anaheim-bulletin 1955-07-06

Editorial Page Wednesday, July 6, 1955 Anaheim (Cal.) Bulletin — 11 No Spoils Left In years gone by, whenever there was a change in the national administration from one party to another, there was also a tremendous turnover in Government jobs. The faithful of one party were ousted to make room for the faithful of the other. These were the spoils of victory. But when President Eisenhower took over, he found few jobs with which to reward the party faithful. Jobs were as scare as uranium. This situation came about through two factors: (1) thousands of federal employees were "blanketed" into the civil service system during the Roosevelt regime, and (2) the economy-minded Eisenhower administration lopped off 200,000 jobs from the federal payroll. It is said that there were no more than 2,000 jobs of the really desirable type to be handed out. (Most desirable are those which pay as much as $7,000 a year but call for little professional skill.) There was a time when a senator from a large state would have had as many as 15,000 jobs to dispense through Presidential appointment (which the senator would largely dictate). This sort of thing may so discourage party hacks—in both parties—that they'll go to work for a living. Gad, what a fate! Eternal Vigilance The world is full of people who think they can handle our lives for us better than we can. Some of them are only harmless, if annoying, busybodies. Others are dangerous. Communism, of course, is the world's clear and present danger. But its very clarity, its obvious despotic brutality, help stir free men to opposition. Communism's Eternal Vigilance The world is full of people who think they can handle our lives for us better than we can. Some of them are only harmless, if annoying, busybodies. Others are dangerous. Communism, of course, is the world's clear and present danger. But its very clarity, its obvious despotic brutality, help stir free men to opposition. Communism's subtler sister, Socialism, is a seductive wench — one far more difficult to resist. The threat of socialism is ever-present. It clouds the future of every profession, every business, every individual. It demands eternal vigilance — that inescapable price of liberty. American medicine provides a classic example of a profession that was vigilant, and rallied to protect itself, and others, from the treat of socialization. Other groups give evidence of similar awareness. The power and light industry — a prime target today for the socializers — was warned only recently by one of its leaders that it must fight for its rights against an increasingly powerful foe. Louis V. Sutton, president of the Carolina Power and Light Company of Roanoke, North Carolina, pointed out to the industry's annual convention in Los Angeles that one Government power lobby alone — the National Rural Electric Cooperative, "spent more money during the first three months this year in connection with its legislative interests than any other agency in the long list of registered lobbyists." Such activity requires an answer in kind. No one today — individual, Nation, or a section of the Nation's economy can afford to forget the words of Daniel Webster: "God grants liberty only to those who live it, and are always ready to guard and defend it." TELEVISION VIEWS Hint Edgar Bergen May Come Up With TV Program In Try to Take Curse Off Disneyland Dominance By JACK GAVER United Press Staff Correspondent NEW YORK (UP)—Off-channel: Edgar Bergen in a quick, sotto voce trip to town at mid-week for conferences about his TV and radio plans for the coming season. Nothing final yet with his agency and CBS, but there is talk of something involving the Hans Christie of the recent Broadway attraction, "Three For Tonight," was fine TV entertainment and gave its producer, Paul Gregory, noted for his sceneryless productions in the theater, a good introduction to television in advance of the new season when he is preparing several shows for CBS. However, it is to be hoped that this initial success WEDNESDAY, JULY 6 today, you need to guard your acting strictly on impulse are sympathetic and kindward all whom you consider serving and might ease come interested in some tant reform movements have the gift of the word and will be able to persuasively on almost any ject in which you are heartedly interested. You are not as inclined push yourself forward as might be. If you were too little more attention to own needs you would faster toward your goals are especially interested in arts and sciences and will happiest if you select some within this area as your work. Although you enjoy activity of the city, you plan to spend at least your time in the country. You women are affectioned and devoted and make spi homemakers. You will best if you wed quite early life and have a family own to care for. Don't live alone — you won't. If unwed, select some whose tastes and cultural ures are similar. Among those born on date are: John Paul Jones Naval hero; John L. Bev statesman; Daniel Coit G and Ashbel Green, educator To find what the stars in store for you tomorrow lect your birthday star and the corresponding para Let your birthday star be daily guide. Thursday, July 7 CANCER (June 22-July 1) Think carefully before on any new idea. It may some testing before you it going. In Try to Take Curse Off Disneyland Dominance By JACK GAVER