anaheim-gazette 1889-09-19
Searchable text
The Weekly Gazette.
ISSUE EVERY THURSDAY
Henry Kuchel, Charles Kuchel,
Editor and Producers
THURSDAY
SEPTEMBER 19, 1880
WHY THE BONDS SHOULD BE VOTED
Every voter who favored the organization of our new irrigation district must of necessity be in favor of the issuance of bonds for the improvement of the same. To say that a few voters oppose the bond issue on account of resultant heavy taxes is to say that they are not in favor of the district at all. It is tantamount to admitting that they made a mistake in voting the district into existence, and now seek to rectify their error by dealing the district a blow at their very first opportunity. No one consistently in favor of the new district can consistently oppose the issuance of the bonds. That is what the district was organized for, and to set up a senseless clamor about high taxes and rain shows either a very poor conception of the subject upon the part of the objectors, or the existence of purely selfish motives thatanimate them in the pregress.
Let us see how the people should answer this question four months ago at the time when they had an opportunity of voting for or against the new irrigation district. On the 31 day of May the new district was voted upon, with the result that 296 electors cast their ballots in favor of the district and 43 (including 28 at Yorba) against it. There was not a single voter in town on that day who called to antagonize the interests of the community by voting against the new district. 183 men went to the polls and voted in favor of it. At last view there were five objectors to the new order of things, and 52 in favor of it. At fulllection there were two objectors and 69 people who voted in favor of the district. The vote had eight objectors and 33 citizens who voted for a better water system. Only two voters at Yorba favored the formation of the district and 28 voted against it. The residents of that precinct were all along opposed to the new district, and fought for a year in the Board of Supervisors, the only instance in the history of the State where the formation of an bill. Do our people desire that heresy to triumph again? If not, a unanimous vote in favor of the bonds will bury riparianism here now and forever. A vote against the bonds will tend to precipitate our old-time internecine conflict with the Yorbas. It will serve to paint the finger of derision at us from afar, from sections in this State where better and wider counsels prevail in matters of irrigation. It will be playing into the hands of our enemies into whom it took its years to incalcate a proper appreciation of the precepts and majesty of the law. It will set this community back twenty years not to vote bonds at all. Do our progressive citizens desire to blight our prospects by listening to prejudiced persons who soured by reverses and down on the town, desire to see it remain forever a "one-horse country village." Do they desire to see us go backward? We should say not: Vote for the bonds, and vote unanimously.
WHAT OUR TAXES WILL BE
With a bond issue of $600,000, suppose the entire amount to be expended on the improvement of our irrigation district, there will be a tax upon the 30,000 acres in this district of exactly $20 per acre, payable in twenty years. This will of course be subject to the reduction made necessary by the volume of taxable property in town, both lines of railroad, etc. The California Central itself pays taxes upon $144,000, and the Southern Pacific upon $79,959, the former having two lines in operation in this district, one running through town and the other route through Yorba. Thus, it will be seen, the supposed tax rate of $20 per acre is decidedly above what the actual rate will be, even if the entire amount of $600,000 be expended. But we hazard the prediction that $400,000 will probably touch the very outtable point of expense incurred in the district. This will leave the tax levy at two-thirds of $20, or $13.33 per acre, payable in twenty years. This rate will still further reduced by the assessable property enumerated above.
Who will refuse to put this light incumbence upon his property in view of the financial and everlasting benefits to come of it?
What shareholder in the Anaheim Water Company will refuse to vote for the bonds when he realizes that in twenty years he
Now that the district is upon the point of being cemented with the presence of bonds for improvements it is strange exceedingly that one should hear that people who voted for the district should oppose the bond issue. Those who opposed the district will of course gratify their interest by voting against the bonds. They are not friends of Anaheim, or of this valley. They would rather see our city and valley set back a decade than to see them prosperous and forgiving ahead. Therefore, their arguments carry little weight with those of our citizens who desire to see the valley brought under a splendid system of irrigation and settled up with prosperous homes. No friend of progress should listen to their rampant rattings. Not a vote was cast in Anaheim against the new district. Let us see how many印尼 will have the tenacity, the foolhardness to vote against the assurance of bonds.
