block 3 amount of tax and costs due, 83 cents. Shaw, Mrs Sarah, in Lorelei tract, lot 3 block A, amount of tax and costs due, $1.09. Shaw, Mrs Sarah, in Lorelei tract, lot 4 block A, amount of tax and costs due, $1.09. Shaw, Mrs Sarah, in Lorelei tract, lot 5 block A, amount of tax and costs due, $1.09. Shaw, Mrs Sarah, in Lorelei tract, lot 6 block A, amount of tax and costs due, $1.09. Silvas, Juan, in Strobel homestead tract,and improvements，lot 13，amount of tax and costs due，$13.63。 Simpson，Mrs Estella May，in Anaheim extension,north 10 acres of lot 32 and improvements，amount of tax and costs due，$13.63。 Southern California Railroad Co., S-100 miles of main line，report of Orange county Surveyor in addition to Orange county Supervisors' report，$13.42. Staufel,Nick，in Santa Fe tract，lot 1，block 4，amount of tax and costs due，$1.21. Stautel,Nick，in Santa Fe tract，lot 2，block 4，amount of tax and costs due，$1.02. SteinerJohn，in Spoerl tract，lot 1，block 4，amount of tax and costs due，77 cents. SteinerJohn，in Spoerl tract，lot 2，block 4，amount of tax and costs due，76 cents. SteinerJohn，in Spoerl tract，lot 3，block 4，amount of tax and costs due，76 cents. SteinerJohn，in Spoerl tract，lot 4，block 4，amount of tax and costs due，76 cents. SteinerJohn，in Spoerl tract，lot 5，block 4，amount of tax and costs due，76 cents. SteinerJohn，in Spoerl tract，lot 6，block 4，amount of tax and costs due，76 cents. SueckindandPolasky,S%and20feetofN%oforiginalcitylotNo40amountoftaxandcostsdue,$6.40. Treasury Department. OFFICE OF Comptroller of the Currency. WASHINGTON,D.C.,November7 ,1902. WHEREAS,BY SATISFACTORYEVIDENCEpresentedtotheundersigned.ithasbeemadetowherethatTheFirstNationalBankofAnaheimintheCITYOFANAHEIM.intheCOUNTYOFORANGEandSTATEOFCALIFORNIA.iscompiledwithalltheprovisionsoftheStatutesoftheUnitedStatesrequiredtobecompiledwithbeforeanassociationshallbeauthorizedtocommencethebusinessofBanking; Now,theforest,L.THOMASP.KANEDeputyandActingComptrolleroftheCurrency.do herebycertifythatTheFirstNationalBankofAnaheimintheCITYOFANAHEIM.intheCOUNTYOFORANGEandSTATEOFCALIFORNIA.isauthorizedtocommencethebusinessofBankingasprovidedInSectionFifty-onehundredandsixty-nineoftheRevisedStatutesoftheUnitedStates. INTESTIMONYWHEREOFwitnessmyhandandSealoffofficethisseventhdayofNovember ,1902.[SEAL] DeputyandActingComptrolleroftheCurrency.No.6481november2010t J.A.TYLER,M.D.PHYSICIANANDSURGEON. ...Telephone,Main75.... OFFICE-Center street opposite City Hall. 10A.M.to11A.M. J.P.M.to4.P.M. 7P.M.to8.P.M.,evenings. Residence-CornerCenterandPalmstreets. You Wontbreakthe cameraSohaveyourpicturetakennowbyHOWARDTHEPHOTOGRAPHERLosAngelesst.,Anaheim. NasalCatarrhquicklyyieldsto treatmentbyEly'sCreamBalmwhichisagreablyaromaticItisreceivedthroughthenostrils,cleansesandhealswholesurfaceoverwhichitdiffusesitself.Druggists sellthe50c.size;Trialsizebymain13cents.Testitandyouare suretocontinuethetreatment. Announcement.Toaccommodatethosewhoarepartialtotheuseofatomizersinapplyingliquidsintothenasalpassagesforcatarrhaltrubles,theproprietorsprepareCreamBalminliquidformwhichwillbeknownasEly'sLiquidCreamBalm.Diceincludingthesprayingtubeis75cents.Druggistsorbymail.Theliquidformembodiesthemedicinalpropertiesofthesolidpreparation.