United Press Staff Correspondent NEW YORK (UP)—Off-channel: Edgar Bergen in a quick, sotto voce trip to town at mid-week for conferences about his TV and radio plans for the coming season. Nothing final yet with his agency and CBS, but there is talk of something involving the Hans Christian Andersen fairy tales—a program to be put on film in the natural European backgrounds—that would be done on a scale designed to try and take the curse off ABC's "Disneyland" dominance on Wednesday nights. There's a bit of a conflict, though. How to arrange for Bergen to do the new radio series planned for him if he has to be abroad most of the time doing the TV series? One thing is certain—this is the season in which Bergen will make his first big bid as a regular performer on TV, with or without the dummies. A year ago there was more anticipatory talk about color TV—larvely because of the then-recent FCC go-ahead on color—than there is today. Yet nothing happened beyond CBS and NBC stepping up their compatible colorcast schedules which scarcely anyone saw except in black and white. Now, when there is little public comment about color, we're on the threshold of a season that will really get the view-with-a-hue started on the way to its inevitably important place in the living room. The price of color sets (still well above the desired $500 mark) and certain technical impracticalities will continue to bar a wholesale changeover from black and white in life next 12 months, but the cost is gradually being whittled down and the networks will at least double their showmanship pressure in color. Come Christmas, 1956 (correct), and Santa Claus probably will wish the rainbow had never been invented. The CBS presentation last week of the recent Broadway attraction, "Three For Tonight," was fine TV entertainment and gave its producer, Paul Gregory, noted for his sceneryless productions in the theater, a good introduction to television in advance of the new season when he is preparing several shows for CBS. However, it is to be hoped that this initial success doesn't lead to frequent duplication of such a method of stark presentation. Because of the small size of the screen and other limitations, TV musicals need all of the values they can get (including the aforementioned color). For TV musicals at best, can only by inferior to motion picture musicals, just as the latter can never hope to capture the appeal of live stage musicals. But Gregory is a resourceful, realistic producer, and he'll probably come up with something to dissipate such fears next fall when he does an original about ministrelay, "The Big Banjo," for CBS-TV. The CBS use of four different bands each Saturday as the summer replacement for Jackie Gleason isn't the only TV shot in the arm for music, which has been sort of a television stepchild. This Saturday night the ABC network will turn over the 9-to-10 spot to the "champagne music" of Lawrence Welk and his band, originating live—and sponsored—from Los Angeles where they have had a big local TV success for four years. Also, on July 7, CBS-TV will inaugurate a nine-week series of half-hour 8 p.m. Thursday programs featuring the music of Stan Kenton and his band. "Music '55" is the name of the program, which is more or less an indication of the "advanced jazz" for which Kenton is known. However, things will not be quite as extreme in this line as when Kenton first began to create a "new sound" some eight years ago. Patti Page says she will find what the stars in store for you tomorrow lect your birthday star and the corresponding parade Let your birthday star buy daily guide. Thursday, July 7 CANCER (June 22-July 4) Think carefully before you on any new idea. It may some testing before you it going. LOOKIN' N' LISTEN! Patti Page says she Some 25 Years Aged By ANN WARDELL SAUCE Patti Page, who has twice-weekly TV show now me she was born Clara Anner some 25 years ago in more, Okla., which also presents greats as Will Rozers. Patti was one of 11 Fowl dren, eight girls and three and she insists that her voice is the result of having compete vocally for the family vender three times daily. Patti's pa was a railroad foreman and real proud of his eight singing daughters they lifted the rattles in a church choir. But Patti's an went higher than just church lifting, so she tried her tail a radio station. The Page Company offered to sponsor she would assume the name Patti Page. Have you a "Corky" in house? Screen Gems televisors Herbert B. Leonard Norman Blackburn would know, for after screen-testing 300 youngsters between thirtieth and fiftieth and to find a possessive venille star for their series cus Bow." a suitable "Corky" has to be found. Noah Bee will handle the top adult roster this series." NBC certainly is aiming to ger and better teleproduce what with laying on the lin THE TARGET UNITED GERMANY DULLES GENEVA BERDANIER OTHMAN'S VIEW Textile Exec Shows Senat Product San WASHINGTON.