When it is remembered that the paid attorneys of those who antagonized the formation of the new district boasted that the present generation would never see its accomplishment, and that "people would be gray headed" before the Yorba would consent to enter into the water partnership with us, it is astonishing that a single voice should be raised in opposition to the bonds. Their defeat would in more ways than one cause for extreme gratification to those who have so persistently fought against the interests of the valley.
Whatever objection may have been felt to the issuance of bonds on account of a personal feeling against individual members of the Board of Directors, or the policy to be pursued by them, should be dispelled by their letter to this journal, defining their position in the matter, published last week. It any voter objects to the personnel of the present board, let him remember that a new board will be elected in April next, when a reorganization may be elected to suit the interests of all. Personal matters, moreover, should not be allowed to stand in the way of general improvements. The present board trusts 183 men went to the polls and voted in favor of it. At Ainsworth there were five objections to the news ordered things, and 52 in favor of it; at Fallen there were two objections and 90 people who voted in favor of the district. Plaintiff had eight objections and 33 citizens who voted for "a better water system." Only two voters at Yorba favored the formation of the district and 25 voted against it. The residents of that precinct were all along opposed to the new district, and fought either a year in the Board of Supervisors, the only instance in the history of the State where the formation of an irrigation district bringing untold good to the people was persistently delayed and action clogged by a variety of moneyed objections who set the minds up as being superior to the law of the land. When, however, the election finally came on, the result, outside Yorba, was practically unanimous in favor of the district. 334 to 15. Even with the vote of the latter present cost against the district, the total was overwhelmingly in favor of the new system.
Now that the district is upon the point of being cemented with the presence of bonds for improvements it is strange exceedingly that one should hear that people who voted for the district should oppose the bond issue. Those who opposed the district will of course gratify their interest by voting against the bonds. They are not friends of Anaheim, or of this valley. They would rather see our city and valley set back a decade than to see them prosperous and forgiving ahead. Therefore, their arguments carry little weight with those of our citizens who desire to see the valley brought under a splendid system of irrigation and settled up with prosperous homes. No friend of progress should listen to their rampant rattings. Not a vote was cast in Anaheim against the new district. Let us see how many印尼 will have the tenacity, the foolhardness to vote against the assurance of bonds.
When it is remembered that the paid attorneys of those who antagonized the formation of the new district boasted that the present generation would never see its accomplishment, and that "people would be gray headed" before the Yorba would consent to enter into the water partnership with us, it is astonishing that a single voice should be raised in opposition to the bonds. Their defeat would in more ways than one cause for extreme gratification to those who have so persistently fought against the interests of the valley.
Whatever objection may have been felt to the issuance of bonds on account of a personal feeling against individual members of the Board of Directors, or the policy to be pursued by them, should be dispelled by their letter to this journal, defining their position in the matter, published last week. It any voter objects to the personnel of the present board, let him remember that a new board will be elected in April next, when a reorganization may be elected to suit the interests of all. Personal matters, moreover, should not be allowed to stand in the way of general improvements. The present board trusts 183 men went to the polls and voted in favor of it. At Ainsworth there were five objections to the news ordered things, and 52 in favor of it; at Fallen there were two objections and 90 people who voted in favor of the district. Plaintiff had eight objections and 33 citizens who voted for "a better water system." Only two voters at Yorba favored the formation of the district and 25 voted against it. The residents of that precinct were all along opposed to the new district, and fought either a year in the Board of Supervisors, the only instance in the history of the State where the formation of an irrigation district bringing untold good to the people was persistently delayed and action clogged by a variety of moneyed objections who setthem up as being superior to the law ofthe land. When, however, the election finally came on, the result, outside Yorba, was practically unanimous in favor of the district. 334 to 15. Even withthe vote ofthe latter present cost againstthe district, the total was everwhelmingly in favorofthe new system.
