anaheim-bulletin 1953-10-31

Editorial Page 4 — ANAHEIM (Cal.) BULLETIN Saturday, October 31, 1953 Published Daily Evenings Except Sundays and Holidays by ANAREIM BULLETIN PUBLISHING CO., INC. 182 S. Lemon St. Anaheim, Calif. HAZEL D. LOUDON, President L. H. LOUDON, JR., Vice Pres and Co Publisher STANLEY LOUDON, Co-Publisher and Treasurer MILDRED TAGGART, Member of Board RICHARD FISCHLER, JR., Secretary and Business Manager DON SHAFFER, Editor CARRIE LOU SUTHERLAND, Society and Women's Department C. WM. BLAND, Adv. Manager Legalized in accordance California State Law December 28, 1951. Entered as second-class mail matter August 15, 1953 at the post office at Anaheim, California under the Act of March 3, 1879. Subscription Rates—1 month, $1.60; 3 months, $2.75; 6 months, $8.00 1 year, $9.50. No additional charge for mailing within the continental United States. Sales tax will be added to quoted prices on taxable items appearing in the advertising columns of the Anaheim Bulletin, same to be paid for by the purchaser as required by law. UNITED PRESS NATIONAL REPRESENTATIVES WEST-HOLLIDAY CO., INC. New York—27 East 10th St.; Chicago—260 N. Michigan Ave.; San Francisco—625 Market St.; Detroit—319 Stephenson Blvd.; Vancouver, B.C.—711 Ball Bldg.; Los Angeles—439 So. Spring St.; Portland—210 W. Sixth St.; St. Louis—431 North Tenth St.; Seattle—603 Stewart St.; Atlanta—326 Grant Building. Honorable Exception One reason for the incredible cost of government is that too many of us want economy for the other fellow only — and never in matters that affect us. But there are honorable exceptions, and they deserve recognition. A short time ago the Forest Service merged its Hailey, Idaho, headquarters with that of Twin Falls in order to save $15,000 a year. It might have been expected that Hailey people would howl in protest. But that wasn't the case. The Hailey Times said: "Naturally we don't like to lose our Forest Service headquarters ... but the fantastic cost of government can't be lowered without some sacrifices. Perhaps a saving of $15,000 annually looks less than a pinhead; but five such mergers made recently adds up to $75,000 annually ... Multiply such savings over and over again through the hundreds of branches of federal government and you begin to see some hope for a cut in taxes." We need more—a whole lot more—of that spirit. Many persons wit hing a cold ear to constan on taking over this Nation in authority, those who cooperation of the citizen. Quoting President Nation on May 19: "W record of deliberately There has been to thi that wasn't the case. The Hailey Times said: "Naturally we don't like to lose our Forest Service headquarters... but the fantastic cost of government can't be lowered without some sacrifices. Perhaps a saving of $15,000 annually looks less than a pinhead; but five such mergers made recently adds up to $75,000 annually... Multiply such savings over and over again through the hundreds of branches of federal government and you begin to see some hope for a cut in taxes." We need more — a whole lot more — of that spirit. Why Advertise? The following is reprinted from the Wynne, Arkansas, Progress: "The late William Wrigley was once riding with a friend in a crack express train from New York to Chicago. His companion was curious to know why the magnate continued to spend so much money on advertising. "Your gum is known all over the world," he said. 'Why don't you save the millions you are spending on advertising?' "Wrigley pondered a second and then asked, 'How fast is this train going?'" "'About 60 miles per hour,' replied the other. 'Then,' asked Wrigley, 'why doesn't the railway company remove the engine and let the train travel on its own momentum?' "A Job Of Selling" The head of one of our leading corporations recently advised businessmen in general to make the most of a ready market for goods. He pointed out that more Americans are employed than ever before, at the highest wages in history. He said further: "The kind of America we live in tomorrow depends primarily on the kind of job we do today. I think the future of American business can be anything we want to make it." Commenting editorially on this point of view, the Daily Journal, International Falls, Minnesota, said: "The market and the money are there. American business can keep the country prosperous by producing a maximum volume of goods at the lowest possible cost — and then do a job of selling." That second factor — "a job of selling" — is an enormously important one. Everyone in this country is to some extent aware of the miracles achieved by American mass production, and so are millions of people in other lands. There should be an equal awareness of the miracles of American mass distribution. The two are full porting employment, wages, and