-J. S. the soft-veed chairman fca's biggest textile coured the best way to Senators about his busishow 'em. So he hauled in unstal chandeliers of th Committee piece after yard goods, auto uphi dow curtains, socks on and spread them on baize table. Before H showing these material givers he'd managed a sanctum into a replica gain basement after a image by the ladies. The statesmen calle cause his Burlington Inc., of Greensboro, N. sorbed $9 other textil and the question was was fostering a monopo he wasn't. His firm came up fr he said, during the last with a line of rayon it began to expand w variety of other synth "And eventually we that the true miracle of nature's own," he add. So he began buying mills and cotton facti in on the trade in ancien Then his experts bega wool and cotton with h lety of synthetics to o ties that clothing never These mixtures, he s the fabrics of the fut be improved, of cour Your Birthday Forecast By STELLA WEDNESDAY, JULY 6—Born today, you need to guard against being strictly on impulse. You are sympathetic and kindly toward all whom you consider devving and might easily be interested in some important reform movement. You have the gift of the spoken word and will be able to speak persuasively on almost any subject in which you are wholeheartedly interested. You are not as inclined to wish yourself forward as you might be. If you were to pay a little more attention to your needs you would advance letter toward your goal. You are especially interested in the arts and sciences and will be applaud if you select something within this area as your life work. Although you enjoy the activity of the city, you should plan to spend at least part of your time in the country. You women are affectionate and devoted and make splendid memakers. You will be happiest if you wed quite early in life and have a family of your own to care for. Don't try to be alone — you won't like it. Unwed, select some person whose tastes and cultural pleasures are similar. Among those born on this side are: John Paul Jones, U.S. naval hero; John L. Beveridge, statesman; Daniel Colt Gilman and Ashbel Green, educators. To find what the stars have store for you tomorrow, set your birthday star and read the corresponding paragraph. At your birthday star be your daily guide. Thursday, July 7 ANCER (June 22-July 23) — Think carefully before you act on any new idea. It may need some testing before you start going. LEO (July 24-Aug. 23) — There are cross-currents in today's aspects, so take it easy! To follow your impulses may not be wise. VIRGO (Aug. 24-Sept. 23) — If you will be conservative in your actions as you are accurate, then you can win an important advantage. LIBRA (Sept. 24-Oct. 23) — You may be rather discouraged about something important to your future. Be patient, and it will work out all right. SCORPIO (Oct. 24-Nov. 22) — If you really work hard today, you can offset any adverse tendencies that may be floating around. SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 32-Dec. 22) — Put a guard on your temperament — temper, maybe?—if you are to avoid real trouble. CAPRICORN (Dec. 23-Jan. 20) — You must be cautious when it comes to expanding business interests or there can be error. AQUARIUS (Jan. 21-Feb. 19) — There can be trouble ahead if you are careless in handling important business affairs. PISCES (Feb. 20-Mar. 20)—Self-control is needed today if you are to avoid a serious emotional crisis. ARIES (Mar. 21-Apr. 20)—Don't take sides if there is an argument raging in your vicinity. TAURUS (Apr. 21-May 21) — You must pay no attention to gossip and rumor, for you have no idea how very wrong it might be! GEMINI (May 22-June 21) — Fine for all your efforts during the morning hours but exert caution after lunchtime, especially during the evening. (Copyright, 1955, by United Feature Syndicate, Inc.) To find what the stars have to store for you tomorrow, set your birthday star and read the corresponding paragraph. At your birthday star be your daily guide. Thursday, July 7 ANCER (June 22-July 23) — Think carefully before you act on any new idea. It may need some testing before you start it going. THOOKIN’ N’ LISTENIN’ . . . Television Patti Page Says She Was Born Clara Ann Fowler Some 25 Years Ago in Claremore, Oklahoma By ANN WARDELL SAUNDERS Patti Page, who has her own nice-weekly TV show now, tells she was born Clara Ann Fowler some 25 years ago in Claremore, Okla., which also produced such greats as Will Rozen. Patti was one of 11 Fowler children, eight girls and three boys, and she insists that her resonant voice is the result of having to compete vocally for the family provider three times daily. Patti’s pa was a railroad sectionerman and real proud he was this eight singing daughters when they lifted the ratters in a Tulsa church choir. But Patti’s ambitions not higher than just church rafter song, so she tried her talents on radio station. The Page Milk company offered to sponsor her if he would assume the name of Patti Page. Have you a “Corky” in your house? Screen Gems television partners Herbert B. Leonard and Norman Blackburn would like to show, for after screen-testing some youngsters between the ages 8 and 11 to find a possible juvenile star for their series, “Clara Bow,” a suitable “Corky” yet to be found. Noah Beery, Jr., handle the top adult role for his series.” NBC certainly is aiming for bigger and better teleproductions, that with laying on the line $500, TAURUS (Apr. 21-May 21) You must pay no attention to gossip and rumor, for you have no idea how very wrong it might be! GEMINI (May 22-June 21) Fine for all your efforts during the morning hour’s but expert caution after lunchtime, especially during the evening. (Copyright, 1955, by United Feature Syndicate, Inc.) These past six years have brought two