Now that the district is uponthe pointofbeing cementedwiththepresenceofbondsforimprovementsitisstrangeexceedinglythatoneshouldhearthatpeoplewhovotedforthedistrictshouldopposethebondissueThosewhopeposedthedistrictwillofcoursegratifythedistancewithbyvotingagainstthefundsTheyarenotfriendsofAnaheimorofthisvalleyTheywouldratherseeourcityandvalleysetbackadecadethantosiethemprosperousandforgingaloadTherefore,theirargumentscarrylittleweightwiththoseofourcitizenswhodesiretoseethevalleybringingamersplendidsystemofirrigationandsettledupwithprosperoushomes.Nofriendofprogressshouldlistenttotherampantrattings.Nota votewascastinAnaheimagainthenewdistrict.Letusseehowmany印尼willhavethetenacity,thefoothardnesstovoteagainsttheassuranceofbonds.
When it is remembered thatthepaidattorneysofthosewhoantagonizedtheformationofthenewdistrictboastedthatthepresentgenerationwouldneverseeitsaccomplishment,andthat"peoplewouldbegrayheaded"beforetheYorbawouldconsenttoenterinthewaterpartnershipwithus.itistastonishingthatasinglevoiceshouldberaisedinoppositiontothebonds.Theireffectswouldinmorewaysthanonecauseforextremegratificationtothewhohaveso.persistentlyboughtagainsttheinterestsofthevalley.
WhateverobjectionmayhavebeftotheissuanceofbondsonaccountofapersonfeelingaboutindividualmembersoftheBoardofDirectors,或thepolicytobepursuedbythem,应该dispelledbytheirlettertothisjournal,defining theirpositioninthematter,publishedlastweek.ltanyvoterobjectstothepersonnelofthepresentboard,LettumrememberthatanewboardwillbeelectedinAprilnext,当reorganizationmaybeelecttedtosuittheinterestsofall。Personalmatters,moreover,不应beallowedtostandinthewaygeneralimprovement。Thepresentboardtrusts183menwenttothepollsandvotedinfavorofit.Alainsworththerewere fiveobjectionstothenewsorderedthings,and52in favorofit;atFallenthereweretwoobjectionsand90peoplewhovotedinfrontofthedistrictThiswillleavethetaxlevytattwo-thirdsoft$20,$13.33peracre,payableintwentyyearsThisratewillbe stillfartherindifiedbytheassessableproperty enumeratedabove。
Whowillrefusetoputthislightincumbranceuphinpropertyinviewofthefinancialcalculableandeverlastingbenefitstocomeofit?
WhatshareholderintheAnaheimWaterCompanywillrefusetovoteforthebondswhenherealizesthat,intwentyyears,hidisbureaumentforassessmentsaloneintheoldcompanywillbetgreaterbyfarthanthisnewliability?Surely,notonewhostopstoconsiderthebenefitstocomeofthenewsystemwhereasundertheold,inttwentyyearsweshallbecidedlyworseoff thanatpresent.
ThereshouldnotbeaVotecastagainstthebonds.Thecostislightandthebenefitsworththemoneyscores oftimes over.Nofriendofprogress,nomowwhowantstoseeAnaheimgrowandprosperwillthinkovotingagainstthem.
Itrequiresno stretchofcandidto saythattheLosAngelesTribuneisissuinganexcellentnewpaper these days.Its exposureofmismanagementattheSoldiers'HomeasSantaMonicameetswiththeapprovalofabgoodcitizen,sno matter whetherthenameofGov.Triechel'ssuccessorisontheslateornot."Ifthedisabledveteransarecompelledtodeenduresuchtreatmentasshouldnotbef toleratedeveninthecaseofconvicts,thesoonerTheGovernorisremovedthebetter.
Buggyfor$3750.
A bargainforthemoney.ForsalebyS.A.Dennis.
