anaheim-bulletin 1955-07-05

Editorial Page Tuesday, July 8, 1955 Anaheim (Cal.) Bulletin — 11 The Halfway Mark Progress toward some easing of tension between East and West was the highlight of the first six months of 1955. This was particularly evidenced in the Big Four agreement on independence for Austria which Russia had blocked for many years. It was also apparent in a lessening of abuse and name calling between the two "worlds". West Germany's return to the status of a sovereign nation was another momentous event, and other headline happenings included Churchill's resignation as Prime Minister, the British election, the Salk polio vaccine development, release of the Yalta papers, selection of San Francisco for the 1956 GOP convention, and celebration of the 10th anniversary of the United Nations. Business in general has had a revival from the modest 1954 letdown. The cost of living has held remarkably steady, and the farm economy as a whole shows a similar pattern. Individual savings remain high, which is a strong defense against both inflation and depression. Thrift has definitely become an integral part of the American character, and relatively few indeed are the people who have nothing in reserve in something such as bank savings, U. S. Savings Bonds, or life insurance. The first half of '55 was good; let's hope the last half will be even better. Can It Bee? There has been considerable buzzing in Washington, D. C.—about honeybees. Congress has been worried because the bees are fast disappearing from the American scene. And that isn't good. The House of Representatives appropriated $200,000 to find out what's happening to them and that isn't just a matter Can It Bee? There has been considerable buzzing in Washington, D.C.—about honeybees. Congress has been worried because the bees are fast disappearing from the American scene. And that isn't good. The House of Representatives appropriated $200,000 to find out what's happening to them and that isn't just a matter of $200,000 worth of curiosity. Bees, we are reminded, do a lot more than merely gather honey. More than 50 crops in this country are dependent on bees for pollination. If the bees disappear completely, so will these crops, for man has yet to find a better way of crop pollination than is performed by the bees. Secretary of Agriculture Benson says that crop losses are already running into the hundreds of millions of dollars because of the depletion of the bee population. In some places, bees are rented out for so much per hive. So don't think of bees as a nuisance. They're very important to everyone—whether he likes honey or not. Your Birthday Forecast By STELLA TUESDAY, July 5 — Born today, you will have a rather exciting life. You have literary talent and if you put it to work for you it will not only make you a good living, but perhaps bring you some fame along with it. You also have the ability to sway people through the spoken word and would probably do well in politics, advertising, selling or any kind of promotional work. You have a perennial optimism which comes to your aid no matter what is happening. There is always something better waiting for you around the next corner! This feeling gives you rather more than an even chance to reach success, even if at first your efforts seem only to result in failure. You are never discouraged but will always bounce back and try again. This persistence is one of the best qualities for your eventual success. You will find that Monday is the best day in the week for you to undertake new enterprises. Although you may not readily admit it, you are fond of members of the opposite sex and will have more than one romance before you settle down. You are seldom demonstrative but your love nature is strong and early sound. LEO (July 24-Aug. 23) — This is one of the best days for you this month when it comes to making a decision on the job. VIRGO (Aug. 24-Sept. 23)—This can be an important day of inspiration for you. For best results implement your plans at once. LIBRA (Sept. 24-Oct. 23) — If you have been hoping for a promotion at the office, this may be the day when you get what you want. SCORPIO (Oct. 24-Nov. 22) — There are elements in your favor today, but your attitude must be just right. SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 23-Dec. 22) — If you will first tackle the job you think is toughest, the rest will seem "easy as apple pie." CAPRICORN (Dec. 23-Jan. 20) — This is a day to cultivate friendships. You may find that you will make a life-long attachment. AQUARIUS (Jan. 21-Feb. 19) — It this is vacationtime for you, make the most of it. If not, perhaps you can manage a super picnic. PISCES (Feb. 20-Mar. 20)—You will be wise if you will permit yourself to heed some excellent advice. You will do well. WASHINGTON — The studied optimism, a deliberate hopeful attitude being here toward the Four Conference "at the Summit," a smart tactic. It puts the den of frustrating the world on the Soviet conference fails. It removes suspicion that the United States is going to the conference a belligerent attitude. But underneath the surface where the facts of Internationally life are well known, the truth is that everybody has only result that can out of the Four Power Conference is a decision to talk more and through specific nels. In the old days whenever errimental officials got mess, they appointed a clue or a commission to get themselves out of it or at last postpone decision by talk. What the Four-Power men are about to do is mulate a series of committees to take up fic items that are troubling world. It's a form of punishment—of deferment. The armament problem has drifting along that way years. It will do no harm drift along some more. President Eisenhower densely popular today, partly because he is neither peaser nor a warmonger holds to a remarkable support of those in A who want him to explore avenue that might give his peace and those who want not to yield on any vital ciple of morality or of justice the oppressed peoples world. On domestic issues, tha BACKSTAIRS AT THE WHITE HOUSE Maine Restaurant Operator Blames President For Not Being Able to Give Customers Ice Tea MERRIMAN SMITH WASHINGTON (UP) — Backstairs at the White House: At Skowhegan, Maine, last Monday a local restaurant operator said he was unable to serve any ice tea to his customers that afternoon because of President Eisenhower. The Chief Executive was the honor guest at a lobster and clam bake given by Sen. Margaret Chase Smith (R-Maine). The restaurant operator said the demand for ice at Mrs. Smith's party was so great it took up the entire production of the town's small ice plant for several hours. Mrs. Smith needed many barrels of ice to keep the lobster cold until time to steam it over hot rocks and seaweed. When Mrs. Smith first met the President Monday, it was at a state police headquarters outside Skowhegan. As Mr. Eisenhower's hostess, the vivacious senator envied him inside the police station to freshen up before parading through town. "Why yes," the President said, starting up the police station steps. "I might refresh my two hairs up." Mr. Eisenhower came back from Maine with a pronounced tan, but some of his friends here he looked a bit tired. He should have been, consider gruelling pace he followed England for six days to haustion of men many years junior. Sen. Smith had little talk politics with Mr. Eisenhower because almost every morrow was with the Chief Executive Maine, the state's Democraternor, Edmund S. Musk was on hand. Mr. Eisenhower did most political conferring in Mr. Saturday and Sunday on the in-Parmachnee-Lake we used as a weekend fishing quarters. Washington sightseeing aboard the tourist buses past the White House are ing attention to the Presiding green which is barel from the street. NEUTRAL? RED IDEOLOGY Dish by United Feature Syndicate, Inc. BERDANIFR OTHMAN'S VIEW New Pressure Foods Soon Needed For U.S. Publisher WASHINGTON—I am an old button-pusher who travels to my chin under matic pressure from a bug gets too close. I little red knob and go. Once I tried some white paint on a pane and it worked fine; I ed one pants leg, but because of a sudden wind. So now we've got oil in cans under press killer, cold medicine, guishing fluid, and gas. I use the latter in torch, for soldering ing. These items, of course, hat. So's pressurized cream. My bride takes view of this. For re remain mysterious to fine when squirted just before it is eat stand on top for a fe and it tends to disappear is not all. A can of this crea to be held exactly up if the fluffy stuff is properly on the puddle sideways and nothing comes out. Soon the and there's-the cream side the tin. Mrs. O., she is none to good cans vertically without line, has wasted late cent cans of gaseous. She said she posited even to give a f pancake batter unde canned pressure. This to woman-kind already on sale in some pa THE DAVID LAWRENCE DISPATCH Studied Optimism Toward ‘Summit’ Conference Burden on Soviets if Meeting Fails WASHINGTON — There's a studied optimism, a deliberately painful attitude being assumed are toward the Four Power Conference “at the Summit.” It’s smart tactic. It puts the burden of frustrating the hop of the world on the Soviets if the conference fails. It removes any espionage that the United States is going to the conference with belligerent attitude. But underneath the surface, here the facts of International war are well known, the sad truth is that everybody knows we only result that can come out of the Four Power Conference is a decision to talk some more and through specific channels. In the old days whenever governmental officials got into a mess, they appointed a committee or a commission to get themselves out of it or at least to stoppe decision by further link. What the Four-Power statesmen are about to do is to formulate a series of commissions or committees to take up special items that are troubling the world. It's a form of postponement—of deferment. The dismament problem has been lifting along that way for years. It will do no harm to gift along some more. President Eisenhower is intensely popular today, primarily because he is neither an appraser nor a warmonger. He holds to a remarkable degree the support of those in America who want him to explore new avenue that might give hope for peace and those who want him not to yield on any vital principle of morality or of justice to be oppressed peoples of the world. On domestic issues, the president also have afraid of Mr. Eisenhower's political strength and capacity for reprisal on the campaign front in 1956. They are cooperating not because they have suddenly become wise statesmen, but because they are good politicians. As a matter of fact, the Democratic Party is in worse shape today than the Republican Party. For inside the Democratic Party is a radical, Socialistic group which would make mincemeat of Mr. Eisenhower's program if it dared. The Conservative Democrats are afraid of their radical bethren. There are outcroppings of it all the time. The Democratic group which wants public power and government ownership of public utilities, as well as eventually the Nationalization of steel and autos, and other major industries, shows its real colors when it keeps on yapping about the Dixon-Yates program. Recently Senator Kefauver of Tennessee demanded what Senator McCarthy was so roundly condemned for demanding—the right to go into the executive department's files and pick out whatever would make good political ammunition. Curiously enough, nothing was heard about "legislative encroachment on the executive," and the "Left Wing" press didn't condemn Mr. Kefauver — primarily because his objective was to accelerate in America the days of public power by government ownership, and that's good "Left Wing" doctrine. It all depends on whose ox is gored. These radical Democrats haven’t hesitated even to disseminate innuendoes that Mr. Eisenhower is hiding a scandal in connection with the handling of the Dixon-Yates contract. The Democrats also have afraid of Mr. Eisenhower's political strength and capacity for reprisal on the campaign front in 1956. They are cooperating not because they have suddenly become wise statesmen, but because they are good politicians. As a matter of fact, the Democratic Party is in worse shape today than the Republican Party. For inside the Democratic Party is a radical, Socialistic group which would make mincemeat of Mr. Eisenhower's program if it dared. The Conservative Democrats are afraid of their radical bethren. There are outcroppings of it all the time. The Democratic group which wants public power and government ownership of public utilities, as well as eventually the Nationalization of steel and autos, and other major industries, shows its real colors when it keeps on yapping about the Dixon-Yates program. Recently Senator Kefauver of Tennessee demanded what Senator McCarthy was so roundly condemned for demanding—the right to go into the executive