living standards. Our superb production system would be of vastly diminished worth if it weren't for a comparable system capable of moving the goods into the hands of the consumers. Thus, the job done by the retailer decides to a very great extent whether times are to be good, bad or indifferent." enormously important one. Everyone in this country is to some extent aware of the miracles achieved by American mass production, and so are millions of people in other lands. There should be an equal awareness of the miracles of American mass distribution. The two are full porting employment, wages, and living standards. Our superb production system would be of vastly diminished worth if it weren't for a comparable system capable of moving the goods into the hands of the consumers. Thus, the job done by the retailer decides to a very great extent whether times are to be good, bad or indifferent. And here, as in other fields of free enterprises, we have been singularly blessed. Retailing is a huge industry made up of hundreds of thousands of enterprises of every conceivable kind and size, from the biggest national chain to the smallest specialty shop. And the inexorable force of competition keeps its efficiency high — even as it keeps prices as low as the conditions of the day permit. SONGS OF A SONNETEER BY R. LOU'S SCOTT "WHAT GAIETY . . . ?" Have you ever paused to ponder just why God first shaped happiness, so rarely shown on human faces? Earth, and sea, and sky—Were formed as approaches to His High Throne, While bitterness, sorrow, and misery Were sharp-honed goads to urge that men atone Their own depravity: what gaiety Might be expected of folk who made boast They scrabbled for cash thru Eternity? Pompous merchants conning what they had grossed; Pious prelates grabbing theirs with a moan—and never a mite for the starveling host Craving some bliss! God caused Joy to be known, Because He found so little of His own! BURNING GOLD—Page 215— Robert H. Andrews Joy—40.20 NOT PEANUTS The Publisher Comments Many persons within the United States are turning a cold ear to constant warnings that Russia is intent striking over this Nation through aggression. But those authority, those who know, continue to seek united operation of the citizenry against it. Quoting President Eisenhower in his address to the nation on May 19: "We all know something of the long word of deliberately planned Communist aggression. Here has been, to this moment, no reason to believe The David Lawrence Dispatch (BY DAVID LAWRENCE) WASHINGTON, Oct. 31—Thomas E. Dewey's reported decision not to run for re-election as governor of New York, in November 1954 is an important development in national politics. He is known to have made up his mind last year that he wouldn't run again, but he has deferred any announcement and probably will not make it formally till next spring. The significance of the Dewey retirement may be this: The New York governor will be able to take a position in the Eisenhower cabinet if a vacancy develops. Then, if President Eisenhower decides not to be a candidate for renomination, the opportunity would be open to Mr. Dewey to try for the nomination from inside the government. As a cabinet officer, he would be in the limelight and would be getting valuable experience in national affairs. For several months now—particularly since President Eisenhower made a cryptic remark at a public dinner attended earlier this year by Governor Dewey about the latter's usefulness in the national picture—it has been assumed that Mr. Eisenhower will say sometime between now and 1956 that he does not want to run again. Four years in the White House is likely to prove a grueling experience for a man who reluctantly accepted political office in 1952 and who may figure that, at the age of 66 in 1956, he will want to travel around the world and enjoy some leisure. But Dwight Eisenhower, on the other hand, is a soldier, and something of the same influence which caused him to listen to theurgings of friends that he allow his name to be entered in the New Hampshire primaries in March 1952 as a public service may be felt again by him when the question of running for a second term comes up. In any event, the decision is not likely to be made known until close to the time for the 1956 Republican convention. If the Eisenhower administration is fairly successful and the President is personally very popular, the pressure upon him will be almost democratic. To begin a second at the age of 66 will make him years younger than when President Truman retired, and it wasn't that influenced the latter too out but political considerations. Governor Dewey has been center of a factional fight in the Republican Party. When was a candidate for the presidency in both 1944 and 