ChurchAnnouncements.
ST.MD.HAELES(Epicaporal)CHURCHR.V.F.Myward,pastor,ServiceseverySundayat7:30M.METHOODISTEPERCIPALCHURCHONPHILIPPHAILSt Sunday school at10AM.Servicesat1AMand7:30PM.W.Prayer meetingWednesdayat7:30PM.D.O.CHAMBERLAYNE.PASTORGermanEvangelicalCHURCHServiceseverySundaymorningandeven,RayP.Snowflakes,pastor
NEW ADVERTISEMENTS
NOTICE.
Noticeisherebygiventhat.theundersignedwillon20thdaySeptember1899.at.thefrontofthePostofficeinVictoria,California,sellto-thehighestbiddertoreforcash,thefollowingdescribedpropertyreceivingto-theestateofWm.T.Bush,amodelflorist.towitBeinga fine large cornerbitwiththetwo storyframebuildingstandingontheshippingpointacross$600000andtimingAgoodjobofgoodsownin saidbuilding.completinggrowses,nationalgoods,tobaccoandeggsandasmalllotofdrygoodsThisisanexcellentchancetocreatebarriconCharlesF.Grim.Assignee
TheLargestPumpkin!
THEUNDERSIGNEDDESIRES TO PURCHASEThe largestpumpkininOrangecountyforshipmenttoNewYorkwhereitwillbeplaceduponexhibitionintheStateFair.Partieshavinglargeexperimentswill滴ppingapaiselgardingweightsThepumpkinwillbe labeled"GrownInOregonqualityCalifornia".Address
Whatever objection may have been felt to the issuance of bonds on account of a personal feeling against individual members of the Board of Directors, or the policy to be pursued by them, should be dispelled by their letter to this journal, denning their position in the matter, published last week. It any voter objects to the personnel of the present board, let him remember that a new board will be elected in April next, when a reorganization may be elected to suit the interests of all. Personal matters, moreover, should not be allowed to stand in the way of general improvements. The present board are in favor of the acquisition of all water rights by annexable purchase or settlement, are in favor of expanding all money for labor and team work among our own people, and favor a system of irrigation such as should meet with the appreciation of right-thinking men everywhere.
These are some of the reasons why progressive citizens should vote for the bonds. The valley cannot enjoy the benefits of the new irrigation district, which every one was extolling a few months ago, without having money at its disposal for improvements. We have already shown that the bond issue does not of itself raise one's taxes—the expenses of the district will regulate the tax levy, be the bond issue large or small. Then why any citizen should oppose the issuance of bonds is something which we cannot for the life of us see. There should not be single votesrown against them among their 330 electors who cast their ballots for the new district.
There is one point which the people may well consider. It is this: Dzens of irrigation districts similar to our own have been organized in this State, and bonds, as a natural sequence, have, in every case, been voted unanimously. Our is the only irrigation district in Southern California organized under the provisions of the Wright Act. We have during the past year repeatedly shown that nowhere in the State may the spirit and intent of that Act be more justly or more profitably applied than here in Anaheim. That which our citizens fought to attain for twenty years was at last placed in their grasp by legislative enactment. Riparianism is dead by virtue of the Wright
NOTICE
Special Election
To decide whether or not the
ANAHEIM
Irrigation District!
Orange County, California.
$600,000!
The Board of Directors of Anaheim Irrigation District, in Orange county, State of California, having at a regular meeting held by said board at their office in said district on the 31st day of September, 1889, estimated and determined that the sum of Six Hundred Thousand Dollars is necessary to be raised for the purpose of purchasing and constructing the necessary irrigating canals and works and acquiring the necessary property and rights therefor for the use and benefit of said Anaheim Irrigation District, and otherwise carrying out the provisions of the Act of the Legislature of the State of California, entitled "An Act to provide for 'the organization and government of irrigation districts,' and to provide for the acquisition of water and other property," and for the distribution of water thereby for "irrigation purposes," approved March 7, 1887, and of the Acts amendatory of and supplemental to said Act, passed at the Twenty-eighth session of the Legislature of the State of California, and approved February 16, 1889.