department's files and pick out whatever would make good political ammunition. Curiously enough, nothing was heard about "legislative encroachment on the executive," and the "Left Wing" press didn’t condemn Mr. Kefauver — primarily because his objective was to accelerate in America the days of public power by government ownership, and that's good "Left Wing" doctrine. It all depends on whose ox is gored. These radical Democrats haven’t hesitated even to disseminate innuendoes that Mr. Eisenhower is hiding a scandal in connection with the handling of the Dixon-Yates contract. The Democrats also have afraid of Mr. Eisenhower's political strength and capacity for reprisal on the campaign front in 1956. They are cooperating not because they have suddenly become wise statesmen, but because they are good politicians. As a matter of fact, the Democratic Party is in worse shape today than the Republican Party. For inside the Democratic Party is a radical, Socialistic group which would make mincemeat of Mr. Eisenhower's program if it dared. The Conservative Democrats are afraid of their radical bethren. There are outcroppings of it all the time. The Democratic group which wants public power and government ownership of public utilities, as well as eventually the Nationalization of steel and autos, and other major industries, shows its real colors when it keeps on yapping about the Dixon-Yates program. Recently Senator Kefauver of Tennessee demanded what Senator McCarthy was so roundly condemned for demanding—the right to go into the executive department's files and pick out whatever would make good political ammunition. Curiously enough, nothing was heard about "legislative encroachment on the executive," and the "Left Wing" press didn’t condemn Mr. Kefauver — primarily because his objective was to accelerate in America the days of public power by government ownership, and that's good "Left Wing" doctrine. It all depends on whose ox is gored. These radical Democrats haven’t hesitated even to disseminate innuendoes that Mr. Eisenhower is hiding a scandal in connection with the handling of the Dixon-Yates contract. The Democrats also have afraid of Mr. Eisenhower's political strength and capacity for reprisal on the campaign front in 1956. They are cooperating not because they have suddenly become wise statesmen, but because they are good politicians. As a matter of fact, the Democratic Party is in worse shape today than the Republican Party. For inside the Democratic Party is a radical, Socialistic group which would make mincemeat of Mr. Eisenhower's program if it dared. The Conservative Democrats are afraid of their radical bethren. There are outcroppings of it all the time. The Democratic group which wants public power and government ownership of public utilities, as well as eventually the Nationalization of steel and autos, and other major industries, shows its real colors when it keeps on yapping about the Dixon-Yates program. Recently Senator Kefauver of Tennessee demanded what Senator McCarthy was so roundly condemned for demanding—the right to go into the executive department's files and pick out whatever would make good political ammunition. Curiously enough, nothing was heard about "legislative encroachment on the executive," and the "Left Wing" press didn’t condemn Mr. Kefauver — primarily because his objective was to accelerate in America the days of public power by government ownership, and that's good "Left Wing" doctrine. It all depends on whose ox is gored. These radical Democrats haven’t hesitated even to disseminate innuendoes that Mr. Eisenhower is hiding a scandal in connection with the handling of the Dixon-Yates contract. The Democrats also have afraid of Mr. Eisenhower's political strength and capacity for reprisal on the campaign front in 1956. They are cooperating not because they have suddenly become wise statesmen, but because they are good politicians. As a matter of fact, the Democratic Party is in worse shape today than the Republican Party. For inside the Democratic Party is a radical, Socialistic group which would make mincemeat of Mr. Eisenhower's program if it dared. The Conservative Democrats are afraid of their radical bethren. There are outcroppings of it all the time. The Democratic group which wants public power and government ownership of public utilities, as well as eventually the Nationalization of steel and autos, and other major industries, shows its real colors when it keeps on yapping about the Dixon-Yates contract. Recently Senator Kefauver of Tennessee demanded what Senator McCarthy was so roundly condemned for demanding—the right to go into the executive department's files and pick out whatever would make good political ammunition. Curiously enough, nothing was heard about "legislative encroachment on the executive," and the "Left Wing" press didn’t condemn Mr. Kefauver — primarily because his objective was to accelerate in America the days of public power by government ownership, and that's good "Left Wing" doctrine. It all depends on whose ox is gored. These radical Democrats haven’t hesitated even to disseminate innuendoes that Mr. Eisenhower is hiding a scandal in connection with the handling of the Dixon-Yates contract. The Democrats also have afraid of Mr. Eisenhower's political strength and capacity for reprisal on the campaign front in 1956. They are cooperating not because they have suddenly become wise statesmen, but because they are good politicians. As a matter of fact, the Democratic Party is in worse shape today than the Republican Party. For inside the Democratic Party is a radical, Socialistic group which would make mincemeat of Mr. Eisenhower's program if it dared. The Conservative Democrats are afraid of their radical bethren. There are outcroppings of it all the time. The Democratic group which wants public power and government ownership of public utilities, as well as eventually the Nationalization of steel and autos, and other major industries, shows its real colors when it keeps on yapping about the Dixon-Yates contract. Recently Senator Kefauver of Tennessee demanded what Senator McCarthy was so roundly condemned for demanding—the right to go into the executive department's files and pick out whatever would make good political ammunition. Curiously enough, nothing was heard about "legislative encroachment on the executive," and the "Left Wing" press didn’t condemn Mr. Kefauver — primarily because his objective was to accelerate in America the days of public power