1948. Bitterness has arisen between Dewey and Taft factions, this tagnism would be largely absurd if the New York governor can be the cabinet in Washington and gan to work with all factions of party. What cabinet post for Gov. Dewey? He has been mentioned Secretary of State in the event his close friend, John Foster Dulles, going at a pretty fast these days in hard work and haunting trips to various parts of the world. There is always the possibility that a vacancy may occur on Supreme Court of the U.S., to which it might be borne Attorney General Bell, an excellent lawyer and a judge of judicial temperament. If the torney generalship became vexed Governor Dewey would be a valiant choice. For, as district attorney in New York, he made a great effort against the criminal elec and is noted for his ability not as a prosecutor but as an orator. It could be, too, that the York governor might be willing go on the supreme bench he as Governor Hughes did in but if that happened Mr. would take himself out of the ning for the presidency. much too young and vigorous man to retire from national politics. The news dispatches from York say Governor Dewey next year to resume the pro- law. That's a plausible way describe his temporary plan Thomas E. Dewey some day as a political figure again and Many persons within the United States are turned away with a cold ear to constant warnings that Russia is intent on striking over this Nation through aggression. But those authority, those who know, continue to seek united cooperation of the citizenry against it. Quoting President Eisenhower in his address to the nation on May 19: "We all know something of the long record of deliberately planned Communist aggression. There has been, to this moment, no reason to believe that Soviet policy has changed its frequently announced pose and purpose — the destruction of freedom everywhere." How is Russia accomplishing her attack? William Henry Chamberlin wrote in the Saturday Evening Post April, 1953: "It is a design that depends for 90 per cent of its success on revolutionary tactic of subversion, propaganda and infiltration . . ." Even in the theoretically desired United Nations, Russia has had her way ahead, according to an editorial in Pravda, the official newspaper of the Soviet Union, it was stated that Russia had joined for the sole purpose of wrecking the project. Membership in the United Nations, with veto power in the Security Council, was to be Moscow's way of assuring itself that the UN could not be used against Soviet interests, and it has been completely effective. Russia's strong use of propaganda in the United States is reaching a point of perfection. She has successfully filtered Russian doctrines into every form of American life, our schools, our churches, civic and social organizations and our government. This has been accomplished mainly by the seizing on our desires for peace and "Freedom." They have befuddled the minds of honest and decent people by twisting the true meaning of such words, and by this means enlist innocent people in a Communist cause. They have been most successful in their phony "peace offensives." How long will the American People fall for these subterfuges in the face of such findings as the investigating committees of our National Government, State governments and the work of hundreds of private organizations? There seems to be no way to convince them Democracy is losing the fight. Another war, another Pearl Harbor, is not necessary if the public will cease to be hoodwinked, not be afraid to look the problem directly in the face and fight it. Bethman's Views on Washington Scenes BY FREDERICK C. OTHMAN WASHINGTON — One approach is efficient. Suppose, would be to pad the list of the mailman's pants. If he's picking up letters from someone, would be to pad the list of the mailman's pants. He said that mailmen now are experimenting with more than 600 vehicles made by 15 different manufacturers. Some of these things of the same influence which caused him to listen to the urgings of friends that he allow his name to be entered in the New Hampshire primaries in March 1952 as a public service may be felt again by him when the question of running for a second term comes up. In any event, the decision is not likely to be made known until close to the time for the 1856 Republican convention. If the Eisenhower administration is fairly successful and the President is personally very popular, the pressure upon him will be almost irresistible to accept a second nomination and keep the country from being handed back to "corruption and communism"—the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticism voiced in 1952 against the political criticismvoicedin 1952 againstthepoliticalcriticionvoicedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthepoliticalcriticionvoidedin1952againstthe politiicationVOIDEDINNOVATION SATURDAY, OCTOBER $3—$ Born today, you are something of a contradiction at times even to yourself. You have ability and assertiveness when it comes to something you want; but there are other times when you can seem almost lazy and lethargic. Usually this happens when you are disinterested and merely going through the motions of doing a routine job which you thoroughly dislikes. If this occurs, change your job. Get out and find something which is a challenge to your talents. Only in this way will you reach the success which should rightfully be yours. You have a great deal of personal charm and sometimes in early youth this will open doors and get opportunities too easily for you. Then, think that world is all yours for the asking and without too much work. You could wake up and discover that you were wrong! Lady Luck may smile once, but after that you will probably have to work out your own destiny rather carefully, if you want to stay at the top. Inclined to be a little too critical of others, you must learn to discover—and remedy—your own shortcomings before pointing out those of others. Being too fault-finding is one easy way to lose friends. Perhaps there is cause for criticism. Then make suggestion which is constructive. In that way you are building, not tearing down, all the time! You of fair sex are loving and domestic; should wed young and have a large family of your own. To find what the stars have in store for tomorrow, select your birthday star and read the corresponding paragraph. Let your birthday star be your daily guild. Sunday, November $1—$ BOORPIO (Oct. 24-Nov. 22) — Even if you have to take the weather man into your confidence, plan a relaxing week end! SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 23-Dec. 23) — Attendance at the church of your choice could bring much-needed spiritual inspiration and uplift. Your early age or you will find that energies become needlessly dull and inactive. However, if you relate your interests and play your program well ahead you will find that you may with more than one active time. But take them one at a time since marriage would bring you coable happiness. Just be sure someone who understands moods and can cope with tittle temperament thorough never let the green monster jealousy enter your life. A little too inclined to be eminent others. Don't be. Your taste quite sufficient to meet any luteness provided you use any truly interesting mysterious must be joined in your investigation of these since you are inclined more than ordinarily succeed To find what the stars have in store for tomorrow, select your birthday star and read the corresponding paragraph. Let your birthday star be your daily guild. Monday, November $7$ BOORPIO (Oct. 24-Nov. 22) — Sure to avoid any possible derestanding by making all lights very clear and "fooly" SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 23-Dec.) Putting all of your energy your work at this time fine dividends later on. CAPRIORN (Dec. 3-Jan.) Personal business Pearl Harbor, is not necessary if the public will please to be hoodwinked, not be afraid to look the problem directly in the face and fight it. Bethman's Views on Washington Scenes By FREDERICK C. OTHMAN WASHINGTON — One approach is efficient. Suppose, would be to pad the seat of the mailman's pants. If he's picking up letters from any boxes he slides across the fashion of his truck 400 times a day. Then he scrambles 400 times a week of this he not only tears out his pants but he tenderls himself. He's in no mood for sliding. So begins hopping out the left side of his truck into the stream of traffic and next thing you know gets bumped. This is not funny. Padding the pants might soothe the nerve ends, but it wouldn't stop the waste motion. So the Post Office Department has ordered from half a dozen automobile manufacturers sample no-slide trucks. These feature the steering wheel in the British fashion on the right-hand side. The management trundled out for my inspection one of these new board steerers with postman Bilbur More of Arlington, Va., at the wheel. This one happened to be a Willis, with a special silvery body featuring wide expanses of all sides. I was pleased to note that postman More's pants weren't even shiny. He can wheel up to a mail box and insert a wad of bills and circulates without ever stirring from its seat. This saves time, pants, and nerves. After a hard day's work now postman More can sit down as comfortably as anybody, no longer is he inclined to eat from the mantel. This is progress and it's only one beginning, Maurice B. Felmister, director of the department's division of Research, came along with postman More as a passenger