Now, therefore, in pursuance of the order of said Board of Directors, notice is hereby given that a special election will be held in the said Anaheim Irrigation District, in Orange county, California, on the
28th Day of September, 1889,
For the purpose of submitting to the qualified electors of said district the question whether or not the bonds of said district shall be issued in the amount of six hundred thousand dollars, for the purposes aforesaid.
Said election will be held in the several districts, or divisions of said districts, as follows:
District No. 1 (Precinct No. 1) at Yorba's store, David Norba, Inspector; Jacob Berin and F. Buther, Judges.
District No. 2 (Precinct No. 2) at Place nta School House — R. H. Gilman, Inspector; John McCallough and P. Hansen, Judges.
District No. 3 (Precinct No. 3) at Amage Bros' real estate office in town of Fullerton — A. McDermont, Inspector; H. G. Wilshire and B. F. Porter, Judges.
District No. 4 (Precinct No. 4) at H.C. Kellogg's mill building, near S.P. depot — E.F.Kellogg, Inspector; Alex Henry and J.S.Gardner, Judges.
District No. 5 (Precinct No. 5) at H.C. Gade's office in Center street, town of Anaheim — Theo Rimpaun, Inspector; Max Nebelang and E.J.Pellegrin, Judges.
Polls will be opened at one hour after sunrise of the morning of the said day of election, and will be kept open until sunset of said day, when the polls will be closed.
At said election ballots shall contain the words, "Bonds—Yes," or "Bonds—No," or words equivalent thereto.
The boundaries of the presidents aforesaid are the same as herefore established by the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles county, California, and are as follows, to wit:
Precinct No. One.
Beginning at a point on the Santa Ana river in the County of Orange and State of California designated at station 0, said station being at a point and place known as bedrock crossing of the Santa Ana river; said station 0 being a course of south 25 degrees and 30 minutes west of distance from the enter of the track of the California Central Railway and north 65 degrees and minutes east from the headgate of the Anaheim Union Water Company's ditch where it enters into connect with the Santa Ana river.
District No. 1 (Precinct No. 1) at Yorba's store, David Norba, Inspector; Jacob Berin and F. Buther, Judges.
District No. 2 (Precinct No. 2) at Place nta School House — R. H. Gilman, Inspector; John McCallough and P. Hansen, Judges.
District No. 3 (Precinct No. 3) at Amage Bros' real estate office in town of Fullerton — A. McDermont, Inspector; H. G. Wilshire and B. F. Porter, Judges.
District No. 4 (Precinct No. 4) at H.C. Kellogg's mill building, near S.P. depot — E.F.Kellogg, Inspector; Alex Henry and J.S.Gardner, Judges.
District No. 5 (Precinct No. 5) at H.C. Gade's office in Center street, town of Anaheim — Theo Rimpaun, Inspector; Max Nebelang and E.J.Pellegrin, Judges.
Polls will be opened at one hour after sunrise of the morning of the said day of election, and will be kept open until sunset of said day, when the polls will be closed.
At said election ballots shall contain the words, "Bonds—Yes," or "Bonds—No," or words equivalent thereto.
The boundaries of the presidents aforesaid are the same as herefore established by the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles county, California, and are as follows, to wit:
Precinct No. One.
Beginning at a point on the Santa Ana river in the County of Orange and State of California designated at station 0, said station being at a point and place known as bedrock crossing of the Santa Ana river; said station 0 being a course of south 25 degrees and 30 minutes west of distance from the enter of the track of the California Central Railway and north 65 degrees and minutes east from the headgate of the Anaheim Union Water Company's ditch where it enters into connect with the Santa Ana river.
District No. 1 (Precinct No. 1) at Yorba's store, David Norba, Inspector; Jacob Berin and F. Buther, Judges.