by government ownership, and that's good "Left Wing" doctrine. It all depends on whose ox is gored. These radical Democrats haven’t hesitated even to disseminate innuendoes that Mr. Eisenhower is hiding a scandal in connection with the handling of the Dixon-Yates contract. The Democrats also have afraid of Mr. Eisenhower's political strength and capacity for reprisal on the campaign front in 1956. They are cooperating not because they have suddenly become wise statesmen, but because they are good politicians. As a matter of fact, the Democratic Party is in worse shape today than the Republican Party. For inside the Democratic Party is a radical, Socialistic group which would make mincemeat of Mr. Eisenhower's program if it dared. The Conservative Democrats are afraid of their radical bethren. There are outcroppings of it all the time. The Democratic group which wants public power and government ownership of public utilities, as well as eventuallytheNationalizationofsteelandautos,andothermajorindustries,theshowsitsrealcolorswhenitkeepsonyappingabouttheDixon-Yatescontract. Recently Senator Kefauver of Tennessee demanded what Senator McCarthy was so roundly condemned for demanding—the right to go into the executive department's files and pick out whatever would make good political ammunition. Curiously enough, nothing was heard about "legislative encroachment on the executive," and the "Left Wing" press didn’t condemn Mr. Kefauver — primarily because his objective was to accelerate in America the days of public power by government ownership, and that's good "Left Wing" doctrine. It all depends on whose ox is gored. These radical Democrats haven’t hesitated even to disseminate innuendoes that Mr. Eisenhower is hiding a scandal in connection with the handling of the Dixon-Yates contract. The Democrats also have afraid of Mr. Eisenhower's political strength and capacity for reprisal on the campaign front in 1956. They are cooperating not because they have suddenly become wise statesmen, but because they are good politicians. As a matter of fact, the Democratic Party is in worse shape today than the Republican Party. For inside the Democratic Party is a radical, Socialistic group which would make mincemeat of Mr. Eisenhower's program if it dared. The Conservative Democrats are afraid of their radical bethren. There are outcroppings of it all the time. The Democratic group which wants public power and government ownership of public utilities, as well as eventuallytheNationalizationofsteelandautos,andothermajorindustries,theshowsitsrealcolorswhenitkeepsonyappingabouttheDixon-Yatescontract. Recently Senator Kefauver of Tennessee demanded what Senator McCarthy was so roundly condemned for demanding—the right to go into the executive department's files and pick out whatever would make good political ammunition. Curiously enough, nothing was heard about "legislative encroachment on the executive," and the "Left Wing" press didn’t condemn Mr. Kefauver — primarily because his objective was to accelerate in America the days of public power by government ownership, and that's good "Left Wing" doctrine. It all depends on whose ox is gored. These radical Democrats haven’t hesitated even to disseminate innuendoes that Mr. Eisenhower is hiding a scandal in connection with the handling of the Dixon-Yates contract. The Democrats also have afraid of Mr. Eisenhower's political strength and capacity for reprisal on the campaign front in 1956. They are cooperating not because they have suddenly become wise statesmen, but because they are good politicians. As a matter of fact, the Democratic Party is in worse shape today than the Republican Party. For inside the Democratic Party is a radical, Socialistic group which would make mincemeat ofMr.Eisenhower's program if it dared .Temperest Storm and Everlyn (Treasure Chest) West as a burlesque headliner. "I have biggest bust in show business," explained Jennie in a business-like tone. "I didn't start the big bust fad in this country—Jane Russell did." So after I finished high school I decided to use the assets I have and this is best way I can make money, and the fastest." Seeing Not Believing "Grace Kelly has her fans, yes." But a pretty bust still gets allthe attention fromthe men. "Those movie stars!" she shook her head." You never can believe what you see onthe screen." They use falsies—even Marilyn Monroe does." Jennie has her own fan clubs like movie stars with membership cards.She is photographed weekly for cheesecake magazines.She also is president ofthe loosely-organized "LeagueofExoticDancers." The league's purpose is "for me to spreadthe word about strippers" She said she posited even to givea fancifulmomenttotheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheassetsIhaveandthisisbestwayIcanmakemoney,andthefastest." SeeingNotBelieving "GraceKellyhasherfans,yes."Butaprettybuststillgetsalltheattentionfromthemen." "Thosemoviestars!"sheshookherhead."Younevercanbelievewhatyouseeonthescreen."Theyusefalsies—evenMarilynMonroedoes." Jenniehasherownfanclubslikemoviestarswithmembershipcards.Shealsopresidentoftheloosely-organized"LeagueofExoticDancers."Theleague'spurposeis"forme tocertainstrippers" She said she posited even to givea fancifulmomenttotheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomicswillhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SoafterIfinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics willhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics willhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics willhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics willhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics willhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics willhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics willhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics willhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics willhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics willhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics willhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics willhavetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblemintowomenautomaticcomics will havetojoke.Thethenansdidntstartthebig bustfadinthiscountry—JaneRusselldid."SofterifinishedhighschoolIdecidedtousetheproblemmustintheproblem INTOWOMENAMOUNTANDMATERIALITYOFPEOPLEINTHEPROBLEM OF MORALITY OR OF JUSTICE TO BE PRESSURED PEOPLES OF THEWORLD.On domestic issues,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestige issue,the prestigereviewedbyprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswillhavetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswill havetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunicationswill havetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will havetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will havetojoke.thethaningsdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.to.jokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigiouscommunications will have.tojokesdemaintainingprestigescommunicationsshowthateverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingisimportantbutnoteverythingis President Eisenhower is in densely popular today, primarily because he is neither an appeaser nor a warmonger. He holds to a remarkable degree the support of those in America who want him to explore every avenue that might give hope for peace and those who want him to yield on any vital principle of morality or of justice to the oppressed peoples of the world. On domestic issues, the president has achieved great strength. Tyros in politics, Tru-uranites and those who know little about grassroots sentiment politics are mistakenly assuming that a Democratic Congress and a Republican President isn't a bad combination after all and might as well be continued. But the facts are the Democratic Congress has cooperated not because it wanted to do so, but because it has been compelled to do so by reason of Mr. Eisenhower's great hold on public opinion. The Democrats are cooperating because they are some of his friends here thought he looked a bit tired. He certainly should have been considering the grueling pace he followed in New England for six days to the exhaustion of men many years his junior. Sen. Smith had little chance to talk politics with Mr. Eisenhower because almost every moment she was with the Chief Executive in Maine, the state's Democratic governor, Edmund S. Muskle, also was on hand. Mr. Eisenhower did most of his political conferring in Maine last Saturday and Sunday on the island of Parmachenee Lake which he used as a weekend fishing headquarters. Washington sightseeing guides board the tourist buses which go east the White House are now calling attention to the President's putting green which is barely visible from the street. These radical Democrats have its hesitated even to disseminate innuendoes that Mr. Eisenhower is hiding a scandal in connection with the handling of the Dixon-Yates contract. The Democrats also have played a clever game on the anti-Communist issue on which they were so vulnerable politically in 1952. They have sought by every means to play down the security problem and have skillfully changed it from an investigation of Communists and sympathizers to an investigation of the Eisenhower administration. Anybody who thinks this is a sign of cooperation by the Democrats or a pastime that the Eisenhower administration is going to enjoy is naive in political matters. Ever since Senator McCarthy blundered in his handling of the "censure" fight, anti-Communists have been making progress, aided and abetted by the Democratic leadership. But in the next two years the anti-Communist issue will not die down. It will be heard from because, despite the satisfaction which "The Daily Worker," organ of the Communist party, takes over the tactics of the Democrats in putting barriers in the way of effective inquiries into Communist activities, the whole course will be put into focus before the next campaign arrives. Maybe some of Mr. Eisenhower's advisers who have been a bit nonplussed by "Left Wing" pressures may come to realize that there can be no compromise with those who defend immorality in government, especially among those security risks who have refused to cooperate with their own government or have told lies to its investigators to protect their henchmen. (Copyright, 1955, New York Herald Tribune Inc.) Those movie stars!" she shook her head. "You never can believe what you see on the screen. They use falsies—even Marilyn Monroe does." Jennie has her own fan clubs, like movie stars, with membership cards. She is photographed weekly for choesecake magazines. She also is president of the loosely-organized "League of Exotic Dancers." The league's purpose is "for me to spread the word about strippers—everybody gets the wrong ideas about us." "The Bazoom Girl" currently is swinging her tassels at a nightclub called Strip City. Tassel dancing, she explained, is "a matter of muscular control and practice." Peanuts, Popcorn, Pix Jennie tells her audience they can find her out front after the show. There she was in the lobby, selling popcorn, peanuts and $1 photographs of herself. Later in her dressing room she carefully folded a bathrobe around her curves and sat waxing her zippers (easier that way). Two other sweet-faced strippers in the room quietly mended their bras and exchanged recipes. One was the mother of three children. Jennie is married to an electronics student, and she studied electronics herself. "I plan to star in a burlesque film, in an underwater strip, and then I'll retire and we'll open an electronics shop," she said. Strippers usually are generous. Jennie presented me with two of her "pasties", all she wears above the waist. They are decorated with sequins and tassels and make dandy ashtrays in the office. QUICK EXIT FRANKLIN, Neb. — Mice haven't a chance in the Franklin County courthouse. Supplies of poisoned grain kept by the county agricultural agent for fighting prairie dogs, mice and other rodents were recently invaded by courthouse mice. The invaders scarcely made it away from the sack before they succumbed. One of these days entitle it won't be long ed ketchup will smite the beans automatic comics will have to joke. Then will comed jam, gaseous sald and pneumatic gravity. From the cans anything oozy enough including pre-footed marshmallow fluff, sauce, and chocolate says my bride with a at the still unsullied in her dining room day. Let a nervous tangle with these gs and she foresees acr scenes straight out Sennett. (Copyright, 1955, Feature Syndicate,) Household Fried potatoes have crust if sprinkled flour before frying. Baking vegetable practically all the foil flavor. Set a pail of ww newly-painted roo paint odor will disa For added flavor rance, mix a little grind with your tea. For additional info 204 E. Center Pho OTHMAN'S VIEWS New Pressurized Foods Soon Due For U.S. Public WASHINGTON—I am, myself