in mufft. He said the department was trying to put all the mail on wheels practically all the time. This not only is humane, it He said that mailmen now are experimenting with more than 600 vehicles made by 15 different manufacturers. Some of these have engines; some are designed to be pushed, like kiddy cars. They include special bicycles; tri cycles both motorized and shank-powered; scooters with three wheels and four, and a wide assortment of right-hand drive cars and trucks. A number of rural carriers are driving sedans with two sets of steering wheels, brakes, clutches, and accelerators, as in driving-school automobiles. This makes them ambidexterous for slippingmall into boxes on either side of the road. This is an ingenious idea, but won't be necessary much longer. Postmaster General Arthur Summerfield has ordered all mailboxes to be moved to the right side of the road for the benefit of right-hand postal cars. This may rile some few farmers, but should reduce the hazards of rural driving. I suggested that the right-drive Willys looked hazardous, nosing into traffic with the driver on the wrong side. Not at all, said Felmister. It has so much glass, such big mirrors, and so many signals that it's safer than any truck the department now uses. It's also easier on mail boxes. Felmster said drivers trying to ease up to the box with left-hand drives always are bumping into them, producing dents in boxes and vehicles, both. He hasn't decided yet which car to buy in quantity, but when he does he figures the savings in bumps alone will help ease that $2,000,000 daily postal deficit. Not to mention easing the anatomy of the mailmen. (Copyright 1958, by United Feature Syndicate, Inc.) Kaltenborn Edits the News BY H. V. KALTENBORN and ROLF KALTENBORN Orace again there is talk and double talk about solving world problems by a meeting of the "Big Four" the "Big Three," or the "Big Two." As though we didn't have unhappy recollections of what has come out of some of these meetings. We thinking of such conferences as the one at Yalta, where the late President Roosevelt agreed with Stalin to take highly valuable strategic areas away from Japan and China and give them to the Soviet Union. In exchange, he got Stalin's empty promise of Democratic government and free elections in Poland, Rumania, Bulgaria and Hungary. That is why President Eisenhower said last April, "Let's have deeds not words" from the Soviet Union before we trust any more of their promises. The deeds haven't come but the pressure for top level meetings continues. Those who insist we should beg Malenkov for an early get together don't realize the harm they do. They ask for a meeting under conditions that are bound to be unfavorable to the Democratic powers. The more anxious we show ourselves to negotiate with the Kremlin the longer the Kremlin will be. Chancellor Adenauer of Germany seems to be the only first-rank Western leader who sympathizes with President Eisenhower's decision to sidestep a Malenkov meeting at this time. Adenauer said the other day, "When there is only the slightest chance that such a meeting will succeed, it is far better not to attempt it. There are too many probable negative results." One of the first dangers the Germans have in mind is that fresh negotiations with Malenkov would give Finance another excuse to posther special interests would be jeopardized by a Malenkov-Churchill deal and in this country a British-Russian meeting would emphasize Anglo-American differences on Iron Curtain trade and Far Eastern policies. So a Churchill-Malenkov meeting is unlikely. Mr. Churchill advisers have urged him to give up this idea both for reasons of policy and because of the health risks which such a journey would involve. Of course, if Malenkov ever offered to leave Russia for any kind of a meeting with Western leaders that would change the situation. What seems more likely is an early meeting between President Eisenhower and Prime Minister Churchill to discuss common problems and to consolidate joint policy towards the Kremlin. That would be the soundest preliminary step for any "Big Three" meeting and would also further that Anglo-American understanding which is the most solid foundation stone for world peace. There has been so much talk about Anglo-American differences that a little emphasis on Anglo-American understanding would not come amiss. So, if anyone is to meet, let it be Churchill and Eisenhower. Bermuda, the Azores, or the Bahamas would provide generous hospitality and good weather. These two men were successful collaborators in war and victory and they have remained good friends. If Russia now accepts our invitation for a November meeting of the foreign ministers of the "Big Four," so much the better. Some possible constructive