lovely children into my life which my community has accepted as members thereof. My community has also provided beautiful parks, excellent schools and churches, and fine recreational facilities where both children and parents alike could gain fulfillment of life’s needs. The aforementioned are the essence of the Christian, democratic process that we have in our republic. Where else could a young man like myself know all this bounty in but six years’ time. It is this type of community that has made America great and strong. America can only remain in such a position if all its members continue to work toward making it better. I thank God for giving me the wonderful opportunity of living in Anaheim these six years, and letting me be a full partner in its activities. Being a functioning citizen of a community assists both the individual and the community in fulfilling the important task of being a good American. My parting prayer is twofold: one that the community of Anaheim continue in growth physically, morally, and spiritually; two, that my new community will accept my family and me in the same manner that Anaheim has, and that I may serve the young people of this State through the process of public education commensurate with the importance of the task. WAYNE L. BUTTERBAUGH years ago? ... George Raft has another film series in mind for him self. Could be that Bert Lahr will star in a new series “Room and Board.” That would be a real happy. Marion (Molly McGee) Jordan says beef stock has more flavor when meat and bones are browned before adding water. Syndicated by Saunders Enterprises. He went on to say lieved the textile business its darkest days. More being born every day used, and of course he lieve textile stocks were a good investment any young man seeking future might well eing into the spinning business. Any one of ‘em, he come up with a cloth put his own mighty eclipse. This situation some, all right, but it like a monopoly to him. (Copyright, 1955, by ture Syndicate, Inc.) OTHMAN'S VIEWS Textile Executive Shows Senators Product Samples WASHINGTON.-J. Spencer Love the soft-voiced chairman of America's biggest textile company, figured the best way to tell those Senators about his business was to show 'em. So he hauled in under the crystal chandeliers of the Judiciary Committee piece after piece of yard goods, auto upholstery, window curtains, socks and suitings and spread them on the green balze table. Before he'd finished showing these materials to the lawgivers he'd managed to turn their sanctum into a replica of a bargain basement after a hard scrimage by the ladies. The statesmen called Love because his Burlington Industries, Inc., of Greensboro, N.C. had absorbed 89 other textile concerns and the question was whether he was fostering a monopoly. He said he wasn't. His firm came up from nowhere, he said, during the last depression with a line of rayon goods. Then it began to expand with a wide variety of other synthetics. "And eventually we discovered that the true miracle fabrics were nature's own," he added. So he began buying up woolen mills and cotton factories to get in on the trade in ancient miracles. Then his experts began combining wool and cotton with a wide variety of synthetics to gain properties that clothing never had before. These mixtures, he said, will be the fabrics of the future. They'll be improved, of course, as the PACIFIERS PREVENT THUMB-SUCKING We've come full circle again. Pacifiers fer babies actually prevent the thumb-sucking habit. That's the latest word. Thumb-sucking is nothing to get alarmed about unless children continue it past the age of five. It's entirely normal until the age of two. The trouble is that once established, the habit may be hard to break. Unlike pacifiers, children always have thumbs available. If they're used to sucking a pacifier, you can throw that away and break the habit. Not so with thumbs. It isn't practical to separate thumb from child. So thumb-sucking may continue until the age when it can begin to hurt teeth, about age five years. Dr. Louis F. Rittelmeyer Jr., of the University of Tennessee College of Medicine has reported a study of 364 children to find out the value of pacifiers in preventing thumb-sucking. He comes out all in favor of them. His study shows that more than four times as many children not using pacifiers became thumb-suckers as do children using pacifiers. Of the 315 children who didn't use pacifiers 84, or 27 per cent, became thumb-suckers. Of 49 children using pacifiers, only three, or six per cent, became thumb-suckers. More important, all who used pacifiers had stopped thumb-sucking by the time they were five. In fact, all but one had stopped by age two. Thumb-sucking is nothing but a nuisance until age five. But it children were still-sucking thumb at the ages of five, six, and ever past seven years. That is no good. After a child is two thumbs sucking may mean that the child is overly anxious or otherwise emotionally disturbed. However a child doesn't begin to suck his thumb after he's two unless he sucked-his thumb earlier. There lies the beauty of the pacifier. It gives baby something to gum and suck on harmlessly. I isn't nearly as dirty at the baby's thumb. It does not lead to air-swallowing or colic. In fact pacifiers are used by some physicians to treat infant colic. Even Dr. Benjamin Spock has publicly