District No. 2 (Precinct No. 2) at Place nta School House — R. H. Gilman, Inspector; John McCallough and P. Hansen, Judges.
District No. 3 (Precinct No. 3) at Amage Bros' real estate office in town of Fullerton — A. McDermont, Inspector; H. G. Wilshire and B. F. Porter, Judges.
District No. 4 (Precinct No. 4) at H.C. Kellogg's mill building, near S.P. depot — E.F.Kellogg, Inspector; Alex Henry and J.S.Gardner, Judges.
District No. 5 (Precinct No. 5) at H.C. Gade's office in Center street, town of Anaheim — Theo Rimpaun, Inspector; Max Nebelang and E.J.Pellegrin, Judges.
Polls will be opened at one hour after sunrise of the morning of the said day of election, and will be kept open until sunset of said day, when the polls will be closed.
At said election ballots shall contain the words, "Bonds—Yes," or "Bonds—No," or words equivalent thereto.
The boundaries of the presidents aforesaid are the same as herefore established by the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles county, California, and are as follows, to wit:
Precinct No. One.
Beginning at a point on the Santa Ana river in the County of Orange and State of California designated at station 0, said station being at a point and place known as bedrock crossing of the Santa Ana river; said station 0 being a course of south 25 degrees and 30 minutes west of distance from the enter of the track of the California Central Railway and north 65 degrees and minutes east from the headgate of the Anaheim Union Water Company's ditch where it enters into connect with the Santa Ana river.
District No. 1 (Precinct No. 1) at Yorba's store, David Norba, Inspector; Jacob Berin and F. Buther, Judges.
District No. 2 (Precinct No. 2) at Place nta School House — R. H. Gilman, Inspector; John McCallough and P. Hansen, Judges.
District No. 3 (Precinct No. 3) at Amage Bros' real estate office in town of Fullerton — A. McDermont, Inspector; H. G. Wilshire and B. F. Porter, Judges.
District No. 4 (Precinct No. 4) at H.C. Kellogg's mill building, near S.P. depot — E.F.Kellogg, Inspector; Alex Henry and J.S.Gardner, Judges.
District No. 5 (Precinct No. 5) at H.C. Gade's office in Center street, town of Anaheim — Theo Rimpaun, Inspector; Max Nebelang and E.J.Pellegrin, Judges.
Polls will be opened at one hour after sunrise of the morning of the said day of election, and will be kept open until sunset of said day when the polls will be closed.
At said election ballots shall contain the words, "Bonds—Yes," or "Bonds—No," or words equivalent thereto.
The boundaries of the presidents aforesaid are the same as herefore established by the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles county, California, and are as follows, to wit:
Precinct No. One.
Beginning at a point on the Santa Ana river in the County of Orange and State of California designated at station 0, said station being at a point and place known as bedrock crossing of the Santa Ana river; said station 0 being a course of south 25 degrees and 30 minutes west of distance from the enter of the track of the California Central Railway and north 65 degrees and minutes east from the headgate of the Anaheim Union Water Company's ditch where it enters into connect with the Santa Ana river.
District No. 1 (Precinct No. 1) at Yorba's store, David Norba, Inspector; Jacob Berin and F. Buther, Judges.
District No. 2 (Precinct No. 2) at Place nta School House — R. H. Gilman, Inspector; John McCallough and P. Hansen, Judges.
District No. 3 (Precinct No. 3) at Amage Bros' real estate office in town of Fullerton — A. McDermont, Inspector; H.G.Wilshire and B.F.Porter Judges.
District No. 4 (Precinct No.) at H.C.Kellogg's mill building near S.P.deptot—E.F.Kellogg.InspectorAlex HenryandJ.S.Gardner.Judges
District No .5(PrecinctNo.)atH.C.Kellogg'smillbuildingnearS.P.deptot—E.F.Kellogg.InspectorAlex HenryandJ.S.Gardner.Judges
Polls will be opened at one hour after sunrise of the morning of the said day of election,and will be kept open until sunset of said day when the polls will be closed
At said election ballots shall contain the words,Bonds—Yes," or "Bonds—No," or words equivalent thereto.