achievements of such a meeting might create an atmosphere in which the top leaders could meet with at least some chance of doing good instead of Forecast (MILA) Early age or you will find that your energies become needlessly diffused and inactive. However, if you correlate your interests and plot out your program well ahead of time, you will find that you may end up with more than one active career. It takes them one at a time! Science, literature and the arts should hold the highest appeal for you. Your emotional nature is strong but you are not especially demonstrative in showing your affections. You might fall deeply in love yet when the object of your devotion might have a difficult time finding out! You are moody and at times don't quite understand why. You enjoy traveling, yet you always want your own home to which you may return. It is likely that an early marriage would bring you considerable happiness. Just be sure you and someone who understands your needs and can cope with your attitude temperament thoroughly. Never let the green monster of salousy enter your life. You are little too inclined to be envious of others. Don't be. Your talents are quite sufficient to meet any challenge, provided you use them properly. Interested in the occult and the mysterious, you must be judicious in your investigation of these matters, since you are inclined to be more than ordinarily susceptible. To find what the stars have in store for tomorrow, select your birthday star and read the corresponding paragraph. Let your birthday star be your daily guide. Monday, November 8 CORPIO (Oct. 24-Nov. 22)—Make sure to avoid any possible misunderstanding by making all directions very clear and "foolproof." AGITTARIUS (Nov. 23-Dec. 22)—Putting all of your energy into your work at this time will pay fine dividends later on. APRICORN (Dec. 23-Jan. 20)—Your personal business affairs seem to be the only first-rank Western leader who sympathizes with President Eisenhower's decision to sidestep a Malenkov meeting at this time. Adenauer said the other day: "When there is only the slightest chance that such a meeting will succeed, it is far better not to attempt it. There are too many probable negative results." One of the first dangers the Germans have in mind is that fresh negotiations with Malenkov would give France another excuse to postpone action on European defense. The French would say, with some logic, "If we come so an understanding with Russia, our wartime ally, we will not need to rearm Germany, our traditional enemy." Some French leaders who are not Communists would much prefer a pact with the Kremlin to the recreation of a strong Germany. The Russians are already playing on France's fear of a revived German militarism to drive a wedge between French and American policy. The present French government believes, in the European defense community and the necessary creation of a substantial German army to check the Communist advance. But, if Moscow so much as pretends friendship for the West, French policy would change. Because of their great difficulties at home and abroad, French politicians do a lot of wishful thinking. Any proposed meeting with Soviet leaders is sure to raise false hopes. Another problem faced by Secretary of Press Dulles in resisting pressure for a meeting with Malenkov, is the great personal ambition of Prime Minister Churchill. This noble leader of the British Empire, who has both shaped and recorded half a century of world history, would really love to make one final contribution. Before advancing age forces him to abaside the world stage on which he has played such an honorable part, he desires to make a final outstanding contribution to world peace. Should a meeting with Malenkov result in a cold truce instead of the cold war, Prime Minister Churchill would realize this laudable ambition. We oppose such a meeting because we feel it would do more harm than good. If Churchill seeks out Malenkov in Moscow he would come as a politician who might offer more than any Malenkov promise could possibly be worth. What can Churchill offer without the backing of the United States? What has he to give that could win any important concessions from the coldly calculating masters of the Kremlin? France would be suspicious that seems to be the only first-rank Western leader who sympathizes with President Eisenhower's decision to sidestep a Malenkov meeting at this time. Adenauer said the other day: "When there is only the slightest chance that such a meeting will succeed, it is far better not to attempt it. There are too many probable negative results." One of the first dangers the Germans have in mind is that fresh negotiations with Malenkov would give France another excuse to postpone action on European defense. The