come out in favor of the pacifier. There is no problem in discarding a pacifier. As Dr. Rittel meyer put it, "The pacifier it not, like the thumb, always and everywhere available at the flick of a wrist. The habit (of thumb-sucking) is more easily broker if temptation is more than an arm's length away." He claims that children usually give up the pacifier before the age of two years. If they don't, the parent can conveniently lose it any time after the second birthday without any fear that baby will begin thumb-sucking. He adds that there is no harm in letting the baby continue to use the pacifier "to go to sleep" if he wants it. So, after going through a period of condemning pacifiers we have come back to recommending them. There is no scientific objection to their use. "And eventually we discovered that the true miracle fabrics were nature's own," he added. So he began buying up woolen mills and cotton factories to get in on the trade in ancient miracles. Then his experts began combining wool and cotton with a wide variety of synthetics to gain properties that clothing never had before. These mixtures, he said, will be the fabrics of the future. They'll be improved, of course, as the chemists make new discoveries. He said he doubted if the Senators, themselves, could tell exactly what their suits were made of. Or even their shirts. This caused Sen. Joseph C. O'Mahoney (D., Wyo) who has numerous constituents in the sheep business, to go, harumph. He knew what materials had gone into his own lightweight tan suit. It was wool, all wool, pure and unsullied by anything out of a test tube. As I look upon the display of fabrics here, I notice how disproportionately wool is represented," Sen. O'Mahoney said. "I shall have to report this back in Wyoming." Textile magnate Love sheathed his half-size cyeglasses (built so he easily could look over the top of them), jumped to his feet, and started displaying yardgoods for the statesmen. "Here's a sports coating (gray and blue) that's 70 percent wool and 30 percent synthetic," he urged. "Here's an 80 percent wool. And here (he held up a reddish fabric) is 96 percent wool and four percent dyneel." This made the gentleman from Wyoming feel a little better. He peered closely at the dark blue suit of the textile man and took a long look at his white shirt. "It looks to me like your suit is not a blend, but pure wool," Sen. O'Mahoney said. Love didn't exactly blush, but he said his costume was made of wool, mohair and small dollop of rayon. His shirt, he admitted, was virgin cotton. "Perhaps I should have come dressed for the occasion," he said. He went on to say that he believed the textile business had seen its darkest days. More people are being born every day, he continued, and of course they'll wear more clothes. He said he did believe textile stocks as of now were a good investment and that any young man seeking an exciting future might well consider getting into the spinning and weaving business. THE DAVID LAWRENCE DISPATCH Claim Democrats Toying With State Socialism In Their Backing of Public Power Projects WASHINGTON — What constitutes a good political issue—and which party is right in appraising the mood of the American people? This question has just been crystallized in the attitude taken by political leaders of both parties toward the problem of government ownership of all electric power facilities. In Britain the public ownership fever, known as "nationalization of industry," has about run its course as the Conservatives found out in their recent election victory. But in the United States there are evidently leaders of the Democratic Party who think they can strike "pay dirt" in the issue of public power. Senator Kefauver, Democrat, of Tennessee, is the leader of the public power side and Senator Knowland of California, Republican, is asserting that the American people would never approve government ownership of electric power as a national policy. This is not a new controversy—for it was Senator Norris of Nebraska, Independent, and originally a Progressive Republican, who a few decades ago insisted that the Federal government appropriate funds to improve navigation and effectuate a system of flood control on the Tennessee river. It was argued then that this was a legitimate Federal purpose and that by-product—electric power—was incidental. The issue went to the Supreme Court of the two years. If they don't, the par gent can conveniently lose it any time after the second birthday without any fear that baby will begin thumb-sucking. He adds that there is no harm in letting the baby continue to use the pacifier "to go to sleep" if he wants it. So, after going through a period of condemning pacifiers we have come back to recommending them. There is no scientific objection to their use. And they seem to prevent thumb-sucking. (Copyright, 1955, by United Feature Syndicate, Inc.) He went on to say that he believed the textile business had seen its darkest days. More people are being born every day, he continued, and of course they'll wear more clothes. He said he did believe textile stocks as of now were a good investment and that any young man seeking an exciting future might well consider getting into the spinning and weaving business. Any one of 'em, he said, might come up with a cloth that would put his own mighty concern into eclipse. This situation