The boundaries of the presidents aforesaid are the same as herefore established by the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles county,California,and are as follows,towit:
Precinct No.Five
Beginning at a point on the Santa Ana river in section T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,where S.P.R.B.crosses a section T2 T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.,to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.S.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.s.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.s.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.s.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.s.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.s.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9 W.s.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9W.s.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9W.s.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9W.s.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9W.s.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9W.s.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9W.s.B.M.),to station I27.T4 S.R.I9W.s.B.M.),to
NOTICE OF REMOVAL.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT MY BARBER shop and both rooms will be removed on air about the 11th of September, to the quarters lately occupied by the Postoffice, where I shall be pleased to meet my friends and the general public.
WILLARD PRANTZ
SPECIAL NOTICE,
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE PARTNERSHIP heretofore existing between John Schauman and R. Boettcher, under the firm name and at the location of the Postoffice, where I shall be pleased to meet my friends and the general public.
WILLARD PRANTZ
J. S. GARDINER, Secretary
Office in the old Postoffice building in the town Anaheim, county of Orange, State of California.
Anaheim Union Water Company
Location of principal place of business in Los Angeles county, California.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE PARTNERSHIP heretofore existing between John Schauman and R. Boettcher, under the firm name and at the location of the Postoffice, where I shall be pleased to meet my friends and the general public.
WILLARD PRANTZ
J. S. GARDINER, Secretary
Office in the old Postoffice building in the town Anaheim, county of Orange, State of California.
Anaheim Union Water Company
Location of principal place of business in Los Angeles county, California.
S. S. FEDERMAN'S
SPECIAL -- CLEARANCE -- SALE.
Bargains in Every Department!
Count of 10 to 15 per cent on all Goods sold before Sept. 25th
Attention to my Special Sale and will sell all Goods to suit the times
Monday next. I will sell
Childrens' Boots and Shoes
Cheaper Than Ever Offered Here Before!
Special Clearance Sale is to Make Room for My FALL STOCK
WHICH WILL BE THE
Largest and Best Ever Brought Here!
I GUARANTEE A GENTINE
Count of 10 to 15 Per Cent on all Goods
And to Close Several Lines will Sell
REGARDLESS OF COST!
GUEARANTEE A GENFINE
Count of 10 to 15 Per Cent on all Goods
And to Close Several Lines will S.
REGARDLESS OF COST!
The next TWO WEEKS, as I leave on or about the 25th to Purchase my Fall Stock.
S. FEDERMAN.
Special Clearance Sale is Strictly Cash.
T. J. F. BOEGE,
Wholesale and Retail Dealer in
WINES, LIQUORS AND CIGARS.
KEeps always on hand
A COMPLETE STOCK!
Of the Finest Wines, Liquors and Cigars.
WINES AND LIQUORS
BY THE KEG, GALLON OR BOTTLE.
Orders by Mail Promptly Attended to.
GOODS DELIVERED FREE OF CHARGE!
Opp. S. P. Depot, ANAHEIM; CAL.
P. Pellegrin & Sons.
JEWELRY, ART AND MUSIC HOUSE.
ANAHEIMCAL.
Pianos & Organs,
P. Pellegrin & Sons.
JEWELRY, ART AND MUSIC HOUSE
ANAHEIMCAL.
Pianos & Organs,
Violins, Banjos,
Guitars,
Sewing Machines.
Fine Watch, Clock and Jewelry. Repairable Ratch and Warrantiel. A Repairer of Pianos, Organs and Sewing Machines is connected with our house. Complete line of Fabric Materials.
PLANTERS' HOTEL,
Center Street, Anaheim, Cal.
N. H. MITCHELL, PROP.
Headquarters for Commercial Travelers