French would say, with some logic, "If we come so an understanding with Russia, our wartime ally, we will not need to rearm Germany, our traditional enemy." Some French leaders who are not Communists would much prefer a pact with the Kremlin to the recreation of a strong Germany. The Russians are already playing on France's fear of a revived German militarism to drive a wedge between French and American policy. The present French government believes, in the European defense community and the necessary creation of a substantial German army to check the Communist advance. But, if Moscow so much as pretends friendship for the West, French policy would change. Because of their great difficulties at home and abroad, French politicians do a lot of wishful thinking. Any proposed meeting with Soviet leaders is sure to raise false hopes. Another problem faced by Secretary of Press Dulles in resisting pressure for a meeting with Malenkov, is the great personal ambition of Prime Minister Churchill. This noble leader of the British Empire, who has both shaped and recorded half a century of world history, would really love to make one final contribution. Before advancing age forces him to abaside the world stage on which he has played such an honorable part, he desires to make a final outstanding contribution to world peace. Should a meeting with Malenkov result in a cold truce instead of the cold war, Prime Minister Churchill would realize this laudable ambition. We oppose such a meeting because we feel it would do more harm than good. If Churchill seeks out Malenkov in Moscow he would come as a politician who might offer more than any Malenkov promise could possibly be worth. What can Churchill offer without the backing of the United States? What has he to give that could win any important concessions from the coldly calculating masters of the Kremlin? France would be suspicious that seems to be the only first-rank Western leader who sympathizes with President Eisenhower's decision to sidestep a Malenkov meeting at this time. Adenauer said the other day: "When there is only the slightest chance that such a meeting will succeed, it is far better not to attempt it. There are too many probable negative results." One of the first dangers the Germans have in mind is that fresh negotiations with Malenkov would give France another excuse to postpone action on European defense. The French would say, with some logic, "If we come so an understanding with Russia, our wartime ally, we will not need to rearm Germany, our traditional enemy." Some French leaders who are not Communists would much prefer a pact with the Kremlin to the recreation of a strong Germany. The Russians are already playing on France's fear of a revived German militarism to drive a wedge between French and American policy. The present French government believes, in the European defense community and the necessary creation of a substantial German army to check the Communist advance. But, if Moscow so much as pretends friendship for the West, French policy would change. Because of their great difficulties at home and abroad, French politicians do a lot of wishful thinking. Any proposed meeting with Soviet leaders is sure to raise false hopes. Another problem faced by Secretary of Press Dulles in resisting pressure for a meeting with Malenkov, is the great personal ambition of Prime Minister Churchill. This noble leader of the British Empire, who has both shaped and recorded half a century of world history, would really love to make one final contribution. Before advancing age forces him to abaside the world stage on which he has played such an honorable part, he desires to make a final outstanding contribution to world peace. Should a meeting with Malenkov result in a cold truce instead of the cold war, Prime Minister Churchill would realize this laudable ambition. We oppose such a meeting because we feel it would do more harm than good. If Churchill seeks out Malenkov in Moscow he would come as a politician who might offer more than any Malenkov promise could possibly be worth. What can Churchill offer without the backing of the United States? What has he to give that could win any important concessions from the coldly calculating masters of the Kremlin? France would be suspicious that seems to be the only first-rank Western leader who sympathizes with President Eisenhower's decision to sidestep a Malenkov meeting at this time. Adenauer said the other day: "When there is only the slightest chance that such a meeting will succeed, it is far better not to attempt it. There are too many probable negative results." One of the first dangers the Germans have in mind is that fresh negotiations with Malenkov would give France another excuse to postpone action on European defense. The