an old button-pusher. Lather travels to my chin under pneumatic pressure from a can. When bugs get too close, I touch the little red knob and gas 'em. Once I tried some gasified white paint on a porch chair and it worked fine; I also painted one pants leg, but that was because of a sudden shift in the wind. So now we've got lubricating oil in cans under pressure; moth killer, cold medicine, fire extinguishing fluid, and just plain gas. I use the latter in my blowtorch, for soldering the plumbing. These items, of course, are old hat. So's pressurized whipped cream. My bride takes a dim view of this. For reasons that remain mysterious to her, this is fine when squirted on the pie just before it is eaten. Let it stand on top for a few minutes and it tends to disappear. That is not all. A can of this cream has got to be held exactly upside down if the fluffy stuff is to squish properly on the pudding. Hold it sideways and nothing but gas comes out. Soon the gas is gone and there's the cream locked inside the tin. Mrs. O., who admits she is none to good at holding cans vertically without a plumb line, has wasted lately two 35-cent cans of gaseous cream. She said she positively refused even to give a fair trial to pancake batter under similar canned pressure. This new boon to woman-kind already has gone on sale in some parts of the I was over visiting the Senate last week, and it appears that the Bricker Amendment will come out of Committee and be on the Senate floor sometime within the next week or so. Last year it failed passage by one vote. A two-thirds majority of all members is required for passage. I have examined the returns on several questionnaires which have been sent out by California Members of Congress, and it is interesting to note that nearly eighty per cent of the returns favored the passage of this Amendment. I sincerely hope that it will be in such form that it will not be opposed by the Executive Department. The Bricker Amendment is very short in context but very powerful in substance. It contains three short sections which are as follows: 1) A provision of a treaty which conflicts with the Constitution shall not be of any force or effect. 2) A treaty shall become effective as internal law in the United States only through legislation which would be valid in the absence of treaty. 3) Congress shall have power to regulate all executive and other agreements with any foreign power or international organization. All such agreements shall be subject to the limitations imposed on treaties by this article. It is sometimes argued that the United States has been making treaties for over 150 years, so why is it now necessary to amend the Constitution. The answer is that now for the first time in our history there is a rising tide of internationalism which threatens the national sovereignty of the United States, and treaty-making power is the vehicle being used to destroy it. trines: the first that the treaty power is unlimited and capable of overriding the Constitution and the Bill of Rights; and second, that Federal power of jurisdiction, by its own voluntary act, making a treaty with another nation, could be increased without limit in spite of the Constitution. The effect of this, if carried to its logical conclusion, means that under Articles 55 and 56 of the United Nations Charter dealing with the entire range of human activity in the civil, political, social, economic and cultural fields, the Federal Government is now one of unlimited powers, the Constitution and Bill of Rights notwithstanding. In view of the fact that there is no explicit limitation as regards treaty-making power in the Constitution, it is high time that an amendment be added to it to keep this power within due bounds. For example, without the Bricker Amendment the Congress of the United States could pass a law affecting the life, liberty, and property of any individual in the United States without paying any attention to the provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights—which were designed to protect our basic American rights and freedoms—merely by basing such law upon an existing treaty. The question would be, "Is this act legal under some treaty?" and the question really should be, "Is this law legal under the Constitution of the United States?" Thomas Jefferson said in interpreting Article Six relating to treaty-making powers of the Federal Government, "It must have meant to except out, all those rights reserved to the States; for surely the President and the Senate cannot do by treaty what the whole Govern- slideways and nothing but gas cames out. Soon the gas is gone and there's the cream locked inside the tin. Mrs. O., who admits she is none to good at holding cans vertically without a plumb line, has wasted lately two 35-cent cans of gaseous cream. She said she positively refused even to give a fair trial to pancake batter under similar canned pressure. This new boon to woman-kind already has gone on sale in some parts of the country. The idea is heat up the griddle, give it four quick squirts from the can, and you've got a quartet of perfect hotcakes, without mess, bother, or trving to find the baking powder. My bride says, nothing doing. The slightest slip of the finger says she, and she's filled her shoe with batter. I guess she is an old-fashioned girl. She is, in fact aghast, at what the gasmen are cooking up in the way of pressurized foodstuffs for the future. Take mustard. One mustard merchant gained fame some years ago by announcing he'd go bankrupt if he had to depend on the mustard that people ate. His profits, he said, were in the mustard they wasted on their plates. Looks like he's going to have to change his sneering tune. The technicians even now are working on the problem of putting mustard into gasified squirt-cans for table use. The question to be solved is the right kind of gas. The stuff that shaves chins and kills bugs isn't ideal for mustard. Way I understand it, this particular gas is likely to combine with the mustard and maybe make mustard gas. This is a minor obstacle. The physicists even now are sniffing out the proper gas for the propulsion of mustard. They're also in a race to see who'll solve the age-old conundrum of the ketchup bottle that won't give ketchup. One of these days, and apparently it won't be long, pressurized ketchup will smear itself on the beans automatically and TV comics will have to find a new joke. Then will come pressurized jam, gaseous salad dressing, and