was worrisome, all right, but it didn't sound like a monopoly to him. (Copyright, 1955, by United Feature Syndicate, Inc.) Ten Years Ago Karl Irwin Jr. of Finley, president, and Orlon Bebermeyer of Santa Ana, were installed president and vice president of the California State Christian Endeavor society at the convention held this week in Anaheim. Marie Ward became the bride of Noel Sweeney in morning nuptials performed at the St. Boniface Catholic church on June 30. Father Keane of West Hollywood, formerly of the local parish, officiated. Lt. Jack Shafer arrived here this week after liberation from German concentration camp. He joined his wife, the former Naomi Carlin, and family. Miss Renette Hansen, Miss Jean Louise Sutherland and Miss Marjorie Coiffman returned to University of Southern California and summer school studies after a short vacation at home. Miss Frances Braddock honored her parents, Mr. and Mrs. Frank Braddock of North Clementine Street on the occasion of their 25th wedding anniversary when she entertained at the family home. But as the years have gone by what was the incidental at the beginning — the generation of electric power — has become primary now. The advocates of government ownership of electric power when faced a few years ago in the Tennessee river with a seasonal shortage of water for electric power purposes, began to urge the appropriation of government money to build steam plants to generate electricity. Thus in time the government ownership supporters have made no bones about their original deception and have come out boldly for Federal construction of electric power plants of all kinds. Certainly the government can furnish electric power more cheaply than private companies if the latter are not relieved of taxes. The government can sell anything to the consumer more cheaply than private enterprise if it wishes to subsidize the projects. In the case of the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Federal government is collecting tax money from taxpayers in every part of the country and using it to benefit the Tennessee area alone. Some of the textile mills in the North have been forced to shut down because certain New England businesses have felt they could get cheaper power near the TVA in the South. That will hardly make votes for the Democrats in New England if they constitute them—for it was Senator Norris of Nebraska, Independent, and originally a Progressive Republican, who a few decades ago insisted that the Federal government appropriate funds to improve navigation and effectuate a system of flood control on the Tennessee river. It was argued then that this was a legitimate Federal purpose and that by-product—electric power—was incidental. The issue went to the Supreme Court of the United States which decided that the Federal government had the authority to construct such projects as flood control and improvements of navigation. But as the years have gone by what was the incidental at the beginning — the generation of electric power — has become primary now. The advocates of government ownership of electric power when faced a few years ago in the Tennessee river with a seasonal shortage of water for electric power purposes, began to urge the appropriation of government money to build steam plants to generate electricity. Thus in time the government ownership supporters have made no bones about their original deception and have come out boldly for Federal construction of electric power plants of all kinds. Certainly the government can furnish electric power more cheaply than private companies if the latter are not relieved of taxes. The government can sell anything to the consumer more cheaply than private enterprise if it wishes to subsidize the projects. In the case of the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Federal government is collecting tax money from taxpayers in every part of the country and using it to benefit the Tennessee area alone. Some of the textile mills in the North have been forced to shut down because certain New England businesses have felt they could get cheaper power near the TVA in the South. That will hardly make votes for the Democrats in New England if they constitute them—for it was Senator Norris of Nebraska, Independent, and originally a Progressive Republican, who a few decades ago insisted that the Federal government appropriate funds to improve navigation and effectuate a system of flood control on the Tennessee river. It was argued then that this was a legitimate Federal purpose and that by-product—electric power—was incidental. The issue went to the Supreme Court of the United States which decided that the Federal government had the authority to construct such projects as flood control and improvements of navigation. But as the years have gone by what was the incidental at the beginning — the generation of electric power — has become primary now. The advocates of government ownership of electric power when faced a few years ago in the Tennessee river with a seasonal shortage of water for electric power purposes, began to urge the appropriation of government money to build steam plants to generate electricity. Thus in time the government ownership supporters have made no bones about their original deception and have come out boldly for Federal construction of electric power plants of all kinds. Certainly