French would say, with some logic, "If we come so an understanding with Russia, our wartime ally, we will not need to rearm Germany, our traditional enemy." Some French leaders who are not Communists would much prefer a pact with the Kremlin to the recreation of a strong Germany. The Russians are already playing on France's fear of a revived German militarism to drive a wedge between French and American policy. The present French government believes, in the European defense community and the necessary creation of a substantial German army to check the Communist advance. But, if Moscow so much as pretends friendship for the West, French policy would change. Because of their great difficulties at home and abroad, French politicians do a lot of wishful thinking. Any proposed meeting with Soviet leaders is sure to raise false hopes. Another problem faced by Secretary of Press Dulles in resisting pressure for a meeting with Malenkov, is the great personal ambition of Prime Minister Churchill. This noble leader of the British Empire, who has both shaped and recorded half a century of world history, would really love to make one final contribution. Before advancing age forces him to abaside the world stage on which he has played such an honorable part, he desires to make a final outstanding contribution to world peace. Should a meeting with Malenkov result in a cold truce instead of the cold war, Prime Minister Churchill would realize this laudable ambition. We oppose such a meeting because we feel it would do more harm than good. If Churchill seeks out Malenkov in Moscow he would come as a politician who might offer more than any Malenkov promise could possibly be worth. As It Was Told To Me CORPIO (Oct. 24-Nov. 22)—Make sure to avoid any possible misunderstanding by making all directions very clear and "foolproof." MAGITTARIUS (Nov. 22-Dec. 22)—Putting all of your energy into your work at this time will pay fine dividends later on. CAPRIORN (Dec. 23-Jan. 20) — Your personal business affairs should work out as you want them to. AQUARIUS (Jan. 21-Feb. 18)—Patience and forebearance is the answer to all problems. Solve one matter at a time, then go on to the next. PISCES (Feb. 20-Mar. 20) — Sometimes difficulty calls for the subtle, diplomatic approach. Today could be one of those times. ARIES (Mar. 21-Apr. 20) — A friend who has embarked on some work of art may need your enthusiastic encouragement. Do a good turn! TAURUS (Apr. 21-May 21) — Test all proposed plans to see how practical they are before turning your energies into a wild goose chase. GEMINI (May 22-June21)—If you can help a friend with kindness and personal assistance, then it is your duty and privilege to do so. GANCER (June 23-July23)—Utilize all your best talents today and you will secure results that may startle you, pleasurably. LEO (July 24-Aug. 23) — An addition to your savings account is in order today; Every little added to what you have is that much more. VIRGO (Aug. 24-Sept. 23) — Minor details, if not efficiently and carefully attended to now, could prove troublesome for you later on. LIBRA (Sept. 24-Oct. 23) — Don't get into needless arguments. Better to remain silent for the time being than to say anything at all. (Distributed by United Feature Syndicates, Inc.). If It's News You'll See It In The Bulletin As It Was Told to Me by HARMAN NICHOLS WASHINGTON (UP)—I was in a state of nervousness, so I went down and applied for membership in a society known as "State of Nervousness, Inc." I now am listed as No. $1,144 in the society's bureau of insanity. The card I received for one claim erotizes me so all of the privileges of a backseat driver. Since mama does most of the driving in our family this is going to grant me "legal" liberties I never had before. I had to pass a nervousness test and I did pretty well, an experienced nerve expert put me in the back seat of his car and drove around a spell. This was B.C.-before card. I wound up as usual a nervous wreck, fit for the crazy ward. The blood pressure was up. I was puffing. My heart sounded like Mickey Rooney playing rata-tat-tat on the skin of his snare drum. Having passed my exam with fluttering colors, I got my card which entitles me a license to Farmer McCabe Sometimes ago I talked with an old gent who sed that he hadn't ever been, to Church, didn't believe in em... But lately I noticed that his family didn't have a plumber put him away, No Sir; they hired a Preacher. Farmer McCabe (off rights reserved) Squeezing Orange County By FRAN STERLING Community Chest workers report that most people are very nice when they come to collect. But they object strongly to those few who peek out beneath the blinds as their pack of dogs attempt to devour the collector's car and contents. (All rights reserved)