pneumatic gravy. From the cans will squish anything oozy enough to spray, including pre-foamed egg whites, marshmallow fluff, hollandaise sauce, and chocolate syrup. That, It is sometimes argued that the United States has been making treaties for over 150 years, so why is it now necessary to amend the Constitution. The answer is that now for the first time in our history there is a rising tide of internationalism which threatens the national sovereignty of the United States, and treaty-making power is the vehicle being used to destroy it. One of the leaders of this international movement was Supreme Court-Justice Owens Roberts who said, "We must decide whether we are to stand on the silly shibboleth of national sovereignty. We must yield our national sovereignty to some higher power—call it what you will—and this call-it-what-you-will could be a super Government of the World invested with power to make such economic adjustments as are necessary to put the people of all the member countries on an equal level." The ultimate end of this would be to completely destroy the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. We have always considered the United States to be a Government of limited power, and all powers not specifically delegated to the Federal Government were reserved for the several states and to the people. Under treaty-making power we would have a Government of unlimited powers, and the Federal Government by treaty could make laws, which are now prohibited by the Constitution, regulating the domestic life of people in the several states. Thus, the Federal Government could then do by indirection that which it is now prohibited from doing directly. Article Six of the Constitution states, "This Constitution and all the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof and all treaties shall be the supreme law of the land, anything in the Constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding." At the time the Constitution was written, international treaties were not of a political nature. They touched only such matters as boundaries, navigation, and fishing rights, and the framers of the Constitution did not imagine a treaty that could sacrifice our national sovereignty, infring upon the rights of the American citizens, and impose on treaties by this article. It is sometimes argued that the United States has been making treaties for over 150 years, so why is it now necessary to amend the Constitution. The answer is that now for the first time in our history there is a rising tide of internationalism which threatens the national sovereignty of the United States, and treaty-making power is the vehicle being used to destroy it. One of the leaders of this international movement was Supreme Court-Justice Owens Roberts who said, "We must decide whether we are to stand on the silly shibboleth of national sovereignty. We must yield our national sovereignty to some higher power—call it what you will—and this call-it-what-you-will could be a super Government of the World invested with power to make such economic adjustments as are necessary to put the people of all the member countries on an equal level." The ultimate end of this would be to completely destroy the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. We have always considered the United States to be a Government of limited power, and all powers not specifically delegated to the Federal Government were reserved for the several states and to the people. Under treaty-making power we would have a Government of unlimited powers, and the Federal Government by treaty could make laws, which are now prohibited by the Constitution, regulating the domestic life of people in the several states. Thus, the Federal Government could then do by indirection that which it is now prohibited from doing directly. Article Six of the Constitution states, "This Constitution and all the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof and all treaties shall be the supreme law of the land, anything in the Constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding." At the time the Constitution was written, international treaties were not of a political nature. They touched only such matters as boundaries, navigation, and fishing rights, and the framers of the Constitution did not imagine a treaty that could sacrifice our national sovereignty, infring upon the rights of the American citizens, and impose on treaties by this article. It is sometimes argued that the United States has been making treaties for over 150 years, so why is it now necessary to amend the Constitution. The answer is that now for the first time in our history there is a rising tide of internationalism which threatens the national sovereignty of the United States, and treaty-making power is the vehicle being used to destroy it. One of the leaders of this international movement was Supreme Court-Justice Owens Roberts who said, "We must decide whether we are to stand on the silly shibboleth of national sovereignty. We must yield our national sovereignty to some higher power—call it what you will—and this call-it-what-you-will could be a super Government of the World invested with power to make such economic adjustments as are necessary to put the people of all the member countries on an equal level." The ultimate end of this would be to completely destroy the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. We have always considered the United States to be a Government of limited power, and all powers not specifically delegated to the Federal Government were reserved for the several states and to the people. Under treaty-making power we would have a Government of unlimited powers, and the Federal Government by treaty could make laws, which are now prohibited by the Constitution, regulating the domestic life of people in the several states. Thus, the Federal Government could then do by indirection that which it is now prohibited from doing directly. Article Six of the Constitution states, "This Constitution and all the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof and all treaties shall be the supreme law of the land, anything in the Constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding." At times in recent years there was a strong push for certain types of governmental changes in order to improve efficiency and reduce costs. Some argue that these changes should be implemented on treaties by this article. It is sometimes argued that the United States has been making