the government can furnish electric power more cheaply than private companies if the latter are not relieved of taxes. The government can sell anything to the consumer more cheaply than private enterprise if it wishes to subsidize the projects. In the case of the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Federal government is collecting tax money from taxpayers in every part of the country and using it to benefit the Tennessee area alone. Some of the textile mills in the North have been forced to shut down because certain New England businesses have felt they could get cheaper power near the TVA in the South. That will hardly make votes for the Democrats in New England if they constitute them—for it was Senator Norris of Nebraska, Independent, and originally a Progressive Republican, who a few decades ago insisted that the Federal government appropriate funds to improve navigation and effectuate a system of flood control on the Tennessee river. It was argued then that this was a legitimate Federal purpose and that by-product—electric power—was incidental. The issue went to the Supreme Court of the United States which decided that the Federal government had the authority to construct such projects as flood control and improvements of navigation. But as the years have gone by what was the incidental at the beginning — the generation of electric power — has become primary now. The advocates of government ownership of electric power when faced a few years ago in the Tennessee river with a seasonal shortage of water for electric power purposes, began to urge the appropriation of government money to build steam plants to generate electricity. Thus in time the government ownership supporters have made no bones about their original deception and have come out boldly for Federal construction of electric power plants of all kinds. Certainly the government can furnish electric power more cheaply than private companies if the latter are not relieved of taxes. The government can sell anything to the consumer more cheaply than private enterprise if it wishes to subsidize the projects. In the case of the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Federal government is collecting tax money from taxpayers in every part of the country and using it to benefit the Tennessee area alone. Some of the textile mills in the North have been forced to shut down because certain New England businesses have felt they could get cheaper power near the TVA in the South. That will hardly make votes for the Democrats in New England if they constitute them—for it was Senator Norris of Nebraska, Independent, and originally a Progressive Republican, who a few decades ago insisted that the Federal government appropriate funds to improve navigation and effectuate a system of flood control on the Tennessee river. It was argued then that this was a legitimate Federal purpose and that by-product—electric power—was incidental. The issue went to the Supreme Court of the United States which decided that the Federal government had the authority to construct such projects as flood control and improvements of navigation. But as the years have gone by what was the incidental at the beginning — the generation of electric power — has become primary now. The advocates of government ownership of electric power when faced a few years ago in the Tennessee river with a seasonal shortage of water for electric power purposes, began to urge the appropriation of government money to build steam plants to generate electricity. Thus in time the government ownership supporters have made no bones about their original deception and have come out boldly for Federal construction of electric power plants of all kinds. Certainly the government can furnish electric power more cheaply than private companies if the latter are not relieved of taxes. The government can sell anything to the consumer more cheaply than private enterprise if it wishes to subsidize the projects. In the case of the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Federal government is collecting tax money from taxpayers in every part of the country and using it to benefitthe Tennessee area alone. Some ofthe textile mills inthe North have been forcedto shut down because certainNew England businesseshave felttheycouldgetcheaperpowerneartheTVAintheSouthThatwillhardlymakevotesfortheDemocratsinNewEnglandiftheyconstitutethem—foritwasSenatorNorrisofNebraskaIndependentandoriginallyaProgressiveRepublicanwhoafewdecadesagoinsistedthattheFederalgovernmentappropriatefundstoimprovenavigationandeffectuateasystemoffloodcontrolontheTennesseeriverwithaseasonalshortageofwaterfor Electricpowerpurposes,begantourgetheappropriationofgovernmentmoneytobuildsteamplantstocgenerateelectricityThusintimethegovernmentownershipsupportershavemadenobonesabouttheiroriginaldeceptionandhavemecomeoutboldlyford federalconstructionofelectricpowerplantsofallkinds. Certainlythegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan sellanythingtotheconsumermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan sellanythingtotheconsumermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan sellanythingtotheconsumermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravelcompanyifthelatterarenotrelievedoftaxes.Thegovernmentcan furnishelectricpowermorecheaplythantravel公司IfIt'SNewsYou'llSeeItInTheAnaheimBulletin