treaties for over 150 years, so why is it now necessary to amend the Constitution. The answer is that now for the first time in our history there is a rising tide of internationalism which threatens the national sovereignty of the United States, and treaty-making power is the vehicle being used to destroy it. One of the leaders of this international movement was Supreme Court-Justice Owens Roberts who said, "We must decide whether we are to stand on the silly shibboleth of national sovereignty. We must yield our national sovereignty to some higher power—call it what you will—and this call-it-what-you-will could be a super Government of the World invested with power to make such economic adjustments as are necessary to putthe people of allthe member countries on an equal level." The ultimate end of this would be to completely destroythe ConstitutionandtheBillofRights.WehavealwaysconsideredtheUnitedStatestobeaGovernmentoflimitedpower,andallpowersnotspecificallydelegatedtotheFederalGovernmentwerereservedfortherelatercountriesonanequallevel." At times in recent years there was a strong push for certain types of governmental changes in order to improve efficiency and reduce costs. Some argue that these changes should be implemented on treaties by this article. It is sometimes argued that the United States has been making treaties for over 150 years, so why is it now necessary to amendthe Constitution. The answer is that now for the first time in our history there is a rising tide of internationalism which threatensthe national sovereigntyoftheUnitedStates,andtreatymakingpowerisanextraordinarypowerliabilitytoabuse.Treatiestmakeinternationallawandalsotheymakedomesticlaw.UnderourConstitutiontreatiestcomethesupremewhominarylawsoftheland;theyareindeedsupreme,moresupremeyhanfiditude.lfifewerewronganddangerousafewyearagestoitshouldbewronganddangeroustodayandIshalldoallinmypowertorugethepassageofthelegislationintheSenateandto-speeditspassageintheHouseOfRepresentatives.IshallalsourgeitsimmediateadoptionbytherequirednumberofStatesinordertomakeitapartofourConstitution. VISITORS: DuringthepastweekwehavebeenverypleasedtwowelcomefollowingvisitorsfromtheDistrict:Mrs.F.M.Slabaugh,Mrs.KemperM.TaylorandsonGary,SantaAna;Mr.CharlesC.Peaise,Fullerton;andMissEloiseMellorDelMar. Farmer McCabe July 5, 1955 Well July 4th is here again andtheCityandCountyRulershavepassedlawsagainshootinFirecrackers.However.I'specttheautomobileswillcommit One of these days, and apparently it won't be long, pressurized ketchup will smear itself on the beans automatically and TV comics will have to find a new joke. Then will come pressurized jam, gaseous salad dressing, and pneumatic gravy. From the cans will squish anything oozy enough to spray, including pre-foamed egg whites, marshmallow fluff, hollandaise sauce, and chocolate syrup. That, says my bride with a side glance at the still unsullied wallpaper in her dining room, will be the day. Let a nervous dinner guest tangle with these gaseous cans and she foresees across the land scenes straight out of Mack Sennett. (Copyright, 1955, by United Feature Syndicate, Inc.) Household Hints Fried potatoes have a tasty crust if sprinkled lightly with flour before frying. Baking vegetables preserves practically all the food value and flavor. Set a pail of water inside a newly-painted room and the paint odor will disappear faster. For added flavor and fragrance, mix a little grated orange rind with your tea. KEEP YOUR GUARD UP! JOIN THE NATIONAL GUARD For additional information 204 E. Center Phone KE 5-3741 At the time the Constitution was written, international treaties were not of a political nature. They touched only such matters as boundaries, navigation, and fishing rights, and the framers of the Constitution did not imagine a treaty that could sacrifice our national sovereignty, infringe upon the rights of the American citizens, and strike down and destroy our internal laws. Thomas Jefferson in his notes on the debates at the time the Constitution was written that there was some concern over the power of treaty making, but they could not conceive that it would ever be carried to the extreme as that with which we are now confronted. One of the first Supreme Court cases, titled "New Orleans versus United States," decided in 1836, expounded the Jeffersonian view of this clause in the Constitution in the following words, Congress cannot by legislation enlarge the Federal jurisdiction nor can it be enlarged under the treaty-making power." That decision continued to be the supreme law of the land until 1920, when the case of "Missouri vs. Holland" held that Federal jurisdiction could be enlarged by use of the treaty power. In this case, the United States entered into a migratory bird treaty with Canada prohibiting the shooting of certain migratory birds. Under the law of Missouri it was legal to hunt and shoot these ducks, and under the Federal Constitution right to make any law affecting Congress would be denied the internal law of the State of Missouri. But the court held that the treaty between the United States and Canada was superior to the Constitution and that the State of Missouri had nothing to say about the matter. The effect of this decision was to establish two remarkable docGary, Santa Ana; Mr. Charles C. Pease, Fullerton; and Miss Eloise Mellor Del Mar. Farmer McCabe July 5, 1955 Well July 4th is here again and the City and County Rulers have passed laws again shootin' Firecrackers. However, I 'spect the automobiles will commit their usual number of Autocides ... facts is, I'll betcha that this Fourth of July week-end the automobiles will take out a way yonder more folks than the Stork can bring in. Farmer McCabe (All rights reserved) Ten Years Ago Mr. and Mrs. John Nellesen, who said their marriage vows in Los Angeles last Sunday, are making their home at 412 Elm St. Marilyn Rimpau received her B.S. degree at UCLA last Sunday. She is the daughter of Mrs. Opal Rimpau. Direct appeal has come from the USO Housing committee for quarters for servicemen and their wives in this area. The committee includes Mrs. R. W. Marvin, Mrs. L. H. Loudon and Mrs. M. P. Thaxton. The Rev. John Kimball Saville begins his work with the St. Michael's Episcopal parish this week. He comes from St. James' church, Los Angeles where he served in an assistant capacity for two years. The Rev. Hayden Swift Sears begins his pastorate at the Anaheim White Temple Methodist church this week. If It's News You'll See It In The Anaheim Bulletin